Crosshairs and Consequences
The 2012 Presidential Campaign Officially Begins
Just surveyor's marks.
Tools
An insane young man goes on a shooting rampage. With his legally purchased semiautomatic, he fires a bullet point-blank into the head of a popular young Democratic congresswoman—the wife of an astronaut—and then fires into the crowd surrounding her. His victims include a federal judge and a 9-year-old girl, born on 9/11, who had just been elected to her school's student council. Thanks in part to the quick thinking of a 20-year-old gay Hispanic intern, the congresswoman survives the assassination attempt. The nation's first black president leads the nation in a moment of silence.
No author could get away with putting that sequence of events into a novel or movie; the symbolism is too heavy-handed, the drama too hackneyed. It's too unrealistic for anything but real life. But it really happened: On Saturday, Jared Lee Loughner allegedly shot Arizona congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and 19 others, fatally wounding six, including federal judge John McCarthy Roll and 9-year-old Christina Taylor Green.
Stranger Personals
Also unrealistic: the reactions to the shooting. In an editorial published at 4:00 a.m. on Monday morning, conservative magazine National Review quickly moved to apoliticize the shooter: "Jared Loughner is clearly deranged, his fevered mind drawn to irrational extremes, whether those of Adolf Hitler or Karl Marx." Not our fault, they're saying, and how dare you even try to make it political by implying it was political? By Tuesday morning, "thoughtful" right-wing hack David Brooks was saying in the New York Times that "the evidence before us suggests that Loughner was locked in a world far removed from politics as we normally understand it" and that charges that Loughner's actions were political "were made despite the fact that the link between political rhetoric and actual violence is extremely murky."
But an attempted assassination of a member of the United States House of Representatives is by definition a political act. Though the murder of Judge Roll appears to have been a terrible misfortune—he just happened to be in the shopping center parking lot and wandered over to say hello—the assault on Giffords was premeditated.
Loughner kept a three-year-old form letter from Giffords in a locked safe in his room; he had complained to friends that she didn't live up to his expectations; he didn't find her smart or authentic enough, and she was presumably not willing to listen to his incoherent ideas about currency and mind control. In that safe, he also had documents referring to "my assassination," along with the phrase "I planned ahead" scrawled on an envelope. On some level, Loughner knew the attack was a political choice, even if his twisted ideas didn't align with any reasonable person's idea of a consistent ideology.
Do you know what else is a political act? Sarah Palin publishing a map with Democratic congressional districts in crosshairs. Palin ordering her followers "Don't Retreat, Instead - RELOAD!" on Twitter in March of 2010. Giffords's opponent in the 2010 election, Jesse Kelly, publishing an ad promoting an M16 shooting party at a firing range to "Get on Target for Victory" in order to "remove Gabrielle Giffords from office." One man was arrested after he dropped a gun on the ground at a Giffords rally in 2009; another coward smashed her Tucson office's window on March 21, 2010—the night the health care reform bill was passed.
More political acts: thousands of teabagger signs at rallies across the country in the last two years promoting armed insurrection against Democrats who dared to pass legislation—health care reform—that they had campaigned and won on.
When writing political copy or giving a political speech—or tweeting a political tweet—you are speaking not just to "real Americans" but to crazy Americans. Any elected official who has ever sat through a town hall meeting knows this. Crazy people gravitate toward politics. Politics is the discourse of the people, and it's the one public sphere where all have to be heard, even the nuts. Attend any town hall meeting or call for public comment on even the most mundane public policy issues—a new park, an addition to a children's hospital—and you will see at least one clearly crazy person step up to the microphone to say crazy shit (the barbecues at the new park give off carcinogens that will render the whole neighborhood barren, say, or the children's hospital is funded by the Freemasons). The elected official politely thanks the crazy person for his question and changes the subject. Even brand-new elected officials understand this: Don't confront the crazy. Don't affirm or deny anything they say. Don't feed the crazy. And most importantly, don't be crazy yourself.
And here's why: because when politics goes crazy—when politicians go crazy—the crazies go crazier.
