Savage Love Podcast
-
Episode 161
(Nov 17) -
Episode 160
(Nov 10) -
Episode 159
(Nov 3) -
Episode 158
(Oct 27) -
Episode 157
(Oct 20)
Savage Love Archives
- Mad Men (Nov 12)
- Girl Seeking Girl (Nov 5)
- Moral Bankrupt (Oct 29)
- Plunge In (Oct 22)
- Feeding Time (Oct 15)
More from Dan Savage
-
Meanwhile in Vancouver
-
Today in Traditional Marriage
-
Pit Bulls!
-
Teabaggers Turn On Palin
-
Do Your Balls Hang Low?
Books by Dan Savage
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Love: Straight Answers from America's Most Popular Sex Columnist
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
Contact Dan Savage
That's Leotarded
April 30, 2009
Tools
Stop using the word "retarded" as an insult, Dan. I know it can be hard to break a verbal habit, but make an effort. Perhaps you should have a "retard jar" that you put a dollar in every time you use the word. When the jar is full, send the money to the Special Olympics.
Whatever you do, though, try to remember that you have lots of listeners and readers who have loved ones with mental disabilities, and we don't want to hear you misuse the word "retarded." Please don't tell me to read or listen to other people if I don't like what I hear. I want to read your column and listen to your podcast, but without the put-downs directed at people with mental disabilities.
The Real Other Sister
I'm going to turn over a new leaf, TROS, and make a conscious, conscientious effort to break myself of the bad habit of using the word "retard." But I don't think the "retard jar" is for me. Instead, I'm going to use a substitution for the word. From now on, instead of saying "retard" or "that's so retarded," I'm going to say "leotard" and "that's so leotarded." I won't be mocking the mentally challenged, just the physically gifted. I will pick on the strong—and the limber—and not the weak.
I've lived with my boyfriend for a little less than a year, and we have awesome sex and a loving relationship. I'm not naive, and I don't expect my boyfriend not to look at porn. However, I've made it clear that porn makes me uncomfortable (I have a weird, visceral distaste), and it makes me feel insecure (am I not enough?). All I ask is that he clear his browser history if we're going to continue sharing computers and that he keep his porn-viewing habits private.
We had a huge fight about this. He was raised in an oppressive, religious household and feels my attitude is oppressively prudish. But I don't think he should feel ashamed of looking at pornography, I just don't want to see it. Why can't he see my point of view? Is it unreasonable to expect him to keep this part of his private life private?
On The Outs
It's not at all unreasonable to ask him to be discreet about his porn-viewing habits, OTO, out of consideration for your feelings. And if he can't see that, well, then he's just being willfully leotarded.
But there are other solutions: Get your own personal laptops, change his settings so his browser history clears automatically, and if he makes an effort and slips up now and then—if you come across a porn-clogged browser history—clear it yourself and resist the urge to bring it up.
And for the record: It never even occurs to me to look at the browser history on the computer my boyfriend and I share. It wouldn't bother me if he was looking at porn—I'd be concerned if he wasn't looking at porn—but there's no law that requires you to check out his browser history. Scrutinizing browser histories is fourth-degree snooping, and only a leotard scrolls through her boyfriend's browser history knowing that what she's likely to find there is going to upset her.
I'm a 29-year-old hetero male considering breaking up with my sweet GGG girlfriend of five years. I can't find a reason to do it, though. We never fight; she loves to do all the chores I hate and vice versa; she's accepting of all my kinks, from anal to public sex; and we love each other. We've been talking marriage and family all year.
But I miss falling in love, sex is becoming boring, and my heart aches every time I hear about a girl who wishes I were single. I told my girlfriend about these things, and she (while crying) gave me permission to sleep around so long as it's on her terms, though her terms are pretty strict. I'm not happy with the restrictions, but I can't ask for more because she gets so depressed talking about it.
Am I being self-destructive in wanting to throw away the love of my life?
Let Me Have It
You're being a self-destructive leotard, LMHI, and your cliché male fear-of- intimacy issues are totally leotarded. Perhaps the marriage conversation is making you jittery—as marriage, in theory at least, means that you'll never again experience the heady rush of new love. But your odds of ever finding another girl—for a long- or short-term relationship—who loves you, you enjoy living with, and is willing to give you permission to sleep around, even with conditions, are infinitesimally small. If you weren't such a leotard, you would be able to see that you're not going to do better than this girl.
And make an effort to kick your sex life with the girlfriend into gear before you sleep with someone else. If she was sobbing her eyes out when she gave you permission to sleep with other people, LMHI, that's not a good sign. Successful and healthy open relationships rarely get their start when one partner has consented under duress. Boring can be fixed, and fixing it may involve opening this relationship up, but she's not really ready to go there.
I'm a big fan of something called the Instead cup, which might help AFTER and her hemo-phobic boyfriend who doesn't want to have sex with her at any time during her period. You can buy them at the big drugstores like CVS here in California. When I have my period, the Instead cup sits up against my cervix. It captures all the menstrual blood and keeps it away from my loving boyfriend's enormous yet fastidious cock. He often doesn't even realize I have it in. It's a little messy to take out and dispose of, but it's totally worth it. Here's the website: www.softcup.com.
And if AFTER's boyfriend still won't fuck her with one of these handy numbers in, then she should definitely DTMFA.
Cup Up Pussy
Readers: Since you're reading this in The Stranger, you might not know what CUP is referring to. Last week, I had to cut a question from the local version of this column—a question from a woman whose boyfriend refused to have sex with her while she was on her period—to make room for info about HUMP! To read the letter from Aunt Flo Terminates Erection Return and my advice to her, see last week's complete column at thestranger.com/savage.
As for you, CUP: I'm familiar—not intimately so—with the Instead cup. But, like a total leotard, I spaced it. Thanks for writing.
Longtime fan, Dan, but I don't see you on Twitter. It would be a blast! Thanks in advance.
Need More Savage Love
Writing a column and doing a weekly podcast and blogging aren't enough? Now I have to Twitter?
Sorry, NMSL, but no. The tech-savvy, at-risk youth who pull the Savage Lovecast together every week may have dragged my gay ass into the early years of the 21st century—they created a YouTube site for me (www.youtube.com/user/dansavage) and a Facebook page (www.facebook.com/dansavage)—but I draw the line at Twittering, at least for the time being, as it would cut into my drinking time.
LMHI has a specific someone in mind he'd like to sample, I'm pretty sure. Chances are, GGG gf knows and knows who.
Avoiding browser history is easier said than done – if you want to keep yours (and reference it), you can't set the browser to clear everything. A good solution – use two different browsers. Also, find some eco-friendly, fem-positive, union-produced porn!
