Savage Love Podcast
-
Episode 161
(Nov 17) -
Episode 160
(Nov 10) -
Episode 159
(Nov 3) -
Episode 158
(Oct 27) -
Episode 157
(Oct 20)
Savage Love Archives
- Mad Men (Nov 12)
- Girl Seeking Girl (Nov 5)
- Moral Bankrupt (Oct 29)
- Plunge In (Oct 22)
- Feeding Time (Oct 15)
More from Dan Savage
-
Today in Traditional Marriage
-
Pit Bulls!
-
Teabaggers Turn On Palin
-
Do Your Balls Hang Low?
-
SL Letter of the Day: Hot & Drunk
Books by Dan Savage
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Love: Straight Answers from America's Most Popular Sex Columnist
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
Contact Dan Savage
This Is Our Youth
February 19, 2009
Tools
I dropped by four large universities last week—University of Lethbridge, State University of New York–Albany, University of Maryland, and University of Alaska-Anchorage—to do "Savage Love Live," the college-speaking-gig version of my sex-advice column. I enjoyed visiting all four campuses and, as ever, learned a few things out on the road. (Brinking? Who knew?)
People submit questions—the ones they don't want to be seen asking—on three-by-five-inch cards at the events. Sadly, I couldn't get to everyone's questions at the U's of L, NY-A, M, and A-A. Here are answers to some of the questions I missed.
At what point in a relationship is it "safe" to have an open relationship?
There's no standard gestation period for an open relationship, no set period of time that you have to spend in the exclusivity pod. In my experience, however, the most successful open relationships I've witnessed—with "success" here defined as "long-lasting," which is kind of arbitrary (can we all get behind the idea that a relationship can be short-lived and still be a success?)—were sexually exclusive for at least a year, sometimes longer, at the outset.
When asked, "How do you make anal sex more comfortable for women?" by Marie Claire magazine, Dr. Drew Pinsky said, "Don't do it. Your butt will leak when you're old." (I am paraphrasing.) My question: Is Dr. Drew homophobic?
Dr. Drew isn't a homophobe. He's an asshole-o-phobe—and a BDSM-o-phobe, a premarital-sex-o-phobe, a three-way-o-phobe, etc. Basically, when it comes to human sexuality, there's not a lot of daylight between Dr. Drew and Pope Benedict XVI. And I'll let you in on a little secret: Odds are good that your ass is going to leak when you're old, anyway—I'll betcha the pope's ass is leaking all over the throne of St. Peter right now—so you might as well enjoy it while you can.
I'm a 24-year-old male who has been out for 11 years. I've been into this guy "Joe" for several years, but I always assumed he was out of my league. We recently started hooking up. I'm totally into him, and it's amazing. But for some reason, I can't stay hard. I don't know what's wrong with me. Do I have ED? I have no health insurance and am not sure what to do.
If you're not having trouble keeping it up when you're alone, and you didn't have trouble keeping it up with other guys, you're probably just nervous. You like this guy, he's way hot, the stakes are high, and a little routine performance anxiety is chasing away your boners. If Joe is continuing to hook up with you despite your inability to keep it up for him, well, then he's not only a hot dude but a patient one as well—and a dude who's into you, too. So take a deep breath, try to relax, and enjoy.
When Sue Johanson was here, she spoke against trying anal sex, due to damages, etc. What would you tell people?
I would tell people to refrain from fucking Sue Johanson in the ass—and please don't fuck Dr. Drew's ass, either. They both seem as terrified of anal sex as they are ignorant about it—and tense, inept people can hurt themselves engaging in anal sex. And if their asses start to leak in old age, I don't want either of them to be able to pin the blame on anal sex.
We are a couple in a long-term committed relationship and have casually considered the possibility of a three-way. It would have to be with someone neither of us knew (or saw) to reduce any chance of an emotional attachment. Good idea?
Three-ways with complete strangers are kind of difficult to arrange—unless you're willing to go the rent-a-third route. But if you want to have a three-way with someone trustworthy and safe, you're better off doing it with an acquaintance or an ex.
When did you first realize you were LGBTQ, and how did people react to that? Did you struggle to find support?