Palin's advisers tried to claim this week that those were "surveyor marks" on her now-infamous map, not crosshairs. But no matter how many aides Palin fires, no matter how furiously she backpedals, this shooting is her legacy. Sarah Palin did not put a gun into Jared Lee Loughner's hands—though Republicans did make sure he could legally purchase a semiautomatic handgun, another political act—but Sarah Palin and her cronies have spent the past two years cranking crazies like Loughner up.
Palin is the monstrous love child of Lee Atwater and Karl Rove, and she long ago crossed the line between hateful rhetoric and incitement to violence. Palin was warned again and again that her violent imagery was getting dangerous, that she was stoking the flames of the fringes with language that insinuated a coup d'état was necessary. Pundits, politicians, and even the intended target of this weekend's attack all tried to warn her. When Palin's crosshairs map debuted in March of 2010, Giffords told MSNBC, "The way that [Palin] has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they've got to realize there are consequences to that action."
When faced with the criticisms of Giffords and many others—way too many to list here—Palin rolled her eyes, shrugged it off, and ratcheted up her violent rhetoric.
If Republicans want to recover from this catastrophe, if they want to make amends for this tragedy, it's going to take more than blame-shifting, responsibility-dodging opinion pieces. They have to do more than merely disassociate themselves from Palin and the violent language Palin has employed to "excite the base"—and crank up the crazies—for the last two years. They have to make Palin a pariah.
The general public is already disassociating from Palin: The day of the shooting, her 2012 stock at Intrade collapsed, predicting an even larger decline in Palin's already-weak showing with moderates and independents. Palin's stock will fall farther should she decide to run for president. Candidate Palin will have to come out of hiding—where the hell is she?—and she will be forced to answer for Loughner outside of the Fox News bubble.
Last weekend was spectacularly bad for Sarah Palin, but it was good for Mitt Romney. (Was that a dig against Palin in Romney's one statement on the incident? It read, "Today's horrifying shooting in Tucson shocks the conscience of decent Americans everywhere." Any mention of "decent Americans" in the wake of the shooting feels directed at Palin.) The Mormon from Massachusetts is practically the only seeming moderate in the Republican Party, and his 2012 campaign, which has been endorsed by party elders like George H. W. Bush, will surely receive a bump when the last few "decent Americans" who support Palin slink away.
While Romney is just as guilty as every other Republican of engaging in the idolatry of Reagan-worship, he's the only one in the current crop who has a chance to woo moderates with his small-government shtick. He's Senator John Kerry to Sarah Palin's Governor Howard Dean—he's "electable," she's "hotheaded." Nobody on earth has ever felt strongly about anything Mitt Romney has ever said, and that might be his greatest strength going into the Republican presidential race after last weekend.
But just because Sarah Palin should go away, that doesn't mean she will go away. And begging for civility out of teabaggers is like trying to convince a treeful of chimpanzees to stop masturbating. In many ways, it's up to the media to stop swooning over everything the extreme right wing says or does—we have to stop helping the people who are cranking up the crazy—which, ultimately, means it's up to all of us to stop needlessly amplifying their hateful, violent rhetoric.
The bloodbath in Tucson opened the 2012 presidential campaign. If we don't find a way to elevate the discourse, it's all downhill from here. ![]()
Is this argument truly just holding together on the assumption that someone, somewhere, sometime will confirm Laughner was influenced by current partisan rhetoric? Or will it be enough to just confirm that he had heard the name Palin or Beck sometime in his life? And don't worry, it won't be difficult to elevate the level of discourse when we're already down here in the deepest fucking bullshit possible.
5
Add mine to the voices objecting to her photo being in the crosshairs. Not funny right now.
7
Even this week, Glenn Beck is saying that the death of Palin would bring down the Republic. Rush Limbaugh is accusing the Democrats of supporting the gunman. I know Fox News doesn't care what happens to the US, but there are millions of decent Americans who do. The death of that little girl feels to me like the death of hope for this country. It's just heartbreaking that Fox will take us over the edge for the sake of profits for the military industrial complex. Freedom of the press is the cornerstone of this country, but here it is meeting up with incitement to violence. Boycotts and whines lile Jon Stewart's are not going to fix this crisis.
The Stranger editorial staff should be ashamed of themselves for putting this in print.
Awesome!
