News

Socialist on the Ballot

Kshama Sawant Is Running Against Council Member Richard Conlin

Socialist on the Ballot

Dominic Holden

KSHAMA SAWANT Wants to raise minimum wage to $15 an hour.

Kshama Sawant arrived in our office last week wearing a T-shirt that blared "Capitalism has failed the 99 Percent: Vote Sawant." It was swag from her last run for office, when she challenged the state legislature's most powerful Democrat, Speaker Frank Chopp, and carved out an extraordinary 29 percent from his general-election winnings—not bad for a capitalism-smashing Occupy Wall Street activist.

This election cycle, Sawant—a university instructor who holds a PhD in economics—is announcing that she will run for Seattle City Council against four-term fixture Richard Conlin (who didn't know that Sawant would be challenging him when this article went to press). She says that Conlin exemplifies the council's cozy relations with business lobbies, while he has personally voted against helping workers and the impoverished. "As a council member, I will use every inch of space as I am using it now—which is as an activist who is advocating on issues that affect the working class," Sawant explained. But if she wins, Sawant would make a salary of more than $120,000. Would it be ironic, I asked her, for a populist champion of the working class to make a six-figure salary, just like the corporate overlords she taunts?

"No, not at all," she said. "If I was to be elected, I will take home only the average worker's salary." Sawant said she would donate most of her paycheck to her Socialist Alternative party. In fact, she estimates she'd keep $40,000 or less.

In targeting Conlin, Sawant says she is tackling everything that is wrong with the Seattle City Council. Under Conlin's leadership—he served as council president for the two immediate previous biennial terms—most of the council has coagulated as a conservative bloc that scuttled meaningful policy reforms while backing mega-projects that benefit the wealthy (such as real estate and highways). Conlin himself was the lone council member to oppose paid sick leave, and he backed a controversial measure to fine panhandlers, against the unanimous recommendation of the city's human rights commission.

So if there's any council member ripe for an incendiary leftist opponent, it's Conlin.

"The city is dominated by the Democratic Party elite, who are in cahoots with the Downtown Seattle Association and the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce, along with the very powerful construction industries and Paul Allen's Vulcan, which is a shark devouring real estate while we are having continued problems with homelessness and skyrocketing rent," said Sawant.

But she has an uphill battle, for sure.

"I don't think an avowed Socialist party candidate can win a citywide council race," says veteran campaign consultant Sandeep Kaushik. He says it's hard enough for a liberal Democrat to raise the money and marshal the votes to oust an incumbent, but, he adds, "Sawant could make some noise in a council race, and perhaps draw heightened public attention to the issues she cares about."

Sawant plans to do exactly that: She is proposing a citywide income tax on millionaires to fund schools, an outright ban on drones, rent control to cap the booming costs of apartments, an elected civilian oversight committee to run the police force, and a citywide minimum wage of $15 an hour. Not all of those things are within the council's legal purview (for instance, an income tax would likely require the legislature's authorization first). Sawant recognizes that she's using a bully pulpit to advance discussions that, without her voice, aren't happening at all on the council.

But running against Conlin is a very different type of challenge from her previous campaign. Rather than reaching voters of the 43rd District in the liberal core of Seattle, Sawant must appeal to voters citywide; instead of taking on the Democratic Party, council races are nonpartisan; and unlike the few thousand dollars spent in legislative district races, she'll be facing big money. Conlin raised an average of $226,000 in his last two runs, and he already has banked $53,000 for this year. recommended

 

Comments (39) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
So it's Conlin she's filing against, eh? If she really wants to serve why wouldn't she go against the least well-defended incumbent O'Brien? This way she has less of a chance of ever having to do the job of a council member, but for sure this means a bright spotlight on her views during the campaign. Cool.
Posted by gloomy gus on March 13, 2013 at 9:49 AM · Report
2
Your article is missing something:

http://votesawant.org/
Posted by kanoxolom on March 13, 2013 at 10:10 AM · Report
sikandro 3
@1. Eh, I like her style. Cut off the head, if possible.
Posted by sikandro on March 13, 2013 at 10:45 AM · Report
4
"Capitalism has failed the 99 Percent: Vote Sawant."

The taxes from capitalism pay for her fat, lazy job in "academia" with cushy benefits, 4 months vacation and defined payment retirement benefits.

Is she still gonna nationalize Starbucks, Boeing and MSFT?
Posted by Sugartit on March 13, 2013 at 11:29 AM · Report
DOUG. 5
Thus ensuring 4 more years of Conlin...
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on March 13, 2013 at 11:40 AM · Report
6
She needs a pie in the face.
Posted by Sugartit on March 13, 2013 at 11:45 AM · Report
7
This news reminds me of some other news. Conlin must be rolling on the floor.

http://www.cuddlybunnies.com/misc/natlam…
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 13, 2013 at 12:25 PM · Report
8
What is her position on Hansen's corporate welfare arena? Conlin is against it.
Posted by hmmmmm on March 13, 2013 at 12:33 PM · Report
9
Conlin's a scum sucking piece of shit, probably scum sucking enough to have arranged for some of his friends to finance her effort. But you do have to hand him some credit. A socialist opponent for a city wide election. Clever, and hilarious.
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 13, 2013 at 12:42 PM · Report
10
"Carved out an extraordinary 29% percent" (against Chopp)

Um - in what world is 29% extraordinary. More like piddling. And we can expect more of the same.
Posted by virtuosobob on March 13, 2013 at 1:05 PM · Report
11
@9: Sorry, the Socialist Alternative folks are freelance dumbasses, not corporate sock puppets.

