Film

Grassroots: A Two-Hour Game of Spot the Landmark

Grassroots: A Two-Hour Game of Spot the Landmark

Let's start this with a huge conflict of interest alert: This film is lousy with The Stranger. The Stranger's lousy offices make a cameo appearance, Stranger theater editor Brendan Kiley fills the screen for a second, and I think my enormous head might loom in the background of a scene, too. These appearances make sense: Grassroots is based on Phil Campbell's memoir Zioncheck for President, which begins with Campbell getting fired from The Stranger news team. ("You can't get any lower" than being fired from The Stranger, Campbell—played by an unremarkable Jason Biggs—moans in an early scene.) Campbell then becomes the manager of former Stranger writer Grant Cogswell's doomed-but-spunky campaign for Seattle City Council.

The good news is that Grassroots was obviously filmed on location. Seattle, and not some shitty generic Vancouver street corner, is everywhere in this movie. And though there are several scenes where characters turn a corner from the Pike/Pine corridor and find themselves in Pioneer Square, Grassroots feels very Seattley. It's not particularly well shot, but it's home.

The bad news is everything else. Grassroots starts to fall apart the second Joel David Moore is introduced as Cogswell. In Zioncheck, Cogswell is a perpetual motion machine powered by an interesting mix of idealism, rage, and self-involvement. Moore's Cogswell carries none of the charisma and is weighted down with all of the flaws. And the plot isn't political enough. Every so often, a character will meaningfully intone, "That's politics" or "You know what they say about bedfellows and politics" so you remember what the movie is supposed to be about, but instead, it's a coming-of-age tale that wastes way too much time on a undeveloped side story about Campbell's crumbling relationship.

But Grassroots is inoffensive enough that you can distract yourself with a game of spot-the-Seattle-landmark until the final scene. It's one of the worst movie conclusions in recent memory, a nightmare of pacing and performance that hinges on the director's apparently fervent belief that a man in a polar-bear suit is the funniest fucking thing in the world. All the wobbly plates crash to the floor, the house lights come up, and you can only look around at the amateur production that just happened in front of you with a growing sensation of pity. recommended

 

Comments (21) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
So says a publication with 0 readership and has to resort to the most infantile, demeaning insults in order to register a millidecibel on the scale of so called criticism.
Posted by arj10 on June 20, 2012 at 11:21 AM · Report
2
Paul Constant obviously missed the whole point of the film, probably because of his loyalty to The Stranger, which he cites in his disclaimer at the beginning of the article. Too bad he had such a huge conflict of interest, because he missed out on a good movie. I saw Grassroots in NY during a promotional college tour and loved the way it spurred a dynamic conversation about local politics. I don't understand why critics are so vitriolic about feel-good movies. The film's got a positive message that I thoroughly appreciated.
Posted by chr3ching on June 20, 2012 at 11:56 AM · Report
Paul Constant 3
Hey arj10 and chr3ching: Welcome! I notice you just joined The Stranger's commenting system in the past couple of hours and that you each have only posted one comment apiece! I look forward to many years of your illuminating, clever commentary on many non-Grassroots-related issues.

Or, you know, not.
Posted by Paul Constant http://https://twitter.com/paulconstant on June 20, 2012 at 1:11 PM · Report
knobtheunicorn 4
NERDFIGHT!
Posted by knobtheunicorn on June 20, 2012 at 1:38 PM · Report
Paul Constant 5
@knobtheunicorn: More like nerdy old me thrashing around on a thick bed of astroturf. But that could be entertaining, too.
Posted by Paul Constant http://https://twitter.com/paulconstant on June 20, 2012 at 2:28 PM · Report
6
Speaking of nerd, how the hell did Paul Constant fail to review Brave this week?
Posted by robotslave on June 20, 2012 at 6:50 PM · Report
knobtheunicorn 7
@5 from now on I shall always read your words whilst imagining you as a most perseverent and inspriring tortoise doggedly striving to right yourself and I will be heard by the angels applauding your will, not your goal, with a slow and steady silent mindclap.
Posted by knobtheunicorn on June 21, 2012 at 12:08 AM · Report
TVDinner 8
Oh gosh, I wanted this film not to suck so badly. What a shame.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on June 21, 2012 at 8:25 AM · Report
Paul Constant 9
@7: Finally! Someone is finally reading me the way I always intended to be read! You are my ideal reader, knobtheunicorn.

