Books

Assassinating William Shakespeare

Joyce's Ulysses Is an Act of Terrorism Against the English

Assassinating William Shakespeare

David Lasky

Every year we meet again, Bloomsday, but this time it's different. This time I've figured you out. On June 16, Dublin and the rest of the world celebrate James Joyce's most important work, Ulysses. Lovers of the book will host readings, bar crawls, Irish breakfasts, performances of favorite scenes and songs, the publication of long and short essays, and all manner of "re-Joyce-ing." In Spokane, there is even a run called Bloomsday, though it happens in May. Seven miles long, drawing over 40,000 participants from around the world, and won every year by a different East African, the event got its name, according to its founder Don Kardong, from "the premise of Joyce's novel, which is that ordinary people are involved in unassuming and yet heroic journeys every day of their lives." This is one way to read the novel, as the deification of the diurnal. In Ulysses, ordinary happenings in the age of man (if I may use the language of Giambattista Vico, a thinker who influenced Joyce) are coordinated with adventures from the age of heroes.

Set against the background of Homer's epic, the novel describes a day in the life of Leopold Bloom (a man who sells newspaper ads); his wife, Molly (who is cheating on him); and his figurative son (a young intellectual and reckless alcoholic named Stephen Dedalus). Bloom's character corresponds with Odysseus, Molly with Penelope, and Dedalus with Telemachus. Bloom is a hero in the sense that he is a modern man with modern problems and predilections. He is open-minded, cosmopolitan, a flaneur, and interested in science, progress, art, and good food. Though he has not had sex with his wife in over a decade, he enjoys masturbating in tubs and in public areas. Bloom's journey takes him to a newspaper office, restaurant, museum, bar, and whorehouse. Nothing much really happens.

Another way to read this novel is as a story about Dedalus searching for a father. Or as a story about Bloom searching for his home. But these readings, as with the one by the founder of the run Spokane, are in essence positive. Searching for the father, searching for home, finding mythic meaning in your ordinary life—not only are these the sorts of things you'd find in self-help books, they avoid the destructive and dark side of Ulysses, which happens not at the level of the story but at the level of words, sentences, syntax. It is here that Ulysses reveals what it is really about—a massive attack on an institution that oppressed the Irish for centuries: the English language.

And it is a strange attack indeed. Joyce does not battle English with the weapons of the Irish language, which was in a very weak state at the time the novel was set (the early 20th century), but with English itself. Joyce's extraordinary mastery (if not sorcery) over the colonizer's words mobilized a linguistic assault of unprecedented magnitude over a wide surface of the language's history and styles. There is nothing like this battle in any other book: Each sentence in Ulysses is packed with small or large explosives. Sometimes a sentence explodes into a brilliance of fireworks, other times into a spray of semen and salty water, other times into slime and shit, other times into blood and guts. This destruction radiates from a center, and that center is William Shakespeare, Joyce's ultimate target.

Operation Takedown begins in the first sentence of the book: "Stately, plump Buck Mulligan came from the stairhead, bearing a bowl of lather on which a mirror and a razor lay crossed." That "stairhead" is in the Martello tower, a decommissioned fort the British built in the early part of the 19th century to repress the Irish. Mulligan, a cynical medical student, lives in this fort with Dedalus and Haines, an Englishman who has appropriated the very language his country has decimated, Irish. Joyce has begun his assault in the fortress, behind enemy lines.

The novel makes us aware that when a foreign language dominates a people, when it enters and shapes their thoughts, when being becomes being in English, there is no going back. This is why Dedalus (Joyce's alter ego) is opposed to the Irish literary revival (or Celtic twilight). Not only is it sentimental, but it also devalues the present as inauthentic. For Joyce, all that was left for the Irish was English, the stranger's words, and it is this that must be destroyed, not for the purpose of returning to the past, but to create a space for the emergence of something new.

In the library sequence, early in Ulysses, Dedalus strikes the center of the power of the English language: the Bard of Avon. He attacks not in the way Brutus attacked Caesar, but by shredding Shakespeare's aura, making him a human by prying into the "poet's drinking, the poet's debts." He mocks Shakespeare's sexuality and weak will:

Do you think the writer of Antony and Cleopatra, a passionate pilgrim, had his eyes in the back of his head that he chose the ugliest doxy in all Warwickshire to lie withal? Good: he left her and gained the world of men. But his boywomen are the women of a boy. Their life, thought, speech are lent them by males. He chose badly? He was chosen, it seems to me. If others have their will Ann hath a way. By cock, she was to blame.

Dedalus further refers to Hamlet as the "absentminded beggar" and continues assaulting Shakespeare: "A deathsman of the soul Robert Greene called him... Not for nothing was he a butcher's son wielding the sledded poleaxe and spitting in his palm." Once the aura of power has been removed from Shakespeare, the oppressive structure of his language, English, crumbles into the terrific—and at times terrifying—chaos of Ulysses. Reading the scene in the national library (the moment Dedalus attacks the core of English power) is like the moment when the revolutionaries are on the road to Havana or Salisbury, Rhodesia: destruction all around but the light of hope ahead.

Ulysses's primary project is to break the ruling power of English and transform its energies into its opposite, a liberating power. This project, of course, has little to do with runs, pub-crawling, and all the other joyful festivities that dominate Bloomsday. The "re-Joyce-ers" do not realize they are toasting an attack on English—the very language they are using to celebrate. recommended

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
What seems to be your main thesis, that Ulysses "happens not at the level of the story but at the level of words, sentences, syntax," is wholly unsupported. There is not one example of syntax or diction given.