I think a commie got 17 percent against Sue Donaldson back in the 90s. Sawant can break that by a point or two.
Posted by J.R. on March 13, 2013 at 1:34 PM · Report
12
I am happy she is running. The cynics on this website can come up with all the clever comments they want, but the 20,000 votes (or 29%) she got in 2012 as an open socialist candidate is pretty impressive. I also appreciate her vision about what "winning" should mean. Capturing office is not enough. We need to build mass movements and a new party that fights for ordinary people. Her is just one small part of a larger struggle. But it is the music of the future.
Posted by Patrick Ayers on March 13, 2013 at 2:00 PM · Report
The Establishment 13
Give up your foolish dreams of upsetting the base of power held by The Establishmentâ„¢. Your struggle is admirable, but ultimately pointless. Submit! Repent! Submit!
Posted by The Establishment on March 13, 2013 at 2:50 PM · Report
14
#11, how would she ever know?
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 13, 2013 at 3:06 PM · Report
Cascadian Bacon 15
"capitalism has failed"

So how are all those Communist countries doing?

Put this piece of lying commie garbage on the first boat back to Mubai.
Posted by Cascadian Bacon on March 13, 2013 at 3:35 PM · Report
16
#15, I'm not exactly a big fan of collectivism, but let's be honest here. I mean, here we are, online where no one knows that we're a dog. So you between you, me, and the fire hydrant, can we admit that capitalism is currently being propped by socialism, in the form of the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of Japan, and mercantantile fascim in the case of the Bank of China?

There's a much longer conversation to be had, and my views wouldn't please anyone, but the idea that capitalism is healthy because communism is unhealthy is, well, stupid.
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 13, 2013 at 3:56 PM · Report
17
I am excited to hear Sawant challenging for a seat on the council. I volunteered for her State house campaign against Frank Chopp last year and I will volunteer for her again for her run against Conlin. According to her campaign website http://votesawant.org/events/ there is a campaign kickoff event on March 22 @ 7pm. I will be there!
Posted by erictheviking on March 13, 2013 at 4:25 PM · Report
18
I'm glad Socialist Alternative is using the momentum from their success against Chopp (and yes, 29% by a 3rd party candidate is pretty darn successful) to continue raising progressive issues in Seattle politics. The democrats have been in power in this city for a long time without taking a meaningful stand against big business or police brutality or the inequitable funding of public education. I think Ms. Sawant's positions on taxes, minimum wage, law enforcement, and rent control are spot on, and this article doesn't mention it but she also strongly opposes the coal train. Even if she probably won't win, she represents my values and what I believe to be best for Seattle, so she'll be getting my vote!
Posted by breakwithdemocrats on March 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM · Report
19
Good article, one small correction. The article says "'If I was to be elected, I will take home only the average worker's salary.' Sawant said she would donate most of her paycheck to her Socialist Alternative party. In fact, she estimates she'd keep $40,000 or less."

Sawant has pledged to donate the rest of her paycheck (after $40,000) to help build mass social movements (not just Socialist Alternative). This would include the struggle against the coal trains, police brutality, workers organizing for their rights, etc. You can see more on her views on this here: www.VoteSawant.org
Posted by Philip Locker on March 13, 2013 at 5:20 PM · Report
Dominic Holden 20
@19) Philip, your correction is wrong. I just reviewed my notes, and Sawant's exact quote after she said "I will take home only the average worker's salary," was this: "The rest would be put into the organization."

Although she talked about supporting mass social movements, "the organization" was unambiguously Socialist Alternative.
Posted by Dominic Holden on March 13, 2013 at 5:48 PM · Report
Cascadian Bacon 21
@16

I totally agree with you. Shit is complicated and the central banks are 10 shades of all fucked up.

I just think Sawant is another piece of shit Marxist authoritarian out to gain some political capital on the backs on some guilty white liberal progressives who have little life experience. Thankfully I don't think here shit will fly even in batshit Seattle.
Posted by Cascadian Bacon on March 13, 2013 at 6:19 PM · Report
22
" inequitable funding of public education."

In Seattle? Go look at the numbers, SPS spends far more per student in the south end than northend.
Posted by She's a joke on March 13, 2013 at 7:20 PM · Report
23
#21, I'm not so sure. I do think she's comic relief, but I tend to see her in the upper-Midwest "sewer socialist" mode rather than the hard-core Marxist mode. There's a big difference. But for now, it's all theoretical, because the woman has less than zero chance of unseating the biggest developer whore on the city council.
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 13, 2013 at 8:08 PM · Report
24
Kshama put herself out there to draw attention to the corrupt system we are now stuck with. Can we please not count her out before she gets in the ring. And please stop the name calling. Agree with socialism or not,you got to admit it didn't get us into the mess we have now.

