Rob McKenna thinks you’re stupid. He thinks all voters in King County are stupid. How stupid? Stupid enough to vote for him.
But You’re Not That Stupid Are you?
Tools
Hey, you.
Yeah, you. You boutique-tequila-swilling Capitol Hill hipsters with contrarian streaks. You old-timey Seattle liberals who pine for the mythical days of the "Dan Evans Republican." You Subaru-driving soccer moms who are too "independent-minded" to slavishly follow the SECB Cheat Sheet (see page 16). Republican Rob McKenna thinks you're stupid.
Stranger Personals
He thinks you're an idiot. He thinks you're a fucking moron. He thinks you're dumb enough to vote for him.
We know. We know how good it can feel to say you didn't vote a straight Democratic ticket, especially given how disappointing some Democrats can be. So if you need to scratch that ticket-splitting itch, show some love for Republican Bill Finkbeiner for lieutenant governor, who at least opposes his party's hateful social agenda. But don't vote for McKenna. Because you're not that stupid.
Say it with us: "I'm not as stupid as Rob McKenna thinks I am."
Rob McKenna has been running for governor his entire adult life. And his whole electoral strategy has always relied on tricking enough King County voters—voters like you—into believing he's not another one of those Republicans. McKenna doesn't want you to think he's one of those Romney/Ryan class-warfare-waging, Koch-sucking GOPers who wants to bust unions, repeal Obamacare, ban gay marriage, outlaw abortion, and unravel what remains of the social safety net, all in the service of cutting taxes on corporations and millionaires.
It is an electoral strategy that almost worked for Dino Rossi in 2004, and one that McKenna has been expertly executing for years. You may have seen those posters asking you to vote for President Obama, R-74, and Rob McKenna—McKenna opposes both President Obama and R-74—and it's clever messaging. It is also a complete and total fucking lie. And McKenna is praying that you're stupid enough to fall for it.
But you're not that stupid, are you?
No Republican can win statewide office while getting his ass kicked in King County.
While we account for only 30 percent of the statewide vote, it is our nearly two-to-one Democratic advantage that keeps Washington reliably, if modestly, blue. To win a statewide race, a Republican has to appeal to voters who routinely and regularly vote Democratic. In the 32 years since they last won the governor's mansion, Republicans have averaged only 36.8 percent of King County's gubernatorial vote.
Nothing better demonstrates the electoral hurdle King County poses for Republicans than Dino Rossi's two losing gubernatorial bids.
In 2004, Rossi shrugged off divisive social issues in an attempt to present himself to voters in King County as a competent fiscal manager. Asked about his stance on abortion, Rossi famously quipped, "I'm not running for the Supreme Court." An overconfident Chris Gregoire failed to use the opportunity to define her opponent, and Rossi's tabula rossi strategy fooled thousands of "Dinocrats."
Rossi captured 40.1 percent of the King County vote, the highest Republican percentage since 1984, a political era before the GOP had completed its transformation from the Party of Lincoln to the Party of Lexus. It was enough to propel Rossi into a statistical tie with Gregoire.
Four years later, a wiser and more aggressive Gregoire campaign didn't make the same mistake. They made sure voters knew what kind of Republican Rossi really is—voters learned of his opposition to choice and environmental regulations, they learned of his support for cutting the state's popularly approved minimum wage—and, confronted with the real Rossi, the Dinocrats faded away. Despite a substantially larger electorate, Rossi won 25,000 fewer King County votes in 2008 than he had just four years before. Gregoire won with a comfortable seven-point statewide margin.
Were you one of the 25,000 King County voters who cast a ballot for Rossi in 2004, only to think better of it four years later? Rob McKenna not only wants your vote, he is counting on it. And McKenna has proved he can win over King County voters before. If McKenna gets 42 percent of the vote in King County, it's likely a toss-up; if he wins 45 percent, McKenna is a shoo-in. That may seem like a high hurdle given recent history, but it's totally doable for a candidate who scored 45.8 percent of the county vote in his 2004 attorney general's race and 53.6 percent in 2008.
Let's be clear: King County voters overwhelmingly vote for Democrats because we overwhelmingly reject the Republican agenda. So McKenna's task is to convince you that he is a "different kind of Republican," one who can help lead his party back to a more moderate political stance.
