News

Mike McGinn Is Running for Reelection

The Mayor Who Has Bucked Conventional Wisdom Before Says He Can Do It Again

Mike McGinn Is Running for Reelection

Kelly O

MAYOR MCGINN Defying political power brokers has defined McGinn’s successful electoral career.

Mayor Mike McGinn was carrying his bicycle helmet when he arrived at our office last week. That image may seem like a caricature of the man who campaigned with the slogan "Mike Bikes," or something out of a Portlandia sketch, but he proudly confirmed with a nod, "I did bike here." He'd ridden from City Hall to discuss his reelection campaign, which he will formally announce this week. As McGinn sees it, he'll ride a raft of successes from his first three years in office—funding transit, helping at-risk students, striking a deal for the Sonics arena, and laying the groundwork for high-speed citywide broadband among them—to victory this November.

But as mayor, McGinn's two-wheeled transport and raw style have often upstaged those substantive accomplishments. His supposed "war on cars" is a favorite theme of the Seattle Times editorial page, which hilariously declared that, thanks to McGinn, "cars are being shoved aside" for a "Motor-Less City." That's ludicrous, of course, but it's typical of the attacks launched from the sore-losing business lobbies and opinion writers who opposed him when he ran in 2009. Still, those criticisms and some of the mayor's ham-fisted antics have contributed to his reputation as a vulnerable political target: His approval rating last year dropped to 33 percent, according to a poll of Seattle residents by SurveyUSA.

Setting down his helmet on our conference table, the 53-year-old mayor began eating two free-range hard-boiled eggs.

Seeing as how cycling has become a wedge issue, I started, is carrying around that helmet a liability for his campaign? He said that most voters don't care how he commutes. "I bike to work most days and ride home when I can."

"I am also in better shape now," he added, popping another egg.

If this makes McGinn sound too folksy to be a typical politician, well, that suits him just fine.

"According to the conventional wisdom, former mayor Greg Nickels couldn't be beat in 2009, because he had all of the endorsements, the institutional support, and the fundraising," said McGinn, who entered the race as a Greenwood neighborhood activist with the lone endorsement of the local Sierra Club and relatively little power to raise money. "The questions they asked about me in 2009 are the same questions they ask about me today."

McGinn won that race despite being outgunned—which he has a knack for doing. In 2008, McGinn ran a campaign to pass a $146 million parks levy, even though Nickels opposed it. In 2007, McGinn resisted the conventional wisdom by defeating a ballot measure that would have made light rail contingent on also building billions of dollars in new roads (which political insiders said was necessary for light rail's success), and instead bet that voters would approve light rail without new highways, and he was proven right the following year. All of this is to say that being dismissed as a marginal outsider—one who lacks connections, money, and political finesse—and defying political power brokers have defined McGinn's electoral career.

A very successful electoral career.

"Mike McGinn is an intelligent, perceptive political player who should not be underestimated," says Dave Freiboth, executive secretary of the ML King County Labor Council, the region's largest consortium of workers, which clashed with McGinn over his opposition to the deep-bore tunnel shortly after he was elected. "That said, the lingering perceptions of the first year or so of this term continue to present challenges in terms of his perceived effectiveness."

But McGinn, an attorney who speaks with a Long Island lilt, doesn't mind the chattering class writing off his chances for reelection this fall. After three years in office that include missteps with the police and caustic relations with other lawmakers, he hopes to ride a groundswell of support from his traditional base of social-justice advocates and cyclists, not to mention sports fans who treasure a recently secured Sonics arena deal, environmentalists hitched to his funding of transit, and scores of regular voters who have attended his 108 town halls since taking office.

And if a handful of yappers at the Seattle Times and wealthy lobbyists bray about him biking to work? Who cares, he shrugs. Those aren't the people who make or break elections—after all, they were wrong last time.

For McGinn to win this time, he must deflect the inevitable character attacks and shift the conversation to his record, essentially challenging his opponents to explain what they would do differently. For example, take one of the politicians lining up to challenge McGinn, Seattle City Council member Tim Burgess. Burgess used a typical refrain when he said McGinn "chose a leadership style that... has alienated a lot of people." State senator Ed Murray and former council member Peter Steinbrueck, other leading contenders in the race, have leveraged similar attacks. The tenor of the campaign is likely to dwell on McGinn as irascible (he once said, "I don't believe we can trust the governor") and treat the city council as if they've been the only adults in the room.