I didn't realize I was L, B, T, and Q until I arrived in Albany. And I'm not sure how friends and family are going to react to my recently discovered lesbianism, bisexuality, impending transition, and questioning status—question: now that I'm LGB and T, what outstanding Qs could there be?—but I expect they will be supportive. Just as confused as I am, but nevertheless supportive.
Did Sarah Palin ever get back to you about your offer to be her gay friend?
No, she didn't—but the offer is still on the table. I'm here for you, Sarah.
Please assign new salacious definitions to the following terms, which are near and dear to the hearts of UM students: "Cornerstone," "Fear the Turtle," and "Diamondbacking."
Cornerstone: When you get high in order to break through a sexual inhibition—like when pot helps you "turn a corner" sexually. "Sue wanted to peg her boyfriend Drew, but he just couldn't do it until he got cornerstoned."
Fear the Turtle: What a woman experiences when she realizes halfway through vaginal intercourse that her bowels are full and her enjoyment of the sex has been superseded by her fear of crapping the bed. "Sue had to ask Drew to stop fucking her because she feared the turtle. She got on the can for a minute, then hopped back in bed, and no longer feared the turtle."
Diamondbacking: Consenting to anal sex in the hopes that doing so will inspire a boyfriend to propose. "Sue knew that Drew was totally into anal sex, so she let him diamondback her. Now they're engaged."
I'm a lesbian, and my girlfriend is bisexual and wants to have a three-way with a man. This makes me nervous. What should I do?
Get yourself a refillable Xanax prescription, or get yourself an actual lesbian girlfriend.
If she hasn't orgasmed yet, will she ever?
Yes, but probably with someone else.
Thanks again to all four universities for bringing my skanky ass to their campuses last week. My primary mission when I do these events, of course, is to undo in an evening the damage done by abstinence educators over the course of many years. But the events are always a blast. If you want me to come to your school, get in touch with Keppler Speakers at savagelove@kepplerspeakers.com. I'm looking forward to my upcoming gigs at Liberty University, Brigham Young University, and University of Notre Dame.
Great column as always and I'm sure all of your readers support you in your newly found lesbianism. :)
Dan do you visit community colleges??
Actually I much prefer that route to relying on an acquaintance or an ex, despite the fact that (aside from the threesomes) I rarely sleep with people I don't know reasonably well. Threesomes are about the only type of sex where I think, OK that was fun---but can we never see each other again?
Great definitions. I think I would piss my pants with excitement if you came to a university anywhere near mine!
Here's some advice that is better (and that I suspect Dan would agree with really): If you're uncomfortable having a threesome with someone you're not attracted to, tell your girlfriend that. If she wanted to have a threesome with another girl that you found unattractive, you should probably do the same. It sounds like there's something that she wants sexually, but she doesn't want to exclude you by saying "Can I sleep with this guy without you?" I know some lesbians who are cool with MWW threesomes as long as they and the M are just pleasing the other girl. Maybe you would be. I know I'm not cool with threesomes if anyone involved is not someone I'm personally attracted to. Maybe you're like that. Figure out your boundaries, and if you're unsure, try it out.
I also have an ex who started taking antipsychotic drugs and lost almost all sex drive - orgasms became rarer than raw steak, simply because she had so little interest in the act.
A better definition, imho, would be anal sex in reward for jewelry. "Susan wasn't really into butt play, but her husband had just given her a pair of earrings so she let him diamondback her as thanks."
Perhaps it ended painfully, but while it lasted... WOW!
And isn't that what life is all about?
Anyway, I look forward to hearing people talk about this on campus.
I definitely agree that Drew is a straight-up straight guy ALL THE WAY. I disagree with fully a quarter of the advice he gives. There are girls who legitimately call in asking how to make anal less painful, and his solution is flat-out not to participate... um, the anus is a muscle and muscles can be stretched and toned and taught to accept larger things in different directions than we're used to, no question about it. GET THE MESSAGE, DREW! Don't try to force people to conform to your uniminded sexual worldview =/
I respect his angle, which is that a person shouldn't participate in a dealbreaking activity (for them), but to actively discourage sexually curious young people from trying new things is never good.
