http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/06/22/51-percent-opposed-to-obamacare Comments On: 51% Oppose Obamacare? by Charles Mudede en-us Copyright 2013 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger. webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster) Sun, 26 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700 Sun, 26 May 2013 01:45:00 -0700 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by I have always been... east coaster]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:23:41 -0700 The Stranger
I am not a huge fan of RomObamaCare but it seems better than what came before.


Posted by david]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:54:01 -0700 The Stranger Posted by floater]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:13:07 -0700 The Stranger
It's all SOSHULIZM until I gots my fist full of dollars... then it's okay.

/sheesh
Posted by merry]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:51:32 -0700 The Stranger Posted by john t]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:57:25 -0700 The Stranger
That said, I really wish those 35% would pull their heads out of their asses.
Posted by T]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:37:54 -0700 The Stranger I am not so sure the GOP would be hurt by a ruling against Obamacare (I'm for it, BTW). I do know the Administration will be bothered big time. I've read an account of what the Dems/Administration is prepping for in case it, AHCA is rejected by the SCOTUS. It is at least a bigger conundrum for the Administration as the SCOTUS will have denied Obama his signature legislative achievement of his presidency.
Posted by lark]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:58:25 -0700 The Stranger
If they actually had pushed Congress, they could have even managed to get a Public Option in the current ACA. Instead they sat back and let a few extreminsts throw a TEA Party and scare the bejesus out of Congress.
Posted by Andy Niable]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:51:05 -0700 The Stranger 2. single payer, nationalized health care, private systems that are more like nonprofit trusts with super regulation, it's all pretty much the same thing: NOT RUN FOR PRIVATE INSURER PROFIT. all over the world this nonmarket solution works. like sewers, or electricity, or having cell phones. nothing about america's uniqueness means it won't work here. fuck man it works in fucking canada how fucking different are they from us, I can't even tell a canadian is one unless they tell me. peter jennings is one, I think. who knew?
Posted by our shit's unique?]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:39:25 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Fnarf]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:26:55 -0700 The Stranger What the hell are you yapping about?

ALL countries are "unique." So what?

Who's using pure socialism? The Health Care act sure as hell isn't, unless you believe giving private corporations gobs of power and authority is "socialism."

As for the original post, the republicans might not "spike the football" if the Supreme Court overturns the Health Care act; however, Fox "news" sure as hell will. It's all they'll talk about.
Posted by Urgutha Forka]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:25:12 -0700 The Stranger
That is why pure socialism doesn't work.

However, Romneycare does...because it blends!

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:08:53 -0700 The Stranger