@ cliche: this is a once-a-week magazine.
and you seem to be missing the point. it isn't that anyone can prove he was influenced by palin or anyone else. it's that palin and tea party conservatives are defending their actions and seem unwilling to admit that anything they say or do is their responsibility. the point is that there is always someone listening, and always someone who is going to take it too far and there already has been, whether you include loughner in that or not.
instead of saying "how we framed our message in the past was wrong, so let's start a healthy discourse on politics and the upcoming elections" they have all just simply complained about being attacked, trying to pretend they are victims.
Maybe you should read your own drivel once in awhile.
Or do some research. How about the Democrat Leadership Council that used bullseye targets?
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid…
"The heartland strategy begins by choosing likely targets for Democratic gains"
"Behind enemy lines" ...etc.
Or the multitude of tweets calling for the death of Ms. Palin:
http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/12/dozens…
Or calling for the Republican governor in Florida to be put up against a wall and shot:
http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/belt…
"Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him."
16
"And by that I mean let's put an article about it on the front page of the ultra liberal Stranger. It's not like this won't be linked to the next round of fundraiser requests from Tea Party central, showing how they need to band together to fight against this liberal smear."
18
If you think this piece drags down the discourse, then don't read it and don't comment on it.
If you want the political discourse in this country to be something other than what it is, then pay attention to what you think is appropriate and ignore the rest. That's your choice right there.
As for me, as much as I'm uncomfortable with the politicization, no one has proven that Loughner WASN'T motivated by violent right-wing rhetoric.
And how does Palin in the rifle crosshairs do this? I understand it's supposed to be "ironic", but right-wingers, especially the most crazy ones, do not understand irony. They can only see things in one way: everyone who attacks Palin is directly attacking them and that means it's time for all-out war. You shouldn't claim that it's our responsibility to try to ratchet down their psychoses and then simultaneously try to provoke them into a frothing rage with that pic.
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the…
The left has been advocating (and practicing) political violence for a long, long time. And they're really good at inciting violence, and then pretending they didn't.
Palin's cross-hairs on a map are NOTHING compared to leftist thugs and goons. Lenin didn't get to power by giving out rainbows and unicorns.
Spot on. Great article.
28
This blog post makes the case nicely: http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2…
I'm no fan of Democrats, by the way. I'm disgusted by any political or media figure who acts irresponsibly or dangerously. The focus is all on the Right at the moment because the normally lock-step Republican Party is currently without a strong leader, so the nutcases have grabbed the microphone and there's nobody to put them back in line (which hopefully will be meaningfully resolved by the time they nominate their Prez candidate; it'd be nice to have a return to a moderately intelligent political conversation in this country).
*If there actually is such a thing, of course.
33
As the folks over at Mother Jones (http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/01/…), Politico (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/011…), The Guardian, (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan…), and the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/10/us/10s…) have reported with ample documentation, Loughner's seemingly incoherent ramblings are anything but for members of the far right conspiracy fringe (the very people to whom sister Sarah and the Beckster are cult heroes).
The thoroughly antigovernment Sovereign Citizens ideology (that the government has been seeking to control the minds of the people since the country's founding and have used instruments like the grammar and phraseology of the Constitution, the public education system, the IRS, the Federal Reserve, and the media at large to accomplish it) seems crazy to normal people, but isn't that far off in tone or substance from the whackier things that Beck and Palin say.
That Beck and Palin feed the crazy by, say, recommending that his viewers read the pamphlet of French anarchist would-be revolutionaries to be prepared, or using gun-related images and rhetoric is grossly irresponsible. The false-equivalency with anything that even the crazies on the left in this country have done or said is preposterous. Code pink doesn't threaten revolution and Dennis Kucinich doesn't support "Second Amendment Remedies" to the Republican Ohio legislature's decision to gerrymander him out of his district (though Republican Nevada Senate candidate - running to actually be a Senator... for real, no joke... - told her supporters that's what they should do if they lost).
Sarah Palin knows what she's done is wrong. And so do her supporters. If they didn't know it, why on earth would they backpedal from the gunsight thing in the first place. Those aren't surveyors marks, and if you want to use gunsights to target your political opponents, and you think that's the kind of thing that fosters healthy debate in this democracy, then have the fucking courage of your convictions. If not, then not only do you want to undermine our political discourse and public safety, but you also want to be free from the consequences of your actions. So much for personal responsibility.