I also believe he invests way too much into the notion that your childhood is entirely responsible for the sexuality you develop. Even if it is, who gives a shit? People should do what feels good, including BDSM if that's your bag. Don't spend years in therapy trying to figure out why you like being ball gagged and fucked with a strap-on. Find someone else who loves what you love and love each other.
P.S. I only get one life and I only have one asshole, and by god I'm going to use them both to the fullest possible extent!
"Yes, but probably with someone else."
- Thank you, Dan! You earn your keep! And this is a keeper!
Anal sex, as you have said in your column, is not for everyone. Anal sex, especially inexpertly done or repeatly done in a rough way, can and does cause serious and potentialy premanent medical damage right now. It is wrong of you to pretend that it only happens to old people whose asses will be leaking anyway.
It seems as though straight women are now being forced by you, the porn industry and others to prove that they are worthy, skilled sexual partners only if as straight men say, "yeah she takes it up the ass". I like your column and podcasts, but please occasionally discuss the right to refuse specfic sexual acts without GGG being the one true (starting to sound religious) way to be a good, healthy, desirable sexual partner.
I hate Drew Pinsky with a passion for so many reasons. He is an incompetent doctor plagued by an obsession to be in show business. His advice on anything is usually terrible and he appears and opines everywhere. Is there any chance that he too could be gifted with a special name like santorum or saddle backing?
Otherwise, being poly, it's a heck of a lot easier to say "buh bye hon, enjoy your fun this evening with the bloke, and don't forget the latex".
I'm not a doctor, but from the porn videos I've seen, I think I can see very obviously damaged sphincters on the girls who do anal videos.
Maybe you could get a second opinion from another Doctor ?
Having a leaky ass when you are 90 years old cannot be compared in any way to having a leaky ass when you are 35 years old.
Dan, I think you have been less than honest/objective on this answer.
Neither Dan nor the lesbian who asked that question were treating the bi girlfriend like shit BECAUSE she was also attracted to people like penises--but rather, because she was acting on that desire for male-bodied partners by cornering her lesbian partner into something the lesbian partner didn't want to do, after having claimed to be capable of a commitment to another woman. That seems deceitful and unfair to me.
~another bi girl
That "get yourself an actual lesbian girlfriend" just hurt the feelings of every bi reader you have. Not that he hasn't said about the same thing before. At least you are consistent in your bigoted opinion of bi people.
-Kay
Sue knows about sex toys. That's about it. But give her a break on account of the fact her callers are pretty dumb.
ps...if Ms. Palin doesn't want you for her gay man-friend, I do! I really need a wing-man for all the seedy bars I typically frequent and some advice on what to wear now that an I'm unemployed loser who surfs the net all day wearing sweats. Oh, no wait, that's queer eye for the straight guy. What, you mean you gays aren't all the same? BTW, congrats on coming out as a LBGTQ (lmao). I, for one, am wholly supportive of your new orientation.
Good point, I can understand that. Also, LOVE your diamondbacking definition! That one gets my vote.
So "feeding the turtle" here is defined as doing what's necessary to help a male sex partner relax enough to get and maintain an erection.
Actually I've had it before, it's really not all that...
how about
the lets try anal when we are engaged is double diamondbacking
and then of course waiting till marriage/honeymoon (lol!) ... triple dog diamondbacking
I haven't laughed out loud at a column of yours in a long time. But "If she hasn't orgasmed yet, will she ever?
Yes, but probably with someone else," made me laugh out loud.
I used to laugh a lot at things you wrote in your columns.
Did the George W. Bush administration years crush your humor a bit? I hope not. I hope it's healthy and plentiful(?) and here's to you making me laugh out loud more often in the next 4 years.
Thanks, Dan.
I've read that some medical professionals consider well-planned, properly-prepped anal sex to be good for the muscular and vascular health of the rectum, so I hope Drew isn't deliberately misleading people.
I listened to Dr. Drew for years and I really like him, even though he's a bit of a prude and uses medical science to justify it. Didn't he post a printable prescription for EC years ago? Either way, Pinsky's advice is a good baseline for people who know they can't/don't want to properly implement Dan't advice. One could do far worse than his advice, though.
how about dating an actual monogamist?
I disagree with the definition of bi that includes the idea of needing sex with both genders.