It's called perspective, TROS. Try it. And Dan, I'd personally substitute "stupid" for "retarded" to avoid this kind of nonsense in the future. It's how I broke myself of the habit you currently have. Those who are mentally retarded cannot help it. Stupid people, however, can absolutely help it. Just remind yourself of this fact and keep using "stupid," "ought to know better" and "willfully ignorant". (You have to add that qualifier--ignorant people can't help it til they're taught otherwise, but you CAN choose to be willfully ignorant. It's all about choice here.)
On my browser, if the history is not cleared, as soon as I start typing a web address, the old web addresses in the history will appear in a drop down menu, although only the ones that begin with the same letter. I'm sure a lot of people are familiar with this.
So, even without trying, she will know what porn her boyfriend has been looking at.
OTO doesn't need to "snoop" to find her asshole's porn (assuming her asshole knows she thinks it's assholish to look at the stuff_
and they share a computer) == all she has to do is type in something that begins with the right letter, and it will pop up.
LMHI's girlfriend, DTMFA; he's a jerk.
And Instead rocks. Even squeamish boys can deal with it (unless they're really hopeless and shouldn't even try to have sex at all).
If he does not feel a wholehearted desire to be in the relationship, then he will continue to make them both miserable.
They advertise it for sex. You'd want to change it shortly before sex, but I'm sure it works great.
Also (not to knock on porn sites), many porn sites are notorious for filling your browser with crap, especially if you browse in Internet Explorer. While clearing history (and hopefully cookies, at least) won't do a whole lot, it's better than nothing.
I used to have the same problem as AFTER. No sex on the rag, whatsoever. Actually, my last and current SO were not into it at all, condom or no. It really pisses you off knowing that you get to clean their spunk out of you (monogamous and on hormonal b.c., not being irresponsible) after they finish, and yet they won't just buck the fuck up and put on a condom and get the job done.
Gentlemen, a few things to note: your love nog exiting the vagina does not feel ANYWHERE close to as pleasurable to us as it did to you putting it in there. Imagine thick snot running out of your asshole, that you have no control over. God forbid you cough or sneeze. Also, it is much easier to wash blood off than to clean come OUT.
(To all my bleeding ladies out there: I feel ya. I solved my issue by getting on a b.c. method that stopped my periods completely. Not for HIM, of course, but because of other health issues.)
In conclusion, all of the menstruate-phobic men out there can spend THAT week fucking themselves. Leotards.
I used to have the same problem as AFTER. No sex on the rag, whatsoever. Actually, my last and current SO were not into it at all, condom or no. It really pisses you off knowing that you get to clean their spunk out of you (monogamous and on hormonal b.c., not being irresponsible) after they finish, and yet they won't just buck the fuck up and put on a condom and get the job done.
Gentlemen, a few things to note: your love nog exiting the vagina does not feel ANYWHERE NEAR as pleasurable to us as it did to you putting it in there. Imagine thick snot running out of your asshole, that you have no control over. God forbid you cough or sneeze. Also, it is much easier to wash blood off than to clean come OUT.
(To all my bleeding ladies out there: I feel ya. I solved my issue by getting on a b.c. method that stopped my periods completely. Not for HIM, of course, but because of other health issues.)
In conclusion, all of the menstruate-phobic men out there can spend THAT week fucking themselves. Leotards.
Seconding the use of "stupid" / "willfully ignorant" as a reasonable replacement, however.
Your problem is not that the sex has gotten boring. Your problem is not that you miss falling in love or that other women wish you were single.
Your problem is you. Your problem is that you don't appreciate what you have. And you will not have any clue how good you had it, until you've lost it all.
I, myself, once got an eyeful of porn on a campus library computer when taking a turn after someone who had come to the US from a repressive country the day before and hadn't learned how to close a browser properly yet. And I can't say that he and I had similar tastes in porn, either.
So, she isn't necessarily snooping when she sees the porn URLs in the browser history. That's all I'm saying.
OTO - set up user accounts on PC!
Good luck!
I know you do a bunch of columns that end up replying to/recanting something you said in your last column, but they are generally just pithy retractions with some sort of back-handed "I was still sort of right" thrown in there. Please don't do that here. Either agree, or don't apologize.
To be honest, using a shared computer without separate accounts squicks me. More than menstrual blood during sex (yes, I'm a bad lesbian - I don't want to fuck when there is a lot of blood around).
My girlfriend uses the cup and we're happy with it.
Last, but not least, the leotarded comments were a bit silly. Dan, a while back you urged a fellow who wrote in to stop using the phrase, "That's gay". One would hope you'd give other groups similar respect. Couldn't you just say, "That's so stupid"?
Ray
So what about just plain old "stupid"? I think as a culture we've lost our appreciation of "stupid". It's such a throwaway word. Still, as an intelligent person I can think of nothing more denigrating than telling me that I'm willfully not using brain, or using it in a self-destructive manner. Unlike, sadly, our less fortunate mentally challenged friends who are probably using theirs just fine but encountering problems that may tax their capability. In fact we could probably learn something from them and uncomplicate our lives a bit if we weren't so stupid. Even Whoppi Goldberg made a good case for "stupid" being a better insult.
In your tradition of creating words, like "saddlebacking" and "santorum" I would like to see you bring back "stupid". It should be something deeply associated with boneheaded moves and that dumb face I make when I cum.
Being white is no longer a qualification for being president, and being straight is increasingly not a qualification for getting married. This country is on the move, and you're disparaging my adorable little daughter on the basis of her having a genetic disorder.
Well fuck you. The times are changing and you're getting left behind. Enjoy hanging out with neanderthals like Ms. California. The rest of will enjoy living in 2009.
If you use gay as a negative term it's offensive because gay is a positive term embraced by a community. As long as you don't want to be referred to as retarded, let it mean something else.
Rememember, "Idiot" and "Moron" used to mean retarded, but we changed their association.
Changing the browser settings to clear out the history files when it's closed would be one way to deal with this. If they use Firefox, they could set up separate profiles with their own sets of preferences, too.
They should also make sure their computer is protected from viruses and malware. Porn sites are notorious sources of computer bugs.
You all are such prudes.
Blood is awesome. I honestly don't get the gross out factor given all the other fluids people share. I might not jump in the first time with a stranger due to disease concerns, but my lady and I are both clean and free to bleed all over one another.
i personally don't see the big deal. i have mentally disabled family members, and i can't help but recall the times people get yelled at for calling the actually mentally disabled "retarded"
so if we can't use retarded to mean people that are handicapped, how are we to consider it offensive to them when it's used in a different manner? it's like trying to stop the word's use entirely. keep using retard, dan. people's rules about words are their own business. it's unfair to try and force their vocabulary beliefs down our throats.
as for TROS, how can she write into your column, basically demand that you cease to use a word, and then comment how she'd rather not go elsewhere? listen, sister, if you don't like the way the man writes, DON'T READ THE MAN. geez.
Probably better to set the preferences to clear history upon closing.
There are many ways to get each other off that don't involve penetration. Seems like those 10 days could be 'inventive' instead of just one-way blow jobs.
