Film

Queen of the Lot: When Is a Movie Not a Movie?

Queen of the Lot: When Is a Movie Not a Movie?

Rainbow Releasing

A peculiar and particular problem afflicts Queen of the Lot: It does not seem like a real movie. It’s not merely that it’s amateurish, though that is certainly true: Actors appear surprised to be saying their lines, the discombobulated script desperately needs editing, the camerawork and production values are frequently bizarre. (That director Henry Jaglom has been making films for two decades is inconceivable.) A movie can be amateurish but still seem real, still be engaged and engaging—take, for example, a lot of (if not most) English movies. A movie that doesn’t seem real is one that, over and over, ejects you from what should be an enveloping cinematic embrace, back into a painful, bald awareness of viewing; a movie that doesn’t seem real refuses to make you and keep you complicit in its movie-ness. (Grant Cogswell manfully discusses this phenomenon in the director’s commentary for his disaster Cthulhu—if you haven’t watched this film with the commentary on, you must do it right away, as it is a hilarious, shockingly honest, brilliant documentary of failure. There is no need to watch Cthulhu without the commentary.)

Queen of the Lot begins as a Hollywood satire: fame-hungry starlet with two DUIs, manager talking on two cell phones at once, monstrous life coach, tiny yapping dog, idiotic actor-boyfriend. Bits here and there are funny, though the pacing is atrocious throughout; even some of the better scenes should be half as long. The plot turns somewhat serious an hour and a half in—the film lasts, and lasts, and lasts, for one hour and 54 minutes—then takes a couple extremely nonsensical twists. Throughout, the acting disintegrates, especially that of the starlet-lead, Tanna Frederick; she is never believable as a dingy actress, and she is then even less believable as an actress acting dingy who’s actually smart. She does not even seem believable as an actress playing an actress, which calls not only the movie but the real world into question. When Noah Wyle, of ER fame, is on-screen with her, his comfort with inhabiting a character—his realness as an actor, along with his (in this context, jarring) charm—conspires to create yet more cognitive dissonance. Frederick and Wyle, captured in the same frame, speaking words to each other, don’t even seem to be in the same movie. The references to Marilyn Monroe and other Hollywood classics, as well as the appearance of Peter Bogdanovich, are profoundly unwise insofar as they raise more meta-cinematic issues—issues that this film should have stayed very, very far away from. If Queen of the Lot is not the worst movie ever, that may be because it is just, somehow, not a movie at all. recommended

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
IMHO, Queen of the Lot is a wonderful film. Henry Jaglom really captures old Hollywood and nestles it into today's world of Google points and off-the-wall therapies. Tanna Frederick and Noah Wyle splash the screen with a Tracy/Hepburn style romance. I'm going to see it again. 
Posted by Mary Iselin on December 20, 2010 at 10:15 PM · Report
2
I think Queen of the Lot is a fine film. Noah Wyle and Tanna Frederick make quite a pair. Queen if the Lot has a great balance with both the depth of the drama and the ridiculously funny scenes. It's also a sweet blend of old-style Hollywood romance and newfangled technology. Now I'm looking at my own Google points and so are some of my friends.
Posted by BJHudson on December 20, 2010 at 10:35 PM · Report
3
I loved Queen of the Lot. Tanna Frederick and Noah Wyle had sizzling onscreen chemistry. I agree with other reviewers who favorably compare Frederick and Wyle to Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn. It's a wonderful film, reminiscent of old Hollywood. Just go and see it for yourself
Posted by MelanieDan on December 20, 2010 at 10:46 PM · Report
4
If you haven't seen Queen of the Lot, run, don't walk to wherever it's playing and see it. It's great! The classic Hollywood romance is alive and well with the chemistry between Tanna Frederick and Noah Wyle and the supporting cast is wonderful.
Posted by Lenay on December 20, 2010 at 10:53 PM · Report
5
My review:

Henry Jaglom's latest movie, Queen of the Lot is set in modern-day Hollywood and stars Tanna Frederick, Noah Wyle and Christopher Rydell. In this sequel to Hollywood Dreams, Margie Chizek has achieved B movie success with her action hero films under her new name, Maggie Chase. But she's also gotten into trouble having had a few DUIs and now she's under house arrest - ankle bracelet and all. She's driven in her quest for A-list fame as evidenced by her obsession with her Google points. She's got more points than her home state of Iowa but far less than Angelina Jolie and that's got to change. She has to be Queen of the Lot - just like Norma Shearer. 
 
Zack Norman and David Proval reprise their Hollywood Dreams roles as Kaz and Caesar, the hotshot gay Hollywood producers who discovered Maggie. They are still "married" (to each other) and funnier than ever. Maggie asks them if she can stay at their mansion for a while because she can't stand being stuck in her apartment on house arrest with the press dogging her. They agree and she gets police permission to stay with them. 
 
Maggie asks Kaz and Caesar if her boyfriend (an already established star) Dov Lambert (Christopher Rydell), can stay, too. Dov is a half-wit who hails from Hollywood royalty. Enter Aaron Lambert (Noah Wyle), Dov's brother, a failed writer and black sheep of the family, who is sent to fetch Dov to help with a family crisis.   
 