But McGinn noted that plenty of previous mayors aggravated the council and Olympia, and all of those burned bridges can be repaired. "If you want to have a real conversation with us instead of a political one, a posturing one, our door is open. It doesn't matter what your history is with us," he said. "There's a lot of stuff we've done that has not been on the media radar but has come out of sitting down and talking and working with people, and we have made a lot of new friends."

For a few examples of his accomplishments: McGinn led the charge to double the size of the Families and Education Levy that helps at-risk students, which is the sort of accomplishment that resonates with parents. He has laid down dark fiber in several neighborhoods for a citywide broadband network, the sort of infrastructure that supports tech firms. And he's overcome the city council's persistent opposition to new transit (it twice voted to freeze the money for transit planning). Nonetheless, McGinn's latest budget found money for studying a rail line from downtown to Ballard—which means that if Seattle approves light rail in 2016, it will be nearly shovel-ready instead of years away.

And contrary to the perception of the council being the only adults in the room, it's McGinn who set much of the council's agenda the past year (arena, budget, South Lake Union zoning). Plus, as mayor, he's satisfied plenty of other constituencies: labor that McGinn backed in a recent garbage strike, Sonics fans who look like they'll get their team back, Southeast Seattle residents who got a new Rainier Beach community center, and that list goes on. McGinn's leadership style—call it what you will—isn't without victories. And with six candidates thus far, McGinn may need only one-fifth of the vote to get through the primary.

"Sure, he's angered some powerful corporations that would prefer a more roads-only approach, and some in the media have attempted to make his balanced approach to transportation unnecessarily controversial," said Craig Benjamin, policy director of the Cascade Bicycle Club, which endorsed McGinn when he first ran for office. But, he points out, "If no one's getting upset, you're not getting anything done."

It's important to distinguish McGinn's actual failings from the smears against him. And he admitted he has made some mistakes. Coming into office with a pledge to eliminate 200 consultant positions, thereby triggering a revolt among city staff, was "not a thoughtful approach," he conceded.

However, his greatest stumble was handling the Seattle Police Department, which was the subject of a federal lawsuit last year to eliminate a pattern of excessive force and concerning trends of racial bias. Even though The Stranger endorsed McGinn in 2009—enthusiastically—we've criticized his lethargy in implementing meaningful police reform and have said that he blew it by appointing John Diaz as police chief.

"I am holding my police chief accountable not just to achieve reform but to achieve it at the pace and depth that the public expects," the mayor explained. "If we're not making progress, I won't hesitate to choose leadership that does get progress." McGinn personally hammered out some of the deal with the US Department of Justice, and he deserves credit for reducing the cost of that settlement by beating back some onerous proposals from the DOJ.

As for the deep-bore tunnel, which he unsuccessfully fought despite indicating he would leave it alone when he first campaigned, voters ultimately approved it. "That may have hurt me politically," he said, but "the public is who I work for, and they said yes."

Meanwhile, he's fallen short of other expectations, like leaving the Bicycle Master Plan underfunded and failing his campaign promise to put light rail on the ballot by 2011. But for Ben Schiendelman, who runs the advocacy group Seattle Subway, there's no one else speaking to those transportation interests better than the current mayor. "Basically, he's been effective in quiet ways, and he's getting more effective as time goes on," Schiendelman explained. "I think if we want more sidewalks, more bicycle lanes, and more Sound Transit in 2016, rather than 2020 or later, he's the best person to keep us on track." recommended

 

Comments (58) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
tim koch 58
who is the real rob mcken, i mean, mike mcginn:

SPD official leaving reform job; replacement sparred with feds

To fill the position, Mayor Mike McGinn has chosen a former city official who clashed with federal attorneys during negotiations on police reforms.

A retired Seattle police captain hired to help the Police Department comply with federally mandated reforms is leaving the job after less than four months and has been replaced by a former city official who sparred with the Department of Justice (DOJ) over the changes.

Steve Brown, who was recruited by Police Chief John Diaz to serve as compliance coordinator, a key position in the reform effort, gave his notice last week and plans to depart on Feb. 1.

