Film

Birth Story: Ina May Gaskin and the Farm Midwives: Birthing Babies

Birth Story: Ina May Gaskin and the Farm Midwives: Birthing Babies

Watching a birth—whether live or filmed, but let's just say filmed for the purposes of this review—is a watershed moment in life. Birth is the most dramatic of commonplaces. It never happens in sleep, like death. It never loses its power, even if you see birth after birth. This is not to say that it's glorious and mothers are magical angels and life is beautiful amen namaste. Birth is an epically complicated subject, and Birth Story: Ina May Gaskin and the Farm Midwives, a new documentary, mostly does justice to it.

Gaskin is the world's most famous midwife. She was a caravanning hippie who returned to San Francisco to find Altamont rather than the Summer of Love she'd left behind. So the Gaskins and their caravan decided to go to Tennessee and set up a farm commune. The women had already been helping each other deliver their babies on the road. Now they would do it at the Farm, which opened in 1971 and is still going strong, training new midwives and delivering new babies.

Gaskin and her fellow midwives are likable people—the best kind of eccentrics: no-nonsense ones—with none seeming to need the attention of a camera whatsoever. Directors Sara Lamm and Mary Wigmore do a good job interweaving new and historical footage of the founding midwives' halcyon days. There are so many birthing scenes that they lose the ooh-a-naked-lady effect, a great public service in itself. (Idea: Everyone should look at a naked lady doing something powerful and nonsexual five times a day. Then let's see how many women get into Congress.)

Gaskin is nondogmatic but wants two things: to lower the C-section rate, and to spread the word about safe breech delivery. We see a breech delivery, butt-first, in the film.

What we don't see much of are the Farm's struggles and conflicts. Also, the final birthing scene is incredible—the woman gives birth by candlelight, in a tub, with not an iota of assistance from any of the midwives—but I'd hate for it to make women think they're doing something wrong if it doesn't go like this. Gaskin's philosophy is simple: relax. But in the force field of childbirth, that's got to be the hardest thing of all to do. recommended

 

Comments (13) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
13
Most loving thing is to be a mother in the lifetime. Since loving the baby and providing the best to the baby is one of the foremost thing which one can give to the baby by the mother it is thus a foremost requirement for every mother. Caring is the most required thing which one can think for the baby child. Further regular checkups must be done to avoid any surgical problems during these happenings.

http://www.babysteals.com.au/
Posted by DaniRose on March 1, 2013 at 4:51 AM · Report
12
Damn. Sorry about the double-post, was trying to fix a typo.
Posted by portland scribe on February 5, 2013 at 6:41 PM · Report
11
Christ, all the woman said was she'd like to see the rate of C-sections reduced. Isn't that something we should all be behind? They are done far too often by doctors not wanting to miss their golf game and mothers who want to avoid labor or keep their twats snappy (I know one woman, a breast cancer doctor, who insisted on a C-section from the git-go, but she was a control freak). Sometimes they're neccessary, oftentimes not.
Posted by portland scribe on February 5, 2013 at 6:40 PM · Report
10
Christ, all the woman said was she'd like to see the rate of C-sections reduced. Isn't that something we should all be behind? They are done far too often by doctors not wanting to miss their golf game and mothers who want to avoid labor or keep their twats snappy (I know one woman, a breast cancer doctor, who insisted on a C0section from the git-go, but she was a control freak). Sometimes they're neccessary, oftentimes not.
Posted by portland scribe on February 5, 2013 at 6:39 PM · Report
9
@7: by the way -- I looked up your profile, and just wanted to add that as many times as I've read "Masquerade", I think I had even more requests for "Afternoon in Park".
Posted by Eric from Boulder on February 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM · Report
8
@7: I was the first commenter on this thread, and wasn't aware that I WAS in an argument about what women should do with their bodies, until I stopped back in here some days later. I'm guessing, and correct me if I'm getting this wrong, that you've been involved in one or more comment threads that are about exactly that, verbal tussles with vaginaless commenters who wanted to tell you what to do, and you arrived here ready to do battle, assuming this one is just a seamless continuation of those nasty threads.

