Palin gets all intellectual:
(Marc Ambinder) In an essay posted last night to her Facebook page, ex-AK Gov. Sarah Palin and her research staff responded last night to criticism from — well, she says President Obama, but it's actually criticism from sensible circles on the right and the left — that she misstated the facts when she wrote last Friday about "death panels" being given the power to decide whether her son Trig's life was valuable. The essay doesn't seem to be in Palin's voice; it is more dispassionate and analytical than anything she has previously written, much less said, in recent memory. It includes 11 footnotes, linking to bill texts, government reports, articles and supportive commentary.Palin should not try to sound smart (or hire people to make her sound smart). This approach will backfire. Not because it sounds phony but because it sends confusing codes to those in the base. The reason why the whole "death panel" thing was a huge success was precisely because Obama is an intellectual, and if you are an intellectual these are your codes: rational, godless, cold. Obama represents state power as a domain of reason rather than feeling. This is why the death panel thing will only work if Palin plays dumb, which has these codes: innocent, commonsensical, god-fearing. Do not confuse the codes. Keep them clear and distinct.Turns out that Palin's argument IS about the advance directive provision of HR 1233. "With all due respect, it's misleading for the President to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients. The issue is the context in which that information is provided and the coercive effect these consultations will have in that context."

2
3
8
9
12
13
15
18
Comments (18) RSS