Bumbershoot Guide

Ask a Musicologist

Why Is That Gotye Song So Catchy?

Ask a Musicologist

GOTYE He sure is handsome, though.

That song. It is an auditory virus. A sonic(k) sickness. It keeps playing in the mind even when the mind goes into a soundproof chamber and shoves the mind's fingers into the mind's ears and climbs under the mind's covers and tries, tries, to replace it with any other melody that ever existed. This year's viral song is "Somebody That I Used to Know," written and recorded in 2011 in Australia by Belgian Australian singer-songwriter Gotye* (and featuring New Zealand female vocalist Kimbra) and unleashed upon the United States at the dawn of 2012.

To get to the bottom of why this song is so damnably catchy, we contacted an expert in 20th-century music and American music: Larry Starr has been teaching musicology at the University of Washington since 1977. We asked him to listen and dissect. We began our conversation by e-mail, then switched to phone.

Larry Starr: Dear Jen, I am going to disappoint you severely, I fear. If there is anything at all noteworthy about this song from a musical point of view, it certainly escapes me. I found it completely predictable from the first few seconds, and not at all memorable. It's "cute" and "unobjectionable." The melodic, harmonic, rhythmic, and formal aspects are all negligible, and not at all original. The singing is impersonal and utterly undistinguished.

Jen Graves: Dear Larry, no, this is great. Maybe what makes it boring is what makes it interesting for our purposes. Why is it predictable to you?

LS (now by phone): I had a very, very smart student who once said, "If you look at anything long enough, it can become interesting." [Laughs] But I also do not want to be one of these people who just sets myself up as someone who rejects all pop music. Still... okay. It's based on a rhythmic ostinato that repeats over and over.

JG: Ostinato [like the word "obstinate" and in fact taken from the Italian word for "stubborn"] being a repeated pattern underpinning a piece of music, as in Ravel's Bolero.

LS: Right. This one is a flat 7-1, which is the form of blues-related ostinatos all the way back in the history of blues. So it's a cliché. It's the same one as in "Green Onions" by Booker T. & the M.G.s, and the opening of Ray Charles's "What'd I Say," but they use it much more interestingly.

JG: The sample is taken from Luiz Bonfá's 1967 song "Seville" on his record Luiz Bonfá Plays Great Songs. Can you explain what "flat 7-1" means?

LS: It's a flat seventh scale degree, and 1 is the tonic, or the keynote. So if the piece were in C—and I don't have perfect pitch, so I don't know what key it's in [later research reveals D minor]—the emphasis would be from C to B-flat and back up to C.

It's really important to note that there is no connection between what is aesthetically good or critically good and popular, and I mean that literally: If a song is popular, that does not mean it's good, and it does not mean it's bad. I think people who try to make a connection are doing wishful thinking.

JG: So you didn't fall victim to "Somebody That I Used to Know." What are songs you do think are insanely catchy?

LS: "Good Vibrations" by the Beach Boys and "Eleanor Rigby" by the Beatles are two extraordinarily sophisticated songs that happen to be catchy. When I heard the first 10 seconds of this [Gotye] song, I essentially knew what was going to happen and there were no surprises. These other songs have surprises, but the songs stick. In "Eleanor Rigby," it begins in a chord that's not the tonic: E minor is the central chord of the piece, but it starts on C major. There's an intro, then the verses/choruses, then the intro comes back. The most amazing thing is that the intro is sung in counterpoint as a concluding gesture, making the end a culmination rather than just a repetition.

JG: It's true that I can't remember how that Gotye song ends. I have no memory of its ending. In my mind, it goes on and on in the same way forever. You also said Gotye's singing was affectless.

LS: Yes. The singer sings very much the same all the way through except for it gets louder. Affectless singing is very popular these days, and I don't know why.

JG: To me it sounds like Sting. He's kind of throwing his voice but not in a way that's emotional or that suggests he's losing control at all; it's stone-faced. What is that tinkling instrument? Is it just a xylophone?

LS: Yes. Or it has the feeling of a high mallet instrument, like a xylophone. But it could be synthesized.

JG: What about the lyrics? At first, you think, "This poor guy. He's so sad. She just left him. She was so cold." But then when she starts singing, you realize he was a jerk. He was hung up on somebody that he used to know. Whiner!

LS: If you want to hear what somebody else can do with the same material, look at Bob Dylan's "Don't Think Twice, It's All Right."

JG: Thanks for enduring this song, Larry.