If you still disagree with me, ask yourself one question: Why should we hold Jared Loughner to a higher standard than Sarah Palin?
Republicans hoot and holler and yell and scream nothing but hate speech, but the very SECOND somebody calls them on it they say, "Well, this one really obscure guy on your side said this one minor comment once 5 years ago, so YOU'RE THE BAD GUYS NOT US!!!!! HOW DARE YOU QUESTION ANYTHING WE EVER DOOOOO!??!!?!?"
Gimmie a break. There's never been such a clear line drawn between the sane and the crazy in politics, and I hate to break it to you, Rep's, but you're not on the sane side of the line.
39
This is true. I think people are always looking for a fight, but they should be looking for sincere debates. The problem is reasoned, researched debates with logical arguments and rebuttals are not compelling to the masses.
My wish is for the politicians in this nation to slow down and listen to each other's views. And everyone needs to use an inside voice.
41
PS. Stop blanketing all Tea Party supporters with the L cross-hairs, btw. They're not all Aryan Nazis.
I remember the republican's going ape-shit because Clinton lied about the bj from Lewinsky. But they are only much too happy to swallow the lies from Palin. But the one's who are not stupid fall in to lock step with the party talking points because they simply can't admit that what they are supporting is wrong at best and evil to the core.
This picture of Palin that you're publishing is wrong. I really really hope that this isn't the cover of next issue, because you're pushing the boundaries of taste, decency and political speech.
You in the media have the same responsibility that Palin does not to publish stuff like this. It's the same reason people don't tend to publish suicides except in very exceptional circumstances - because people on the edge see it as a message.
You're better than this. I hope.
"And begging for civility out of teabaggers is like trying to convince a treeful of chimpanzees to stop masturbating. "
Two of my favorite lines from this magnificent article.
PALIN, you fucking yeasty used tampon of a person, KEEP TALKING,,, so everyone knows what a fucking EMPTY HEADED cum-dumpster you are.
47
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/IndictSP/p… which calls for the Dept of Justice to indict Palin for incitement to violence. It has over 4,300 signatures.
If they said it, why can't we?
51
52
53
55
57
If you want to be pissed about something, how about a lack of mental health care in our culture. Maybe if being "crazy" was actually a condition we showed some compassion for and not one of the first social services to always be cut, there would be fewer incoherant violant people to be wary of.
That said, show me the direct link between Palin's cross-hairs, I mean survey markers, and this psycho opening fire. They found in his safe letters stating that he was upset because he wasn't being heard when he suggested that grammar and currency needed to be changed.
How is that relevant to the cross-hairs map discussing health care reform?
Then to add that image on the front of this article? It's been mentioned in previous comments, why are we, the left, lowering ourselves to Sarah Palin's level? I just assume be the bigger person in this situation.
62
I'm pretty sure it has already been stated, but the real troubling fact is that all of this violent rhetoric has desensitized us as a nation. Not in the way that folks blame video games and rap music. Rather, while ten years ago, hearing someone discuss killing a member of Congress would be so out of the norm, that any normal person, seeing a crazy make comments to that end, would act.
But it is to the point now where we are so used to hearing violent rhetoric, that it is hard to take anyone seriously when they make comments about actual violence.
And that is just sad.
and yet, I'm reminded of "The World According to Garp", which (like the movie "Network") seems less and less scathing satire and more and more dead-on prophetic.
Irony is lost on lefties, isn't it??
@51 to Descartes: Your ignorance of European history is as boundless as your apparent contempt for American history. Oceans of blood have been spilled in Europe -- past and present. Before you start in with your whining about America and its problems, perhaps you should pass a basic European history class.
67
So, why is the race of the congresswoman's intern relevant? The Stranger wouldn't be race baiting, would they? Not again!
His race is important because it's Arizona and he's Hispanic. Arizona has a law that can reasonably be interpreted to mean if someone looks "illegal" (ie, Hispanic), police are required to stop them and ask for ID. It is actually important in the context of the Arizona political scene.
What does Europe's history of violence (five decades old, mostly) have to do with America's rapid slide towards authoritarianism?
Try 3000+ years. Ever open a book?
http://www.27bslash6.com/
cheers!
