Tools
T he community is raising $4,000 so your 13-year-old dog can get surgery and ACUPUNCTURE? I get it, you don't want to let go. I feel bad for your pain, I really do. But what about the elderly animal whose pain you are cruelly extending? Perhaps I'm more angry at the people putting money in the chip-in account. Imagine the amount of poor kids who could be fed, the number of sick people who could be helped. An elderly animal is more important than your fellow man? I'm ashamed of you, Seattleites.
—Anonymous
5
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/743651…
http://debunkatron.com/
Editors: Please chuck this one out and come try a new on.
8
"what's wrong with acupuncture for pets? we're all mammals, with nerve endings, if it works for people why not canines."
The placebo effect doesn't work on babies or animals because they don't have preconceived notions and expectations of an outcome. The adult human animal is far easier to dupe into believing that needles/potions/chakra manipulations/etc. are helpful.
Penn and Teller's widely sucessful show, BULLSHIT! explains--
preview: http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/episodes.do…)
episode:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h_nWeXIV…
9
Think about how much cocaine and liquor you could buy with $4000 instead keeping alive some old dog.
or
The dog would enjoy $4000 worth of cocaine and liquor more than acupuncture and surgery.
10
11
This anon was boring.
p.s. "Pet acupuncture" sounds like a great yuppie scam.
Penn & Teller ARE Bullshit! They (he) substitutes bluster for fact and berates with obscenity anyone who believes otherwise. I used to be a fan, but now I call BULLSHIT on P&T, their act, their politics, and their supposed "fact" filled Bullshit rant.
22
Even if you dislike P&T's politics or entertainment style, the facts remains the same: acupuncture is bullshit. Check out all the science-based and scholarly sources and, for dog's sake, stay away from the acecdotal nonsense.
Carry on.
23
If money weren't an issue for me I honestly can't say what would be 'too much' to pay to keep them alive and (even ostensibly) alleviate their pain.
I don't think I could ask other people to help me with that, though; that would feel wrong to me.
24
25
27
No, an elderly animal is not *more* important than people. But if showing an animal some care is stealing that care from starving orphan children, then why do we even keep pets in the first place? All that money could be spent on some homeless dude, right?
30
31
33
36
I donated to this particular cause, not because the owner asked, but because we as a community saw our friend having a difficult time, and wanted to encourage him and show him love. What I donated to the dog, was a minor portion of what I donate to shelters and other charities per year. It was my money.
Dear Anon. If you spend money on anything other than pure charity and eat nothing but beans and sleep in a tent, then you can start criticizing how the rest of us GIVE money.
1.Animals are peoples kids. Love knows no limits.
2. I personally know the people involved in the situation, they donate to other things as well and most donations were small amounts. The largest donation was from a personal friend.
3. It was a surgery only. NO ACUPUNCTURE! It was a tumor removal only.
4. By the time the money was raised the tumor had grown and was too close to vital nerves and it was no longer able to be removed.
5. The dog is currently ALIVE. The money was used for radiation and quality of life treatments. The dog still acts happy and loves life.
My thoughts; Why would someone kill a love with such joy in its eyes still. If the dog was sick and peeing on its self I would understand. But that is not the case. This animal has fight, why would someone that loved him deny him of help if it was possible. The owner never even knew the money was being raised. His friends and loved ones got the donations starting. This is also a man that is a big deal here in Seattle. He supports large public events here.
Facts are important to be a competence reporter. Please people do your research before publicly stating something.
1.Animals are peoples kids. Love knows no limits.
2. I personally know the people involved in the situation, they donate to other things as well and most donations were small amounts. The largest donation was from a personal friend.
3. It was a surgery only. NO ACUPUNCTURE! It was a tumor removal only.
4. By the time the money was raised the tumor had grown and was too close to vital nerves and it was no longer able to be removed.
5. The dog is currently ALIVE. The money was used for radiation and quality of life treatments. The dog still acts happy and loves life.
My thoughts; Why would someone kill a love with such joy in its eyes still. If the dog was sick and peeing on its self I would understand. But that is not the case. This animal has fight, why would someone that loved him deny him of help if it was possible. The owner never even knew the money was being raised. His friends and loved ones got the donations starting. This is also a man that is a big deal here in Seattle. He supports large public events here.
Facts are important to be a competence reporter. Please people do your research before publicly stating something.
The money raised was DONATED. I personally gave up a couple of lattes to throw in a few bucks, so what? I also donate a couple of bucks to the Ronald McDonald house because I love their mission, I donate my time and energy to raise money for the YMCA, I give money to the homeless and I donate my time to help empower young children.
So what's your point? Because I'm doing my part, are you?
The money raised was DONATED. I personally gave up a couple of lattes to throw in a few bucks, so what? I also donate a couple of bucks to the Ronald McDonald house because I love their mission, I donate my time and energy to raise money for the YMCA, I give money to the homeless and I donate my time to help empower young children.
So what's your point? Because I'm doing my part, are you?










RSS
Comments (44) RSS