LS: I listened to it twice!

JG: You are the best.

*The man's real name is Wouter De Backer. Wikipedia says, "The name 'Gotye'—goatee-yay (!)—is derived from 'Gauthier,' the French equivalent of 'Walter' or 'Wouter.'" All right, then. recommended

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
jamieaaron 1
The song employs a handful of 'hit' song writing techniques:

1) the pitch of the vocals go up substantially in the chorus
2) the drop-out of percussion right before the chorus.
3) the melody of the chorus ends on the root note of the song.
4) the tail of chorus is the title of the song repeated and hammers home that root note.
5) it's super repetitive.

It's also interesting that there is no bridge. And by 'interesting' I mean 'zzzz.'
Posted by jamieaaron on August 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM · Report
2
Or to put it more simply: the core melody is essentially the alphabet song, Baa Baa Black Sheep, Twinkle Twinkle...

The greatest earworm known to Western Civilization!
Posted by Chris B http://eccentric-orbit.org on August 29, 2012 at 12:14 PM · Report
3
Wow. That's just a really lazy analysis of the piece. There is some interesting stuff going on in the piece, but apparently two listens isn't enough for Starr to notice them. Or, apparently, notice that there are two singers. Nice analysis of the lyrics, too -- Bob Dylan has a song about breaking up, so why bother writing another?
Posted by RJL20 on August 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM · Report
4
Professor or not, it's just his opinion. Personally, I hate most modern music but there's some good stuff out there. This song has a great, insanely repetitive childlike xylophone motif(s), meaningful lyrics and an interesting take of giving the woman tell her side of the story. We've all seen people run down other people without hearing the other side and realize how the person they demonize had their side of the story too, in this song we get it. Also, it's great how when the man takes the final word, the woman can still be heard (and in the video, seen) effectively shouting the man down with the harmonies. The prof mentions sixties music and that's what I think is most interesting about this work, you can hear snatches of Simon and Garfunkel, Donovan and to my ears most of all Atlanta Rhythm Sections "Spooky". I don't want to beat a dead horse but if this guy is a music professor he should have learned like the rest of us that a song usually requires more than two listens to appreciate.
Posted by Gerald Jones on August 29, 2012 at 4:38 PM · Report
5
Professor or not, it's just his opinion. Personally, I hate most modern music but there's some good stuff out there. This song has a great, insanely repetitive childlike xylophone motif(s), meaningful lyrics and an interesting take of giving the woman tell her side of the story. We've all seen people run down other people without hearing the other side and realize how the person they demonize had their side of the story too, in this song we get it. Also, it's great how when the man takes the final word, the woman can still be heard (and in the video, seen) effectively shouting the man down with the harmonies. The prof mentions sixties music and that's what I think is most interesting about this work, you can hear snatches of Simon and Garfunkel, Donovan and to my ears most of all Atlanta Rhythm Sections "Spooky". I don't want to beat a dead horse but if this guy is a music professor he should have learned like the rest of us that a song usually requires more than two listens to appreciate.
Posted by Gerald Jones on August 29, 2012 at 4:43 PM · Report
6
You don't need to do a musical breakdown of an earworm to explain why it's an earworm. All the affectless, repetitive, sonically inoffensive elements the musicologist dissed about the song are exactly why it gets stuck in one's head so easily. See "Call Me Maybe" for an extreme example.
Posted by the_spiral on August 30, 2012 at 3:31 PM · Report
7
This was very interesting to read, thank you.

Posted by SaraJean on August 30, 2012 at 6:47 PM · Report
seanmichaelhurley 8
This was a really fun article. That being said, trying to articulate the power of a pop song with a musicologist is like trying to articulate the grandeur of a garden with a cartographer. Pop music is a fundamentally semiotic relationship, a set of social dynamics set to a melody and beat; these things are most keenly viewed through an anthropological prism ( Somebody call Charles!).
Posted by seanmichaelhurley http://seanmichaelhurley.blogspot.com on August 30, 2012 at 7:55 PM · Report
blip 9
There isn't anything special about the music but the production makes it stand out from most other radio-pop songs, even for a mostly acoustic / non-electronic / non-dance kind of pop song (versus Adele, for example, whose songs have instruments and arrangements that are extremely conventional). The verses are boring but it works because they build tension for the 'pay off' of the chorus, and the minimal arrangement allows the textures of the various instruments to stand out. The quirky instruments lend it an old timey vibe that reminds me of a "Peter and the Wolf" film strip from the 50s or 60s we used to watch in elementary school music class. Whatever the reason it grabbed my attention the first time I heard it, even thoguh most top 40 songs breeze right past me.

