Columns

Dear Science

How Does Instinct Work?

Dear Science,

A termite mound is not a simple thing. In order to thermoregulate their colonies, many species orient them along north-south axes, and the actual architecture fulfills not only the regulation of temperature, but of course, defense against predators, and in some cases, actual agriculture. A single termite queen flies to some location, loses her wings, and then begins pumping out eggs. This is not a case of teaching offspring how to build a mound. This is instinct. So my question is, how the hell is this information encoded in DNA? It seems straightforward to me how proteins are encoded in DNA, and I'm aware that some genes encode instructions for turning other genes on and off, but how do you transmit blueprints for a termite mound?

Programmed To Write This

Robert Provine, professor at the Universityof Maryland, would turn your question back on you, asking you to prove the conscious mind plays a significant role in even complex adult human behavior. The dominant assumption is that the conscious mind, wielding language, is responsible for much of our actions. Forget about the termites: What if most human actions are all a combination of reflexes—preprogrammed (instinct) and learned?

When you're going about your day, try to figure this out for yourself. When you're walking down the street, can you break down your decisions and actions into clear triggers followed by preprogrammed actions? Much of the muscle control involved in walking is contained within reflex arcs that never go much beyond the spinal cord root; the connections between the motor and sensory neurons, stretch and tension sensors and muscle fibers are programmed in the stretches of DNA used in development.

I'll raise your termites with the life of the malaria parasite. This single-celled organism jumps from mosquito to human. Upon entering the body of a human host, it floats around in the blood until it finds the liver. How? By smelling the characteristic proteins made by the liver that are leaching into the blood. A small cue, detectible by a protein, allows a complex behavior—finding the liver among all the organs of the body—to happen.

Science has barely begun to unravel all of the small cues used by various life-forms enacting complex and coordinated behaviors—from trees losing their leaves in the fall and regaining them in the spring to honeybees' collaborative hunt for nectar. This is, in part, why human-caused changes in the environment—like climate change—are so worrisome. We're changing the timing and nature of an incalculable number of cues in rapid order, increasing the risk of breaking down the sorts of coordination that allow a biosphere as complex as the one we enjoy to function.

Automatically Yours,

Science

Science question? Send it to dear science@thestranger.com.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Whut? 'Taint nuthin' 'bout this in the Bible.
Posted by ctmcmull on May 27, 2009 at 1:24 PM · Report
2
Whut? Th'aint nuthin' 'bout this in the Bible. Souns' like a librul homosecularist plot t'me!
Posted by ctmcmull on May 27, 2009 at 1:28 PM · Report
datajunkie 3
I often think about this when people talk about having a digital copy of the human mind. Even if we were be able to translate the entirety of the brain into a digital format, what about our hormones and other complex chemical processes going on? Who would we be without those? Definitely not the same person.
Posted by datajunkie on May 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM · Report
4
You didn`t answer the question! Now I really want to know how termites know how to build their mounds!
Posted by Ridia on May 27, 2009 at 7:44 PM · Report
5
God beams the instructions straight into the hive-mind. See? It's so simple, and a much more satisfactory answer than all that crazy science talk
Posted by ctmcmull on May 27, 2009 at 9:15 PM · Report
6
The answer is, broadly, by stigmergy (look it up on wikipedia). Individual termites respond to (relatively) simple chemical signals from the environment, which are the result of actions of other termites. One termite rolls a ball of mud mixed with pheromones, and the next one who happens to wander by will respond to the pheromone by adding more mud to the existing ball. In a giant system of hundreds and thousands of termites, this gives rise to complex mound structures, or moving "highways", without central coordination. It's the principle of self-organization at work. I'm hugely oversimplifying, but the exact answer would require lots of math.
Posted by gavastik on May 27, 2009 at 10:34 PM · Report
Violet_DaGrinder 7
I tend to think of something like a termite mound as the product of a huge, complicated chemical reaction. The reactants are put in place by genes and geography, and a whole bunch of chain reactions occur, eventually leading to the structure. It all comes down to chemical reactions.
Posted by Violet_DaGrinder http://www.imeem.com/jukeboxmusic51/music/y1malqpG/prince-the-new-power-generation-featuring-eric-leeds-on-f/ on May 28, 2009 at 9:50 AM · Report
8
Terrible answer by Dr. Science. Receptor binding by the malaria parasite for transit to the liver is nothing like the complex social and organizational endeavor of mound building. Don't equate molecular and macro molecular events.
Posted by archaeadoc on June 2, 2009 at 4:40 PM · Report
9
Seriously, this column sucks. Have you ever even taken a college science class?

The actual answer to your question is speculated to be by termites' ability to sense the earth's magnetic field (Jacklyn & Munro (2002) "Evidence for the use of magnetic cues in mound construction by the termite Amitermes meridionalis (Isoptera : Termitinae)".

As for you, Jonothon Golob, do some research. The act of following a chemical gradient to a food source, sex partner, or desirable environment is the oldest, simplest behavior any life form ever carried out. Actual scientists know much more about why trees lose their leaves in the fall and how honeybees coordinate their flight patterns than you let on. Sure, there are some unanswered details about these processes, but just because you don't understand something it doesn't mean that nobody does.
Posted by olaus on June 2, 2009 at 8:45 PM · Report
10
Seriously, this column sucks. Have you ever even taken a college science class?

The actual answer to your question is speculated to be by termites' ability to sense the earth's magnetic field (Jacklyn & Munro (2002) "Evidence for the use of magnetic cues in mound construction by the termite Amitermes meridionalis (Isoptera : Termitinae)".

As for you, Jonothon Golob, do some research. The act of following a chemical gradient to a food source, sex partner, or desirable environment is the oldest, simplest behavior any life form ever carried out. Actual scientists know much more about why trees lose their leaves in the fall and how honeybees coordinate their flight patterns than you let on. Sure, there are some unanswered details about these processes, but just because you don't understand something it doesn't mean that nobody does.
Posted by olaus on June 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM · Report
11
No scientist would ever claim to know why anything happens, olaus. All we can do is describe what happens, and predict future happenings based upon our current observations.

Also, archaeadoc, Golob is trying to make the point that all things we observe on the macro level are the result of things happening at the micro level. In fiendishly complicated ways that some people chose to spend their lives studying. And isn't quorum sensing a more mundane version of complex termite organizations?
Posted by daybaye on June 3, 2009 at 9:20 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Columns