But to find the real McKenna, you need look no further than your ballot.
Marriage equality? McKenna opposes marriage equality.1 Now and forever. "Because it's based in faith, it could never change," McKenna told the Yakima Herald in May of his staunch opposition to gay marriage. McKenna isn't voting for marriage equality, but he's hoping that supporters of marriage equality in King County are stupid enough to vote for him.
And it's a faith that clearly informs his actions in office. When his assistant attorneys general were tasked with assigning Referendum 74 a ballot title, they drafted prejudicial language that included the phrase "redefine marriage" (a phrase McKenna himself has used in describing the law), a poll-tested talking point promulgated by the gay-bashing National Organization for Marriage. Does that sound like a different kind of Republican? A Thurston County judge had to step in and replace the ballot title with more neutral language, blocking McKenna's efforts to assist anti-gay- marriage campaigners.
Initiative 1185, Tim Eyman's latest oil- industry-backed effort to require a two-thirds supermajority to raise taxes? McKenna is for it.2 And not just as a matter of policy. In defending the provision from a recent constitutional challenge, McKenna's office bizarrely argued that the results of a referendum should trump the state Constitution.3
Does that sound like a different kind of Republican?
And of course, in the most important item on the ballot, McKenna no doubt supports Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan—though he lacks the balls to come out and say it—and, just as clearly, the vast majority of voters in King County would regard a Romney/Ryan win as catastrophic.4 McKenna was also the Washington State chair for the McCain/Palin campaign in 2008.
Does that sound like a different kind of Republican?
On issue after issue, McKenna is the exact same kind of Republican candidate that King County voters have rejected year after year after year. Marijuana legalization? McKenna opposes it.5 Charter schools? McKenna is for them.6 Choice? McKenna does not support the Reproductive Parity Act, a bill that would have merely required insurers to cover maternity and reproductive services. McKenna's fellow Republicans in the state legislature managed to kill the Reproductive Parity Act in the last session. If the state house and senate manage to pass the bill next year, Governor Rob "Different Kind of Republican" McKenna would veto it.7
McKenna is a different kind of Republican in one respect. You will never catch McKenna talking about "legitimate rape" or denying climate change science or evolution. I'm guessing McKenna probably wouldn't force a 14-year-girl to bear her rapist-uncle's anencephalic baby. (Maybe. McKenna says he supports legal abortion "within certain parameters," but he hasn't told us exactly what those parameters are. Like Romney and his budget numbers, McKenna wants us to trust him on this issue without providing us with the details.) So you could say that McKenna is different from other Republicans: He's not as stupid as, say, Todd "Legitimate Rape" Aiken. McKenna, for all we know, may agree with Aiken. But he's not dumb enough to say so out loud.
You want more?
This is a man who describes conservative columnist/apologist David Brooks as a "liberal." This is a man who told the Snohomish County Republican Women's Club in October 2010 that Barack Obama is "farther to the left of center... than any American president we have ever seen." McKenna then doubled down: "Farther to the left than FDR."
Barack Fucking Obama—who lifted his health care plan from conservative think tanks and the Republican nominee for president—is farther to the left than FDR. Really?
Rob McKenna is a man who describes public employee unions—teachers, cops, fire fighters—as "dangerous."8
You want more? Let's look at McKenna's record as attorney general.
McKenna was at the center of an effort by Republican state attorneys general to overturn Obamacare.9 The Supreme Court rejected the bulk of McKenna's shoddy constitutional arguments. But he did help get one provision scrapped: The court ruled that states can opt out of the crucial Medicaid expansion provisions, and McKenna has expressed every intention of exercising this option if he becomes governor. That's 350,000 additional low-income Washingtonians who would be denied health insurance coverage should McKenna win election.10 (A 2008 Families USA study estimated that 380 working-age Washingtonians die each year due to lack of insurance.)
In 2005, while he was defending the state, in his role as attorney general, from a lawsuit challenging the legitimacy of Governor Gregoire's election, McKenna publicly thanked the right-wing Building Industry Association of Washington for helping to fund the suit. (No conflict of interest there!)
