Smart Power, Dumb World

A New Hillary Clinton Biography Pinpoints Her Greatest Weakness

Smart Power, Dumb World

If you're in the middle of reading HRC, Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes's new biography of Hillary Clinton's time as secretary of state, I do not suggest that you watch House of Cards in your downtime. It's not that the Netflix series about a sociopathic politician will force you to think ill of politicians. The problem is that the politicians in House of Cards are so competent, so in control of their lives and plans, that they'll make every politician in HRC look like an amateur in comparison.

It's not that HRC is an especially negative or partisan account (although Allen does work for the rightward-leaning Politico). It is a reminder that much of what the secretary of state (and, by inference, the president) does is reactive. Clinton approached the State Department with a proactive agenda—she wanted to demonstrate "smart power," Pentagon official Joseph Nye's foreign policy approach that blends "traditional 'hard power' such as military force and economic sanctions with the 'soft power' of inducing foreign nations to change their behavior by offering carrots such as political or economic assistance." Instead, she inherited a Middle East that was about to launch into radical upheaval and an America that was standing on shaky financial ground at the same time that China was surging into primacy as an economic power.

And so Clinton did what she always does: She got down to work. In fact, HRC is a portrait of a woman running herself ragged. It's packed with accounts from staff who, anonymously and on the record, report that Clinton both macro- and micromanaged the State Department. They describe a leader who would lose her temper at small mistakes, but who would also display remarkable compassion for staffers who were going through tough times.

This is not a biography that will be relevant past 2016; the whole book is pivoted toward a potential Clinton presidential run. Which means that conservatives will eagerly flip to the index to look up all the references to Benghazi. Those conservatives won't find a smoking gun here. Parnes and Allen suggest that a results-minded Clinton may have pressed the situation in Benghazi too quickly—she wanted improved relations with the Libyan city to be a demonstration of her smart power, so the State Department ignored increasing hostility and other warning signs until it was too late. But they also suggest that Clinton was on top of the situation immediately, and that she handled the resulting deaths and political repercussions in an intelligent, compassionate—some would say, presidential—manner.

Clinton's record as secretary of state will be used as a political baseball bat by Democrats and Republicans for the next two years. But the truth of her record isn't as simple as a series of pluses and minuses lined up in columns. Ultimately, it appears that Clinton approached the State Department with the same plan she brought to her presidential run: She came prepared and armed with boundless energy. But when the unexpected occurred, she simply had to do what every other politician does in the real world: react, to the best of her estimable ability. recommended

PSST! Check out The Stranger's New and Improved THINGS TO DO calendar.
It has a complete calendar of what's happening in Seattle's Readings & Talks Scene.

Comments (7) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
I'll vote for her.
Posted by longwayhome on March 8, 2014 at 9:28 PM · Report this
So you're saying that she's a human being with virtues and flaws who works diligently on problems foreseen and unforeseen, some of which are intractable despite her best efforts? Say it ain't so!
Posted by Marooner on March 9, 2014 at 7:58 AM · Report this
And the United States MICC* continues to promote unrest (Libya, Ukraine, Iraq, Iran, Georgia...) and propagate violence (Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen...) around the world because it can. I've no doubt that Hillary Clinton will continue to use that power should we be so unfortunate as to elect her. That said, so will anyone else that is selected by the PTB for us to vote for.

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military–industrial complex."
-- President Eisenhower, 1961

*MICC = Military-Industrial-Congressional-Complex
Posted by nwcitizen on March 9, 2014 at 9:44 AM · Report this
House of cards is FICTIONAL! Stop with the Hillary HATE people! Anyone who watches HOC is a cynical, nihilistic POS.
[same goes for any mike judge material]
Posted by carsten coolage on March 9, 2014 at 10:25 AM · Report this
bitchslap 5
I love House of Cards and HRC!
Posted by bitchslap on March 9, 2014 at 11:36 AM · Report this
HRC 2016! I was ready for Hillary when she first ran for President in 2008.
Posted by auntie grizelda on March 11, 2014 at 12:52 AM · Report this
Autobiography about to be published for her take on Secretary of State years
Posted by Sharip on April 1, 2014 at 4:32 PM · Report this

Add a comment