74
Now we have a dead 9 year old to look at when we make this shit up and publish it as edgy, hip and post-colonial. Make it up to her and go to lobby Olympia on MLK day.
And just how do you know this 48 hours in exactly? Your vile, repellent article is devoid of any understanding that most likely (note, unlike you a supposed "journalist" I don't speak with absolution and certainty when I don't have it) most likely Lougner is a schizophrenic who has never been treated. Most of the facts that have come out support this.
I really don't give a shit about the fact-free disgusting spew from Palin, Beck and Limabaugh et. al because I expect it from them. But as I've always been a strong supporter of liberal causes, you and your ilk are why I no longer will as I see there isn't much difference in the shameless loose play with reality.
"Do you know what else is a political attack? Sarah Palin...." Yeah, fantastic debate there too asshole. Not much different then when Bush attacked Iraq after 9/11 right? They didn't attack on that day--Hussein was a real bad guy but come on, let's go to war with him! See where I'm coming from? Probably not because you already have figured out what happened. Not much different to me.
"he had complained to friends that she didn't live up to his expectations" that's pretty strong investigative work there. Can't wait for more fine work from you.
And just how do you know this 48 hours in exactly? Your vile, repellent article is devoid of any understanding that most likely (note, unlike you a supposed "journalist" I don't speak with absolution and certainty when I don't have it) most likely Lougner is a schizophrenic who has never been treated. Most of the facts that have come out support this.
I really don't give a shit about the fact-free disgusting spew from Palin, Beck and Limabaugh et. al because I expect it from them. But as I've always been a strong supporter of liberal causes, you and your ilk are why I no longer will as I see there isn't much difference in the shameless loose play with reality.
"Do you know what else is a political attack? Sarah Palin...." Yeah, fantastic debate there too asshole. Not much different then when Bush attacked Iraq after 9/11 right? They didn't attack on that day--Hussein was a real bad guy but come on, let's go to war with him! See where I'm coming from? Probably not because you already have figured out what happened. Not much different to me.
"he had complained to friends that she didn't live up to his expectations" that's pretty strong investigative work there. Can't wait for more fine work from you.
79
To those here in the comments (and elsewhere, I suppose) calling for Sarah Palin's murder, I would ask that they first really think about the repercussions of such an event. We don't want Sarah Palin murdered. Setting aside of course the fact that no decent person should say such and mean it, that would make her a martyr that people could rally behind. The conservatives in this country already venerate Reagan as the president who could do no wrong. Do you want Sarah Palin idolized in much the same way?
No, I think her living to a ripe old age and having to live with having been Sarah Palin is far crueler. When she's telling her great-great grandchildren (and it looks like she may actually live to see them, if the family trend continues), it will be that much sadder, coming from the bitter, wretched husk she will no doubt become. The tragic story of the most mocked and most hated beauty queen/college dropout/politician/hockey mom/pit bull/trend-setter/author/pundit/"reality" TV star/mama grizzly/has-been that you ever heard. And she would be more than happy to share the story with you any time you meet her at the old folks' home. She doesn't get any visitors anymore.
BTW, those are not crosshairs or surveyor's marks. They are badly done symbols of the BMW! Everyone knows that liberals drink chablis and drive beemers...right?
You're a hypocrite and an idiot. The Left has engaged in as much *or more* violent imagery and actual physical violence as the right. Just take a scroll through this page: http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the…
And then repeat what you just said to yourself in a mirror.
"She deserves it." She deserves what? To be shot? Pot to Kettle: You Are Black.
Here's my issue. With both parties I catch shit for having views that aren't in lockstep with the entire platform, ergo I don't consider myself to be either Democrat or Republican. Initially I liked the idea of the Tea Party until it was apparently hijacked by the GOP and subsequently marginalized if not outright derided by the Democratic contingent.
But I digress. The issue here is with a psychopathic murderer. While we are trying to pigeonhole him into the Republican camp maybe we should also say that since hs is a white male, his actions represent the ideals of all white males, Or maybe all twenty year olds, or maybe everyone in Arizona. The fact is he acted apparently alone and of his own volition and *that* is what needs to stand before the court.
Ignorant and clueless is not a great way to run a paper.
Good for me, because I know what a rag it is, but to your readers...a disservice.