Rob McKenna, the attorney general in perhaps the most environmentally conscious state in the nation, had to be sued by the Department of Natural Resources to provide the legal services necessary to defend sensitive state lands.11 This is an attorney general who lauds the will of the people, but who attempted to subvert our popularly approved minimum-wage law by bizarrely reinterpreting the word "by" in the service of denying a 12-cent increase in the minimum wage—an official attorney general opinion so fanciful that the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries took the rare step of simply ignoring it.12
"But what about education," you may ask? Hasn't McKenna promised to spend billions more on education than even Jay Inslee, his Democratic opponent? Sure. But just like a Republican, McKenna has promised not to raise taxes to pay for it. Where will that money come from?
Even those deceptive posters absurdly urging you to vote for Obama, R-74, and McKenna should give you a clue as to what sort of Republican McKenna really is, if you look at who is funding them: the reliably pro-Republican/anti-worker Washington Restaurant Association. High on the WRA's political agenda: lowering the minimum wage and fighting mandatory sick leave laws.
That's the sort of company McKenna keeps. Republican company.
If it walks like an elephant, talks like an elephant, and shits all over working people and sick people and women and gays like an elephant... it's a fucking elephant.
Republicans aren't a bunch of dickless appeasers like their Democratic counterparts. If McKenna wins in November, even by the tiniest of margins, he will become Washington's first Republican governor in three decades. He will not only claim a mandate, but he will govern like he has one. And as a red governor in a blue state, McKenna will also instantly jump to the top of the short list of Republican presidential contenders for 2016.
But this will only happen if voters in King County are just as dumb as Rob McKenna thinks we are.
We're not that dumb. We don't think you're that dumb.
Vote for Inslee. ![]()
1. Jay Inslee, his Democratic opponent, was an early supporter of marriage equality.
2. Inslee is voting against I-1185, saying it violates “democratic principles.”
3. Inslee, an attorney, believes the two-thirds provision is clearly unconstitutional.
4. Inslee and President Barack Obama share Washington State campaign headquarters.
5. Inslee will vote no on marijuana legalization, too, but unlike McKenna, Inslee says he would defend the law if passed.
6. Inslee opposes charter schools.
7. Inslee has been a champion of reproductive rights, and he is endorsed by NARAL and Planned Parenthood.
8. Inslee is the overwhelming choice of organized labor.
9. Inslee helped draft Obamacare, inserting Medicare provisions crucial to Washington State.
10. Inslee will fully implement the Medicaid expansion, saying it will save the state millions of dollars and hundreds of lives.
11. Inslee is endorsed by every environmental group in the state and literally wrote the book on clean energy: 2007’s Apollo’s Fire.
12. In Congress, Inslee has consistently voted in favor of raising the federal minimum wage.
T-shirts should be available for sale across the country by tomorrow morning.
And like the article said, if we dump McKenna now he won't be getting the chance screw us big time later.
4
It's tough to nail down any evil, incompetence and bad intentions on his part and you failed here, though you tried mightily and somewhat desperately.
Mostly, he's legitimately that geeky dude you see. The one with numbers running through his brain and ideas coming out of his mouth. When compared with Inslee it does not speak well of our state that this race will even be close.
King County is vitally important to his chances, yes. Inslee is counting on monolithic, intellectually vapid voters to pull the lever for him. And it might well work out for him.
But if you were to sit down with both with a truly open mind it would quickly become obvious McKenna is the real deal.
You can paint it however you choose but this article boils down to the usual four words: Vote for the Democrat.
Also, Charter schools are an excellent idea! Why not build a system where schools need to compete for business? Aren't our children's future worth finding the best education available? Or do we want to continue with incredibly low graduation rates in some high schools?
Has King County forgotten that we live in a CAPITALIST country? Where competition drives the economy. Stagnation through government incentives and oversight only hinders the growth of jobs and businesses. Everything relies on the ability to have jobs so that our communities may thrive and our children can have a future.
Otherwise please move to Cuba, Iran, North Korea, China, or Vietnam where Socialism is embraced and everyone gets fair treatment...
The governor has the power to issue what are called "executive orders" where he can mandate rules for state agencies and employees. Should gay marriage or marijuana legalization pass, McKenna could cite federal law and give executive orders to state employees to refuse to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples or permits for marijuana-related businesses.
9
10
12
13
Oops, caps lock on. Oh well, you gotta shout to be heard in this noise bath...
