Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, May 29, 2009

Something's Coming

Posted by on Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:38 AM

The Office of Arts and Cultural Affairs has released their city art grants ($225,000 all told), and the list reads like a season preview for the city of Seattle. Certain individuals have been very grumpy in the past about how the city spent its public art dollars.

But, reading through the press-release-ese, some of these projects sound great, mostly because of the people involved.

Marya Sea Kaminski, theatre, Condomillennium: A Play About Fantasy and Real Estate. To develop and perform a full-length monologue play that investigates the inner-workings of people who have been affected by a major condominium project in their neighborhood. The play will combine real human stories with absurd fantasies to build a theatrical picture of the evolution of our urban landscape and our instinctual need for space and home.

Stefan Gruber, theatre, Psychic Portraiture. To create and perform a show in which the artist paints portraits of audience members with animated light on a stage arranged with a large-sized canvas. Symbols from the life of the model also materialize to decorate the portrait. In a banter with the model and audience, psychic details are intuited.

Dayna Hanson, theater, Great Great Great Great Grandchildren of the Revolution. To create and perform a dance-driven rock musical bringing the Boston Tea Party, Paul Revere's legendary ride and other iconic moments of the Revolutionary War to life. The work blends dance, theater, music, design elements and testimonials to link revolutionary ideas to modern-day hopes and failures.

Keri Healey, theatre, Torso. To research, write and workshop a new play based on a recent real-life murder case in Minnesota, to which the playwright has a personal connection. "Torso" (working title) will explore new and darker territory for the writer: violence, revenge and broken family relations in America.

Derrick [Ryan?] Mitchell, theatre, Flinch Not and Give Not Back. To create active dramaturgical environments geared towards the idea of third-person narrative dialogue that addresses the non-narrative subtext of the often striking images performance group Implied Violence is known for.

Amy O'Neal, dance, too. To create a dance/video performance following the fragmented and dreamlike events of two dancers who encounter 50 other people duet style, but manage to miss each other while environ-ments and people constantly change. The duo meets people under varying circumstances and their inter-action with these strangers, friends and acquaintances creates a cut- and-paste dance of physical extremes.

John Osebold, music, THE WEST. To create a stage performance deconstructing, debunking and celebrating the myths of the Westward Expansion and American imperialism. This multidisciplinary show will explore Lewis and Clark's discovery of the Pacific Northwest, subsequent growth of regional industry, and social impacts on the modern and future world.

Amelia Reeber, dance, this is a forgery. To perform an evening-length solo dance incorporating the visual element of video. There will be a soundscore that consists of previously recorded songs and a thematic armature of original music by composer/musician Sam Mickens.

Jennifer Zeyl, theatre, Sonic Tales. To design and coordinate the execution of the scenic environment for the work, a series of contemporary fairy tales told through intricately woven dance theater and live music, set in Joseph Cornell-inspired and video-powered landscape. This project will put the idea of heroism under a magnifying glass - exploring the tiny, everyday variety - exploding them into a new mythology.

It's like a theater/dance all-star lineup. And that's just a few of them. See the whole list here.

 

Comments (15) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
1. Other things are more important.
2. This is why the working class gets poached by the GOP.
3. This is insane. If you want to spend money on art buy paints and pay art teachers so kids get more art. Or pay for kids to go to well established plays or the ballet.

This is mere ephemera.
Posted by PC on May 29, 2009 at 10:51 AM
2
"create active dramaturgical environments" = it's a play dummy

"geared towards the idea of third-person narrative" = wow narrators are not you, and not me? Profound.

"dialogue" = people in the play talk to each other, wow, what an innovation

"that addresses the non-narrative subtext" = you know, the fact that there's unspoken shit going on is sooooo profound
"of the often striking images performance group Implied Violence is known for" = but saying what they are or what it means or what happens would let us be able to judge for ourselves what the hell it's "about" i.e. that it's likely crap.

Clearly, this is more important than paying teachers, or providing transit, or health care.
Posted by PC on May 29, 2009 at 11:22 AM
COMTE 3
Well, for one thing PC, eight year-olds don't turn the end results of those paints and brushes into things that generate income for artists, galleries, performance venues, theatre and dance companies, and a plethora of local businesses.