As a bi woman, I see myself as attracted to folks of either gender.
So I'm attracted to many different types of people, this does not affect my monogamy.
The fact that my life partner enjoys role plays that include her wearing some, ur, penetrative equipment... well... that does affect my monogamy! most positively ;)
It's unfair to claim gay men automatically advocate for anal. I like it far more than several gay men I know, and plenty of other women love it dearly, too.
And obviously the question that remains, given your "Q" status is: wait, then who am I attracted to?
It's true that vaginal sex doesn't lead to frosting, but that's not what Dan is talking about. Dan defines "fearing the turtle" as a woman's urgent, distracting, pleasure-sapping need to shit during vaginal sex.
I'd argue that the term is applicable to men and women, and also could occur while receiving oral sex.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sue_Johanso…
I don't know about bi guys, but it seems to me that a lot of bi women probably revel in straight identities when it suits them. And even their bi tendencies are not seen as threatening to society, so long as they eventually end up with men. But given that a whole lot of women have bi tendencies, it does seem logical that gays and lesbians would be skeptical that these bi women (who are presumably comfortable being thought of as straight in daily life) are really willing to live a marginalized and unpopular lifestyle, especially when they can leave at any time.
In other words, Dan is right again.
I also agree with PS - in my (admittedly limited) experience, most bi women are quite happy to let people think they're straight. A variation on this, especially, I think, among young women (I'm an eighteen-year-old lesbian, and this has happened to me twice; I can't speak for the habits of bi men), is to adopt the bi label temporarily (and on the down-low) as an excuse to experiment, and then abandon it again if they discover that other girls don't really do it for them. While I've no problem with experimentation when it's labelled as such, the "really, I'm bi! ...OH NO WAIT" type of girl probably generates a lot of the hostility towards bisexuals in the queer community.
Another thing is that especially for bi women, being with men is easier, because men don't tend to see bisexuality as a threat - and I'd argue that this is cultural. It's a fairly common supposition that female bisexuality doesn't really exist, so for a woman in a straight relationship to identify as bi makes her sexy and cool and funky in her boyfriend's eyes, because more often than not he doesn't seriously believe that she'd really pick a woman over him. The thing is that this supposition also spills over into the queer community - so lesbians believe it too. Thusly, if a woman in a same-sex relationship to identify as bi, the other woman is much more likely to see any man in her life as a potential threat, which I can imagine would make things pretty tough on the bi girl. Unfair? Perhaps. I'm...not entirely sure how much sense this comment makes, so I'll stop here.
Rei: Your (and other) comments apply equally to the misgivings gay men feel toward bi guys. They can always run back to women. I've had so many men tell me that they're more sexually attracted to men but not emotionally, or that two men can't build a life together. It's a tiresome crock of shit. If bi people are so proud of themselves, why don't they throw their own parades? Why are there no major bi rights groups? It's because they've hopped on the back of the gay rights movement and support it when it's convenient for them.
I've only ever been seriously screwed over by bi guys. Gay guys can be slutty jerks, but bi guys will treat you like you're a pile of crap once they've gotten off. Not to mention, so many bi men and women later come out as either totally gay or totally straight that it's pretty hard to take them seriously. Certainly, people can be bi. But they can also be dishonest and delusional.
Like, as a straight guy, I can pretty much say I'd be stoked on any hot lesbians who wanted to experiment with bi-curiosity for a time.
No?
I remember her getting a card "Is anal sex a bad idea?" Her reply "YES! Next Question."
This put me off anal sex for years, and I was honestly concerned for the health of my bi friends who were all about the anal, and tried to explain it to me.
I used to have such respect for her since her show was really the only available information we had at the time. I thought if Sue said it was a bad idea, she must be right.
Am I ever glad Dan's out there, undoing the damage.
Again, I haven't listened to Drew in years, but at the time he seemed reasonable, articulate and open-minded. Three adjectives, Danny, I'm having trouble using to describe you of late. Yeah yeah yeah, you were never reasonable, articulate (unless the use of the word fuck as a comma counts) and your open-mind slams shut whenever someone disagrees with you on the topic of, oh say, gay marriage.
