News

The Dropping Dow

Why is a Democrat trailing Susan Hutchison in liberal King County? More importantly, what is he going to do about it?

The Dropping Dow

DOW, SINKING 
A screen grab from a new attack ad against Constantine, paid for by a coalition of conservatives.

+ Enlarge this Image
In a recent poll conducted by SurveyUSA, Constantine was slipping slightly.

It used to be a political given, something close to a mathematical certainty. Democrat Dow Constantine would beat Republican Susan Hutchison in the race for King County ex-ecutive because, in this liberal county, the numbers were firmly on Constantine's side.

Just look at the returns from the 2008 presidential election: Barack Obama, whom Constantine supported, won 70 percent of the vote here. Mike Huckabee, the strident conservative whom Hutchison backed with a $500 donation, was too hard-line to even make it through the Republican primaries. Or look at the returns from the 2008 governor's race: Democrat Christine Gregoire, whom Constantine supported, got 64 percent of the King County vote. Republican Dino Rossi, whom Hutchison supported with over $1,000 in contributions, got just 36 percent.

More to the point, look at the returns from this year's primary.

With no other serious Republicans in the race for King County executive, Hutchison had the county's conservative voters all to herself. She got 33 percent of the countywide primary vote—no doubt due in large part to name recognition from her years sitting behind a TV news desk, since she was otherwise a political unknown.

The Democratic primary field was much more crowded. State legislator Ross Hunter got 11 percent of the vote, state legislator Fred Jarrett got 12 percent of the vote, and King County Council member Larry Phillips got 12 percent of the vote. Constantine, also a King County Council member, came in first among the Democrats with 27 percent. It was fewer primary votes than Hutchison received, sure, but if you added all the primary votes for Democrats together, it was possible to see the old King County that liberals know so well. About 62 percent of the total vote went Democratic.

But something odd has happened on the way to this year's general election. Beginning in early September, according to three tracking polls conducted by SurveyUSA, Constantine hit a ceiling of 44 percent of the general-election vote (with the most recent poll, released on October 13, showing him dropping to 42 percent). Hutchison, meanwhile, has pulled a consistent 47 percent in every poll.

She's in the lead? In King County? How does that math work?

"First of all," said Constantine spokesman Sandeep Kaushik, "we're now in the general election. We've got nearly twice as many voters. It's not like we just re-vote with the primary election voters. If that were the case, it would be very different."

But why isn't Constantine doing better with the general election pool? They're mostly Democrats, after all.

"We just initiated our voter-contact efforts late last week," Kaushik said on October 19. "We saw the exact same pattern during the primary, where, in the last two weeks of the primary race, Constantine more than doubled his share of the vote. We went from like 12 percent to 27 percent." True, if Constantine more than doubles his support in the next two weeks—or merely increases it by a quarter—he wins. But can he? His SurveyUSA polling trend is downward, not upward.

Jordan McCarren, Hutchison's spokesman, explained the situation this way: "As the Seattle Times noted in their endorsement of Susan, 'This election is about change.'... Our county's many problems will not be solved by the same career politicians who created them."

Part of Constantine's problem, of course, is that county executive is now officially a nonpartisan position, making this a "nonpartisan" race. (Hutchison, no surprise, helped pay for the 2008 ballot measure that made it nonpartisan.) But Constantine has been trying for months to make sure the county's huge Democratic base knows that Hutchison is anti-­choice, bad on the environment, a donor to conservatives such as Huckabee and George W. Bush, and alarmingly inexperienced.

So far, it's not working.

"This is one of the jobs we have between now and the election—to make sure voters understand where these two candidates stand on these issues and which one has the qualifications," Kaushik said.

The candidates' four televised debates would be a good venue for doing this. But in the first debate, Constantine struggled to puncture Hutchison's powerfully telegenic aura. He seemed stiff, nervous, and small in his suit, while Hutchison, commanding in a yellow jacket that only a former anchorwoman would wear, successfully turned Constantine's Democratic cred against him. "My opponent is a foreigner to the marketplace of ideas," she said. "He can't accept anything that isn't in his narrow area."

By the second debate, Constantine had found the right tone and message. He put some bite into his voice and aggressively countered Hutchison's "nonpartisan" claims, repeating over and over that she's anti-choice, bad on the environment, a backer of the likes of Huckabee and Bush, and inexperienced. He also went after her tenure running the Seattle Symphony, saying it wasn't as smooth as she contends and undercutting her central claim to past executive leadership experience.

But by then, Constantine had more than just debate presentation to worry about. He was facing an attack ad, put out by an independent coalition of conservatives with more than $150,000 to spend, showing him as a cartoon marionette drowning in his own mistakes. A liberal-leaning coalition countered within days with an ad attacking Hutchison as a Sarah Palin clone, but they have only $100,000 behind their effort.

The focus of these ads? The roughly 10 percent of registered voters still undecided about who should be the next county executive, according to the SurveyUSA polling. Most of them should be low-information Democratic voters who presumably can be pulled to Constantine's side, provided they receive the right information.

"We expect, over the next two weeks, to see voters move in our direction once they learn about Susan Hutchison's repeated efforts to hide where she really stands on core issues," Kaushik said. "I'm feeling pretty good." recommended

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
These guys are in a fucking state of denial. They are focusing too much on voting against Susan versus voting for Dow.

