Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, May 4, 2009

Re: One of the Country's Great Newspapers...

Posted by on Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Here's the detail that blows MY mind: Even as it's trying to wring cost cuts from the Boston Globe, the NYT plans to drive away even more readers by raising the price of its dead-tree version to $2 on weekdays, $6 on Sundays. Hell of a business plan you got there, guys.

 

Comments (21) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
That's practically $1k a year. It's like a fucking bus pass. So now you can spend $2,000 a year to ride the bus while you support the old technology that is Newspaper. The hell.
Posted by Mr. Poe on May 4, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Sammy Loggins 2
YESTERDAYS NEWS TODAY! ONLY 2 DOLLARS!
Posted by Sammy Loggins on May 4, 2009 at 12:07 PM
spoiler alert 3
six bucks for a paper???
Posted by spoiler alert on May 4, 2009 at 12:14 PM
w7ngman 4
Why read yesterday's news today via NYT when you can just read it for free via ECB's renditions of the Morning News?
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on May 4, 2009 at 12:33 PM
hahnsolo 5
what ever happened to the pay to see content on their web edition? it could be mad cheap, like $15-20 a month .
Posted by hahnsolo on May 4, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Good Grief 6
I would really miss The Big Picture if it went away...

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/
Posted by Good Grief on May 4, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Urgutha Forka 7
That's like the post office's strategy. Fewer people are using snail mail, so their solution is to raise the price of stamps. Brilliant!
Posted by Urgutha Forka on May 4, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Will in Seattle 8
You know, that's way too much for any paper without two full pages of comics.

No wonder their readership is dropping.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 4, 2009 at 12:45 PM
9
The NY Times Co may not be aware that Boston is largely made up of four groups: college/grad students, a strong working class, an entrenched group of upper-middle class professionals, and the UBER rich (i.e. Boston Brahmins). Of these groups only the last two buy the Globe (the first group reads the globe online if at all, the second group reads the Boston Herald). So it makes a CERTAIN amount of sense to charge more for the paper since the people buying the paper are disproportionately from the affluent sections of society. HOWEVER this is a horrible LONG-TERM PLAN. The economy just needs to that slump that much lower before the upper-middle class professionals start clamping down on their subscriptions. As for the uber rich readership, they're slowly dying off.

Plus why would ANYONE pay $6 for the Sunday Globe when they can get the Sunday Times (complete with Frank Rich, the Ethicist, and Virginia Heffernan's column) for a dollar cheaper?!

My modest proposal for saving the Globe is simple (and admittedly probably ill-concieved): the Boston area is overrun with students, in fact we have so many colleges I literally cannot name all of them off the top of my head (though I can think of the names of at least 20). The Globe should create a sister publication that is targeted at the greater Boston student community. Sort of an intra-school paper, staffed by professionals and incorporating stories from the main (and shrinking) Globe newsroom into coverage that's more geared toward the concerns of the area's massive student population. The big added benefit of this move would be the rejuvenation of the newspaper ad market by companies wanting to maintain their presence in the lucrative youth market. Hell the Globe could even try and talk schools into buying subscriptions for all incoming freshmen!

There you have it. Anyone with a better idea let me know...
More...
Posted by stuck in boston http://www.nothing.com on May 4, 2009 at 12:50 PM
10
@9: The $6 for the Sunday paper is for the NYT, not the Globe.

How's that reading comprehension class working out for you?
Posted by alwaysamasshole on May 4, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Simac 11
The NYT is in a bind because ad revenues are too low to keep the company afloat, and weighing the survival of the Globe and the NYT means that the NYT itself is prioritized. Raising prices is one way to get loyal customers to pay more to make up for the missing ad revenue, but in reality this will be offset by canceled subscriptions (people in recessions are quick to cancel subscriptions to save money). So, I think this move will backfire.

I myself used to get the NYT seven days, but when they near-doubled the price a year or so ago I had to lower that to weekdays only, and I buy the weekend editions myself sporadically when I have time for them. I'm surely not alone.

If the NYT distributed Kindle-style readers to every subscriber for free and largely suspended its national print distribution, they would save a ton of money (and trees). This might be worth considering very seriously.
Posted by Simac on May 4, 2009 at 12:56 PM
12
@7,

I don't know if that's really a strategy. The USPS isn't really a business enterprise. So if they can't function without raising prices, they have to raise prices. Cutting costs isn't so easy when your employees are civil servants.

$6 is worth it for the Sunday edition, but $2 for the daily? They're out of their fucking minds. It already takes a week to read the Sunday edition.
Posted by keshmeshi on May 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM
michael strangeways 13
if the Globe is so great then why do so many people from that part of the world refer to it derisively as "The Globule"?
Posted by michael strangeways http://www.seattlegayscene.com/ on May 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
14
A tip for increasing ad revenues.....

During hard times there are creative ways to increase ad revenues.

I am quite certain that The Stranger/Boston Globe/NY Times could increase their own profitability by working with local businesses on ways to increase profits.

Here is but one example

http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/new…
Posted by PaulinBallard on May 4, 2009 at 1:30 PM
15
Pay more for less is the new order of the day.
Posted by Trevor on May 4, 2009 at 1:35 PM
16
The NYT price increase is for newsstand sales. One strategy is to encourage people to subscribe (at substantially less) rather than buy at the newsstand, thus assuring more consistent, ongoing revenue.

The Sunday NYT is well worth $6 to me. Just as The Stranger is worth every penny I pay for it.
Posted by alwaysamasshole on May 4, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Cato the Younger Younger 17
And this is why I am not renewing my NYT subscription when it comes due.

So much for the paper of record!!!
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on May 4, 2009 at 1:47 PM
18
@10 OOPS. Price hike for the NYTimes not Globe. Clearly those reading comprehension classes are not working.

Agreed. $6 for Sunday Times= totally worth it. $2/daily....not so much...
Posted by stuck in boston http://www.nothing.com on May 4, 2009 at 2:30 PM
michael strangeways 19
no, don't blame yourselves for reading miscomprehension...ecb's post is inelegantly written.
Posted by michael strangeways http://www.seattlegayscene.com/ on May 4, 2009 at 2:55 PM
20
It's like Qwest's plan to make payphones more available by increasing the minimum rate to make a call thusly encouraging people to use their expensive payphones.
Posted by Weekilter on May 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM
Reality Check 21
Fools
Posted by Reality Check http://www.nraila.org on May 4, 2009 at 9:51 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy