Marriage Equality

How to Talk About Marriage Equality

On November 6, Washington has the chance to make history as the first state to uphold same-sex-marriage rights at the ballot box. Besides voting to approve Referendum 74, what can you do to help make this dream a reality? You can read the following pages to get up to speed on the latest political intrigue—the creep who's coming to town to fill the airwaves with anti-gay nonsense, the homos who don't even know this vote is happening, the grandmas who can still be swayed. Most of all, you can start having conversations like the ones we misanthropes at The Stranger have been forcing ourselves into. Drunk conversations, "courageous conversations," conversations about cold, hard cash. This fight can't be won without lots of people talking to ambivalent and undecided voters, so let's go. Starting with a refresher course in...

 

Comments (23) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
When the "changing the definition of marriage" canard comes up, cheerfully ask which one they mean. For example, there are several in the bible alone:

Marriage (noun):
1. A property transaction between a man and a woman's father, involving the sale of the woman for conubial service in exchange for like good (goats, grain, etc.),

2. A spiritual union between one man and one or more female concubines,

3. A tribally enforced relationship between a rapist and a woman, after she is raped.

4. A union between a man, a woman, and her slaves,

5. A union between a brother and sister, if descended directly from Adam and Eve.
Posted by ctmcmull on October 10, 2012 at 1:11 PM · Report
2
Oooh, those are nice definitions! Can you attach bible chapter and verses to that for reference?
Posted by outrider on October 10, 2012 at 1:40 PM · Report
Texas10R 3
"...will somehow lead to second-graders coming home from school with dildos."

Avoid using that phrase in a conversation aimed at persuading ambivalent voters.

Worst sound bite ever.
Posted by Texas10R on October 10, 2012 at 4:30 PM · Report
4
Is this comic out of date?

As of 2008, domestic partner’s benefits and responsibilities include visitation, health care decision-making, and information-access rights.

Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_pa…
Posted by EdWal on October 10, 2012 at 7:50 PM · Report
Ada-L 5
What about the arguments that R. 74 will open up the pathway to arrangements like polygamy? Can we get a comeback/answer to that one?
Posted by Ada-L on October 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM · Report
6
lets talk evolution.

blue-eyed couples have blue-eyed babies.

brown-eyed couples have brown-eyed babies.

black people have black babies.

white people have white babies.

and in between.

gay couples have.. what?

So much for evolutionary adaptation. Sweet christ guys, pick a shittier mutation.

You thought you were natural?

You are a social ill.

Go say hi to Rick and shake his hand, because you're on his side.

Fucking creationists.
Posted by iamafuckingarchon on October 10, 2012 at 10:09 PM · Report
7
polygamy.

what a glorious answer to you pathetic fucks.
Posted by thanksforallthegirls,ifuckinghateoyu on October 10, 2012 at 10:14 PM · Report
8
Science is my anti-faggot.
Posted by godiealone on October 10, 2012 at 10:19 PM · Report
Pridge Wessea 9
@6 - So straight couples only have straight babies?

Um.
Posted by Pridge Wessea on October 11, 2012 at 5:48 AM · Report
10
@6 - Brown-eyed people sometimes have blue-eyed babies, because blue eyes are a recessive trait.
Posted by Belle Starr on October 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM · Report
11
Check out WUM's (Washington United for Marriage) TALKING POINTS. Personal stories are the best way to persuade.
Posted by brittanysteffen on October 11, 2012 at 12:31 PM · Report
icouldliveinhope 12
@4: "Carries more weight." Domestic partners do have hospital visitation rights in a lot of states, including ours, but that hasn't been the most useful in all emergency situations. "I'm his husband" or "I'm her wife" adds a ton more gravity. I'm thinking specifically of the lesbian couple in Nevada, but I'm sure there are others.
Posted by icouldliveinhope on October 11, 2012 at 1:58 PM · Report
13
That actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it

www.UA-Privacy.tk
Posted by tingvoo on October 12, 2012 at 7:23 AM · Report
14
I'm Queer. I don't think that voting for referendum 74 is a very good thing for my community. I'm a Transman that can't wait to marry his girlfriend. You didn't get my opinion want to meet up in a bar and have a cocktail about it?
Posted by Brothers O' Hooligan on October 12, 2012 at 11:47 PM · Report
15
If stupidly ass-backwards Catholic infected countries like Spain and Portugal can have full-fledged legal gay marriage then surely the state of Washington can get its head out of its ass and do the same.
Posted by Bobito el matador on October 13, 2012 at 5:23 AM · Report
16
The cartoon is accurate but illustrates why the campaign is only half honest. Evidence? "Ref 74 only concerns civil marriage, not religious marriage."