Kshama can hold her own in a debate. Frank Chopp knows that very well. She will impress those who will follow this election. Not for the ideology but the truth she will repeat over and over. That being, the most needy are not represented and are the ones suffering the most from the hijacking of our democracy. It will be interesting.
Posted by mikelapointe on March 14, 2013 at 8:53 AM · Report
25
Her candidacy insures Conlin's re-election. If I were Conlin, I'd be funding her effort. He probably is, one way or another.
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 14, 2013 at 11:09 AM · Report
26
@ 15 No need to bring race in this, also do you know she is from India or was she born here.
Posted by Seattle14 on March 14, 2013 at 11:58 AM · Report
27
@24: thus illustrates the agony of the left. You have to put one's self in a losing position on purpose to prove to everyone that we are in a losing position; because, no one even noticed that the systems (economics, government) have end results that short changes individuals and social classes. No, we need SA to show us, because we all are too dumb to notice.
Posted by hmmmmm on March 14, 2013 at 1:42 PM · Report
28
Okay #26, then send her back to Brazil. Happy now?
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 14, 2013 at 2:26 PM · Report
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn 29
There was no "measure to fine panhandlers". Typical Dominic Holden.
Posted by Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn http://youtu.be/zu-akdyxpUc on March 14, 2013 at 3:19 PM · Report
30
I'd rather send you back to whatever racist cesspool you emerged from, creep.
Posted by Zen Punk on March 14, 2013 at 9:47 PM · Report
31
Wtether she was born here or India is not relevent. She is a USA citizen, and therefore can run for an office.
Posted by Yusuf Cabdi on March 15, 2013 at 1:12 AM · Report
32
The title of the article betrays The Stranger's bourgie nature:Kshama is HELPING the three major demographic groups that have ALWAYS been under attack by Mainstream America:non-"Whites";the Lower Class;Leftists.Sandeepinshit KauSHIT's irrational opinion about her odds is being called out right the fuck here!All the Socialist Alternative Party needs to do is utilize the Citizens United decision to raise funds for her campaign for that city-council seat,and go appeal to the Oppressed One-third (of SSnobbattle's electorate) to vote for her once their Primary ballots arrive in the mail. ---- http://www.broadleft.org
Posted by 5th Columnist on March 17, 2013 at 5:07 PM · Report
33
Wow:lot's of old white guys lying big time about Capitalism (which,like I.Q. and "White" Supremacism, is NOT falsifiable!) and its alleged virtues.I guess you socialism-haters are beneficiaries of both "White" Privilege and KKKorpSSepirate Welfare??? ------- http://www.inequality.org , http://www.blackagendareport.com
Posted by 5th Columnist on March 17, 2013 at 5:13 PM · Report
34
Since one-third of all voters who self-classify as being racially "White" have at least one non-"White" ancestor,Sawant would be able to win the council seat if EVERY non-"White" voted for her in the Primary (along with all of Seattle's Poor Voters and Leftists):that's more than thirty percent of the Overpriced City's electorate . . . .
Posted by 5th Columnist on March 17, 2013 at 5:15 PM · Report
35
Sawant will win in the primaries because the other candidates will split the decadent vote amongst each other ! (But she MUST get the young Black vote and the Lower-Class "White" vote to win in November. ) http://socialistalternative.org
Posted by 5th Columnist on March 18, 2013 at 8:01 PM · Report
36
Of course Sandeep Kaushik will say no Socialist can win office:HE'S an anti-Socialist!!! (Polls?Have you seen any polls?Pfft!!!) ---- http://theyrule.net
Posted by 5th Columnist on March 19, 2013 at 5:34 PM · Report
37
Actually,over FORTY percent of all Seattleites (who will be eligible to vote in the August Primary Election) are not racially "White::It would be in their own best interest to vote for Sawant,as she is AUTOMATICALLY represents them ALL. (Note:unlike most cities in America,Seattle still uses the at-large system of filling its city-council seats:that process violates the federal USA's Voting Rights Act of 1965,and the ACLU used the same argument to help overturn at-large voting in California,Texas,and Wyoming,while the ACLU chapter in Seattle refuses to do the same.) http://www.aclu.org
Posted by 5th Columnist on March 20, 2013 at 4:30 PM · Report
Cascadian Bacon 38
She looks like she stinks and speaks like a liar (but what socialist doesn't).

That she teaches "economics" points to the failure of our education system.

@32
Why do you have yo bring races into this, looks like you are a typical leftist bigot.
Posted by Cascadian Bacon on March 20, 2013 at 5:44 PM · Report
Cascadian Bacon 39
She looks like she stinks and speaks like a liar (but what socialist doesn't).

That she teaches "economics" points to the failure of our education system.

@32
Why do you have to bring race into this, looks like you are a typical leftist bigot.
Posted by Cascadian Bacon on March 20, 2013 at 5:45 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in News