His position has been filled by Bob Scales, who previously served as director of the Government Affairs Section of the Seattle City Attorney’s Office from January 2010 until July. He left to take a job as an attorney at Microsoft.

In the government-affairs position, Scales took a lead role in negotiating an agreement on police reforms with the Justice Department, although he left before the settlement was concluded in late July.

Before his departure, Scales joined with Mayor Mike McGinn and other city officials in strongly challenging the Justice Department’s findings that Seattle officers had engaged in a pattern of excessive force and displayed evidence of biased policing, according to sources familiar with the talks.

http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2…
Posted by tim koch on January 23, 2013 at 8:56 AM · Report
Cascadian Bacon 57
As a bike commuter I say we need to ship his fat, stanky bearded, Constitution trampling ass back to New York. Just because he bikes and eats free range eggs it does not prevent him from being an east coastie authoritarian asshole.

Cascadia for Cascadians!
Posted by Cascadian Bacon on January 15, 2013 at 3:38 PM · Report
56
If you are not White and/or Poor,then you'd e a fool NOT to vote for the mayoral candidate that will be fronted by the Socialist Alternative Party. ---- http://socialistalternative.org
Posted by 5th Columnist on January 14, 2013 at 3:35 PM · Report
55 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy
54
Mike McGinn is a dangerous corporate shill who gives nothing to the city of Seattle other than a plan to build an arena and displace workers.
Posted by Mepriser666 on January 13, 2013 at 11:43 AM · Report
53
Ask him what the Seattle Police needs drones for.
Posted by harold on January 13, 2013 at 8:06 AM · Report
tim koch 52
that was for number 50 up there btw

i don't really want to argue with anyone here that aint no fun. we should all go masturbate or fuck instead. im serious. dan will concur i think. this shit is all written up in tiny boxes and the shit it aint right for our brains anyway. ok.
Posted by tim koch on January 12, 2013 at 3:05 PM · Report
tim koch 51
actually me and mcginn go way way back. as im sure he knows by now.

so f mister g and fu

im friends with the stranger folks too even though they are/were misled by tim keck. i still love them all even if we fight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPYdm5Lhr…

Posted by tim koch on January 12, 2013 at 2:59 PM · Report
50
@11 Most disabled people are more affordably transported through Metro's ACCESS-you know the service FOR disabled people that costs $1.25 and takes them door to door or even hand to hand for people with developmental/mental safety concerns-and the MULTITUDES of non-profits like Mercy transit or Transia and Eastgate Mobility that are equipped to safely handle everyone from wheelchair bound CF patients to those with oxygen tanks to developmentally disabled adults to epileptics. It's FAR more affordable-and if she's low-income she'll get those services for FREE via hopelink-than having a car. It costs less to ride Access than gas alone for many trips(you can go with her as long as "PCA" is on her pass). Like other services Access has unlimited pass options that are very affordable... Freeing up the roads with better buses and rail funds such great options (many people can't just cut work to escort family around and who's to say you'll always be able to babysit-why not enable her to be her own advocate while you support her when it's TRULY necessary-a taxi for the ER-ambulance for urgent emergencies-is FAR less costly than insuring&maintaining a car on standby-either you're uneducated and a terrible advocate as a result or you WANT a car and are too high-society to care for the environment)& lets those services get people to their destinations faster--not to mention how much safer you are in a bus/train than behind the wheel... Add the perk of reading a few books every week and the better investment is CLEAR.

As for the rest of the comments here, would Mister G and tim koch please stfu or consolidate their pointless ranty posts, or are they Times shills desperate to argue their lifeless lives away? Find a way to be of use or gtfo.
Posted by Y'all forgot a$Shat Mayor Maynotdoadamnedthing Nickels? on January 12, 2013 at 12:12 PM · Report
49
My favorite line:

"effective in quiet ways."

I recommend it for his campaign slogan. We need a little more humor in our local politics! I may have to buy some bumper stickers for Mike: "effective in quiet ways---so quiet you can't hear him when he is!"
Posted by howie in seattle on January 12, 2013 at 9:34 AM · Report
48
How anyone can talk about Seattle having a "war on cars" when BILLIONS are being spent on a new freeway tunnel and we're about to TRIPLE the amount of the Arboretum which is taken up by 520 is beyond me.