Of course you can also fuck in the shower or tub at the beginning/end to minimize any fear of having to 'deal' with it.
A cheaper option for OTO would be to set up separate accounts on the same computer. I occasionally like to search porn, gossip sights and other things that might be embarrassing if anyone were to see, so I have a guest account set up for privacy. I had an embarrassing moment when a friend and I were searching for movie listings and the wrong thing came up, so I consider it essential to have a "clean" account that is never used for porn, TMZ or any of the blogging I do. Not that there is anything wrong with a little porn, etc, I would just rather not have that conversation with out of town relatives, mom, dad or my orthodox virgin friend.
Also, OTO isn't necessarily being nosy. If her boyfriend googled "shoe fetish" and then she later googled "shoes", she would probably be confronted with his web search habits for shoe fetish porn, because the cookies would bring it up. Or it could show up if she accidentally clicks on the wrong thing from her browser history.
But, I agree with you, there's much more fun to be had than penetration alone. I don't particularly enjoy sex while I'm having my period so that week becomes more of a fun experimental week.
I use the Diva Cup (similar to instead but sits lower so you can't use it during penetration) which is made of silicone and allows natural wetness to still be present so manual stimulation and great orgasms are still possible.
And while I highly enjoy giving blowjobs, most of the time my male partner and I would start off with oral but finish with penetration. Period week means I get to give blowjobs to completion. Yum.
Plus it's verbally satisfying to say "That's totally RONDO!" or "You're so rondo." It might even be better than retard, and will only offend car dealers and soccermoms who drive a kia minivan.
I couldn't resist responding to you, Let Me Have It. You remind me of too many of the lame guys I dated in my twenties. They too were commitment-phobic, self-centered dorks, and I hope their miserable, beer-belly ridden, 40-year-old single asses are all somewhere perched on bars stools chain smoking Camel Lights and reminiscing about their lost loves and glory days.
That said, I went on to become a successful professional, marry a sexy, successful (and happily monogamous) guy, and have two beautiful kids. And if you aren't careful, LMHI, 15 years from now, your awesome girlfriend is going to be writing the same thing about the wonderful husband who appreciates her, and the loser boyfriend who dumped her in her late twenties so he could chase pussy. And you are going to be sitting on a bar stool somewhere with your pack of stogies wishing you could travel back in time and make things right.
So get with it, LMHI. You have nothing to complain about. The truth is that long-term monogamy is a sacrifice of sorts, but when it's a requirement of great relationship (and it sounds like it is in your case), it's a small price to pay for all that you receive in return. Honestly, there will come a day when hot chicks aren't going to look at you anymore, and that day isn't as far in the future as you might imagine. And when that day arrives, you will be much happier with your awesome girlfriend/wife at your side. So apologize to your girlfriend, take a weekend getaway, do something romantic for her, and don't lose the best thing that ever happened to you.
http://www.gladrags.com/jade-pearl-menst…
AFTER's boyfriend won't even feel it.
Let Me Have It - realize you are SUPER lucky. A kinky girlfriend who is awesome in most ways? That's great. Own your desire to sleep around and figure out a way to do it so you can both have fun with it.
I understand the desire for novelty, but she is letting you sleep around. Have some sex on the side on her terms and be responsible, and my guess is she will open up more as she sees you aren't going to run off. But DO NOT use this opening as a chance to audition other girls.
And finally, give her your permission to sleep around and don't be a jealous twit if and when she does!
BTW, you can twitter while drunk. But it usually really isn't a good idea. Trust me.
O.K., at risk of being accused of political correctness, use of the word "retarded" is very offensive to high functioning folks with cognitive disabilities. They DO care. Sure, a guy in a persistent vegetative state doesn't give a rat's ass what you call him, but the vast majority of folks with cognitive disabilities are high functioning. And that means that they understand most things. While they may lack the ability to grapple abstract concepts like mathematics, etc, they sure as hell know that's it's not nice to be called a "retard." But being called a "retard" hurts them just as much as being called a "nigger" by a white guy hurts a black person, or being called a "faggot" by a redneck hurts a gay person.
And how do I know this? Well, I used to work with people with cognitive disabilities, and you wouldn't believe how sensitive they are to name calling. I mean, they are just about the last minority group that you can still make fun of in public without being called a bigot. They are, therefore, very accustomed to stares and cruel words. One guy I worked with would actually cry when someone called him a retard. He couldn't read or write, but he lived on his own, cooked his own meals, and was a very pleasant, polite person. He did nothing to deserve the treatment he received from many members of the general public.
Part of the problem is that people with cognitive disabilities are treated like babies, even when they are adults. That treatment is discriminatory. It says that since babies don't mind if you call them babies, mentally disabled people won't mind if you call them retards because they aren't any more cognizant of reality than babies are. Well, that's just not true.
And Dan, as much as I love you, I don't think you should use the word "retard" either. You don't belong to the named group (at least I don't think so!) so you don't have to the standing to own the word the way you did with "faggot."
Everyone else on Twitter: http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/how…
Get over yourself.
Dan, you made a very good effort there. Now, KEEP IT UP! And BE FIRM!
Right Jeremy?
For example: I wish my boyfriend's cock was retarded sometimes so I could get off without extra manustimulation.
I wish my boyfriend was not retarded so we could ever get anywhere on time.
I wish this debate was not retarded so all the retards who are giving too much of a shit would shut the fuck up.
I wish someone would call me a retard and smear shit on my tits.
I wish the retards of the Comment section would shut up. Oh wait, I said that already. Boy, was I retarded for that!
Retards, the whole lot of em. I'll stand by you Dan.
There's no difference between gay=stupid and retarded=stupid. Except that in one case it's an entitled jerk who thinks he's superior based only on one happenchance of birth (his heterosexuality) and in the other case it's the exact same thing based on his (perceived) mental accuity. You're glad you're not retarded so you can throw the word around as an insult, but somehow it's completely different for those who are glad they're not gay to do the same with the word gay. Hmmm. Pretty hypocritical.
http://www.divacup.com/?gclid=CMX0q9L2lp…
http://www.mooncupsandkeepers.com/
http://community.livejournal.com/menstru…
Humans need to have the ability to insult each other. "idiot", "Moron", those words have the exact same root meaning as retarded, they were originally terms for specific levels of retardation. Should we ban those too? Get over it, its not Dan Savage's responsibility to coddle your sensitivity. Guess what, it's not a hate crime to call something "gay" if you want. And calling a guy a "fag" is not a hate crime if you're just making fun of your straight friend, or, conversely, if you yourself are gay and making fun of your gay friend.
Stop censoring language, no one is yelling "Retard!" at an actual retarded person, so don't get all indignant when someone calls Antonin Scalia retarded.
Sorry, leotarded
I assume Apple would have a similar feature.