FWIW, this "waste of working class taxpayer money" represents exactly 0.024725274% of the City's 2009 Budget - yes, a bit more than two one-hundredths of one percent. If you were to give each of Seattle's estimated 322,614 taxpayers a rebate on that $225,000 they'd receive a whopping $0.70 back per person - less than the cost of two first-class postage stamps, so yeah, I'm sure they'll be eternally grateful for your largesse.

And of course you fail to consider that it's pretty much guaranteed that practically all of this grant money is going to go right back into the local economy because the recipients will use these awards to purchase supplies, hardware, materials, and a variety other goods and services from local businesses, thus helping to stimulate an economy badly in need of stimulation right now. They might also use some of it to pay rent, buy groceries, or get their car repaired, you know other things that keep local businesses IN business.

I'm not saying teaching kids about art isn't important - it's vital to the healthy maturation of any society - but it's sort of stupid to subsidize kids going to see art events, if you're not going to subsidize the events themselves, and that includes individual working artists, which is specifically the constituency for these grants.

And I'm sure there were Philistines such as yourself in Euripides' or Shakespeare's day who would have poo-pooed subsidizing their work (which was most certainly the case) as "mere ephemera" as well, so, don't feel too badly about your "penny-wise pound-foolish" nature, because you're probably in good company.
More...
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on May 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM
Steven Vroom 4
To much theater not enough music.
Posted by Steven Vroom http://vroomjournal.com on May 29, 2009 at 11:48 AM
DOUG. 5
$225k is, what, 50 cents per resident? I think we can swing that.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on May 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM
6
"Thematic armature of original music?" God, sometimes I really hate artspeak.
Posted by Levislade http://ballofwax.org on May 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM
7
Oooh, I am excited for Amy Denio's musical bench, though.
Posted by Levislade http://ballofwax.org on May 29, 2009 at 12:13 PM
8
For $225,000, you get a whole lot of culture. The same dollar value does not exactly buy a lot of roads. Culture wins. I'll ride my bike.
Posted by arts&letters on May 29, 2009 at 12:19 PM
9
For $225,000, you get a whole lot of culture. The same dollar value does not exactly buy a lot of roads. Culture wins. I'll ride my bike.
Posted by arts&letters on May 29, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Will in Seattle 10
The multiplier effect of the money spent on artists is far higher than the money spent on biotech or road-building, actually.

This is why the highest ROI in job multipliers is actually for unemployment benefits, once unemployment gets beyond a certain level (both current and total).
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 29, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Puty 11
Why bother buying kids paint, PC? They'll just grow up to be artists looking for funding you don't want them to have.
Posted by Puty on May 29, 2009 at 1:47 PM
COMTE 12
@6:

Don't blame the artists, blame the granting agencies & foundations that have persisted in promulgating this type of language. I'm sure the people who apply for grants would much prefer to do them in "plain, simple English", if for no other reason than it would cut a HUGE chunk of time off what it takes to actually write the things, but they've had to learn to "parlez-vouz l' francais" as it were in order for their applications to be seriously considered.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on May 29, 2009 at 2:03 PM
13
Actually, having been at a meeting of local arts agencies who fund the arts yesterday, the topic of discussion was how to convince artists to use plain-speak instead of fancy language. Funders would LOVE artists to speak in a way that the average person on the street can understand so that art would feel less elitist. The funny thing is the funders thought maybe artists were doing that to show off the fact that many of them have MFA's. Funders have to go through so many applications, it's actually refreshing to get ones written in plain English. But even when funders put it in their application guidelines, we still get artspeak.
Posted by sender on May 29, 2009 at 4:21 PM
14
Yaaaaay Stefan Gruber!!!!! He was my animation teacher at Nova and deserves any support he can get.
Posted by judy tenuta on May 29, 2009 at 4:28 PM
15
"Actually, having been at a meeting of local arts agencies who fund the arts yesterday, the topic of discussion was how to convince artists to use plain-speak instead of fancy language."

They are lying to themselves--the dominant paradigm in arts funding is to use that incredibly obscuring language, and it comes from the top down. There's no debate about that. It's nice that you were in a room with local arts agencies who feel differently, and that's heartening, though the fact that the group doesn't even know where these trends originate is depressing.

If funders and institutions want this to change, change the guidelines explicitly and begin *demanding* that, and demand other institutions to do the same.
Posted by Mike Daisey http://mikedaisey.com on May 30, 2009 at 9:00 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy