The Dropping Dow
Why is a Democrat trailing Susan Hutchison in liberal King County? More importantly, what is he going to do about it?
DOW, SINKING A screen grab from a new attack ad against Constantine, paid for by a coalition of conservatives.
Tools
It used to be a political given, something close to a mathematical certainty. Democrat Dow Constantine would beat Republican Susan Hutchison in the race for King County ex-ecutive because, in this liberal county, the numbers were firmly on Constantine's side.
Just look at the returns from the 2008 presidential election: Barack Obama, whom Constantine supported, won 70 percent of the vote here. Mike Huckabee, the strident conservative whom Hutchison backed with a $500 donation, was too hard-line to even make it through the Republican primaries. Or look at the returns from the 2008 governor's race: Democrat Christine Gregoire, whom Constantine supported, got 64 percent of the King County vote. Republican Dino Rossi, whom Hutchison supported with over $1,000 in contributions, got just 36 percent.
Stranger Personals
More to the point, look at the returns from this year's primary.
With no other serious Republicans in the race for King County executive, Hutchison had the county's conservative voters all to herself. She got 33 percent of the countywide primary vote—no doubt due in large part to name recognition from her years sitting behind a TV news desk, since she was otherwise a political unknown.
The Democratic primary field was much more crowded. State legislator Ross Hunter got 11 percent of the vote, state legislator Fred Jarrett got 12 percent of the vote, and King County Council member Larry Phillips got 12 percent of the vote. Constantine, also a King County Council member, came in first among the Democrats with 27 percent. It was fewer primary votes than Hutchison received, sure, but if you added all the primary votes for Democrats together, it was possible to see the old King County that liberals know so well. About 62 percent of the total vote went Democratic.
But something odd has happened on the way to this year's general election. Beginning in early September, according to three tracking polls conducted by SurveyUSA, Constantine hit a ceiling of 44 percent of the general-election vote (with the most recent poll, released on October 13, showing him dropping to 42 percent). Hutchison, meanwhile, has pulled a consistent 47 percent in every poll.
She's in the lead? In King County? How does that math work?
"First of all," said Constantine spokesman Sandeep Kaushik, "we're now in the general election. We've got nearly twice as many voters. It's not like we just re-vote with the primary election voters. If that were the case, it would be very different."
But why isn't Constantine doing better with the general election pool? They're mostly Democrats, after all.
"We just initiated our voter-contact efforts late last week," Kaushik said on October 19. "We saw the exact same pattern during the primary, where, in the last two weeks of the primary race, Constantine more than doubled his share of the vote. We went from like 12 percent to 27 percent." True, if Constantine more than doubles his support in the next two weeks—or merely increases it by a quarter—he wins. But can he? His SurveyUSA polling trend is downward, not upward.
Jordan McCarren, Hutchison's spokesman, explained the situation this way: "As the Seattle Times noted in their endorsement of Susan, 'This election is about change.'... Our county's many problems will not be solved by the same career politicians who created them."
Part of Constantine's problem, of course, is that county executive is now officially a nonpartisan position, making this a "nonpartisan" race. (Hutchison, no surprise, helped pay for the 2008 ballot measure that made it nonpartisan.) But Constantine has been trying for months to make sure the county's huge Democratic base knows that Hutchison is anti-choice, bad on the environment, a donor to conservatives such as Huckabee and George W. Bush, and alarmingly inexperienced.
So far, it's not working.
"This is one of the jobs we have between now and the election—to make sure voters understand where these two candidates stand on these issues and which one has the qualifications," Kaushik said.
The candidates' four televised debates would be a good venue for doing this. But in the first debate, Constantine struggled to puncture Hutchison's powerfully telegenic aura. He seemed stiff, nervous, and small in his suit, while Hutchison, commanding in a yellow jacket that only a former anchorwoman would wear, successfully turned Constantine's Democratic cred against him. "My opponent is a foreigner to the marketplace of ideas," she said. "He can't accept anything that isn't in his narrow area."
By the second debate, Constantine had found the right tone and message. He put some bite into his voice and aggressively countered Hutchison's "nonpartisan" claims, repeating over and over that she's anti-choice, bad on the environment, a backer of the likes of Huckabee and Bush, and inexperienced. He also went after her tenure running the Seattle Symphony, saying it wasn't as smooth as she contends and undercutting her central claim to past executive leadership experience.
But by then, Constantine had more than just debate presentation to worry about. He was facing an attack ad, put out by an independent coalition of conservatives with more than $150,000 to spend, showing him as a cartoon marionette drowning in his own mistakes. A liberal-leaning coalition countered within days with an ad attacking Hutchison as a Sarah Palin clone, but they have only $100,000 behind their effort.
The focus of these ads? The roughly 10 percent of registered voters still undecided about who should be the next county executive, according to the SurveyUSA polling. Most of them should be low-information Democratic voters who presumably can be pulled to Constantine's side, provided they receive the right information.
"We expect, over the next two weeks, to see voters move in our
direction once they learn about Susan Hutchison's repeated efforts to
hide where she really stands on core issues," Kaushik said. "I'm
feeling pretty good." ![]()
They have to create ads that have lots of details about what Dow has done and accomplished. They need to frame the budget issues within the context of the worst recession since the fucking 1930s, and that Hutchison supported ALL of those. They also need to paint her as an opportunist --- WHY ISN'T ANYONE mentioning Susan was going to run for the Senate in 2006, where the PUBLICALLY declared herself a moderate Republican?!
4
How long is the term - 4 years? She's going to regret winning the job before Xmas.
11
What this means is that as long as you account for this bias towards the right you can trust the numbers. A poll that was not precise would vary by a wide margin every time you polled the people, this would make it useless. This poll is likely to come out with he same result if it was taken several times in the same time period (impossible but an important consideration).
The bottom line is these polls might not be correct from an absolute standard but they are good for showing trends. Sure the more liberal people will score lower but if they are showing a trend in any direction I would believe that.
12
I disagree, it's more like in this liberal county, the numbers are firmly on an Democrat's side that is a decent candidate. But even progressive liberal types like me are totally turned off by Dow Constantine. And if he can't even rally his base, he's got a big fucking problem. I voted for Dow begrudgingly, the lesser of two evils and all, but I wish sure wish I had a better choice in this election.
13
14







RSS
Comments (14) RSS