An easier and 100% honest approach would be a campaign to add the word, "civil" to every reference to marriage in the RCW thus "civil marriage. "Word" could it in ten minutes, ten buck's worth of a secretary's time.

The unstated purpose of the campaign is to piss (good Bible word - see Strong's) off right wing Christians.
Posted by billwald on October 15, 2012 at 1:55 PM · Report
17
a large lie of the other side is the notion that for 5000 years marrige has been defined as man plus woman. fail. much of the time it has been defined as:

man and many women.
man plus women captured and enslaved.
man rapes woman, then gets right to marry her.
a deal between families, headed by men.
a contract between a man and another man about the latter's 13 year old daughter, plus an assortment of goats and sheep.

an unending bond. till re reformed marriage for no fault divorce so now marriage means either an unending bond or unending parenting plan revisions -- a union of a man, woman, their lawyers, and the judge, and child psch. experts costing all concerned hundreds of thousands of dollars. that's straigh marrriage today.
Posted by marriage is malleable on October 16, 2012 at 9:43 AM · Report
18
A marriage is A blessed union. Normaly A civil union. It is a blessing nothing more! Been that way for 900 hundred years! It was used to protect christians from the haters. So to change the definition to a union is just A hatefull attack against christians.So gay marriage NO that depends on the religion that is giving the blessing!! Civil union YES!! Contract Union NO!If you get married you don't get to chouse witch rules or laws you wish to follow. Your ither married or your not!(kiss)Keep It Simple Stupid!
Posted by oneMALEopinion on October 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM · Report
19
@18 - What the hell are you rambling about? Learn how to speak English properly before you try to make a point.
Posted by Did on October 16, 2012 at 5:30 PM · Report
20
But isn't everything in the cartoon above, and more, answered in this video?.

http://youtu.be/8cQCi4ehXkg

From a public policy perspective, how are same sex relationships different than tennis partners or drinking buddies?
Posted by Jeremy75 on October 17, 2012 at 4:31 PM · Report
21
The argument for “traditional marriage” can be combated by the fact that the purpose and definition of marriage has changed over time and is different across cultures. So to who's "tradition" are they referring? This article by an anthropologist gives a few examples of how the traditions around marriage varies greatly in different communities:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/american-a…

In other cultures, marriage is “often a political and economic arrangement between groups rather than a personal arrangement between individuals.” Even for most of Western history, marriage was a pragmatic matter of business arranged between families.

Here’s more information on the history of marriage: http://zeus4.cms.hu-berlin.de/sexology/A…
Posted by mslainie on October 17, 2012 at 8:49 PM · Report
22

The argument for “traditional marriage” can be combated by the fact that the purpose and definition of marriage has changed over time and is different across cultures. This article by an anthropologist gives a few examples of how the traditions around marriage varies greatly in different communities:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/american-a…

In other cultures, marriage is “often a political and economic arrangement between groups rather than a personal arrangement between individuals.” Even for most of Western history, marriage was a pragmatic matter of business arranged between families.

Here’s more information on the history of marriage: http://zeus4.cms.hu-berlin.de/sexology/A…
Posted by mslainie on October 17, 2012 at 9:02 PM · Report
Gitai 23
A great illustration of the separate and unequal status resides in my wallet right now. In order to ensure my domestic partnership rights are recognized, I have to carry around a card that a hospital could demand to see. No one demands to see a marriage certificate for straight spouses. Marriage means something.
Posted by Gitai on October 17, 2012 at 10:04 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Pullout