I cannot think of any other US city which is presently so willing to sacrifice so much of its livability on the altar of automobility. Even Houston and Oklahoma City have stopped tearing up urban parks for freeways.
Posted by Dendroc on January 12, 2013 at 8:08 AM · Report
47
If McGinn wants to get re-elected he need only do one thing between now and the election: fire John Diaz and go back and hire that Sacramento chief of police. Yeah, we're going to take your chief of police too.

Also, I like the "handful of yappers at the Seattle Times ... bray" reference in the article. Bray - a reference to none other than the incessantly critical and incessantly mediocre Joni Balter.
Posted by MacGruber on January 11, 2013 at 7:53 PM · Report
46
I'm moving to Shoreline or Bellingham. I'd rather have their schools instead of the handwringing parents hastily reacting to nasty incompetency of Seattle Schools (lack of capacity in NE Seattle), and a mayor who thought making a 1.5 block "road diet" on an arterial was a good idea.
Posted by beady-eyed troll w/a bike helmet on January 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM · Report
tim koch 45
see,

the way to tell if the stranger staff is lying about any of this mess is to ask any of them if any of it is true at all. they will all say no, none of it is true at all.

thats how you can tell when someone is lying to your face. %100 zero liability

fuck roll out some fucking car insurance ads man.
Posted by tim koch on January 11, 2013 at 2:18 PM · Report
44
#37, it's not about bicycles. That's a sop to the hipsters, done for the usual Seattle "progressive" reason: appearances. The real action is with the real estate developers. The Stranger, and McGinn, and the city council, are in their hip pocket.

"It's the corruption, stupid."
Posted by Mister G on January 11, 2013 at 12:53 PM · Report
43
Please take his ugly mug off the cover page!!!
Posted by menolikey on January 11, 2013 at 12:34 PM · Report
42
I think anyone who runs for any elected office will have to accept the possibility of needing 24 hour security and surveillance by the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security... Basically ---- protection from gunfire or car bombings... That's not a threat from me ---- just my prediction of the future.

However, I wouldn't want any of the above agencies watching over me if they are carrying weapons (if you catch my drift). You think this is some paranoid fantasy? Watch the future unfold and behold the dissent into 3rd world status. If anything, this would make a great novel or movie?
Posted by Pluto in Capricorn on January 11, 2013 at 12:06 PM · Report
41
I supported McGinn because he was the only one in the race who opposed the Alaskan Way tunneling plan.

Whether he could have stopped the tunneling I don't know. But he sure could have fought a helluva lot harder.

Now he's sold out his citizens to the private interests. Building a stadium with tax dollars to support a bunch of billionaires is just one example of that.

To top it off, the City Council thinks he's a joke.

Oh sure, I live in Shoreline this election cycle. But if I were a Seattleite, I wouldn't give McGinn more than two seconds of thought.
Posted by David in Shoreline on January 11, 2013 at 11:41 AM · Report
40
Ha, What a joke. Mike is such a career politician that knows his audience and how to fool those with the pocketbooks (including himself). Its time for fresher blood to be in charge.
Posted by Reallynao on January 11, 2013 at 11:02 AM · Report
tim koch 39
tim keck is the seattle cops. thats how they stay ahead of the rest of you all.

keck's been working with these right wing national chamber of commerce people since the beginning of the stranger, back in the late 80's. it goes all the way back to wisconsin.

dom,

"the role is vital.." = why mike mcginn always acts drunk

its all an act.

slog knew the washington restaurant association was a koch front back in june, and they still won't report on. they chose to run rob mckenna ads instead. doms rolling around with more bicycle shit today. rock on dude. ill post some baking videos later on line out.
Posted by tim koch on January 11, 2013 at 10:40 AM · Report
38
KILL IT WITH FIRE! "I am ineffectual. I cannot do anything about a cop murdering someone, but I can make you stop using plastic bags...vote for me again!" Won't do fuck-all about a chief of police that thinks the citizens he works for are shit under his shoe, or the 'spokesperson' that obfuscates to cover up their own crimes, but gosh darn, we'll do something about potential litter based on bullshit. FUCK YOU, MCGINN!!!! FUCK YOU IN THE ASS WITH A FUCKING CACTUS!
Posted by cattycat on January 11, 2013 at 9:35 AM · Report
37
Stranger getting as bad as Times - what is this McGinn lovefest based on?- bicycling- really? -- maybe should have brought a bit more scrutiny to his record - like not burying the Seattle PD fiasco - he showed complete lack of leadership- and wasted everybody's time with tunnel debate already decided--but damn, he's good on bicycling- hot damn--- Stranger needs to do better.
Posted by zippy0 on January 10, 2013 at 8:06 PM · Report
tim koch 36
actually many of seattle's restaurants are owned by right wing weirdos that hate things like washington's minimum wage laws and health care laws. thats why they backed rob mckenna.