And, "retarded" is not the same as the N-word. It was a clinical term - mentally retarded - that was changed to "mentally disabled," which some now wish to change to "mentally challenged" and so on. Where will it end? "Retarded" simply meant that their mental development was halted at an earlier stage - that's what retarded means. That's why "retarded growth" means "stunted growth" in plants and so on. It's just a description, and rather than blowing rainbows out their butts while demanding that people use happier and happier sounding words for every freaking thing on the planet, why don't people focus on actually being constructive if they really care about the wellbeing of that particular population of people.
But Kiki's right: it's hard to avoid browser history. When I type in my address bar, there's always a list of a bunch of sites I visited. And although I try to hide them with that "Stealther" plugin, there's also a few porn sites. Urgh.
On the other hand, Dan's comments don't address OTO's boyfriend's own fears: that his sex life would be branded as shameful. OTO needs to take care of that.
She should stop trying to give reasons to her disgust ("alright, it's ridiculous for me to feel jealous, but it's still downright disgusting to me"), maybe make him feel that disgust ("imagine seeing two hot guys with huge dicks and huge muscles - awhhh! - having sex together". Or show him that sounding image from Dan's post) and then make the necessary adjustments to make it easier for him not to forget his porn (don't forget that a male post-orgasmic brain isn't the fastest thing around).
re: retard v. gay. We want to keep "gay" because otherwise it messes up the abbreviation and no one's coming up with a better-sounding word to refer to dudes-who-like-other-dudes. Or should we be "Heterosexually challenged"?
Oh, and Dan is 100% right -- she agreed to the sleeping around thing under duress, which is of course obvious to you, but because you can only thing of you and your precious wang, you don't give a shit.
My current boyfriend doesn't like to have sex while I'm on my period. He has explained that he thinks it's a time when a woman's body "cleanses" itself and doesn't think it should be interfered with. Of course, I think he's also disgusted by the idea of having blood all over his penis, but whatevs.
I just don't think you can force someone to get over being grossed out by this. Hell, sometimes I even get freaked out by the sight of the blood and I know it's perfectly natural.
As for OTO, I dont think there's anything wrong with bringing up the porn issue with your bf if he fails to meet your completely reasonable request. One slip up? Okay, fine. But, if he's a dick about it, I think it indicates a strong immature and selfish streak and I would consider other options...
Anyone who isn't using some kind of privacy mode to browse porn on a shared computer is either inconsiderate...
or they have very specific preferences for which they need the web browser history.
1. The leotard/retard thing is passive agressive.
2. He doesn't get that browser history also includes the address bar (i.e. www.meluvabukakke.pron)
3. He's encouraging an ass stain to stay glommed onto a perfectly loving human being.
4. He confused us all with the Instead cup thing.
5. He doesn't get the benefits/ease of Twitter.
That is all.
So yeah, funny stuff. But I don't suspect I'll be using it tomorrow.
I myself had been trying to remove "retarded" from my vocabulary except when I refer to something or someone with arrested development. I had weeded it out of the "Insult" category, because I had been a champion of repurposing the words "Faggot" and "Gay".
However, I didn't have a word that rolled off the tongue easily to replace "retarded" or "retard" in my own active vocabularly. "Leotarded" and "Leotard", however... are gorgeous. I have never cared for leotards. Heck, I am a costume designer and I still don't much care for actual leotards.
So I intend to adopt your new idea and spread it far and wide!
Thank you, Dan! Thank you for Santorum, Saddlebacking, and now Leotards!
I have no idea what her real IQ is, but I do know that there is nothing in the world that causes her more pain than to be called a retard.
She has been called a retard her entire life - most memorably and painfully by most of the supposedly "normal" classmates who attended all of the various schools where Susan attended special ed.
As a 46 year-old lesbian, I have lived long enough to have witnessed the successful co-opting of the terms gay and queer by my well-educated and politically-savvy brethren.
Unfortunately, retarded people don't have the same ability to co-opt language. Every new generation of retarded people starts fresh - dealing with hurtful words and ignorant biases without any sort of shared history. There was no Stonewall Riot of the retarded population and there never will be.
Sadly, my sister and her peers rely on the mercy, charity, and decency of us "regular" folk. Which means that as a result they are the victims of our willful ignorance.
Dan, you are a gifted writer. Your power with words and language is a rare gift and you normally wield that power with effective and devastating effect.
You are also a clarion voice for the misunderstood and unheard. Plus you're gay! Considering all of that, I feel as though you, of all people, must understand the power of language to affect or prevent change.
Why not take the Hippocratic oath when it comes to those among us incapable of mounting a coordinated defense - first do no harm.
I don't think anyone can be blamed for not wanting to have intercourse with a woman while she is on her period, aka, BLEEDING from her vagina.
Maybe you missed it, but the guy won't even touch her when she's spotting, which extends her period to ten days. Unless he's an Orthodox Jew, there are only two explanations: he's a pussy or he's looking to get free blowjobs for 1/3 of the month. If he doesn't get over himself, he'll deservedly get his ass dumped.
I read Savage Love because it is (often) an intelligent and witty column. This week it read as a sophomoric exercise of a person's right to say whatever. The column has lost some respectability and moral weight for me. I don't really look forward to reading future columns. I can't say I'm angry, just disappointed.
My point being no one has used the word retarded to describe someone with a mental disability in ages, and retarded has instead come to mean something that is dumb, obnoxious, ect. Language changes.
I for one thought leotarded was hysterical- but that could be because I'm retarded.
Here's an technique I employ whenever I think I might be acting like a selfish douche: I imagine that my partner is telling me the things I am considering saying (or, unfortunately, just said) to him. Try it. If it hurts like hell, it's time to seriously reconsider your proposal.
And On The Outs creeps me out. It would never occur to me to check my husband's browser history, anymore than I would read his email or check his cell phone. The only situations under which I could see myself doing this are A) my husband calls me from work and asks me "Darling, could you go check this for me? I can't remember the URL," something that has NEVER happened, or B) if my husband were the victim of assault or murder, and the cops thought the information necessary to solve the crime.
Snooping is low, and it's death to relationships. Cut it out. If you don't trust your lover, leave. If you can't trust anyone, leave and get therapy. But don't go snooping and then whine about it.
Go to ccleaner.com and check out the free download. I use it on all of my computers, and it's great for assuring basic privacy (because, while it may be embarrassing to leave behind a porn-viewing trail, confidential information like bank access codes and private client information transmitted via the web should always be protected/erased when not needed).
If you download this software, make sure to donate to the very cool guy who offers the freeware (and I have no affiliation with him, if that's an issue).
Instead of 'retarded' and 'retard', how about using 'stupid' and 'idiot', or 'foolish' and 'fool', or any of the myriad of synonyms available in the English language that don't insult people who have to put up with quite enough crap already.
- Name that tune!!!
to make slow; delay the development or progress of (an action, process, etc.); hinder or impede.
