News

The Kids Are... Just Fine

Is Legalization Actually Driving More Kids to Use Pot?

The Kids Are... Just Fine

A news article that went national last week sensationally spun the results of a drug-use survey to imply that Washington State students may be smoking more pot due to the state's new legalization law. But it turns out that pot use isn't up. It's steady, even down a little bit.

The Healthy Youth Survey, released last Thursday by state officials, is a biennial trove of data used as the gold standard for gauging risky behavior by students, including smoking, drinking, and using drugs. An Associated Press story blared that pot is twice as popular as cigarettes, while adding that "the number of high school students who believe using marijuana is risky is also at a low point." It went on to quote Washington health secretary Mary Selecky, who said, "As the perception of harm goes down, use goes up." As a result, the article explained, officials "expressed concern that marijuana prevention efforts aren't ready to ramp up in response to the new state law."

In other words: Pot is really popular, kids think it's less harmful, and that leads to higher pot use.

So I pressed state officials for data on pot use among 10th graders—the same grade used to compare pot and tobacco consumption—because the article never cited those figures. If the declining perception of harm causes use to rise, the numbers should bear that out. Once I got the data, though, the numbers showed that while perception of harm has dropped significantly over the last decade, pot consumption among 10th graders remained basically flat. Regular use actually declined slightly, from 20 percent to 19 percent, in the last two years.

So despite the sensational contrast with cigarettes and the warnings of state officials, pot use isn't spiking among teens.

Why is pot twice as popular as cigarettes (which are actually riskier than marijuana)? Largely because society invests a lot of money in antismoking education campaigns. "Smoking has dropped tremendously in the last 10 years," says health department spokesman Tim Church. And while Selecky warns that legal pot will send a bad message to kids, Initiative 502 is designed to do the opposite. The tax revenues we start collecting this December will raise an estimated $110 million for drug-abuse prevention and education each year. That's money we don't currently have, and it's dedicated to discussing the actual risks of marijuana—not hyping fear. recommended

 

Comments (18) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Of course use is down in school age kids - now that it's legal it's no longer "cool".
Posted by woofy on March 20, 2013 at 12:49 PM · Report
2
The surveys were conducted in October, before passage of the I-502. The next healthy youth survey will be more useful in sorting out the effects of legalization under 1-502 and the funding of prevention education.
Posted by PAWA on March 21, 2013 at 1:43 PM · Report
3
This is still useful, though, in examining the claim that "As the perception of harm goes down, use goes up." Cigarettes stink, are addictive, and kill people. Are we really surprised that cannabis is regarded more favorably?
Posted by pox on March 22, 2013 at 11:33 AM · Report
4
If people believe that roller coasters are safe and well-maintained, they might visit more amusement parks! What if it leads to car crashes?!
Posted by Orsh on March 22, 2013 at 11:38 AM · Report
5
That said, it wouldn't be bad if they'd poll for the accuracy of perception of harm, not just vague statements of whether it's pretty bad or not so bad. We should absolutely be concerned with kids having useful knowledge about the relative risks of recreational activities, extra-specially risks that are higher for the developing brain.
Posted by Orsh on March 22, 2013 at 11:48 AM · Report
Pope Peabrain 6
Those kids are huffing. That kills. Get your priorities straight!
Posted by Pope Peabrain on March 22, 2013 at 11:54 AM · Report
rob! 7
Dominic--

The AP story I found does not include any figures. Was that graph included in the state report? If so, the graph title is very (deliberately) misleading; the casual viewer reading the large-font header and not looking at the footnotes will assume that the dark green line is elevated pot use and the light green line is peoples' perception of risk, when it's just the opposite.

This story would be improved by links to the AP story and to the state report, if it was released on-line.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on March 22, 2013 at 11:55 AM · Report
8

The data pre-dates I502. We have no idea yet how I502 will affect pot use. Great journalism, Dominic.
Posted by ian on March 22, 2013 at 12:00 PM · Report
9
Also, blowhard pot activists take note: 81% of 10th graders DON'T smoke pot. "Everybody" does not smoke pot; for this example, pot has little relevance to the lives of 81% of high-school students.

I voted for legalization and I'm thrilled that it happened, and I'm excited about it ameliorating racial imbalances in incarceration rates etc. etc., but it might be good to keep in mind: most people really just don't give a shit about pot one way or the other.
Posted by rca on March 22, 2013 at 12:08 PM · Report
rob! 10
Re: 7, should have read "...very (deliberately?) misleading..."

Also, whichever line the casual reader decides represents risk, the header implies that significant perceived risk is being graphed; the footnote indicates that it's those who perceive little or no risk.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on March 22, 2013 at 12:15 PM · Report
JonnoN 11
The war-on-drugs crowd has been lying about harmful effects for years, why should they be trusted now?
Posted by JonnoN on March 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM · Report
Reverse Polarity 12
Just backing up @2 & 8.

I know a 10th grader who took this survey, and it was definitely conducted BEFORE the November election. So whatever it purports to show, it has nothing whatsoever to do with the passage of I-502.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on March 22, 2013 at 12:58 PM · Report
13
@9- Lot's of shit doesn't appeal to high school students. Doesn't mean it should be illegal for adults.

And why is pot twice as popular as tobacco? Have you ever done a side by side test?
Posted by Bhamjason on March 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM · Report
14
imagine if something this sloppily researched were in the seattle times...dominic and co. would have a field day with it.
Posted by ian on March 22, 2013 at 3:01 PM · Report
15
@13 -- Likewise, if there are health dangers for teens, that doesn't mean that it is dangerous for adults.
Posted by Ross on March 22, 2013 at 3:02 PM · Report
16
I think the reality is that actually engaging with kids so they will give a hoot what you tell them about the risks of various drugs is a lot more effective than tossing a few in prison. Very few public health problems can be solved by locking people up. Legalization also makes harm-reduction strategies easier to implement, and of course cuts out a lot of the more dangerous crime long associated with smuggling and dealing.
Posted by treeowl on March 28, 2013 at 10:52 PM · Report
17
Just because something is legal, that does't mean it has to be healthy! Worrying about these
things is like worrying about alcohol-or poor
dietary choices leading to rotting teeth,pain and death. The dangers of pot smoking, no matter
how many or how few, do not warrant it being an illegal drug.
Posted by handelfire on April 4, 2013 at 12:31 AM · Report
18
Look to the Netherlands.
Posted by 5th Columnist on April 11, 2013 at 4:53 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in News