Is there really such a thing as a functional family? I don't think I've ever met one. Dov takes Maggie home to meet the family, headed by charismatic patriarch Louis Lambert (played with great depth by Jack Heller). At dinner, Dov introduces Maggie to everyone, including his sort-of estranged wife (Daisy White). What happens at large dysfunctional family dinners (as in Jaglom's Last Summer in the Hamptons)? Fur flies between various factions and, of course, Margie is right in there trying to fit in and help out and maybe make a connection that will propel her to megastardom. Aaron is in the fray maintaining his role as the family scapegoat and helping Maggie feel comfortable amidst the family bickering while Dov plays with his wife and other more important things - like his poker buddies. Maggie and Aaron reluctantly fall for each other and the way their relationship develops is one of the most irresistible aspects of the film.  
 
Frederick and Wyle together make the silver screen simmer with vintage Tinseltown charm reminiscent of Tracy and Hepburn. Frederick plays Maggie Chase as down-to-earth, believable and loveable. Maggie is driven, insecure, and slightly conniving but she's also smart, forceful and can take care of business. This is Frederick’s best performance as she infuses Maggie with her uncanny combination of star and girl-next-door. Wyle is at the top of his game as Aaron, an insecure good guy whose wife has just left him. He's a wreck but his inner strength comes through in emergencies.
 
As often occurs in Jaglom films, his brother Michael Emil appears, this time as a curmudgeonly interloper in a therapy group. Jaglom's daughter Sabrina is absolutely stunning. Remember her as Zoe Lambert, the young filmmaker in Hollywood Dreams who rejects Margie Chizek? Well, Zoe's turned into quite a formidable, sometimes calculating young woman. Simon Orson Jaglom, is just adorable as Michael Lambert. Love him!
 
There is an outstanding supporting cast including great performances by Kelly DeSarla, Ron Vignone and Diane Salinger as Maggie's "handlers." Salinger is frighteningly believable as Maggie's "life coach." Mary Crosby, Peter Bogdanovich, Dennis Christopher, Paul Sand and Beege Barkette shine as various family members and associates. Tommy Garrett is delightful as a reporter who empathizes with Maggie's quest for fame and the fact that she only gets attention from the press when she’s been bad.  
 
You’ve got to see this movie. There are some very funny lines and Queen of the Lot has heart and soul. When I saw Jaglom’s Hollywood Dreams I thought, "This is the REAL Hollywood." Queen of the Lot has reinforced that. I'd like to poll some Hollywood types to see if they agree. In any event, I am confident that Tanna Frederick is going to achieve her dreams in Hollywood and if there were still a lot, she would be queen of it!
More...
Posted by SallyBrooks on December 20, 2010 at 10:58 PM · Report
6
Those comments above cannot sound like anything but fake.
Posted by camilla on December 21, 2010 at 5:01 PM · Report
7
Tanna Frederick fans might also enjoy this November 10, 2010 radio interview: "Director Henry Jaglom and star Tanna Frederick demonstrate their 'Queen of the Lot' chemistry on Mr. Media!" http://www.mrmedia.com/2010/11/director-… Don't miss her story at the end about kissing Noah Wyle!
Posted by andelman on December 23, 2010 at 5:02 PM · Report
8
I am a fan of Henry Jaglom's. I went into this film expecting to like it, and did. So, shoot me.
Still, I found Frederick's laughter and gaucheness grating, as I did the ending to the scene where ....

..... SPOILERS ....

... where the guy gets shot and just lays there for what seems like a freakin' eternity, OK?

Yeah, that scene! The ending was dumb-dumb wherein he just got up and seemed to pretend that nothing happened, grrrrr.

Which reminds me, where can I go online and watch "Always, but not forever" (Jaglom, again) ONLINE, for free, streaming, where I do NOT have to fucking register?

Muchas gracias!
Posted by I-Write-Inconvenient-UNcomfy-Truths-Fortunately on December 23, 2010 at 10:32 PM · Report
9

@ Lenay: You mean, even IF Frederick CACKLES throughout much of this movie? Man, she lays it all on a biiiiiiii thick, don'tcha think?
Posted by I-Write-Inconvenient-UNcomfy-Truths-Fortunately on December 23, 2010 at 10:34 PM · Report
10
wow major love bombs
Posted by James Early on December 24, 2010 at 8:24 AM · Report
11
When is a movie not a movie? I think we shoudl ask Sara Palin when a TV show is not a TV show but rather a long as fuck commercial for her political campaign?

We should start there with this question.
Posted by sonder on December 27, 2010 at 11:49 AM · Report
Canadian Nurse 12
6 posts by people who registered on the day of their first post, wrote a glowing review of the movie, and have never posted again? Great "viral" campaign, Rainbow Releasing! So subtle, no one will ever notice.
Posted by Canadian Nurse on December 29, 2010 at 9:35 AM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Film

  • The Spazz Age Baz Luhrmann Glitter-Bombs Fitzgerald in the Explosively Entertaining Gatsby