Dan, you could use "idiotic" instead. Though people with mental retardation used to be called "idiots" back in the day. That's fallen out of fashion, though, so maybe it would suffice?
Buying a second computer in this climate is not a good solution. I would suggest setting up two different user accounts. All the software would be available to each, but the setting for each person would be different. And they autoload when you log in.
OR, at the very least every recent browser version has a privacy or "porn" mode built in. He should have the sense to tick it when he starts browsing so that none of what he looks at is recorded. Be curtious.
My ex BF and I were equally well suited and after 5 years he broke up with me. He then spent the next 25 years regretting it.
If you really want to create drama in your life, break up with her. You'll miss her more than you can imagine but by the time you get over yourself she'll be off happily engaged to a smarter, more appreciative man.
It makes me think of the 80's with sweat bands around the head and Pink leg warmers!
kelly
Why are you so peevishly holding on to "retard", and so childishly switching to "leotarded"??? I just don't get it - it's offensive, and that includes your thinly-veiled "alternative".
Take my advice - drop both "retarded" and "leotarded", and grow up.
maybe after looking the the browser history you should look at the cookies too,
Hey OTO's BF:
maybe you should check out Mozilla or Opera and delete private data it's simple to do, oh yea, try youporn.com,
tube8.com, redtube.com, all give nice long movies to watch for free,
also youjizz.com, hotbbwsite.com
Twitter is even siller than Facebook for simulated human connection. The interaction is, by its very design, virtually meaningless. Mature people quickly realize the limited value and reserve it for keeping in touch with their kids.
Applications like Twitter are just another crutch for those addicted to constant, simple-minded stimulus.
Reading advice columns might also be considered simple-minded by some, but at least one has to be literate to read Dan's columns -(hopefully also when commenting). They also promote open-mindedness and provide useful information. Things Twitter can hardly claim.
I have been in the situation a couple of times before myself. A lot of single women (or men) will flirt with you and lead you on when you are in a relationship because, well, you are not in a position to do anything about it and they enjoy the casual attention. I think you will find the prospects diminished considerably once you are actually in a position respond to their advances.
I broke up with someone wonderful for this very reason, and once I did all the women who once fawned over me scattered quickly. I still regret it.
Better to evaluate your relationship on its own merits than compare it to a dozen imaginary one. If you have perfectionist tendencies like me, you always imagine other people's lives and relationships to be much better than your own.
Dan, I know you're a computer-leotard and all, but most browsers have an Auto Fill setting that makes any semi-matching websites in the history appear in the address bar as you type.
For example, the girlfriend could go to type "google" in the search bar, and when she typed "go", the website "www.gobs-of-cum.com" would appear if that was in your history.
In other words, she doesn't need to be purposely snooping to have the boyfriend's porn habits put on display. It is possible, however, to disable the "Auto Fill" feature on a browser.
Your advice to Let Me Have It brings to mind 1950s morality. Imagine one of a straight couple coming to realize an irresistable attraction to another of the same sex. One can imagine the charges of self destructive behaviour, of throwing it all away and then some well-meaning advice to do the best with what you've got. But we don't need to use our imaginations, you Dan, you fucking retard, you're doing it right now.
You're treating polyamory like it's some game-playing exercise, a way to fix the boredom. Is this what homosexuality is? Look, homosexuality was until very recently considered a social deviancy, and still in some spheres, considered such, considered an abomination, and yet today, gays marry, they live together in houses, adopt children as a couple, they vote republican... “Why... they're just like us!”
Thing is, polyamorists are not like “us.” They can never be like “us.” You write, “marriage, in theory at least, means that you'll never again experience the heady rush of new love.” How can this be acceptable?
Who are the most vocal and vicious opponents of homosexuality? What are the conservative institutions that need preserving? Church, Family. Why? I'm not going into some conspiracy theory. But as someone who recognized our purely physical existence, not living in the here an now is totally unacceptable. Marriage creates a “love taboo.” Sure, the chances of meeting someone and falling in love are pretty slim. We both know attractive straight single people who can't find that significant other. But if we are open to it, we sometimes do fall in love. It's rare and it's awesome. We live once, but that's no reason to only love once. The “love taboo” is constantly threatened by the slim possibility of falling in love. To avoid this dangerous other love, we avoid closeness, the intimacy out of which love might grow. Falling in love could ruin everything. What? Who wants to live in a world where the only thing worth living for is considered destructive? (probably people who believe another better world is waiting for them.)
Look at the fear-mongering going on around socialism right now. It's bordering on hysteria, very similar to the way gay marriage is considered. Socialism, too, is a threat to the church and the family. The early European socialist knew full well that the institution of family, was imposed on people by the church, and for this reason wanted to do away with both institutions. But if socialism is defined simply as the practices necessary for the full development of the entire human species, then yes the institutions that limit our ability to be fully human need to be abolished.
LMHI is like everyone in western society completely conditioned to behave in acceptable ways, these ways are unfree, but when he opens up the relationship, when his girlfriend stops crying and falls in love with another man, this is when the bonds of love are tested, and if they hold, and from the short letter it looks like they will, he'll be on his way to a totally different world. My advice would be to read and watch A Clockwork Orange together, and to really try to understand that our social conditioning is a very physical thing; that when we cross the socially set lines it hurts physically. The one try thing you said dan, was that she was not ready, and I'd say he isn't either, because once he crosses the line, she'll cross it, and he won't be ready for that. A big hurt is coming, but it'll be worth it.
time to grow up...stop the leotard comments. it takes a lot of energy to keep remebering to say leotard...why don't you just stop? i agree it is mean spirited. Maybe some people who thought you were being juvenile might take your sex column seriously....
because we seriously need a sex column
Having someone in your family (or a friend) who is developmentally challenged does not make you an expert on their lives or give you permission for using the "r" word...just as if you have someone in your family who is gay - does not make you an expert on the gays and give you permission to use it as a put down. Dan back to junior high.
Another solution: IE8 and Firefox 3.5 (due out Real Soon Now) have a "private browsing mode" in which they save no history.
Also, what about doing it in the shower or some other kind of water-related scenario?
And, all that said, your bf sounds like a jerk... I hope he wises up.
The softcup won't stay in!
*yosemite samming*
I'll keep trying, and if I still don't get it to work, I'll take one to my gyno and ask if I'm too small or doing it wrong. Good luck to all the others that try it!
My sister's got downs. I've kicked people like yours ass before for pushing her around.
Have a heart.
Better luck next time, Dan.
And thanks Dan for avoiding Twitter! I'm (probably naively) hoping this trend blows over soon.
If you're using the newest version of firefox, the browser history just starts showing up as you type. If you're using Google chrome, screen shots of frequently visited pages show up.
The solution, I think, is for the guy to use Google Chrome in the Incognito mode which would suit their needs very well. Nothing you do in Incognito mode is logged or saved to your computer.
You continue to ROCK!
I wish there were more guys out there like you.
