Film

Django Unchained: The World's First Western Blaxploitation Revenge Buddy Comedy!

Django Unchained: The World's First Western Blaxploitation Revenge Buddy Comedy!

DJANGO UNCHAINED A vengeful slave, a gay Foghorn Leghorn.

The world's first western blaxploitation revenge buddy comedy, Django Unchained is one of Quentin Tarantino's best movies—a brutal, hilarious, thrilling, messy bastard of a thing. It's the result of Tarantino gleefully making a balls-out western after years of almost doing so. And it's excellent that he did—the genre hasn't been served this well since Deadwood, No Country for Old Men, and Red Dead Redemption.

"Western" might be the wrong word: Much of Django riffs on the likes of Sergio Leone, but it's set in the South, just before the Civil War. There, dapper German bounty hunter Dr. King Schultz (Christoph Waltz, flaunting what's probably the year's best performance and unquestionably the year's best beard) rattles about in a creaky dentist's wagon that has a giant, wobbling, spring-mounted tooth bolted to its roof. "I kill people and sell their corpses for cash," Schultz explains, pragmatically and charmingly. And so—pragmatically and, somehow, charmingly—Schultz buys Django (Jamie Foxx), a slave who can help him identify his current bounties, the Brittle brothers. ("For the time being," Schultz tells Django, shortly after pouring him his first beer, "I'm going to make this slavery malarkey work to my benefit.") While Schultz plans on setting Django free once the Brittles are dead, he soon finds himself devoted to Django's own quest: rescuing his wife, Broomhilda (Kerry Washington), from Candyland, a notorious plantation owned by the rot-toothed Calvin Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio) and run by Candie's devoted slave, Stephen (Samuel L. Jackson). And so: We get a film that Tarantino boasts is "the most violent western since The Wild Bunch"—even if, by the time Tupac shows up on the soundtrack, Django has become significantly bloodier. (And, as evidenced by Jim Croce's sitcomy "I Got a Name" playing over a montage of Django and Schultz pallin' around on their horses, significantly funnier.)

Like Inglourious Basterds—another film where Tarantino reduced history to pulp, both factually and viscerally—there's a lot to unpack in Django, be it the boiling-down of America's fucked-up past into melodrama or Tarantino's continued indulgence of his second-favorite fetish, after Uma Thurman's feet. (Here, at least, there's more context for the N-word than in Pulp Fiction.) That's for later viewings, though: On first watch, Django is simply a hell of a lot of fun—visceral and clever and operatic, with Foxx's deadpan humor barely hiding his righteous fury as DiCaprio's baby face smiles and smiles and smiles until it splits apart in rage. And that's not even getting into Jackson, or that gunfight, or what is—I'm fairly certain—the only and best scene ever filmed that features the KKK, Don Johnson, and Jonah Hill.

Told you it was a messy bastard of a thing. And it's bloody, and it's mean, and it's great. Good luck finding any other movie this Xmas that's even half as much fun. recommended

 

Comments (4) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
The only thing I'm looking forward to more than Django Unchained is all the (white, conservative) people who are going to be really angry about Django Unchained.
Posted by highverbalfan on December 19, 2012 at 3:28 PM · Report
2
Tired of Tarantino hanging stories on the revenge plot and all his characters talking like mouthpieces for him. He'll never do better than Jackie Brown unless he enlists someone who can craft plot and character like Elmore Leonard again. At least Paul Constant didn't review it, but still a crappy review.
Posted by beatjunkie on December 19, 2012 at 7:29 PM · Report
3
@1 Too late! Spike Lee already beat them to the punch.
Posted by srslydude on December 25, 2012 at 12:42 PM · Report
4
I would really like to hear Charles Mudede's take on this movie. I think this movie did a much better job at showing white people as racist then Lincoln did. Lincoln seemed to whitewash the ugliness of racism, with most of it's racism coming from wordy speeches. It also made white people look like the hero and whitewashed Lincoln's own racism.

Django Unchain showed white racists as the horrifying monstrosity that it was/is.

I saw Lincoln in Seattle in a theater of mostly white people, and there was this self congratulatory vibe in the theater. A feeling of WE DID IT, WE ENDED RACISM! Look at Daniel Day Lewis as wise old Lincoln ending RACISM! Man aren't white people great! Everything's going to be sunshine and roses from here!

I saw Django in a theater in Waterloo Canada, mostly filled with white people, and there was just a feeling of disgust for how the people acted. As a white person, seeing that many white people acting like that just makes you feel sick. But at the same time makes you realize that this is what racism is, this is shit that us white people have done to black people just because of their skin colour. Sure Tarantino doesn't show all the complexities of racism, but at least he shows the ugliness of it and makes his audience confront it head on.

Sorry for the rant, but since Charles thoughts on slog on race relations are always interesting I'd love to hear his take on the movie.
Posted by j2patter on December 30, 2012 at 11:30 PM · Report

Add a comment