They have to create ads that have lots of details about what Dow has done and accomplished. They need to frame the budget issues within the context of the worst recession since the fucking 1930s, and that Hutchison supported ALL of those. They also need to paint her as an opportunist --- WHY ISN'T ANYONE mentioning Susan was going to run for the Senate in 2006, where the PUBLICALLY declared herself a moderate Republican?!
Posted by paulwashere on October 21, 2009 at 11:13 AM · Report
2
Dow is a turkey and not even the democrats are biting.
Get used to seeing Yellow...
Posted by Bwa Haa Ha Ha Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha on October 21, 2009 at 12:33 PM · Report
3
Dow, whom I voted for enthusiastically, is going to be crushed. I am not a cynical liberal. I just know that what matters is appearances, not substance. It sucks. A lot.
Posted by matt on October 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM · Report
Max Solomon 4
King County is not immune to the Schwarzeneggar phenomenon. Lots of shut-ins, gormless TV addicts and spiteful know-nothings vote.

How long is the term - 4 years? She's going to regret winning the job before Xmas.
Posted by Max Solomon on October 21, 2009 at 12:49 PM · Report
5
When will the Dow campaign get it....just calling her a republican is not a reason enough for people to vote for Dow. The campaign has not made the case to the public as to why he is the best for the job. Its sad, but as a die hard democrat Dow is just not an exciting candidate, and he has terrible messaging.
Posted by isitfriday on October 21, 2009 at 1:34 PM · Report
6
"Susan Hutchinson- isn't that the pretty lady from the news? She always seemed friendly and nice. I don't know anything about this "Dow Constable" character."
Posted by stuckie on October 21, 2009 at 2:13 PM · Report
7
Dow looked Nixonian on television.
Posted by Dow is the Rick Lazio of King County on October 21, 2009 at 3:52 PM · Report
8
I don't think Dow looked like me at all! Ewww.
Posted by Toby Nixon on October 21, 2009 at 4:35 PM · Report
9
Dow is sinking for any number of reasons, not the least of which is that his involvement in "vote-trading" on the ferry district for the flood district, leaves a bad taste in voters mouths.
Posted by knarles on October 21, 2009 at 8:28 PM · Report
10
Dow has gotten pwned in all three televised debates. Now he's got this e-mail scandal bubbling up, and it doesn't look pretty. He sure as hell doesn't want any more storm clouds rolling in (he was for the flood district, before he was against it). Plus, none of this partisan litmus-test stuff is going to get him to where needs to be to win. 'Course, the polls could all be dead wrong...or not.
Posted by jakeW5 on October 21, 2009 at 11:07 PM · Report
Packeteer 11
There is an important distinction between precision and accuracy. These polls are relatively precise but less accurate. Basically what this means is that the overall trend may have an unbalanced result but the data they do derive comes to a precise and therefore relatively correct conclusion.

What this means is that as long as you account for this bias towards the right you can trust the numbers. A poll that was not precise would vary by a wide margin every time you polled the people, this would make it useless. This poll is likely to come out with he same result if it was taken several times in the same time period (impossible but an important consideration).

The bottom line is these polls might not be correct from an absolute standard but they are good for showing trends. Sure the more liberal people will score lower but if they are showing a trend in any direction I would believe that.
Posted by Packeteer on October 22, 2009 at 10:09 AM · Report
dan10things 12
"in this liberal county, the numbers were firmly on Constantine's side"

I disagree, it's more like in this liberal county, the numbers are firmly on an Democrat's side that is a decent candidate. But even progressive liberal types like me are totally turned off by Dow Constantine. And if he can't even rally his base, he's got a big fucking problem. I voted for Dow begrudgingly, the lesser of two evils and all, but I wish sure wish I had a better choice in this election.
Posted by dan10things http://10thingszine.blogspot.com on October 23, 2009 at 4:00 PM · Report
Texas10R 13
Jesse Ventura, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Ronald Reagan, Jean Godden, and now Susan Hutchison...pathetic "wrestlers", lousy "actors", coffee-talk columnists, "news" people of questionable gravitas. Why in the hell does "name recognition" matter to ANYONE? The very fact that it does, or that idiotic campaign commercials have any effective influence on voters, means we are essentially doomed to a field of candidates likely to include ego-cases of considerable unworthiness.
Posted by Texas10R on October 25, 2009 at 4:48 PM · Report
Texas10R 14
If a recently-established trend traced to Alaska holds, Sue H., if she wins, will resign somewhere around two years into her term. How merciful.
Posted by Texas10R on October 25, 2009 at 4:56 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in News

  • Out of Step Why Is Seattle's Port CEO Lobbying Against Environmental Reform?

  • Give 'Em Heck Democrats could lose a congressional seat in southwest Washington this fall. Why they need to get behind a candidate now, and why that candidate is Denny Heck.

  • Police Beat Teacher Schooled by Student

  • My Marriage License This gay man got a marriage license in Seattle last week. Unfortunately, I only obtained it by agreeing to marry a lesbian.

  • Pot Potato A Bill to Decriminalize Pot Is Popular with Voters—So Why Won't the Legislature Pass It?