Tools
Remember the British pop group Right Said Fred? In 1991 and 1992, their hit song "I'm Too Sexy" was inescapable. People either loved it or hated it, but it achieved pop-culture trope status because it touched on a widely accepted sentiment: Straight men who present themselves as sex objects are ridiculous.
I thought of it recently while watching a trailer for an upcoming movie called Balls to the Wall. It looks like Revenge of the Nerds meets The Full Monty—a low-paid (and badly groomed) IT nerd wants to give his hot fiancée an expensive wedding, so he becomes a male stripper. With this flimsy plot device, the moviemakers will take every cliché about male strippers, dress the men up in bow ties and thongs, and thrust them onstage to face... blistering contempt. Because if a movie hero wants to appear scantily clad onscreen, he can only retain viewers' respect if he also kills someone. Think about it: almost- naked man with a weapon? Conan. Almost-naked man without one? Borat.
Stranger Personals
It's a less-examined aspect of sexism. In that worldview, women are assigned value based on appearance. We may get a low score or a high one, but we can't opt out. Now, it's sexy to be objectified when you want to be. Performing a stylized female sexiness on chosen occasions is both a gift to a lover and a narcissistic pleasure. Trying to be a sex bomb all the time, however, is tiring, expensive, and hard on anyone's self-esteem. That pressure creates some female resentment of men, because men aren't expected to do the same.
But it's more accurate to say we don't allow them to. A straight guy doesn't have the option of openly presenting himself as a nonviolent sex object without being—at the very least—viciously mocked. But my observations of male sexual fantasies indicate that lots of men wish they could. They would love to raid a Chippendales closet and strut like peacocks before a feminine gaze, but they don't dare. It makes me wonder if there's some psychological projection going on in egregiously sexist men. They won't give themselves permission to act like sex objects, so they're trying to experience it vicariously. It's not an excuse, but it's an idea.
However, it's not just men enforcing these rules. Women can be pretty quick to see a guy theatrically showcasing his sexuality as an offense against good taste or a sexual threat. Or, perhaps, as an implied rebuke to how we perform sexiness? But it doesn't have to be any of those things. Cheering for male strippers in the movies won't magically end sexism as we know it, but sneering at them teaches men that they'd better not try to express their sexuality that way, and that's a shame. I find there's nothing like a taste of the other perspective to raise someone's consciousness. It might ease some of the tension if everyone had the opportunity to experience the mating dance from both sides of the thong.
And I would love to see my bf in something saucy :)
What's more, what few men talking about these aspects are gay.
I have nothing against women or gay men, but while we are on the topic of giving men permission to express our sexualities, how about ...
... in the post-feminist world, giving men permission to have masculine identities?
In modern America, its not just men are not allowed to express our sexualities, its more that we aren't even allowed to have identities accept perhaps as "non-women".
American men are facing some serious problems. We're increasingly headfucked by a toxic culture that has been obsessed with advancing women for 40 years now.
Over here, outside your dungeon-clique and on the streets of Actual America, we routinely encounter (or in some cases, are) straight, non-white American men being comfortably self-objectifying with their deliberate sexiness, and many Americans (outside of the whiteburbs and urban whitecool zones) are perfectly comfortable with those straight, self-sexualizing men, too.
And if you can tear your attention away from North America for a moment, you can even find straight white men of various ethnicities being overtly sexual in public, too.
What really amazes me is the number of guys that don't take proper care of them when they're supposedly so proud of them.
Sexuality as presented by straight males is indeed measurably more muted than what is expected and indeed encouraged in straight females, but taking a look at what straight males consider sexuality, it's clear that a straight male's idea of overt sexuality is more or less a doofus-filled parade of bimbo-acting guys who are taking cues from how women tend to present themselves sexually. Guys wanna see tits and ass (or cock, but that's a different story). In general, immediate sexual gratification for them is more or less the goal. As a psychology student, I should hope that I'm not being a totally misinformed douche in saying that in general, women are a little more subtle about it.
13 has the right idea here. Female strippers exude what is culturally thought of as female sexuality. Straight male strippers exude... well, something like a ridiculous parody of female sexuality, as though acting attractive is a one-size-fits-all set of actions and settings. It isn't. Notice that they do NOT exude what is culturally thought of as masculinity! A woman tends to want to see a guy who is more than just some dumb bimbo, I think a lot of guys are turned on by girls who aren't just dumb bimbos, either. Some might be, but those guys tend to be boorish dorks. So it isn't that straight males aren't allowed to be overtly sexual, it's that they are being mocked for being ridiculous.
It's like laughing at the douchebags on Jersey Shore, though of course, I have more contempt for the Jersey Shore douchebags. But the concepts are interconnected, for men the idea of masculinity and sex appeal are intertwined, a man who does not act properly is going to be laughed at by other men because they don't think he will be able to attract women, and depending on one's definition of what a "man" should act like, that may very well be true.
16
So it's been a 1-2 punch: Previous expressions of masculinity are less and less acceptable, as they are perceived as overbearing and potentially dangerous; and the only other expressions of male sexuality are aimed towards same-sex relationships.
Female expression of sexuality remains the 'gold-standard' of sexual expression in many ways, with many repressed men wanting to wear panties and be perceived as sexually attractive while cross-dressing.
Just my 2 cents.





RSS
Comments (19) RSS