16
As for same-sex marriage, it's harder to see what McKenna could do to disrupt it. But I think it's fair to view this issue as a litmus test of where McKenna's values depart from ours. How is a governor morally opposed to marriage equality as a matter of faith, going to act on other equality issues? It's why women should be concerned too on access to reproductive services.
It's amazing to imagine that an article like this would sway even one thinking voter. Unfortunately, i am eft with no choice but to vote for McKenna. Because his opponent is as confused about how the government actually functions as the author if this article. As if calling you stupid isn't a childish thoughtless way of getting someone to change their opinion.
You have a mind use it. Hey, maybe even look into the candidates a bit? Vote for whoever you want.
Or just mindlessly go with whatever your entertainment newspaper says.
Sorry Robbo, I'm voting for Jay.
The only stupid thing I see around here is your grin.
Are we going to continue to massively underfund education in order to pay Inslee's corporate snake oil salesmen? As you read this comment billionaire corporate lobbyists are spending millions to back Inslee. Why?
If you really think Rob McKenna is going to ban abortion or cut down gay rights... We don't need your stupidity in our state!
Are we going to continue to massively underfund education in order to pay Inslee's corporate snake oil salesmen? As you read this comment billionaire corporate lobbyists are spending millions to back Inslee. Why?
If you really think Rob McKenna is going to ban abortion or cut down gay rights... We don't need your stupidity in our state!
23
But I appreciate the fact the Stranger took the time to tear down McKenna, but did not offer a single reason why we should support INslee. The debate this week confirmed for me what I suspected from the commercials: Inslee is dramatically under-equipped to hold executive office. The notion that "hundreds of millions of dollars" in inflation savings from helaethcare reform - reform that has not even been implemented - will pay for $1 billion in necessary education funding next year shows that Jay can't do simple math.
Yet supposedly, I'm the one that is stupid...
26
Keep up the good work!
27
About Marijuana, both candidates oppose the current bill. They both have different reason, but not that different.
Abortion, once again, the article is wrong. McKenna has been very clear about his view on abortion. He is pro Choice, but the parameters (which the article claims that there are no details) are that if a minor is having an abortion, parents must be told. Beyond that he is in favor of all the other reasoning pro choice. (Once again, just watch the debate)
Finally,in Education, neither Inslee or McKenna have given a clear plan of what they are going to do to fund education. Charter schools are a dumb idea but the other side hasn't offered anything concrete either... (Again, please watch the debate)
I personally am against McKenna because, like the article did mention, he has a staunch conservative positions in the economic matter of politics. He gave the state of Washington a bad name by going against the Affordable Care Act, and his environmental track record is not good.
In my opinion, McKenna does think we are stupid to vote for him, but based on this article "The Stranger" thinks we are stupid as well, if they are willing to throw facts that can easily be fact checked.
... probably no one will care about this post...
About Marijuana, both candidates oppose the current bill. They both have different reason, but not that different.
Abortion, once again, the article is wrong. McKenna has been very clear about his view on abortion. He is pro Choice, but the parameters (which the article claims that there are no details) are that if a minor is having an abortion, parents must be told. Beyond that he is in favor of all the other reasoning pro choice. (Once again, just watch the debate)
Finally,in Education, neither Inslee or McKenna have given a clear plan of what they are going to do to fund education. Charter schools are a dumb idea but the other side hasn't offered anything concrete either... (Again, please watch the debate)
I personally am against McKenna because, like the article did mention, he has a staunch conservative positions in the economic matter of politics. He gave the state of Washington a bad name by going against the Affordable Care Act, and his environmental track record is not good.
In my opinion, McKenna does think we are stupid to vote for him, but based on this article "The Stranger" thinks we are stupid as well, if they are willing to throw facts that can easily be fact checked.
... probably no one will care about this post...
Yes, it is possible for people to have opposing viewpoints.
