News

Pro-Pot Cops

Both Guys Running for Sheriff Are Thrilled About Legalizing Weed

Pro-Pot Cops

It used to be politically mandatory for police officers to oppose marijuana legalization. In 2003, for example, King County sheriff Dave Reichert went as far as to coauthor a knee-jerk voters' guide statement opposing Seattle's initiative to deprioritize pot enforcement because it would be "wrong for our children and our community."

That era, apparently, is over.

In an interview last Friday, both men running for King County sheriff not only said they support legalization—they sparred to prove who supported it more.

"As the sheriff, I don't think it is a problem for public safety if we legalize it because that will provide a supported, understood law that we can enforce," said Steve Strachan, the current King County sheriff. His leading point was that legalization—particularly a model with well-defined regulatory mechanisms like this fall's Initiative 502 proposes—would help delineate lawbreakers from law abiders. "I think legalization will lead to the greatest clarity," he explained. "I will vote for I-502."

But John Urquhart, a 24-year department veteran running to replace Strachan in the November election, said his opponent's stance contains "no leadership" and is not enough. "Strachan talked about clarifying the law," Urquhart said. "The reason I am for legalization is not to clarify the law. I am saying that, morally, it should be legal."

Strachan responded by disavowing some of his practices as a former D.A.R.E. officer, adding that the "lack of clarity in the law is bad for criminal justice, bad for rule of law, and bad for kids."

It's hard to overstate how new a phenomenon this is—especially for cops. Just a few years ago, the former King County sheriff was using his bully pulpit to fight legalization. Now both of the cops who want his old job are invoking children and morality to declare that the war on pot needs to end. That, in a word, is progress. recommended

 

Comments (6) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Flightning 1
Yeah, finally! Young adults and responsible people doing pot do not need criminal records for a on-criminal act! Way to go?
Posted by Flightning http://felixmendoza.deviantart.com on October 4, 2012 at 2:50 PM · Report
2
The federal Controlled Substances Act violates the Tenth Amendment (and the Man has a patent on ganga: Patent # 6630507).
Posted by 5th Columnist on October 5, 2012 at 5:38 PM · Report
3
How disgusting. These idiots only support this now because we are in a budget crisis. If that were not the case, then they'd still be all for jailing people for pot offenses.
Posted by hipocritesrus on October 9, 2012 at 10:10 PM · Report
4
Well, I'm not going to complain about old white guys finally being in favor of something I like. In fact, I'm going to roll around and expose my belly like a cat!
Posted by PhotonJon on October 9, 2012 at 10:37 PM · Report
5
Will they feel the same after the election? I have heard this before,only to be disipointed.
Posted by Bobby Wolf on October 28, 2012 at 7:03 AM · Report
bob wolf 6
I've heard alot of promises in my 72 years but its still a waiting game, till after the elect.
But i sure hope it works out for all of us.
Posted by bob wolf on October 28, 2012 at 9:43 AM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in News