It would be best if you two split up. She will go on to find someone who appreciates her but the only way to do this if she doesn't give in to all his kinks, IMO. LMHI needs someone that won't give in that easily plus someone who has the confidence to tell him to hit the road if he keeps asking her to do things that don't appeal to her.
LMHI, if you want to keep her, realize that you will find all sex boring with anyone. Most women, including your girlfriend, don't like the creepy, kinky sex. When you get your head around that, you'll appreciate what you have. You'll have kinky sex most likely until you get married. After that, with the possibility of kids, with anyone, the sex will fizzle. So, it's good to choose someone you can live with day in, day out with some good, not so kinky sex. Trust me, you'll think missionary style is the greatest when you don't get much.
But if people complain, and it's really causing people emotional angst, why not "leotarded"? It's got zing, but it's also definitely retarded. It thus takes the piss out of both the original complainer and from Dan himself.
Points to Dan for leotarded.
By the way, there is nothing wrong or limbaughed about people who choose not to have a presence on Twitter, Facebook, or MySpace. No one is required to expose every detail of one's private life every freakin' minute. The government is taking away enough of your privacy--you don't have to voluntarily surrender the shred you have left. (I had a MySpace page for one week, but canceled it when I saw they accepted ads for Palestiniansolidarity.org.)
The thing is that while the term has a sad history of use towards challenged people as targets - the word does not inherently refer to just this group. The basic definition of the term is "limited or delayed in intellectual or emotional development." This can describe anyone or any thing fitting the definition. So, as long as I'm not specifically referring to challenged persons, and not equating any one to challenged persons, and because those people certainly do not refer to themselves as such, then what's the big deal if I use that term?
Let's take it back yo!
I think Prostitutes use a sponge when they have their periods...
TROS asked Dan not to use retarded anymore
He agreed not to and instead used 'Leotarded" which has completely different connotations - exactly the opposite, actually - so it's actually a pretty clever pun. The word has the same phonetic qualities BUT IS IN NO WAY RELATED TO MENTALLY DISABLED PEOPLE.
So wtf is everyone's issue?
So... the GGG girlfriend is just putting out with the good kinky sex until they get married because she wants to keep him? Because most women don't like the "creepy kinky sex". And the fact that she's "giving in" with the sex is the PROBLEM in the relationship?? You are crazy as shit, dude, and I can't speak for your "creepy" kinks but I sure as hell pity whoever you attempt to have relationships with. The very idea that women should "hold out" in order to keep guys interested makes me sick. It's the holdover from the myth that women don't like sex and will be happy when men stop "bothering" them. Yeah, she shouldn't do things she doesn't want to do- like let him sleep around- but there's no sign that she doesn't like sex and/or kinky stuff in general. Shove it up your butt, WC.
/this comment has waaay too many "quotation marks". Sorry.
Also, "leotard"? Really? That's just petty, not to mention willfully avoiding the problem.
1. Some Browsers, like Google Chrome have a special browsing mode that wont store your history or will hide it from other users. OTO's boyfriend should look into that.
2. Instead of the "Instead" cup may I also recommend the "Diva" cup? It is a reusable cup that also sits up inside the vagina against the cervix. But it doesn't create waste! Weee and you save money in the long run. (They run you about 30 bucks initially, but you really only need one.) There is a whole live journal community for cup fans and their users. http://community.livejournal.com/menstru…
Clearing your full browsing history will degrade your user experience -- the browser is there to help you do your thing, and if it can't remember which sites you like to visit and which links you've clicked, it becomes a less useful tool. With the navigation suggestion and search keyword suggestion features in modern browsers, browser history is a lot more visible to users, and embarrassing sites can pop into view without anyone having intentionally snooped.
I happen to be a married hetero woman and I've been reading Savage's column for years. I like his responses so I keep reading. First time I responded online and I'm flamed by you. You've gotten everything wrong about me.
BTW, I've read this column long enough to see that MANY guys complain that their glamorous GGG girlfriends/fiancées becomes a 'frumpy' wife that hates sex.
I've also read recently many guy's comments about a wife that has oral sex and who eats her husband's cum but refused getting a facial. Almost every guy said that a wife eating their husband's cum was rare among wives and he should count himself lucky.
So don't get mad at me. Get mad at guys who want that stuff along with threesomes, anal, getting on with parsnips and rutabagas and expect woman to put up with that all the time just to keep them. I hate that many women would have to do the bait and switch.
I would say good riddance to them if they need all that to keep it up.
The problem is this, cb. You and the other posters that use this lame excuse fail to understand that almost all derogatory terms have more than one meaning (e.g. a "faggot" is a bundle of sticks; "fag" is slang for cigarette). When used in a negative context it can become harmful; at the very least it is degrading, and at its worse, it can lead to violent reactions. Recently two young eleven year old boys (different parts of the country) committed suicide--they could no longer take the homophobic taunting they were getting at school. And though I have only a physical disability, as a child I was bullied by kids that called me "retarded" while kicking my ass. Words can and do hurt, and it is the RESPONSIBILITY OF ANYONE OLD ENOUGH TO KNOW BETTER to set the right example for children. Some of us may be thick skinned, including those of us with physical or mental challenges. But not everyone is.
A relative of mine and his wife just gave birth to a baby born with Down Syndrome. I'd like to believe that they, and their beautiful child can go through life without having to deal with hearing "retard" or "retarded" casually thrown into conversation. They have enough of a challenge as it is.
I take it back on "leotard".
Ummmm....yeah. That doesn't work for me, either.
Like The Lion, I too, have a Leonine (late July) birthday.
But I'm still with you on "twittering", and.....you are a total STUD!
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Savag…
God damn it, it’s not enough that I have what amounts to a life sentence caring for my autistic daughter (whom I love deeply), but now I have to read your wise ass comments about using the word leotard? Fine. I’m going back to using nigger and fag. If you don’t like it just don’t listen to me. Jesus, you’re worse that Rick Santorum, you’re just intolerant of different people.
I hate casting stones at Dan or anyone else. I've used the R-bomb but only describing myself.
I have some strong views and I can see how some are offended. I don't bend easily because it's what I believe as honest. My experience is that guys don't like their women to be 'used' especially guys within their social circle. Seems desperate to me but this is the Internet and much is miscontrued.
My husband is extremely happy with me and he brags to his friends and co-workers about me over what I think are funny anecdotes but what he thinks as strength of character.
What I really don't understand is blaming the people who WANT kink and/or variety for having those desires. Nobody has to do the bait-and-switch. (Particularly since most guys I know are actually quite vanilla.) I don't know if you're familiar with Carolyn Hax, but she's an advice columnist in the Washington Post who preaches the gospel of finding someone who accepts you as you are. I know it can be hard when you're in love, but if there's a basic incompatibility- the "everything's great except.."- then letting go needs to be an option on the table.