@6: I was on vacation on the other side of the country when they screened it for press, unfortunately. I'll see it soon, and when I do, I'll Slog about it.
Posted by Paul Constant http://https://twitter.com/paulconstant on June 21, 2012 at 10:35 AM · Report
10
@3 - Seriously do people who do this kind of stuff really think it works on any site whose readers are pretty much anyone but my mom and her friends? You have to have an internet IQ of zero to not laugh at this stuff. It's like the Yelp review where the business owner didn't even make up a fake name.
Posted by longball on June 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM · Report
11
If anyone is sitting around waiting for Stranger writers to actually tell them more than smart ass "I'm so clever, cool, hip, anti-everything, and so bitter because I've been such a maxi-dweeb most of my life", movie review, you'll have a long wait.
Sadly, Cogswell's writing is one of the few things worth reading in this infantile sack-o-shit rag, and he hated all the wanna be hipster assholes and yuppies that run this city enough to wisely leave it.
Posted by assata_hampton on June 21, 2012 at 4:38 PM · Report
12
Cool! Sneaking wine into the theater and playing spot the landmark sounds like fun :)
Posted by Erok on June 21, 2012 at 8:38 PM · Report
deadlyfingers 13
Wait - isn't this the movie where Cedric the Entertainer plays Richar McIver? I don't doubt that the rest of the fim sucked... but how did you manage to write about anything else?
Posted by deadlyfingers on June 21, 2012 at 11:20 PM · Report
Andrew Chapman 14
I appreciate the Vancouver corner statement- my girlfriend and I play "THATS NOT SEATTLE" during movies and tv shows all the time.
Posted by Andrew Chapman http://princessismetal.blogspot.com/ on June 22, 2012 at 8:45 AM · Report
Paul Constant 15
@13: I do regret not getting Cedric the Entertainer in this review.

He was good! He was not great. He wasn't doing a McIver impersonation at all, but he gave a solid performance. It's not revelatory or anything, but I wouldn't mind seeing him play a politician in a real movie about politics sometime.
Posted by Paul Constant http://https://twitter.com/paulconstant on June 22, 2012 at 3:02 PM · Report
16
Um, Stranger, why so uptight?! Paul, a bit harsh a review-- I thought the movie was pretty darn good, on a number of levels. First, pure humor value--I found myself laughing out loud throughout the movie, I could relate to the silliness, effusiveness, and idio-syncricities of grassroots characters, the ridiculous acts of a low budget campaign to get attention (planting illegal signs in median strips all over the city in the middle of the night!) The seriousness of it all and the strain on personal relationships,Cogswell's crazed and zany character, black on white politics and McGiver's humanity. And yes, the Seattle scenes were exploitive of the natural beauty and legendary crustiness,potholed streets, run-down craftsmans, occasional blue skys (it was filmed from June through August) soft light, massive traffic congestion, grunge, mosh/pitcircle pit, etc., but so what?? That's Seattle! The film captured it, and makes a statement about local politics, grassroots activism (let's hope we don;t lose it) and the hope that progressive change can still happen. The actors played their characters convincingly if not endearingly. A good independent, low budget film- go see it! -Peter Steinbrueck
Posted by Peter Steinbrueck on June 23, 2012 at 1:23 AM · Report
17
@16, what the fuck. Even less convincing astroturf than @1 and @2.

Just to start, I'm pretty sure Peter Steinbrueck can spell "idiosyncrasies" and Richard McIver's last name....
Posted by seriously who writes this shit on June 27, 2012 at 2:04 AM · Report
gloomy gus 18
I'll definitely see it when it hits Netflix streaming in about five minutes.
Posted by gloomy gus on July 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM · Report
DOUG. 19
I saw the film at SIFF. It's good. If you lived in Seattle in the late-90s/early-00s, you'll like it too.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on July 2, 2012 at 6:37 PM · Report
birdy num num 20
i saw this last night - the last showing at the harvard exit and man, what a turd. seriously, mr. constant you nailed it - this movie is plain awful.

here's a movie that closed the SIFF, filmed here in seattle, lots of locals and local shots and there was uh, six people in the theatre. oh, my tickets were free and yet while watching i was trying to figure out how to get my money back for time WASTED.
Posted by birdy num num on July 6, 2012 at 11:52 PM · Report
21
BUTTTTTTTTTTTTT THERE'S A SCENE FILMED AT THE 5 SPOT!!!! For that and that alone it should win the best picture oscar!!!!!!
Posted by j2patter on October 13, 2012 at 9:44 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Film