<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>















































































































































































































































 
	 	 





















































































































































































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Gregoire Proposes $3.6 Billion in New Transportation Spending, but Shies Away from a Gas Tax Increase
    
      by Goldy</title>
      <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Rss.xml?oid=11587214&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Gregoire Proposes $3.6 Billion in New Transportation Spending, but Shies Away from a Gas Tax Increase
    
      by Goldy</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger.</copyright>
      <webMaster>webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:30:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Gregoire Proposes $3.6 Billion in New Transportation Spending, but Shies Away from a Gas Tax Increase]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11612880]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11612880]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Will in Seattle]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@4 and what was your point?<br />
<br />
Mine was that the fake MSM meme of "electric vehicles don't pay gas taxes" is wrong on two levels - one, there are very very few electric vehicles - two, most of the electric vehicles are ALREADY EXEMPT FROM TAXATION.<br />
<br />
Follow the large numbers. There's your missing money.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503038">Will in Seattle</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:36:55 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Gregoire Proposes $3.6 Billion in New Transportation Spending, but Shies Away from a Gas Tax Increase]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11596262]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11596262]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Reader01]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["I find that last one particularly baffling, as the paltry amount raised hardly seems worth disincentivizing the shift toward electric cars."<br>
<br>
It's not baffling at all. They use the roads and don't pay gas tax.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Reader01]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:54:58 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Gregoire Proposes $3.6 Billion in New Transportation Spending, but Shies Away from a Gas Tax Increase]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11591883]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11591883]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[emor]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@1<br />
<br />
Why do you write like that? Care to actually commit to an actual point this time? I'd love to know what you're talking about.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1505712">emor</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:40:36 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Gregoire Proposes $3.6 Billion in New Transportation Spending, but Shies Away from a Gas Tax Increase]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11589465]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11589465]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[philosophy school dropout]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[disincentivizing electric cars is part of the goal. electric cars don't pay the gas tax. olympia will also want to throw a (largely symbolic) bone to their oil peeps w/ the $1.50 per barrel proposal.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=4970259">philosophy school dropout</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:07:41 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Gregoire Proposes $3.6 Billion in New Transportation Spending, but Shies Away from a Gas Tax Increase]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11589367]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11589367]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Matt the Engineer]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Thanks to the 18th ammendment of our state's constitution, gas taxes have to go to building and maintaining roads.  So though gas taxes are good at curbing driving, they ironically end up building more roads (even though driving has gone down in the past decade).<br />
<br />
What we need is a sales tax on gas, with money going to the general fund.  And an increase in transit spending.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1637802">Matt the Engineer</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:02:05 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Gregoire Proposes $3.6 Billion in New Transportation Spending, but Shies Away from a Gas Tax Increase]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11589186]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/01/10/gregoire-proposes-36-billion-in-new-transportation-spending-but-shies-away-from-a-gas-tax-increase/#11589186]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Will in Seattle]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Good points.<br />
<br />
Also, unnoticed by many is the growing number of vehicles that don't pay a gas tax.<br />
<br />
No, not electrics. Very few of those.<br />
<br />
Follow the large numbers.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503038">Will in Seattle</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:49:29 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