So, please tell me why these women aren't responsible for pretending they like and want something they don't, knowing that their intended loves it and wants it on a regular basis?
As for kinky sex, it's not my thing. It appears to me that once one indulges in kinky sex, the sex never goes back to where it was. It just seems to me that a partner keeps pushing the envelope until the other is gets fed up and leaves.
As for accepting others kinks and all, I agree because no-one is perfect and if one wants to be accepted, they need to accept others the way they are. But what I'm saying is that it's not healthy to indulge in every kink you can. A little restraint and moderation won't kill you. It could save your life.
You wouldn't tell someone morbidly obese to eat that entire chocolate cake (or two) that they should keep doing it just because it makes them feel good. Let's face it they aren't starving. But if one says anything, they're going to be shot down.
LMHI, please break up with your girlfriend. She deserves to be with somebody better than a selfish douche like you.
RE: "Leotarded", As a former ballet dancer I am offended and demand you change it to "incognizant".
Definitely they should get separate laptops. Especially with Dell cutting them loose for sub-$500. Your laptop is your most intimate lover, you really shouldn't share it... unless you have an e-cuckold fantasy.
a) retarded
b) fucktarded
c) leotarded
why not replace any of the above with "George W. Bush"?
I think that fits--don't you?
My experience with religion has been very similar and though I am moved by a stirring gospel choir, I don't believe the fairy tales any longer. Thank you for putting these feelings to works better than I could. And warm hugs as you deal with the loss of your mom.
Joe
It didn't cross anyone's mind how offensive the suggestion of the "retard jar" was? If I write a check to the NAACP can I start throwing around nigger (I donated last year) scott free? If I write a check to GLADD can I use gay as a pejorative?
Dan caught this and instead did something equally stupid and ineffective.
Sure, I "got it" too. I still think it was over the line. Consider: when Dan uses "gay" as a perjorative, gay people, by and large, understand that he's being his usual sarcastic, ironic, nothing's-sacred self. They may or may not agree with using that word perjoratively, but they understand that he's not insulting them simply by saying "that's so gay."
The problem, and the difference, with "retarded," or "leotarded," is that mentally impaired individuals may *not* get that. I've talked to several people who *are* honestly, deeply hurt by this column... who no longer trust Dan as a person who views them as having a right to be sexual. Have I tried to explain otherwise to them? Yes. Have they "gotten" it? No. This column was just too heavy-handed for those individuals to accept that this was just "Dan being Dan." They feel they've lost a safe space.
Yeah, I got it too regarding the jar idea. The problem is that Dan shouldn't need to be weaned off his use of the word. He's agreed that he should stop using "retard" and "retarded" the way he does. The answer is simple--just stop. There was no need for him trying to be funny, which has had the effect of egging on those self-centered individuals that still think it's perfectly acceptable to be insensitive and uncaring. No need, except that it's what pays his bills. The more controversy he creates, the more we read and respond. Should he apologize? No. I seriously doubt that it would be sincere. Why? Because if he were interested in apologizing he'd have already posted it in this string.
And about kinky sex issues, if someone tries something, he or she needs to be able to say, "I tried it and I didn't like it and I'm not doing it again." and have that be respected. It seems to me that the problem isn't people with kinks, but people who are disrespectful of their partners' desires, and that the solution isn't to find someone who wants just the same things you do(which hasn't been totally feasible in my experience) but to find someone who cares enough about your feelings to respect your boundaries.
Plus, I'm not advocating for indulging in every sexual idea that crosses your mind. Trying things solely for novelty shouldn't be a constant need, and rutabagas really won't meet your needs, sexually or emotionally. (Oh boy, here come the vegisexuals!) But on the other hand, something that tugs strongly and consistently at you and is enormously gratifying(that isn't immoral) ought to be given consideration. Just like I refuse to marry someone who can't accept that I have my very own zoo, all of whom are treated as well as people, I refuse to marry someone who won't be my houseboy once in a while. That's just part of who I am and what I do.
Man, I feel bad for LMHI's girlfriend. It seems clear to me that he's just getting himself geared up to dump her. Now that I understand where you're coming from, though, I appreciate your advice more; if the problem isn't that he doesn't want to be with her any more but his antsiness for more sexual excitement, then he really would do better to put a lid on it. Losing love isn't worth it.
Where have I been? Would it help cure the 0 -to- psychotic nastiness I experience monthly?
Dan---I really feel for you and the loss of your mother. Please be comforted that you and your family are in my thoughts and prayers. I'm not Catholic, but can relate to your painful loss: my mom passed away last summer after a losing battle with Parkinson's.
God and Goddess bless, and continue to kick ass!!
My husband frequently uses "that's so gay" in a derogatory way and I always correct him. I know it's a bit uptight and pc but I don't think you should use "gay" interchangeably to mean that sucks/is stupid/lame/weak. Hmm, how many more late 90's adjectives can I think of? Anyway, I suppose you have seen this campaign from the Ad Council?
Think Before You Speak - Cashier
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEpBYKOs3…
If you don't understand how 'retarded' can be offensive and perpetuate prejudice against the mentally disabled even when that's not the intent of the person using the term, then you have no understanding of language or culture. Enroll in a psychology or sociolinguistics class, kids, it'll be enlightening.
I was in the same position as the GGG girlfriend, with an almost-perfect relationship and offered an open relationhip to my love, without all the melodramatic crying, because I knew it was a mid-life crisis and he either would grow tired of it or it would become a part of our sex life. However, the foolish boy didn't believe me when I said the thought of him kissing/fucking someone else turned me on rather than made me jealous. He chose to keep lying and seeing people in secret instead of being honest. The ex-husband still regrets letting me get away, so I'm pretty confident that history will repeat itself. I'd rather be happy than right in this instance, though.
take sister's
point. but if i can call people bastards...which i am. Or assholes which i have.Or tell them to go fuck themselves which is on of my favorite hobbies i say i can call someone retarded if they're being really stupid. Not if they're actually mentally challanged. and not if they don't deserve it. only if they're being willfully stupid.
anne the bastard
And really, to everyone here who thinks that their use of the word is ok because you happen to know a disabled person who doesn't mind it... FUCK YOU. There are many physically and mentally handicapped people who have been brutally bullied both by peers and government using the label "retarded". It was not so long ago in our own country that people were locked in institutions in horrifying conditions based on the attitudes surrounding that word.
The history of disabled people has been mostly one of cruelty and ignorance towards people who are just trying to do their best with the life they are given. And if you want to contribute to that, then don't pretend you are justified because you happen to know someone who doesn't mind.
*cough* Sorry about the rant, but attitudes like that make me angry x_X
What do I think of "Leotarted" ? I think it is still racist. It's like what the other reader said, you would not change the N word to "ligger" or call a Jew a "like". It still carries the slur and shows the speaker to be too lazy to open their mind or open a thesaurus.
