Marriage Equality

When It's Your Own Family That Needs Convincing

A Tense Talk with My Relatives in Port Orchard

When It's Your
Own Family
That Needs
Convincing

Robert Ullman

My relatives are the kind of folks who live on a few acres in the Port Orchard backwoods. We're the sort of family in which everyone ends up at my grandmother's house on Sundays talking about diets. We're also by and large a Republican family.

So I avoid talking to my conservative family about political issues to preserve a comfortable "don't ask, don't tell" ideological relationship. But Referendum 74 is on the ballot, and these conversations need to happen if it's going to pass.

With that in mind, on a recent Sunday I asked my family if they would be voting for R-74. My grandmother shuffled her feet in her slippers, and my uncle sighed the way he does when he sees a fight brewing. There were a few murmurs of "That's just not right" and "Gosh no, I couldn't support that." I asked why, and there was a thick silence. I tried to maintain eye contact, but everyone was looking elsewhere, watching the dogs run circles around the coffee table. Then my grandmother faced me and said, clear-eyed: "For me, no. I just don't... no." Then—either accidentally or as the best theater—my grandmother knocked her mug of water on the floor and someone shrieked, "Enough of this conversation."

I pressed on, and both my grandmother and my aunt ended up recounting the story of a Seattle lesbian (Kate Fleming) ending up in the hospital in grave condition after a sudden rainstorm and flooding filled the basement of her home, and how her partner had a hard time getting in to see her and make medical decisions before Fleming ultimately died in December 2006. They've never met a homosexual, they mentioned, but that story years ago on KING 5 just made them cry. "I think they should have all of those rights, of course," my grandmother said.

I ultimately realized that I needed to frame R-74 in a way in which my relatives could agree. I can't convince my grandmother that gay marriage is right for her church, but I didn't have to. Instead, I made a successful case that each church should be able to decide what is right for its congregation (which R-74 allows). I hammered on this individual-liberty point again and again until the murmurs turned to a quiet consensus that people should be left alone to do what they want.

On some level, I feel like I lost a moral battle with myself. Instead of engaging in a conversation about love being love no matter who it's with, I fought on easier ground—that people should be equal in the eyes of the state, that churches shouldn't be meddled with, that you can't tell anybody else what to do or what not to do. But I'm proud to say this argument worked. I'm not sure if they'll all vote yes, but none of them are voting no. recommended

 

Comments (4) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Dan Savage had a good analogy to use for talking with people like my conservative Christian family members who might still be convinced to vote for marriage equality. Most churches consider divorce to be a sin. (In fact, Jesus condemns divorce, although he is not recorded to have said anything about homosexuality.) As regrettable and "sinful" as these conservatives might consider divorce to be, they would agree that divorce should be a legal option, a right. And so with marriage equality.
Posted by Sally Hemings' daughter on October 12, 2012 at 6:20 AM · Report
2
I had a very similar conversation with my family, but it didn't go as well.

I grew up in Ohio, and my family still lives there. Ohio is starting a petition to get same sex marriage on the ballot, and I tried to get my family to sign the petition. My 80ish mom and dad were no problem. But my asshole older brother (so conservative he won't read the New York Times) just refused to sign. When I asked him why, he refused to say anything. That was the worst part. No "Gay sex is icky" or "Gay people are going to hell", just nothing. Nothing to go on, nothing to respond to, nothing other than pure hatred.

Oh well. No goodbye hugs from his gay/bi nieces then!
Posted by spudbeach on October 12, 2012 at 7:01 AM · Report
3
I guess conservatism is relative. Try discussing the topic with someone who won't buy a Android cellphone because Google isn't fighting state laws restricting online advertising for firearms.
Posted by david_42 on October 29, 2012 at 2:20 PM · Report
4
You gotta argue in a way they can't deny. Some of my own conservative relatives in Ohio have stated something that will put why the whole "they're just fighting for the right to love each other" doesn't work with the far right into perspective. They stated that all non-hetero people are "evil" because they lifestyle makes them incapable of having monogamous relationships. If you're trying to fight for equal rights in marriage, you won't get anywhere by saying it's the right to love who you want if they think that they're not going to respect marriage like they supposedly do. You have to make it an argument about people they have met and know who fit their moral standards or relate it to different issues they support (like religious freedom and taxes). It's sad that people will promote restrictions on people's right to live a life in the manner they see best fit while they hold the very same privilege.
Posted by lil tiger on November 4, 2012 at 4:52 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Pullout