http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/11/27/the-suburban-times Comments On: The Suburban Times? by Dominic Holden en-us Copyright 2010 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger. webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster) Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:01 -0800 Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:15:00 -0800 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
In other words, the usual Republic Party of No hatred of America, our Government, our President, and our Middle Class.
Posted by Will in Seattle]]> Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:19:37 -0800 The Stranger
What? Ryan doesn't even pay anyone to edit his stuff anymore.

How can anyone be surprised by this list? Anyone who still calls themselves a Republican is impossibly stupid. Anyone who still calls themselves an Independent is deluded. Anyone who still calls themselves a Democrat is depressed and worried about 2012 and not because the world may end. It's not a good time to claim membership in any political persuasion.
Posted by sarah68]]> Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:15:27 -0800 The Stranger Posted by dwight moody]]> Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:45:13 -0800 The Stranger
No Blethen has had to really work since The Colonel was called home to be with Jesus. Even when they kill The Times, there'll be enough money to keep them comfortable for a few generations.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay]]> Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:52:00 -0800 The Stranger
can you support our current market-based health care system which leaves 15% of the population without coverage and also oppose health-care rationing? if the republicans are so opposed to health-care rationing, why are they opposed to providing reproductive services to women?

how can you oppose cap-and-trade while supporting "market-based energy reforms?" cap-and-trade is how the market determines the price of greenhouse gas emissions.

it's cool that in the world republicans live in never-ending war (including their new wars with iran and north korea) and ever-increasing military budgets don't contribute to the deficit and are paid for with money magically conjured from their asses.

they support the right to bear arms but not for iran or north korea.

can they even define victory in iraq and afghanistan?
Posted by justinf]]> Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:40:47 -0800 The Stranger