mike mcginn knows the washington restaurant association is just a front for koch and alec, but he helps them out anyway, he goes way way back personally with some of them.

they all work in step with the cops too. you people are getting played.

http://warestaurant.org/

Posted by tim koch on January 10, 2013 at 6:23 PM · Report
tim koch 35
look,

mcginn just sucks and dominic knows it. he is just being misled by his right wing owner boss guy and the right wing bar owners and cops. look it all up.

did keck give c that raise yet?

fuck that cheap motherfucker..
Posted by tim koch on January 10, 2013 at 5:54 PM · Report
34
For all my misgivings about McGinn, my misgivings about Burgess are just as great and my misgivings about Murray greater still. I'm open to voting for any of these guys, but someone's going to have to close the sale with me with a strong campaign and a progressive, forward-looking platform that has some specifics.

Top issues on my list, off the top of my head:
1. Positioning Seattle to make the most of Sound Transit 3. See Seattle Subway. Plus smaller transit infrastructure improvements.
2. Getting the best deal possible for Seattle out of the deep-bore tunnel project.
3. Continuing to attract business and development without writing a blank check.
Posted by cressona on January 10, 2013 at 2:58 PM · Report
pinksoda 33
@ 30 - Exactly! I just had this same conversation with a woman from my neighborhood when I was advocating for developers to have to provide a transportation plan for their developments, as opposed to the knee jerk 1:1 parking spot built on-site. She looked at me very coldly and sniffed that she "had" to drive her car because she wasn't going to take the bus after dark. I said, "Great, but if this frees up other people from being on the road in their cars with you, isn't that a good thing?"

Critical thinking skills are on the decline.
Posted by pinksoda on January 10, 2013 at 2:31 PM · Report
32
Yeah, fuck that politician that entertains corporate interests! Let's replace him with another politician that entertains corporate interests!

And please, tell me more about how much you hate corporations via this website run by an LLC! Or let's do it over a drink made by a corporation at a bar or restaurant run by a corporation; maybe one that serves food produced by folks who have incorporated!
Posted by madcap on January 10, 2013 at 2:30 PM · Report
Cato the Younger Younger 31
McGinn will be lucky to make it out of the primaries.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on January 10, 2013 at 12:16 PM · Report
30
#11--did you ever consider that maybe walking,biking,alternative transit improvements would get more people out of their cars so that you, someone that really needs to use a car, are not sitting in traffic with them? Might sound naive, but it got me out of my car. Get rid of the bike lanes and I'll be in my car right in front of you on Dexter. And BTW I'm a TERRIBLE and slow driver like everyone else in Seattle.
Posted by fish04 on January 10, 2013 at 9:06 AM · Report
29
No more McGinn.
Posted by seven on January 10, 2013 at 8:04 AM · Report
Matthew 'Anc' Johnson 28
McGinn definitely started off stumbling, but he has grown into the role.

I think a big issue is going to be how well The Powers That Be can keep the complete and utter fiasco that is the deep bore tunnel under wraps.

Who in the media is talking about how pretty much everything the Mayor said would happen: tolling will be SIGNIFICANTLY less than expected, already slashed from $400 million to $200 million; diversion rates are SIGNIFICANTLY higher, the legislature doesn't look to be in the mood to take Seattle off the hook (see our friends over in Bellevue putting 'retain cost overruns provision' in the legislative agenda for their delegation)...

