Cafe Racer Shooting
Without a Net
Who's to Blame for the Cafe Racer Tragedy
Tools
Cafe Racer Shooting
- A Neighborhood Comes to Grips with the May 30 Shootings
- How Seattle's Finest Handled Seattle's Worst Hours
- The Victims of the May 30 Shootings
- Who's to Blame for the Tragedy at Cafe Racer
- A Risk, Apparently, Our Pro-Gun Legislature Is Willing to Take
- An Open Letter from the Cafe Racer Staff
- What to Do if Someone You Know Needs Help
Ian Stawicki, the man responsible for last week's shootings—like Kyle Huff (the shooter behind the Blue House massacre) and Isaiah Kalebu (who committed the South Park attack and murder)—struggled with mental illness. Stawicki's family, his partners, and the very people he killed on May 30 at Cafe Racer all were concerned about his erratic behavior, his lust for firearms, his delusional and grandiose thinking. They shared a growing dread about him.
In Washington State, it is exceedingly difficult to involuntarily commit someone— particularly for an extended period of time—who is mentally ill unless they are an imminent threat to themselves or others, or so gravely disabled they are unable to complete the most basic tasks of life. Individuals with illness severe enough to be committed to a mental health facility in other communities are allowed—they are compelled—to try to integrate into the community here. Washington State has among the fewest inpatient psychiatric beds of any state in the nation. Given this dearth, it is now typical for mentally ill patients in crisis to wait for hours—or days—in emergency rooms to receive care in our community.
Stranger Personals
In place of (costly and arguably inhumane) warehousing of the mentally ill, the plan for decades in Washington State has been to provide aggressive outpatient case management. Psychosis, bipolar disease, depression, anxiety, and others are all treatable diseases. The notion—and it's not a bad idea at its core—is to use an army of social workers to keep mentally ill people in the community engaged with treatment and the community safe.
Over the same decades, our investment in social services has dwindled—acutely so in the past few years of no-new-taxes budgeting. Right-wing propagandists who have fought bitterly against any new taxes to support social service spending in our state—including the Seattle Times editorial board, Tim Eyman, and anyone you know who has uttered the phrase "a more efficient state government"—are directly responsible for our social service network being gutted. They are directly responsible for the many safety nets left tattered and unmanned.
Essential, successful, and efficient programs like our mental health system have been cut. Social workers responsible for caring for (and keeping watch over) mentally ill individuals in the community are now routinely expected to handle scores of complicated patients, with fewer resources to direct them to. As a social worker commented on Slog last week, under these circumstances, the desperate battle to keep their clients—and you—safe is a losing one:
I am a social worker, and while I happen to have a small, manageable caseload, most of my colleagues are saddled with a totally unrealistic amount of clients (60, 70, 100!!!). In addition, we are paid just a tiny bit more than your average fast food worker... I myself work two jobs (both in social work) and rarely have even a day off. I do this because I honestly love the work and the clients, and I know it is important (and also because I need to survive). But I know I am not always at my best...
The budget for mental health services is insufficient, making it pretty impossible to find resources for clients sometimes. And we're talking about basic resources like food, shelter, and clothing.
The big picture here is that our society does not care about the mentally ill or the people who dedicate their whole lives to working to help stabilize them. The only time we even talk about mental illness is when horrible things like this happen. And that's a huge problem.
The events of last week could have been very different if the hard work of Washington State's mental health providers had been properly supported.
The reign of the radical right's financial policy in Washington State has left us—particularly the richest among us—with some of the lowest tax burdens of any community in the United States. The cost is the Blue House, the South Park, and now the Cafe Racer tragedies. ![]()
we are to blame for swalling the nra's hogwash and defeatism, and for saying all the time "guns don't kill people, people do" because you know what?
in france
germany
england
canada
japan
sweden
switzerland
and oh about 20 other nations, GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE as much as here, cuz they got stronger gun control laws, acting as if, you know, guns are dangerous and every tom dick and harry shouldn't get alicense to carry handguns around like it's no big deal.
they also seems to realize that all these handguns are NOT going to make you safe. somehow the myth your gun protects you is one we swallow wholesale. wyatt earp and the folks in tombstone got it right -- you need some serious gun control.
there's no way to find and corral all the disabled people, mentally, and while criminals don't obey laws that doesn't mean you should fucking let them get well armed does it. we control nuclear arms. you can't have one at home. we can control guns. by choosing not to, we're responsible, but mainly the NRA.
The state is failing us, and yes they can perhaps choose to go with large and very cheap solutions to simply warehouse people in dungeons and make it easier to put people in there (and if it was profitable, there would be an incentive and the results would mirror the situation with the prisons were we jail too many people for victimless crimes). When the state fails - but still takes our money - what else can we do?
The so-called left has it's sacred cows: a welfare statism with visible projects in the sort of programs that are more appreciated. Sometimes I think the so-called left is more into building parks than anything else. The so-called right wants warfare statism and God help you if you say we had too many cops around that crowd.
So I'd say that everybody is getting what they wanted, and getting it good and hard.
Of course, when you're talking policy, you're never talking about how the POLICY would have prevented THIS SPECIFIC THING from happening. All full, robust funding of social services would have done is make something like this less likely.
OR, we can continue to make the perfect ("GUARANTEE me this thing will NEVER happen") the enemy of the good ("That thing is less likely to happen") and do nothing. It certainly is the lower-effort and lower-cost path, and those are the reasons why we'll continue to choose it.
She also believes that anyone who disagrees with her is full of demons.
She literally has to form "L's" with her hands to tell right from left.
They were rich, once.
I scored a 99.9% on every standardized test I've ever taken.
I failed out of my freshman year of junior high with a GPA of 0.9.
By your rules, the lying coward wins.
Maybe the rules are that way because of YOU.
Fuck you, and fuck your social system.
1) No one
2) Everyone






RSS
Comments (6) RSS