But never mind all that. Of course gays should be allowed to marry whoever they want. And of course we should all be able to fuck just the way we want to fuck all the fucking time (see? it's just distracting). But in a country where too many states are teaching abstinence-based sex ed (yeah yeah, dumb Christian hicks, wocka wocka, just listen for a second, ok?) don't you think it may be wiser, for the sake of the long run, that you kinda-sorta embrace relatively progressive people like Drew? Especially considering the miles of difference between him, and Johanson, or the eons between him and a Dr. Laura, or a Dear Prudie?
Or would that be, y'know, too reasonable?
There ARE real bisexuals out there. And, like all people, regardless of whether they identify themselves as gay, straight, trans, whatever, there are good bisexual people, and there are deceitful ones. But to say that all bisexual women really just want to make themselves more attractive in a straight relationship is ignorant bullshit. I'm bi, and I've been in a relationship with a lesbian for over two years. And I don't think that our relationship in any way prepares me to appear more sexy in a presumed future relationship. And, even though I intend to spend the rest of my life with this woman, I am not a lesbian.
Grow up! Realize that when it comes to sex and relationships, there are many people who are likely to screw you over, not just bisexuals!
I'm glad Lethbridge got to experience you Dan. I hope your visit can inspire some change. That cultural wasteland was a place I lost three decades of my life. Not only is it devoid of a pulse, but things you usually see in a college town like art and music and nightlife are totally perverted by the Albertan way of thinking. There is literally nothing to enrich oneself with in that town.
I hope you enjoyed my personal favorite part of Lethbridge: leaving and not looking back.
I've lived 25 years in an open relationship with my boyfriend and 14 years with my other boyfriend (we all live together). I was openly poly with them both from the beginning. It caused some jealousy problems on their part initially, but they've actively come around. They had to or it wouldn't have worked for us because I've only ever concieved of myself as poly from as far back as I can remember. So, I must be the exception that proves Dan's first point about when it is safe to move to an open relationship. I never had that first year he talked about.
These relationships do make finding a female more than friend a little difficult and I can live with that. However, I'm still bi.
that would fucking amazing..share your knowledge amongst those willing to learn
Bring a gun. <3
Sure, the outer rim, if both you and the really hot experimenting chick know and accept that she's experimenting and it may well not last. I've no quibble with that kind of experience. My problem is when experimenting people claim bisexuality - honest-to-God, this-is-how-I-am bisexuality - because they think that's somehow more okay than bicuriosity, and then drop the label once they've tried out someone of the same sex and realised they're not really that into it. That's how a lot of people get screwed over. I'd imagine the same thing happens - for argument's sake - when gay people start out bi-identified because that's somehow easier than being gay, and become involved with someone of the opposite sex.
Likewise (and I realise no one asked for my opinion on this, but here it is anyway) I know that bisexuals exist and that they are capable of committing to a partner - of either gender. I'd just argue that genuine bisexuals have sort of been lost among those who identify as bi when they're actually not - for whatever reason. I'm not saying biphobia is right. It isn't. But things like this are probably why it happens.
BTW, @? who wrote:
BYU? Since when do the mormons embrace Dan Savage? Seems like a strange speaking engagement request from an LDS-run institution... I think I would like to be a fly on the wall during that event.
---------
Assuming Dan wasn't pulling our legs, perhaps BYU invited him to show to the fresh-faced kiddies how NOT to turn out, perhaps neglecting to imagine that for many of them it's too late.
{snip} I disagree with the definition of bi that includes the idea of needing sex with both genders.
As a bi woman, I see myself as attracted to folks of either gender.
So I'm attracted to many different types of people, this does not affect my monogamy.
{snip}
WORD.
The key here, people, is "either," not "both." I prefer to use the term "ambisexual" for this reason.
Check the February 17, 2009 at 9:09 PM posting
Hate to burst your bubble dude, but that's straight from the good ass doctor's mouth.
Onwards and upwards Dan!
Also, be smart about it and do it in Montreal in a hotel room (where it is perfectly LEGAL)(this is especially critical if it doesn't involve the committed partner), and not in the crazy US of A where you can give it away all day long, but if you accept one red cent your ass is going to jail, your mugs (literally) is on the TV, the Net and the local newspaper and you have a record. Crazy place you guys live.
