Oooh, Kennedy! She's the new face of, *ahem*, young conservatives! I remember when she lived here in the late 90's early 00's as she had a radio talk show which i prank called often acting like an old conservative who agreed with her diatribes like this dribble. What a tool.
@8: All her points are extrapolated from basic facts, such as fewer hours for minimum wage workers and issues with taxation. You know that. I know that. Everyone who lives here knows that.
She presents such an amazingly dense jungle of mixed message and self-contradiction; combining lawlessness, communism, socialism, and topping it off by proposing that a property's value is tied to the particular individual that resides there.
@11: Always been one, she just used to talk about grunge and alt instead of politics.
All this because someone dares to (scream!) TAX THE RICH! I don't want to go back to the 50s for a variety of reasons, but Elvis Presley paid 90-cents in taxes for every dollar he made back then. Does anyone want to suggest he went without anything because of taxes? And that tax money was used to build schools and hospitals and the Interstate Highway System, etc. And we had a middle class who benefited from many of these projects.
So, yeah, yeah, yeah, Kennedy...let's hold on to every cent and keep the government out of our pocketbook. The poor deserve to be hungry because they are weak and lazy and unfortunate. Children should be educated privately because nothing comes from a decently-funded public education system (and if you can't afford the $40,000/yr. tuition, well, you know what poverty is, right?). Let's forget about our airports and bridges. I've got my own plane and runway, don't you? And if you are sick and/or disabled, it may be that your number is just up. Yeah, let's learn from Seattle, a dreary Communist nightmare where no one wants to live (and have been moving there by the fucking truckload since you were hustling videos late at night on MTV).
Glad you found a home at Fox - owned by Rupert Murdoch. Didn't he let a son drown at sea because helping him would have meant letting go of a bag of money?
Probably around the time "latte-sipper" supplanted "quiche-eater" as a derogatory term for progressives.
Alert the Politburo!
Wasn't she always?
It was no secret in the 90s, at any rate.
And what @14 said, she was always a dickhead.
All this because someone dares to (scream!) TAX THE RICH! I don't want to go back to the 50s for a variety of reasons, but Elvis Presley paid 90-cents in taxes for every dollar he made back then. Does anyone want to suggest he went without anything because of taxes? And that tax money was used to build schools and hospitals and the Interstate Highway System, etc. And we had a middle class who benefited from many of these projects.
So, yeah, yeah, yeah, Kennedy...let's hold on to every cent and keep the government out of our pocketbook. The poor deserve to be hungry because they are weak and lazy and unfortunate. Children should be educated privately because nothing comes from a decently-funded public education system (and if you can't afford the $40,000/yr. tuition, well, you know what poverty is, right?). Let's forget about our airports and bridges. I've got my own plane and runway, don't you? And if you are sick and/or disabled, it may be that your number is just up. Yeah, let's learn from Seattle, a dreary Communist nightmare where no one wants to live (and have been moving there by the fucking truckload since you were hustling videos late at night on MTV).
Glad you found a home at Fox - owned by Rupert Murdoch. Didn't he let a son drown at sea because helping him would have meant letting go of a bag of money?