Also, I don't know about this Bob Dylan song but the he said / she said break up format reminds me of The Human League's "Don't You Want Me" more than anything, which is also a much better pop song.
Posted by blip on August 31, 2012 at 12:27 PM · Report
10
That's interesting, but the analysis is based solely in music theory. This article adds a bit of science--SCIENCE!--to the discussion (different tune, but sonic crack all the same):

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424…

Regardless, "Affectless singing is very popular these days, and I don't know why" is a marvelous sentence.
Posted by California on August 31, 2012 at 1:37 PM · Report
11
Next, could you ask him to analyze why hipsters are so annoying? ;-)
Posted by Timothy http://www.moreperfect.org on August 31, 2012 at 5:22 PM · Report
12
More…

If I hear one more baby boomer prattle on about how great the Beatles and Bob Dylan are…seriously, move on.

This piece is set up to answer the question as though it's a conspiracy. It's not. Gotye simply wrote a song; it's very doubtful that he or anyone could have known it would hit the way it did.

Pop music is interesting for its own reasons. It captures something about the leading edge of culture in a given time. It just is.

I like the song. Am I tired of hearing it? Of course. But, I still like it. And, I completely disagree with the analysis that his singing (or hers) is affectless. Bullshit.

Is it a simple melody? Of course. So what. Less can often mean more. But, it is within that simplicity that a more complex nature can unfold and be surprising. And that, I believe, is the power of the song. The simplicity of the melody betrays a more complex analysis of the end of a relationship than we are used to in pop and love songs.

A time after the heartbreak? Two perspectives? The lingering threads that remain, even after time. This is not a simple heart break song. This is a next-step evolution to the blues.

But, as I alluded in the post above, what I find really annoying is the hipster attempt to dismiss something if it is popular, simply because of its popularity.

We all have a threshold, and this song has certainly hit it. But, don't confuse that with some justification for a hipster "too cool for school" analysis.

:-)
Posted by Timothy http://www.moreperfect.org on August 31, 2012 at 5:36 PM · Report
LEE. 13
@11 & 12

well it looks like you've got it all figured out!
Posted by LEE. on September 1, 2012 at 3:02 PM · Report
14
Wow, I just listened to it 3 times. never heard it before and if I hear it again I probably won't recognize it (except for maybe thinking, there is that song that sounds like Sting). in fact, i did not notice any of the lyrics or even remember the title.
Seriously, why is music so shitty these days? 60's to 90's all had lots of shitty music, but there was a lot that was great too. Adele and one or two Beyonce songs are about the only things that stand out for me, and I don't even like them.
Posted by jussmbdy on September 2, 2012 at 3:57 AM · Report
15
"Affectless singing is very popular these days, and I don't know why"

...would be an interesting observation here if in fact it were relevant to this song. However, in the present context it is rather puzzling, since I find the interpretation in this song far from affectless. Maybe it is cultural - maybe American musicologists cannot detect affect unless it hits them upside the head like a hammer. Bonnie Tyler anyone?
Posted by cockyballsup on September 2, 2012 at 4:48 PM · Report
stoompy 16
I wonder what the ratio of stalkers/death threats with overly played annoyingly catchy songs is? I bet this song is near the top though! $20 and I suck you off if you do the number crunches and prove me wrong!
Posted by stoompy http://www.efukt.com/ on September 3, 2012 at 12:20 AM · Report
17
The same thing happened to Smells Like Teen Spirit: pointy-headed music professors tore it apart. But who cares? You either like it or you don't. There's no point in debating matters of taste. Now I'm going to listen to Lady Gaga's Bad Romance, because it sounds AWESOME.
Posted by meso on September 3, 2012 at 12:07 PM · Report
robwolf 18
The problem is that Gotye is Belgian. Nobody likes the Belgians - not even the Belgians...now a joke:

How do you keep a Belgian busy?

Put him in a round room and say there are chips in the corner. You could also give him a note with "see on the other side" written on both sides.
Posted by robwolf on September 3, 2012 at 1:38 PM · Report
LEE. 19
@15

the popularity of Bonnie Tyler can be summed up in two words: Jim Steinman.
Posted by LEE. on September 3, 2012 at 6:03 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Pullout