Heck, go to Montreal (or any big city in Canada for that matter) for all sorts of good times (even if you don't want to do a threesome). Every city is different though so do your research ahead of time.
Now that I've made Canada out as the prostitution mecca of North America (never been to Mexico in this regard, but I've heard about some good things from there too, some fucking scary things as well...) and a gay haven (hey you can get married here if you want!), I think I'll go and enjoy the rest of my fine country your good president was so kind to visit first in the entire world.
But here's the thing. There are layers and layers and layers of sexism and hate and repression. If you are often in same-sex relationships, for any duration, there is potentially an unbelievable amount of shit you have to deal with that people who are not in same-sex relationships do not. I have hooked up with women, am married to a man, am still deeply attracted to women, and am slowly working up the courage to open up my relationship and go after all my desires. But in the meantime, I can put my partner's picture up in the office. I can hold his hand or kiss him anywhere I want to. I get his health insurance. If one of us gets sick, the other one can make health care decisions. We can have a child together with no technical assistance of any kind, no one will ever dispute who our child's parents are, and we will have no trouble getting child care. We can go home with each other for any holiday. On and on and on.
These differences are often a matter of life and death. Lesbians do not just have a chip on their shoulder.
So bi women, I am not saying we're not closeted, misunderstood, stereotyped, objectified/exoticized by straight men, etc. But our closet is a different size and shape.
This is a HUGE generalization, but I'm saying it anyway: it'll be a cold day in hell when bi women stop pissing off lesbians (if I were a lesbian, I'd probably be annoyed with me, too) and when lesbians stop hurting bi women's feelings (I've just read all the comments here and there were definitely some owies). But I'm not sure we really have time to sit around worrying about whether there's such a thing as "internalized biphobia" when - just for one example - queer youth around the globe are at higher risk for suicide, sexual violence, HIV/AIDS, etc. etc. etc. We can have our internal conflicts and complain to our friends about feeling left out - and movements and communities have always marginalized some while excluding others.
So to all the bi women in relationships with men (especially if you have a marriage license), please find the courage to BE OUT whenever and wherever you can be. And be out in a way that acknowledges that you have straight privilege. Have sex with whomever you want, however you want, whenever you want, safely, with consent, but be out. You will be a happier person for it and you will be contributing to all of our liberation.
But let's keep our eye on the prize...human rights for people of all genders and sexual orientations (even Dan and his LGBTQ self), worldwide.
Also? I laughed so hard when I read the definition of diamondbacking that I feared the turtle.
Liberty?!?
Dan,
please don't be so clever, obviously your readers are too GODAMN STUPID to pick up on a joke.
I wanted to follow up the asshole advice I gave earlier.
Don't bother with a condom or worry about STI, we're all going to die eventually- enjoy life while you can!
Remember, I'm a bad man!
I think bisexuality only becomes an issue if you spread it around. Then it sounds like you are giving yourself an "out."
Sue talks so positively about consensual sex - she clearly knows how to have a good time - lesbians and gays in the audience feel supported and respected.
Sue Johanson has come to my school every year for the last god-knows-how-many years, and she pretty much says the exact same thing every time. I don't recall her saying anything remotely like that, only pointing out the realities of anal sex, much as Dan here does, when necessary.
Her website sure as hell doesn't sound like she thinks it's any fun, but she gives advice on how to do it if you're going to. I doubt she would do that if she was really just against it.
This is completely directed at the person who wrote the question, not Dan - witty, as always - and I know he's met her (http://www.talksexwithsue.com/episodes/a…), so I think if he was serious, he likely wouldn't use the phrase "WHEN (she) gets old", lol
Dan admits it, though in a typical smart-ass don't-give-a-shit way.
Dan claims your ass will leak anyway, so it doesn't matter.
He is wrong.
How about a little "SCIENCE" about anal sex and a little less BULLSHIT?
Oh, BTW.....what's "brinking?"
Just because you ARE an asshole doesn't mean you are qualified to give medical advice ABOUT assholes.
In the current oppressive PC social environment no physician is going to go out on a limb and give unwelcome frank accurate advice about anal health.