Is the big money powerful enough, does the Seattle Times hate him enough that they squash all this until after the election?
Posted by Matthew 'Anc' Johnson on January 9, 2013 at 11:20 PM · Report
27
McGinn blew it big time with the US Justice Department. Maybe it's because he hasn't been here for 60 years watching what I've seen here, or maybe he doesn't have locally savvy advisers, but DUDE...I've watched the the cops in this city for most of my years and I've gotta tell ya' the sort of attitudinal dysfunction represented by the appalling Rich O'neill is par for the course around here, and has been forever. The US Department of Justice has offered its considerable expertise and resources for a wholesale reformation of our police. Murdering poor drunken whittlers and crippling a man for acting afraid when aggressive black-clad thugs chase him is not OK and we need help to make this work better.
Instead, McGinn proceeded to circle the wagons, make nice with the likes of rich oneill, and get all popinjay and miro-managey with Justice.
NO
Dude, call a huge confab for everybody who has anything to say about the police, and say: "After decades of abuse, criminality, and fraud, Justice is finally coming to town. All of you will be heard as we do this hard work and we will all do everything we can to help the federal government fix our broken police. We are lucky to have their talent and expertise at our disposal. Then really get to work on the changes we need.
Posted by Songbird on January 9, 2013 at 10:06 PM · Report
tim koch 26
and fucking dominic here.

dude, how the fuck does some dude off the street talk to you yesterday (or cienna) about the corruption behind megan's new sodo arena coming here, and then calls you all out, and then less than 12 hours later seattle gets a new basketball team?

"its because the role is vital.."

"The whole world is getting in the game..."

reference:

http://www.uschamber.com/ads/congress-do…
Posted by tim koch on January 9, 2013 at 9:35 PM · Report
25
Gee, #23, you've just illustrated why I put "progressive" in quotes.
Posted by Mister G on January 9, 2013 at 9:18 PM · Report
24
I live how Sloggers think McGinn will lose because he isn't left wing enough.
Posted by The Establishment on January 9, 2013 at 8:22 PM · Report
tim koch 23
tim keck, dan savage, and the stranger staff are a front for the right-wing national chamber of commerce don't believe anything these people tell you. they are deliberately lying to you all.

keck, mcginn, and the right-wing bar and restaurant owners have this weird national chamber of commerce deal going on from way way back.

the stranger staff is just covering it all up to not look so bad.

mike mcginn is not a progressive, its all just a carefully crafted act. vote for anyone else but that guy (except for burgess, f that guy too)

reference:

http://seattletimes.com/html/pacificnw/2…
Posted by tim koch on January 9, 2013 at 7:08 PM · Report
22
I actually think McGinn has a decent chance of re-election.

For starters, he'll have boatloads of cash from all the corporate interests: the developers and their toadies, Chris Hansen, the various "progressive" yuppies.

Secondly, about one-third of the people who vote in a presidential year won't bother to vote in the mayoral race. In Seattle, this hands a lot of power over to the various "progressive" interest groups.

Thirdly, while McGinn has pissed off people in every neighborhood, he'll definitely get the support of the sports fans. In the end, they'll at least get him through the primary.