Print this list for handy use anytime you need an adjective rather than insulting people who were born with a disability. Used in a sentence: Rather than use the adjective "retarded" the reporter helped someone avoid the same mistake again by calling them xxxxxx.
airhead
apathetic
ass
asshole
balky
barbarian
birdbrain
blockhead
bonehead
boob
bozo
brainless
chowderhead
chump
clod
clueless
delusional
dense
dim
dimwit
dingbat
doofus
dope
dork
dull
dullard
dunce
fool
ignoramus
ignorant
imbecile
impenetrable
inflexible
intractable
intransigent
knucklehead
lamebrain
luddite
lug
lummox
meathead
moron
mulish
naive
nincompoop
ninny
nitwit
numbnuts
numbskull
nutbag
oaf
obdurate
oblivious
obstinate
peabrain
pigheaded
schmuck
simpleton
slow
stupid
thick
twit
unimatinative
uninformed
unintelligent
PS: I just used the 2 second keyboard shortcut to open my computer thesaurus. Dan, how hard is that? The shortcuts vary a bit, but in MS WOrd for the mac simply leave the cursor on a word like "stupid" and press and hold Option + Apple then tap the letter: R
Macs with OS 10.4 come free with the amazing Oxford English Dictionary, Look under applications on your hard drive.
If you can't do that you're willingly ignorant, and all of the above.
Y-U-C-K
Please just dump your girlfriend and let her move on. She'll cry for awhile and then in 8 - 10 months she'll thank GOD that she is rid of you.
Go. Please the countless drooling ladies awaiting you. Just let this poor girl get out there and find a real man.
This might not be the right way to post a letter, hope it gets to you. My girlfriend, whom i love with a totality I have never before experianced, occaisionally asks me to choke her while we are having sex. This scares me and it is generally difficult for me in the sense that it sorta feels like an act of violence even though it is not intended this way, it just feels like it. If I can figure out how to do this safely for her, if there is a safe way to do this, I will. If not, it is not likely to leave her disconsolate and unsatisfied so I could opt to not without losing her I think.
If I can please her this way i will, for her, is there a safe way to do this?
Hey OTO, download the new google browser Chrome on your shared computer and set it to incognito. That way it won't save anything in the browser history when you, your boyfriend, dinner party guests, or others cruise the web to indulge their porno preferences.
first off... I didn't realize you DUMPED ME, that's good to know... and secondly "girls were beckoning you"... my oh my... the wondering eye, and the good old term "the grass is always greener..."
to bad you realized to late huh!
I asked one about it. He said he just uses it like other people do, and it's just another word with two meanings. 'Homo' and 'annoying or dumb'. No big deal, and he knows, when people use it perjoratively, they generally aren't trying to associate gay people with being dumb.
Get over it already.
Also, there's no way any given gay person can be homophobic or unknowingly propagate homophobia, oh no, that's completely impossible.
Aside from the general fallacy of anecdotal evidence, there's also a massive dose of heterosexual/ableist privilege going on there. There are tons of mentally disabled and homosexual people who find 'retarded/gay' offensive. They're not WRONG just because there happen to be homosexual and mentally disabled people who don't find those slurs offensive, assuming your inane little anecdotes are even true to begin with. How about you stop telling minorities what they shouldn't be offended by, assholes?
292
While we're talking about offensive terms that are used out of their appropriate context, how about bitch? Or cunt? Or the countless other sexist and degrading names we call not only women, but people we don't like. Both are taken way out of context, and are made to mean something they do not (for example, a bitch is a female dog; consider how stupid it would be to call someone a mare). Many of the insults we use today are words that take on a different meaning in the context of an insult than they do in their original form. And unless you plan on changing all of them, get with it or get over it. We hear many things we don't agree with, and many things we find offensive (which are sometimes, shockingly, not words of insult, and are in fact MUCH more important than this topic). Save your rage for those, and understand that not everyone thinks like you do. Freedom of speech can be unfortunately used, but it's there. And you have the right to be offended. But not to force someone else to be offended because you are, or to change their behaviour just for you.
My point was exactly what I said: people use words for multiple meanings, and intentions aren't always to hurt. Correct them, sure, but as has already been said, if the perjorative use really offends you, and everybody uses it, time for some thicker skin.
Work for change, sure. But 'get over it already'. Sorry I wasn't clear enough the first time 'round.
That shit is so gay.
To whomever can't use it right, don't be shy. The worst thing about them is you have to touch yourself. Yes, you do. You must hook it behind your pubic bone, which means you need to find your pubic bone. Try it when you're not having your period - the cup can be inserted and removed as often as you need to (unlike tampons which can't be removed without hurting until they're sufficiently saturated) so practice. My friends report it taking a couple months to get used to, so they wear pantiliners for the trial period, so to speak. I haven't used anything else in so long, I don't remember my learning curve. I remember being concerned that it would be gross. It is not much messier than tampons only the cup never smells, and it's so much less smelly and gross than pads that I will never willingly go back.
I don't know why they say the cup's not reusable. I use one per period and rinse it out in the shower in the morning. Soap it up a little, rinse and put back in and you're good to go, unless your body reacts negatively to it, and toss at the end of the week. On some heavy days its easier to just throw it out when I have to change it at work one day, so I might use two. Dump it out before sex or the gym and (after a good #2). The date knows its there, but doesn't care.
Regardless of brand, menstrual cups are the best product for periods I have ever used.
Here's the thing...when he says they've been "talking about" marriage and such for a year, who's doing the talking? Very few women will just go and broach this subject, because we all know damn good and well that it'll generally send a man running like a bunny. You wait for him to do the talking...and here's where it gets really incredibly selfish...anyone get the feeling that LMHI is the one who brought up the M word? And is now scared shitless about the marvelous idea he had? And has now led on his girlfriend for over a year about their fabulous future, when he really just plans on dumping her as soon as he can find a reason he can tell everyone they know without sounding like a ginormous douche?
EVERYONE gets bored from time to time, and, knowing there is a last first kiss just makes all other peoples' lips incredibly tempting...but those lips, those other peoples' lips, aren't going to magically be new again all over again every day. Soon, those other lips will be boring, too. And then, after you've run through all the strange lips and are 70 and alone, just where the fuck do you think you'd find new lips to kiss? Who'll hold your hand while you're dying slowly for years? You think some little new pussy you picked up at the bar is going to care for you, accept you, and keep your kinky secrets? Good fucking luck, and good riddance.
LMHI's girlfriend should drop his pussy chasing, game playing, peter pan ass to the curb hardcore.
LMHI's girl:
Go out and find yourself a kinky MAN, and leave the little boy who is playing with you like a novelty toy (just going through his list of kinks to get them all out of the way with the person who loved him enough to indulge him...and maybe enjoyed them, too ;) ) and find someone who adores YOU and not what kinky ideas just popped into his head...you should be his goddess, not his convenience...
Just a thought.





RSS
Comments (305) RSS