Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

McGinn's Plan to Handle a $72 Million Deficit

Posted by on Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:17 PM

Mayoral candidate Mike McGinn issued a four-point plan today for managing the city's $72.5 million projected budget shortfall. His top priority is slashing 200 strategic advisers at City Hall, which he calls a return to pre-2001 levels, when Mayor Greg Nickels took office.

McGinn proposes cutting duplicative information-technology and human resources staff that are represented in central staff and again in agencies. He also suggests reforming the city's contracts for services. For instance, he argues, "In the age of internet, all contracts should be open for public bids."

In a small miracle, his proposal says nothing about a tunnel. Not a word.

His full proposal is after the jump.

As mayor, I will work to cut city administrative costs before reducing direct services to citizens.

By doing more with less, we can stretch tax dollars further. And as the economy and revenue collections recover, we can reinvest the savings in fully funding public safety, eliminating furloughs in the library system, and restoring human service programs.

The following are specific initiatives that I support to reduce the cost of government while providing greater openness and transparency.


1. Rollback the politicization of city government

The city has doubled the number of strategic advisors over the last decade. We can eliminate 200 of these political appointee positions by rolling back the number of strategic advisors to 2001 levels. Further savings can be achieved by reducing the number of executive and management positions across the government.

2. Consolidate duplicated functions
City departments are largely decentralized, yet the city also maintains large internal support agencies. The following are some examples of functions and responsibilities that need to be more clearly delineated.

Information Technology
We have nearly 200 employees in the IT department, yet major agencies also have their own IT staff.

Personnel
We have over 100 employees in the personnel department, yet major agencies also have their own payroll clerks and HR staffs. Further cost reductions can be made by transitioning to electronic payroll.

Public information / Community outreach
Public information officers and community outreach staff are funded in virtually every major department. By housing these functions in the Department of Neighborhoods, we can strengthen community involvement and reduce costs.

Further efficiencies
We should explore merging Seattle City Light and Seattle Public Utilities to reduce administrative overhead and operating costs. Other departmental consolidations should be pursued if they will yield real savings.

3. Reform contracting and procurement:
While the potential general fund savings are relatively small, the government as a whole spends far too much on contracted goods and services. The following steps, along with stronger overall fiscal management, will help reduce costs.

No-bid contracts
The city currently allows no-bid contracts up to $260,000. In the age of internet, all contracts should be open for public bids.

Contract amendments
Contract costs often soar due to contract amendments. Such amendments should be rare and strictly limited to the scope of the original contract.

Retire/Rehire
City employees should not be able to "retire" and then return to city work as higher-paid consultants/contractors. The current 12-month ban is insufficient. Efforts to increase the limit to 24-months are appropriate, but a simpler solution is to limit compensation to the level earned while working for the city, adjusted for inflation.

4. Independent forecasting
Key budget assumptions, including the revenue and inflation forecasts, should be determined by an independent economic office. This office should be jointly accountable to the executive and legislative branches.

 

Comments (17) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Cato the Younger Younger 1
I'd like to see actual numbers with how this will add up to $70 Million
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on September 15, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Fnarf 2
Wow, some actual sense from McGinn. The city is CRAWLING with contract advisors, none of whom have any agenda except hoarding information about their department's work from everyone else. If there's an indictment of Nickels's administration that makes sense, it's this: the stonewall protectionism of city departments, and the bloated advisory budgets. Seriously, try getting a city employee on the phone, and then try getting them to tell you something, anything, about any city service.

Oh, and the last time I was in a city office, I snuck a peek at an ENTIRE ROOM full of Dell computers, still in boxes, that were at least a year old, judging by the models and shipping dates. So maybe there's some gas in their IT balloon too.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on September 15, 2009 at 2:42 PM
3
I was hoping for an excel sheet. What he sent out instead is pure crap. For example: what is the additional overhead cost to have bidded contracts for under 260k? Hint: double the cost per contract. Can we have some numbers please?

Finding inefficiencies at Seattle City light? No meat there, McGinn.

Roll back 200 polical appointents? Can we have the names and departments of those 200? On what criteria will he decide what is "political"? The same as what people use when they say FOX news is "objective"?