32
How mighty nice to hear you say are posting as yourself and not being paid to. What I find ass-biting hilarious is how well the Republicans play the victim card. They cry and moan about how the "liberal media bias" is against them. Then when the truth comes out that the so-called liberal media has actually been bought out by Koch Enterprises and is now running ads for McKenna, what is the reaction of these Tea Baggers? Why, complain about the liberal bias of The Stranger, of course! These fascist Republicans just won't rest until EVERY SINGLE MEDIA OUTLET is in the tank for their guys. Can't tolerate any form of dissent or freedom of thought. Hates anyone who doesn't think or look like them. Can't resist buying off and stealing elections. I dunno, but kinda sounds like the Nazis to me. Maybe the Republicans in our state aren't full-on fascists just yet. Maybe Rob McKenna, Kim Wyman, Bob Ferguson, and company are baby fascists in their training wheels. But I tire of this constant spewing of hate by the Republicans, calling us Democrats stupid, partisan, lazy, whatever. I never heard of any politician trying to "win over" Democrat voters by spewing toxic hatred upon us nonstop. If we are truly a blue state, then we should start acting like it. I'll start by wearing our tolerance and love of equal rights proudly and just tell these intolerant fucks who want to kill off poor people, minorities, and our grandmas just to pay a little less in taxes to go move to another state.
"Washington Attorney General Rob Mckenna” Weekday. Puget Sound Public Radio. KUOW, Seattle. 22 Jun. 2010. Radio.
[…]
24:46: Thomas (Caller): Hey how are you this morning Steve?
24:50: Steve Scher: Very good, thanks for calling
24:51: (Caller): Hey I had an unrelated question, as an elected representative who represents military personal in Washington, where do you stand on lifting the ban on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell?
25:06: Rob Mckenna: Well of course it’s federal policy, but I think it’s time to make that change.
25:16: Caller: Ok, so you back that?
25:17: Rob Mckenna: Yeah
25:17: Caller: Ok
25:18: Steve Scher: I appreciate your call…
"Washington Attorney General Rob Mckenna” Weekday. Puget Sound Public Radio. KUOW, Seattle. 22 Jun. 2010. Radio.
[…]
24:46: Thomas (Caller): Hey how are you this morning Steve?
24:50: Steve Scher: Very good, thanks for calling
24:51: (Caller): Hey I had an unrelated question, as an elected representative who represents military personal in Washington, where do you stand on lifting the ban on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell?
25:06: Rob Mckenna: Well of course it’s federal policy, BUT I THINK IT'S TIME TO MAKE THAT CHANGE.
25:16: Caller: Ok, so you back that?
25:17: Rob Mckenna: Yeah
25:17: Caller: Ok
25:18: Steve Scher: I appreciate your call…
You cannot try to paint Rob Mckenna as a right winger. He just Isn't. He is the most experienced candidate for governor BY far. WATCH the debates. I guarantee you will see that Rob has a clear plan and a new direction for Washington State.
Watching the debates, it was actually painful to hear Inslee give one non-answer after another. The guy is way past his prime.
McKenna may be a bit of a nerd. But he has good ideas and answers for all of the important problems.
I'm an independent who's voting for gay marriage, pot legalization and most importantly Rob McKenna.
Hard to imagine that the McKenna campaign could ever doubt your journalistic independence after reading this.
P.s., Here's an IQ quiz for you - What WA State politician (currently active) has been running for governor LONGER than McKenna? Answer: Jay Insless (sic). In fact, unlike McKenna, Insless actually ran before for this office (1996) and considered it again in 2004.
@26 Cascadian, and @32 Occupy Seattle: WAY TO GO!!!!!
I could not have said it better!!!!
I don't want to vote for McKenna. I really don't for all of the reasons described at length above. But I feel like a vote for Inslee validates the Democratic Party's decision to force yet another candidate on us who has no bold ideas (or, in Inslee's case, no ideas) and then turning around and saying the alternative is 100 times worse. But maybe that's because the only thing more mythical than a "Dan Evans Republican" is a "Progressive Democratic Governor."
I don't want to vote for McKenna. I really don't for all of the reasons described at length above. But I feel like a vote for Inslee validates the Democratic Party's decision to force yet another candidate on us who has no bold ideas (or, in Inslee's case, no ideas) and then turning around and saying the alternative is 100 times worse. But maybe that's because the only thing more mythical than a "Dan Evans Republican" is a "Progressive Democratic Governor."
Would Jay Inslee lead the charge for safe, legal, regulated adult prostitution in WA? Probably not, given his lack of courage on the marijuana issue -- but at least I can't envision him signing legislation requiring all patrons of adult prostitutes to register as sex offenders (like I can see McKenna doing).