You do discuss interpretations of the words that describe attitudes of the fictional Dedalus and Haines, but those interpretations are entirely, as you might put it, "at the level of" semantics---and a wholly literal and facile semantics at that. I don't think you've really gotten close enough to the words in order to see them separately from literal interpretation, though your thesis at least acknowledges such a thing is possible.

Additional comments: Do texts have "levels?" Is "dark side" anything more than a folk cliche, and why have you deployed it here? A comma is not a syllogism; "words, sentences, syntax" is not a well supported logical progression.

Grade: D

Your actual abilities do not match your imagined ones. Next time get closer to the text, work within your limits, and if you are confused about the distinction between syntax and semantics please come to office hours.
Posted by YourTA on June 11, 2009 at 10:08 AM · Report
merry 2
Interesting take, Charles... I've never considered Joyce from this perspective. This is a very interesting lens through which to view ALL of his works, culminating in the 'scorched earth' of Finnegan's Wake...

I believe "YourTA" has graded you too harshly here, I myself would give you a B+.

Posted by merry on June 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM · Report
3
"The "re-Joyce-ers" do not realize they are toasting an attack on English—the very language they are using to celebrate."

At last year's Bloomsday in Dublin, ambassadors from all over the world read excerpts from the novel in their own languages. I heard entire episodes in Korean, Spanish, French, Japanese, among others. The ambassador of Finland was read the entirety of Episode 18 in Finnish, barely pausing for breath.

What was interesting was the celebration of translation of Joyce's work. It wasn't about Dublin itself (as most think Ulysses is a love letter to the city), plot was entirely absent, and readers most often did not differentiate between characters in their voices. It was about language, but more about the fluidity of Joyce's use of language.

I've never heard an argument contrary to the one above. Formalist readings of Ulysses are popular, and make much more sense than allegorical ones. However, despite Joyce's disdain for his home country and the English-speaking world, I don't think he used the language as a weapon. He pushed the language forward, not backwards for the purpose of denigrating his predecessors. He thought himself above that. He wouldn't take the time to spit on Shakespeare's grave. I don't see any malice in his experiments.
Posted by tuesday on June 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM · Report
4
I, too, wish you had given more evidence to support your argument. Without it, this piece doesn't amount to much. Which is a shame, because the premise is certainly interesting.
Posted by Anonymouse on June 12, 2009 at 1:35 AM · Report
yourherokate 5
"true literature is the destruction of literature." -maurice blanchot

FUCK, YES, MUDEDE...but i do agree that i'd enjoy a more lengthy dissection. maybe the stranger is not the appropriate place, though?
Posted by yourherokate http://blogs.evergreen.edu/katerr on June 12, 2009 at 11:26 AM · Report
6
A problem with your argument is that Shakespeare could easily to be said to have done the exact same thing three centuries before.

ANY piece of great literature destroys and recreates the language in complex, emergent ways. That's what makes it great: canonicity is not inherent in anything, but follows from the influence of a work on the language, culture, and future writers.

Or are you saying that Joyce is attacking the ideological Shakespeare that existed in his time, not the historical man and writer?

Not a terribly convincing argument either way. I think H. Bloom's argument that Joyce was trying to out-Shakespeare Shakespeare (Joyce's agon with Shakespeare) holds a lot more weight. And it carries back to Joyce's earliest short stories and forward to Wake.

Regardless, happy Bloom Day everyone! Drink a pint and insist Hamlet was his own grandfather.
Posted by Lilting Missive on June 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM · Report
7
Post-mod lit-crit twaddle. Exactly the kind of strained, narrow reading to be expected of the effete critic--and the kind of furrowed-brow, constipated musing that Joyce, a great literary trickster and agitator, predicted would ensue for, as I recall, about 300 years.

I agree with YourTA; 'D'.

I also mostly agree with Lilting Missive: Have twopints and a Happy Bloomsday!
Posted by Paddy Dignam's Priest on June 14, 2009 at 1:00 PM · Report
8
@1 & @7 That POV is why lots o' talented writers never pan out. the academic echo chamber rewards conservative formalities at the deep expense of insightful instincts this this piece definitely has. Their writers figure they're rubes and shuffle off. Only the truly great ones, like Joyce, have the cojones to tell the ivories that their focus on structure is intellectually selfish.
Posted by Montdidier on June 16, 2009 at 6:31 PM · Report
9
Dear Montdidier: Hmmmm??

Posted by Paddy Dignam's Priest on June 16, 2009 at 8:56 PM · Report
FreudianShrimp 10
I have tried and tried to read "Ulysses" but I always end up with my nose in buried in an E.R.Burroughs' "Barsoom" novel. What's with that?

By the way, if one wants to "...use the language of Giambattista Vico...," one should write in eighteenth century Italian.

Posted by FreudianShrimp on June 20, 2009 at 8:38 AM · Report
FreudianShrimp 11
@8 You've exceeded your daily allowed count of adjectives and alliteration. "...conservative formalities at the deep expense of insightful instincts..." Didn't Batman say that?
Posted by FreudianShrimp on June 20, 2009 at 8:46 AM · Report

Add a comment