News

Running from Office

Can a Staffer for an Anti-Gay Senator Get Elected in Seattle?

Running from Office

EVAN CLIFTHORNE

Two months after Paull Shin became one of only three Democratic state senators to vote against marriage equality in Washington State, Shin's legislative aide, Evan Clifthorne, is mounting a run for the legislature—in Seattle's 36th District, one of the most gay-loving, über-liberal spots in Washington.

Will the voters of this lefty district view Clifthorne's work for an anti-gay senator as a deal breaker?

"It's a very interesting question," says Democratic representative Reuven Carlyle, who's been representing the 36th since 2008 and hasn't yet endorsed anyone in what is currently a seven-person race for the seat being vacated by retiring representative Mary Lou Dickerson. "In a race like this, in the most educated district in the state, obviously every single nuance is incredibly important."

Clifthorne, 28, says that he hopes working for Shin won't hurt him: "I hope that people in the 36th District will be able to understand that I took a job with Senator Shin because I'm passionate about public policy. And while I disagree with him on certain social issues, the vast majority of our beliefs and ideals lined up."

Did Clifthorne try to convince Shin, who represents the 21st District around Edmonds, to vote for gay marriage?

Clifthorne declines to answer, citing confidentiality between the lawmaker and his staff, but he will say that he personally has "always" supported marriage equality.

That support for marriage equality didn't stop Clifthorne from signing on to work for Shin two years ago, after Shin voted against the 2009 "everything but marriage" expansion of domestic partnership rights.

"When I first started working for him, marriage equality and his record on the issue was not something that was at the forefront of my mind," Clifthorne explains. But this year, when it became clear Shin was going to vote against gay marriage, Clifthorne says he thought about resigning. In the end, he didn't.

Says Carlyle: "People understand that you can't make every single issue something that you fall on the sword for. But this is a pretty big issue... I think that it opens the door to a certain level of difficulty for him because it's easy for him to be somewhat trapped in a bit of perpetual motion of explaining the issue." recommended

 

Comments (2) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
2
I would like to call out this article for rather imprudent, ham-fisted journalism. None of the other candidates running for this office come directly from the state legislature, let alone from an office of an acting senator. Mr. Clifthorne certainly wouldn't be doing himself any favors if he decided to nail his former boss, Shin, to the cross for one vote he made on the floor. Senator Shin actually represents me up here in the 21st (Edmonds/Lynnwood), and he's old. Very old. And he represents a suburban district with a lot of old people. So you can judge Shin himself too harshly for making a vote that isn't in direct agreement with trendy educated Seattlites in the 36th.

I think Clifthorne was right to preserve his confidentiality with Shin as a former employee for someone STILL active in the leg. As for what Clifthorne actually believes about gay marriage, mr. Sanders (author) neglects to clearly allow him his position on the topic, but instead drops sloppy speculation about Clifthorne "convincing" Shin to vote against gay Marriage. The guy is OLD!
Posted by Faryl on April 12, 2012 at 2:39 PM · Report
doloresdaphne 1
There's nothing like a safe carefully crafted "this won't give you anything to use against me" answers to win me over.

If he worked for this guy and can't speak about it in the context of same sex marriage, then it's going to be hard for the public to get to know him and what he stands for. It's not a good start to his career, to be a closed book.

Given this, I recommend Paul go out of his way to communicate in detail the following;

1. Why he chose the 36th District to run for office
2. What are the issues he agreed with Shin on and why
3. Did he ever downplay his support on same sex marriage to Shin and why, and if not, how proactive was he on sharing his views with Shin on the subject
4. How vocal has he been on the issue of same sex marriage outside of his "confidential" discussions with Shin.
5. What does he stand for new, and how is his current political position influenced by his past.

Posted by doloresdaphne on April 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in News