But since you've called me out: I'll admit that, both times my wife was in labor, I DID feel pretty invested in what happened both to mother and child, and participated in the conversation (not really "argument") of what should happen next, as the labor proceeded. Creepy, no?
Posted by Eric from Boulder on February 2, 2013 at 8:48 PM · Report
k.strezo! 7
Jen, this is a great review, simple and informative. And, nobody's denouncing emergency C-sections. They have their place. But, it is undeniable that their usage and medical intervention has been overused in the U.S., which has ACTUALLY increased the maternal mortality rate.

@2: how many children do you have? Where did you deliver your children ex-hospital, etc.? And, FYI- your stats aren't backed by reality (''Homebirth can be deadly''). The rest of the world and their live birth rates/maternal death rates disagree with you.

Do more research, like stats from the W.H.O., the movie 'The Business of Being Born', 'Pushed', and then you can choose to do whatever you like with your vagina.

And, um, @1: I'm happy that your family was saved by an emergency procedure.
Again, no one's denying that c-secs have a place in medicine. And, you can do whatever you want with your vagina, as well. What? You don't have one? Oh, then here's my next suggestion:PLEASE STAY OUT OF THE CONVERSATION OF WHAT WOMEN ''SHOULD'' DO WITH THEIR BODIES. I'm getting damn tired of guys thinking, for some strange reason, that they have any place in the argument of women and their bodies, including birth, including c-sections.
Posted by k.strezo! http://strezolive.blogspot.com/ on February 2, 2013 at 12:55 PM · Report
Jessica 6
I'm 100% for the rise of midwives if it means that birth is looked at more as a natural process and not a medical emergency. That being said, I am deeply in debt to the nurse-midwives at Swedish in Ballard for bridging the gap between low-interference pregnancy and birth and "GET ME THE FUCKING EPIDURAL" with grace and empathy. The emotional connection to the women who helped me give birth seems to be more common to women who've worked with midwives. I went through the scariest thing possible with trained people I trusted.

That being said, I'm a healthy c-section kid, so is my brother, and so are many of my kid's playmates. I think what's more important is that people stop judging women for how they give birth and be more supportive of pre- and post-natal support programs, both private, public, and in the workplace.
Posted by Jessica on February 1, 2013 at 4:57 PM · Report
dwightmoodyforgetsthings 5
There are many good compromises between the unsupported home birth and the hospital birth experience. My daughter was born at a birth center a block from a hospital with nurse-midwives in attendance. Emergency medical care was very close at hand, but the birth center was a very home-like and comfortable place.
Posted by dwightmoodyforgetsthings http://www.reddit.com/r/spaceclop on February 1, 2013 at 11:09 AM · Report
4
Oops. Here is a link to research, and many peer reviewed articles, on birth outcomes.
http://www.washingtonmidwives.org/for-hc…
Posted by CassieP on January 31, 2013 at 8:56 AM · Report
3
http://www.washingtonmidwives.org/for-hc…

Birth is an inherently risky process. What is interesting is the RISE of the maternal mortality rate in our country in recent decades, along with the increase in medical interventions. Something to think critically about.

Of course medical technology saves lives when needed, and it can be dangerous and risky when over used.
Posted by CassieP on January 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM · Report
2
Please think critically about this topic. Homebirth is dangerous and can be deadly, with a higher rate of death when compared to hospital birth.

Things can go wrong very quickly and appropriate medical care can mean the difference between life and death, or lifelong disability.

Midwives cannot provide that are in a home or "farm" setting. They know this, but continue to promote risky home births because it is their livelihood.

Check out this blog, by a Harvard trained obstetrician, for more on homebirth and midwives: http://www.skepticalob.com/
Posted by Liz in Seattle on January 30, 2013 at 8:00 PM · Report
1
You're right Jen,
It doesn't always go like that. And when it doesn't, a C-section can save two lives. The three people I love most in the world are all around today thanks to C-sections.
Posted by Eric from Boulder on January 30, 2013 at 7:42 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Film