Film

Moon: Slow-Burning Sci-Fi

<i>Moon</i>: Slow-Burning Sci-Fi

MOON Sam Rockwell: somewhat likable.

This is one of those rare films—Pi and Primer are the only other recent entries that come to mind—that prove that you can do great, intelligent sci-fi with a tiny little budget. Moon is a bit more ostentatious than those two movies, and certainly features more special effects than both of them combined, but at heart it's a slow-burning thought piece.

A blue-collar worker named Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell) lives alone on an energy-mining colony on the moon. As he nears the end of his three-year hitch, he gradually starts to lose his mind. Sam suspects his HAL-like helper robot Gerty (voiced with delicious apathy by Kevin Spacey) of colluding with his superiors in some kind of a conspiracy. His wife and daughter's infrequent video messages from Earth only serve to frustrate Sam further. And just as he starts to prickle at his robotic companion, he encounters, impossibly, another Sam Bell, identical to him in almost every way, on the station.

It's in these scenes—Rockwell interacting with Rockwell—where the movie really finds its power. This is no Parent Trap; the split-screen effects are stunning, allowing the actor to get in close with himself and somehow build a palpable tension. Moon was written for Rockwell, and it is completely his show: He's in almost every scene and at times the movie feels so intimate that it could practically be a theatrical production. Rockwell does a fine job of staying somewhat likable (never entirely likable, to his credit), and, most notably, he never overacts. Jones displays remarkable confidence for a first-time director; at his SIFF appearances, he remarked on his desire to make a gritty, realistic '70s-style sci-fi film like Silent Running, Outland, or Alien. Moon's steady inward gaze, and humble sense of scale, makes it a worthy heir to those films. recommended

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Posted by danhowes http://danhowescinephile.blogspot.com on June 24, 2009 at 11:05 AM · Report
2
eh, I guessed this whole movie in about the first 5 minutes at SIFF. Timecrimes was better in terms of sci-finess. Or any episode of the Martian Chronicles. Or almost any episodes of the 80s twilight zone. Lame review. Stick to comics.
Posted by mac's are cool but i love my Zune on June 24, 2009 at 12:35 PM · Report
3
Uh, is this playing here? I don't see it anywhere in the listings.
Posted by YogiWan on June 25, 2009 at 5:18 PM · Report
4
Paul, while I'm looking forward to "Moon" (character studies in hermetic environments are delicious), I can't get past the flawed "Pi"/"Primer" comparison. Those two films are notable precisely because they performed genre reinventions and made cultural dents on truly next-to-nothing budgets and with almost no involvement from established American film-industry players (none whatsoever in the case of "Primer") until they had been cut, locked, and shown around.

"Pi" was made for $60,000 and, apart from Clint Mansell, involved no one of prior renown.

"Primer" was made with $7,000 worth of film stock, a bunch of in-kind services from local businesses, help from family, friends, and coworkers, only one person with any acting experience, a crew of five who figured things out as they went.

"Moon" cost $5 million, was made in a full-fledged film studio, by a slew of industry-ensconced professionals, with an equally established actor. Oh, and the director's dad is David Bowie.

None of which is bad. It's just not remotely analogous.

At a time when most indie film productions think it's more important to track down a Hollywood agent and get them to send you Tori Spelling ("Cthulhu") than it is to make a halfway decent film, it's nice to remember films that achieved something memorable through shear talent, resourcefulness, and ingenuity.

Posted by d.p. on June 26, 2009 at 2:36 AM · Report
Lindy West 5
@3: My fault--I screwed up on the release date. It's actually opening next Friday, July 3rd.
Posted by Lindy West on June 26, 2009 at 11:14 AM · Report
6
Yeah those are better stories and better movies and maintain a true air--potentially surpassing it--of DIYness for certain. This is huge movie compared to those, and tiny compared to T4 and transformers. And everything about Cthulhu was pretty heinous. I had to switch from beer to vodka to finish it.

Like I said, Paul should stick to comics as his knowledge of how films get made is severely limited.
Posted by down down down on June 30, 2009 at 1:13 PM · Report
7
sounds kinda sunshine-ish, which I found kubrickesque in the good way. I hope I can catch it... any compares?
Posted by gruptitus on July 1, 2009 at 1:22 PM · Report
Trouble 8
Just saw it at Harvard Exit and I was not disappointed. Easily the best hard sci-fi since Sunshine. Sam Rockwell knocked it out of the park in this movie.
Posted by Trouble http://www.google.com/reader/shared/11442504487209353568 on July 11, 2009 at 7:32 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Film