In the general election, the corporate cash will be king, and McGinn will get the vast majority of it. There's no bribe a Seattle "progressive" won't solicit, take, or spend.
Posted by Mister G on January 9, 2013 at 6:20 PM · Report
21
20 comments; 1 positive? During the 2009 campaign, McGinn owned the comment threads. They need a strategy to shift that sentiment or he won't make it through the primary.
Posted by Inside-Out on January 9, 2013 at 5:42 PM · Report
Enigma 20
I worked on the McGinn campaign, I helped out at all but 2 of the city wide Town Hall events. Victory night was a great night and I couldn't have been prouder of the team.
I won't even be voting for McGinn this time because of his handling of the SPD. Chief Diaz is a joke and as long as he retains his position I have no faith McGinn will do anything of substance to change the SPD.
Posted by Enigma http://washingtonunitedformarriage.org/ on January 9, 2013 at 5:11 PM · Report
Westlake, son! 19
Yo Mike, what are you going to do about the SPD thug force?
Posted by Westlake, son! on January 9, 2013 at 4:00 PM · Report
18
#17, gridlock is McGinn's goal and strategy. He and his "transit" and "urbanist" "progressives" are pursuing gridlock. It's all part of their war on cars that the Stranger laughs at -- and endorses.
Posted by Mister G on January 9, 2013 at 3:58 PM · Report
17
Terrible transportation policies have led to more gridlock and he's an apologist for the SPD.
Posted by JohnDoe1234 on January 9, 2013 at 3:40 PM · Report
TheMisanthrope 16
Fuck McGinn. Can we get somebody who doesn't suck the cock of corporations and the police department?
Posted by TheMisanthrope on January 9, 2013 at 3:24 PM · Report
15
#13, maybe if we'd get someone other than the usual corrupt, downtown clown "progressive" developer whore that Seattle usually winds up with, there'd be a little more kumbaya in the air.
Posted by Mister G on January 9, 2013 at 3:18 PM · Report
14
Holy smokes! Thanks for running a glowing campaign advertisement for McGinn. This is the best spin I have ever heard on what every other person I have talked to decribes as a majorly failed adminstration.
Posted by #SeattleFail on January 9, 2013 at 3:08 PM · Report
SPG 13
Keep in mind that the most vitriolic haters of McGinn are the same ones who spewed furious hatred at Nickels, Schell, Rice, and will automatically hate whoever comes next.
Posted by SPG on January 9, 2013 at 2:57 PM · Report
12
#11, you should take your disabled sister and dump her off the Ballard bridge in the middle of the night. The "progressives" of Seattle will thank you for eliminating a useless eater. And if you can find any old people who've been in the same house for 40 or 50 years, please burn them out. The "urbanists" will gladly provide the torches.
Posted by Mister G on January 9, 2013 at 2:25 PM · Report
11
My family has 1 car. I typically walk or take the bus. However, I do drive my disabled sister to her doctor appointments. I guess I should get her to walk or ride a bike even though she is disabled? Traffic has gotten way worse since this clown got into office. I am fairly confident he will be voted out, he has an extremely low approval rating in Seattle.
Posted by ritzidean on January 9, 2013 at 2:18 PM · Report
10
We need someone who advocates for cyclists and pedestrians who doesn't come off as a clown and can perhaps make some true progress. He's fallen far short of my expectations.
Posted by ian on January 9, 2013 at 2:02 PM · Report
9
@ #3 don't like sitting in traffic? don't drive a car.
Posted by good shit on January 9, 2013 at 1:53 PM · Report
8
"Coming into office with a pledge to eliminate 200 consultant positions, thereby triggering a revolt among city staff, was "not a thoughtful approach," he conceded."

He pledged to eliminate 200 STAFF positions (not consultants), without having a clue what services those staff provided, and based only on their job titles. They were in fact managers and professionals, most of whom had years of experience and institutional knowledge. A "revolt among city staff" is quite the understatement. I believe he will have a hard time winning any loyalty from most city staff.

Posted by crone on January 9, 2013 at 1:53 PM · Report
7
@3 - Ive been waiting in Seattle traffic for fucking ever... don't think that's his fault.
Posted by Don Jeebus on January 9, 2013 at 1:52 PM · Report
6
Example of savy: Sonics, gun buy backs and re-election announcement in the Stranger that wasn't leaked.

A damn fine choreography.
Posted by Man in the Yellow Hat on January 9, 2013 at 1:45 PM · Report
ralph 5
I'm glad Mike is running so we can formally vote the clown out of office. If he had been smart enough to say he had decided to go do something noble in a far off land, and hence was stepping down, he would have possibly been able to leave with some plausible deniability. Not now.
Posted by ralph on January 9, 2013 at 1:40 PM · Report
4
I generally think Mike is OK. He has grown on the job. But I can't quite get over his handling of the police, which wasn't a primary issue of mine until I started watching with increasing horror from John T. Williams on.

I'll need a different candidate to vote for.
Posted by gator bait on January 9, 2013 at 1:40 PM · Report
3
vote for Mike McGinn if you enjoy sitting in traffic. If it was up to him, no one would be allowed to drive. Just look at the mess his bicycle lanes have created on Dexter Avenue and in Ballard. That and his tolerance for police brutality make him on of the worst politicians Seattle has had in the last 10 years.
Posted by ritzidean on January 9, 2013 at 1:33 PM · Report
Former Lurker 2
As long no one is punished within SPD for continuing to brutally assault Seattle residents, he will not get my vote.

Easy policy: excessive force = fired, not paid vacation. Those cops can work in Bellevue or Kirkland or Snohomish... Those are the terms to work at SPD. Don't like it, don't work here.
Posted by Former Lurker on January 9, 2013 at 1:21 PM · Report
Will in Seattle 1
Sweet.

Time to get my checkbook.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 9, 2013 at 12:47 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in News