I DO NOT like Sarah Palin, Sam-I-Am, but I would neither shoot her nor vote for her (yeah, RIGHT!)
Has the entire universe gone nuts???
R.I.P. Common Sense.
The only thing to add is a shout out to all the gun toating monkeys out there. If packing armor makes the world safer then why didn't you shoot the MFB? Leave your guns at home boy. Don't take your guns to town. :(
97
To use speech which by allegory, metaphor or outright hateful bigoted words on the public media carries with it the responsibility of free speech to not yell "Fire", it's not there to exploit an agenda, the guy wanting to burn the Koran in public is another example of where to draw the line, "cross-hairs" is over the line, except to tyrants and totalitarians ... I have a new campaign slogan for sweetie Sarah: Prison for Paulin!
The Palin pic is inexcusable. Period.
If she was shot today, would you run an apology for it? Maybe the media should take on more responsibility than Sarah.
Maybe that is also how crazies see gun scopes on photos. They may not be intended to incite violence, but if that's how they are defined....
99.9 percent of the world would agree.... those are crosshairs. .01 are surveyors.
BIG GUN = little penis
104
As for the kid who the police thought had a knife in front of the cinemas on 4Th ave the training was run at the kid with the knife and push him as hard as you can into a brick wall?
"no" wait police training means if you see a man with a knife it means walk up close to him and start shouting commands and if he does not comply with demands or "cant" for any reason its good old fashion Seattle Police training that dictates to shoot the individual with in a 4 second time frame?
Spin Doctors are every where these days it seems? Politics are just as gross as the police seem to be the end result of the formula
you felt it important enough to post at two boards calling people you disagree with names ??
also you posted two times about dicks?? really?? and you are proud of your insults?? really???
@ the stranger.. you slip further and further away from sanity. maybe it's time for some old guard to be let go, their agenda is tarnishing a once respected name.
107
Is that a Paul Constant original or is it inspired by something you read elsewhere? Wonderful article - nice balance of seriousness and sarcasm.
You're being trashy and for the first time in my 5 years following you guys, I'm disappointed with you.
Nice false equivalency, it shows you're entirely too dense to understand context.
Really, is it necessary to establish your liberal street cred before stating the obvious?
I don't care about Palin, alright? I don't feel threatened by Palin, OK? I don't see her as having any significance in my life, now or in the future. She's a failed vice presidential candidate, not unlike John Edwards.
Do you really need to hang on her every word, act as though she is some significant figure on the political landscape and all that. Jesus people, relax.
Yet coming to the conclusion that Sarah Palin and the Tea Party have fault and no mention of any fault from the Left?
Face it, far-left Jared attempted to murder the Congressional Representative 3 days after she voted to replace Pelosi.
Facebook page details his favorite book is The Communist Manifesto; his second favorite book was written by the leader of the German Socialist Workers Party.
His Facebook page details that his favorite movie is the anti-capitalist Zelgist the movie.
With lots of evidence he is a hard Progressive and no evidence regarding any right wing interest, you still conclude that Sarah Palin and the Tea Party have ANY fault? Only someone as insane as Jared would publish your story.
One—you need to have a Cover retraction of this story if you hope anyone will ever give any article or review in the Stranger any journalistic credence in the future. That’s right—Cover.
Two—anyone with gatekeeping ability to have prevented this journalistic embarrassment from being published as written needs to be terminated.
Three – using the word Teabagger is the same as using the word Nig@er. No other legitimate publication uses that hate word Nig@er and no non-hate based publication publishes the hate word Teabagger either when used in the political sense.
Your institutional HATRED is showing and every staff member and every advertiser in your publication should be Ashamed. Would your advertisers run in a KKK publication? They may as well.
I remember Obama stating “If they come with a knife, we come with a gun”. He also in a televised speech stated to Hispanics to “Punish your enemy’s”. You might want to look at hate words from the left before pointing fingers at the right when a left wing person commits a crime.
This libelous blame occurred before—remember the Times Square attempted bombing? The media focused on a innocent white guy in a camera frame and immediately laid all blame on the incident the Tea Party. This is the second time you in the media have been wrong in a year.
The intolerant Left actually is their own bad dream.
Brian O’Neill Los Angeles, CA









RSS
Comments (117) RSS