For his trouble Pinsky gets labeled homophobe. Activist gays won't accept advice that doesn't fit their view of the world. There is no room in the cult for objective advice.
Go ahead.
Blow your asshole out.
Leak like Dan.
"It's just part of getting old"
Stock up on brown pants.
And, Dan, I pee in the shower. Regularly. Not just my own shower, but everyone's shower I use. Pee is sterile, Dan, unlike anal sex and its byproducts. I just thought I'd state this, because in the past you've expressed some revulsion at the practice. I bet if you looked at the constituents of a healthy person's urine it wouldn't differ much from your household cleaner.
As a complete non-sequitir, I'm going to propose the idea of hosting Mr. Savage to my university's Q & A.
The whole city was founded on brothels and illegal booze after all.
I am having flashbacks to my own sex-ed classes many years ago, where the teachers threw out more of the 3x5 cards then they answered (with a faint murmur of "I can't talk about this").
I have a better definition for Brownbacking-
It is when leaky ass gays wear inappropriately light colored pants;
as in;
"Marco thought he was the stuff in those white pants but he was brownbacking by the third dance..."
The the "other" is a different gender is immaterial. It's like asking a monogamous person to feel totally comfy dating a person who's poly. It's just not going to work for the monogamous person.
Thanks for that. I've wanted to hear that for years.
I agree the "get yourself a real lesbian girlfriend" was a bit pointed toward bisexuals, which are already the lowest notch on the sexuality totem pole I think.. because apparently we are just confused, or selfish, or in transition, or blah blah. .. and that comment certainly didn't help the cause, and I would like to think in my mind it was supposed to be funny and not taken to heart. I would like to think the REAL advice would be the same for anyone who's partner is interested in having a 3some and their not game- don't do it, but don't be surprised if you're not meeting her needs and she moves on. Bisexuality unimportant.
Glad you're here now, wish you were around back when I was in college.
2.3x5 cards are a bad idea because they fuck up your disk drive.
3. And yes! to short but good relationships. First, they teach you to take the focus off duration as a measure of quality. (How many of us know some grandparents who should have divorced during the Johnson Administration?) Secondly, I had a great short relationship that definitely helped my current marriage. This guy, though he dumped me three months in (bastard!), taught me (before that) what it was really like to fall in love, that I could have fun in a relationship where I was treated respectfully, be with someone who wasn't a head case, etc. I'm not in love with him anymore and don't even think of him in those terms, but I have a soft spot for him because he helped me learn some good things about myself.
i heard the pres today call on a third runway from the state of
wa(r)shington...
thanks to the stranger, liberalism is a brighter shade of blue....
and yes... the lips are blue.
PS, the U of Md. definitions are hilarious! Especially when you think about Thirsty Turtle (a shady CP bar).
Oh well. It was funny!
It's just not as obvious for women as it is for men. You need to experiment and, if you haven't already, TRY A VIBRATOR. Of course, the woman might lying to make you feel better.
[also our GLBTQ pride week is in april]
Yes, but probably with someone else."
OMFG! You are a funny funny man.
Greta Christina wrote a wonderful reply to your answer about "an actual lesbian girlfriend" here:
http://blog.blowfish.com/culture/greta-c…
I think you'd like to consider it.
I would rather hear the down side to any sexual activity and then make a well-informed decision.
I usually enjoy reading this column. Not this time. It just felt bitchy and mean.
Yes! Fuck yes!
Thank you, Dan, for this bit of unconventional wisdom.
As a poly person, it took me a few years to learn that a relationship can be healthy, happy, and successful, and still come to an end, just because (like any living, dynamic thing) it has a lifespan.
A relationship might last a lifetime, a year, or just one special night, but its ending is not necessarily a failure.
I just notched down from lover to platonic friend with someone after about eighteen months. It hurt when he said he wanted to change the nature of our relationship, but in retrospect it was the right thing to do. The time we were together was healthy and healing for both of us, and it came to a natural end.
This is not to say good relationships can't be broken and ended prematurely by people fucking up, because naturally that happens too. It just shits me up the wall that in mainstream society an ended relationship is always seen as a failed relationship.
Dr. Drew sucks! He gives the worst all-around-phobic advice!



RSS
Comments (171) RSS