I agree with Savage and Goldy: Anyone who cares about these personal-liberty issues and votes for a Republican for a position with any significant policy-making power is a moron.
When you ratchet up the partisan rhetoric you're not really helping.
I disagree with you on McKenna. He has the intellect to deal with economic issues outside political parameters. Inslee brings nothing to the table. Is anyone, even in the conservationist community, buying the "green jobs" panacea anymore?
But I respect your opinions. Very refreshing.
I'm leaning towards voting for McKenna as well. I usually vote Democratic though consider myself an "Independent". I will be voting for Obama, but am undecided about the governor's race.
I agree with Fuckd.
Basically, I'd rather risk being wrong about McKenna (i.e. he ends up being much more conservative than I'm comfortable with) as opposed to right about Inslee (i.e. he ends up maintaining the status quo in Olympia, without the resolve to make necessary changes).
The Democrats in Olympia will still hold majorities in the house and senate which will make it difficult for McKenna to push throw radically rightist ideas, and which might make the Democrats up their game.
Still undecided...
Perhaps I am stupid. Dan and the Occupy poster may be right. I should be humble about such things. While I don't feel brilliant, I don't feel stupid, but that may just be an illusion...
I'm leaning towards McKenna, for many of the same reasons Fuckd mentions in posts 40 & 41.
Basically, my logic is I'd rather risk being wrong about McKenna (i.e. he ends up being much more conservative than he currently portrays himself) than risk being right about Inslee (i.e. he ends up maintaining the status quo in Olympia, without having the politic will/drive to make necessary changes.)
The Democrats will still have a majority in both houses, which makes me believe if I'm wrong about McKenna, there is a limit to the damage he can do.
On the other hand, the Democrats still having majorities in the house and senate means that it would be hard for even a strong Democratic governor to effect real change/reforms, as Inslee proposes to do.
McKenna is not Rick Perry, Dan. There are still different kinds of Republicans as there are different kinds of Democrats.
I am still undecided and appreciate reading the comments here that go beyond the rhetoric on both sides.
48
49
Yes, Republicans can disagree with you without being any of the things you describe. Maybe you should step back a bit. You're really out of control, if you don't mind my saying so.
The choice we seem to be getting is a Democrat who will manage the decay in state government with socially progressive leanings and a Republican who could shake things up but also potentially take us backwards in terms of budget priorities and the social safety net (if the nightmare scenario outlined here were to come true). These are not attractive options.
54
Then again, maybe not----they'd need a crane for all the gross tonnage.
59
62
63
if you are middle or lower class....MCKENNA HAS NO INTEREST IN HELPING YOU. He will intellectualize inane policies that will....shock of all shocks...make you poorer! and golly...the rich will get richer! It's not rocket science...they've been doing it since the 80's!
sincerely- frustrated gay man.
64
When these Republicans accuse Jay Inslee, Bob Ferguson, and Kathleen Drew of being "partisan" - what they mean is that these and other Democrats will actually stand up to powerful special interests, create a fair and equal playing field for middle class and poor Americans, and defend the rights that are stated in our Constitution. And I find it hilarious that the very Republicans who claim to be so fucking smart (like dork king McKenna) can't even answer basic questions about science & technology: http://www.sciencedebate.org/rob-mckenna…
I see a cartoon with Mckenna on a -short leash led by a Blethen,
So while in theory it does sound like a fantastic idea, in reality it is not - it simply takes money away from the existing education infrastructure for at best a gamble on a marginal gain, and at worst, a reduction in overall education quality.
We vote D because every damn R in the last three decades (that I've been paying attention) either comes across as a dirtbag, or as a normal Joe with a not so subtle dirtbag affiliation.
Of course I wish that the D's weren't so damn liberal with our money!
But if money is going to be spent, (because it will!), I would rather see it being spent on the people.
There you have it. Most of us vote for the lesser of two evils. Want someone to run that I would actually vote FOR.
(alas)
I'm still appalled that The Seattle Times publicly endorses McKenna. Sad!
Hooray to the 100 Times' staffers who protested this outrage!
Stranger---PLEASE don't turn Republican on us!!!!!!






RSS
Comments (73) RSS