Reducing HR will lead to other inefficiencies with staffers. It will also lead to more litigation.

Re retire/rehire: when long time p[eople leave, they take knowledge with them. Retaning people as a consultant is way cheaper then reinventing the wheel in many cases.

It's clear that McGinn knows very little about being an executive for a large organization that actually does anything beyon lobby, writie grants, and issue press releases. This latest press release reveals his true ignorance.

Nickels I'm sure has already gutted most everything to pay for his toys. Why does McGinn seem to think that massive layoffs are a solutions? That will furthure depress the local economy, as less money in the form of wages, leads to less purchasing, which leads to more layoffs.

McGinn doesn't get his econ 101 at all.
Posted by the old man on September 15, 2009 at 2:59 PM
Will in Seattle 4
These are really really good and practical ideas.

Now watch as the political appointees who make four times what the standard city employees come crawling out of the woodwork do. They'll be on this in droves.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM
5
I don't know what department you saw, Fnarf, but I work for the city and my desktop is seven years old, made by a manufacturer that is no longer in business. It crashes every time I try to work on graphics. And there's no money for a new one, or even for more memory.

I understand the need for efficiencies, but this candidate has no clue how things work. Merging City Light and SPU? That makes as much sense as merging libraries with police - unrelated audiences and services. Consolidating all the PIOs in neighborhoods? That's like fixing the DC news coverage at the New York times by sending all the reporters to Detroit - Good luck getting accurate information fast.

I hope both of these candidates get a crash course in city government soon, otherwise, we are all going to be nostalgic about the bad old days of the Nickels administration...
Posted by bonacruton on September 15, 2009 at 3:17 PM
6
You mean he didn't call for a tax raise? I'm beginning to like this guy!
Posted by Billy Boy on September 15, 2009 at 3:20 PM
Will in Seattle 7
@5 - President Obama's desktop is more than 200 years old.

You don't see him whining.

As to computers, we just dropped a Unix box made by Digital. Yeah, we're talking 1980s. It worked fine for decades.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 15, 2009 at 3:34 PM
8 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy
Will in Seattle 9
god you anti-tax people are a bunch of whiners.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 15, 2009 at 4:00 PM
10
I wonder what we're paying for licensing of software for which free alternatives exist. How many people really know Word (the latest version) so well that their work would be significantly disrupted by switching to OpenOffice? Do most people get far enough past the desktop GUI to know or care whether their computers run Windows or GNU/Linux? The city should get off the Microsoft forced-upgrade treadmill and adopt standards-based computing everywhere it can.
Posted by Phil M http://twitter.com/pmocek on September 15, 2009 at 4:53 PM
11
"3 percent surtax on incomes between $200,000"

Joint or individual? If it's joint, F...U...
Posted by Ian Smith on September 15, 2009 at 6:48 PM
12
"another person I spoke to said even McDonalds wasn't "

Bull shit. The one on 15th ave has had a help wanted sign up ALL fucking year.

"Many people in Seattle are beginning to conclude that we need to take our city back--from the Nickelsville residents holding their ground, to the students organizing against budget cuts, to teachers' union members protesting layoffs.:

Thanks for the laff. Luckily bums are too lazy to vote as well.
Posted by Ian Smith on September 15, 2009 at 6:59 PM
13
hey don't reveal contracts with MFR!

We only paid them $1.5 million to say there were problems in SDOT -- as if we didn't know -- then we didn't do anything about the problems!

Posted by "One hand washes the other" on September 15, 2009 at 8:42 PM
seandr 14
It's refreshing to hear McGinn talk about being mayor as opposed to an anti-tunnel activist.

If McGinn can shed his image as yet another idealistic lefty whose refusal to play the game completely undermines his good intentions, he'll win by a landslide.

Take, for example, this whole biking thing. It's really wonderful that Mike, like almost everyone else in the city, enjoys cycling. But guess what - we pay the mayor to do his fucking job, not to spend most of his day training for STP. Put on a fucking suit, get in the hybrid SUV, and start busting your ass getting to every goddamn meeting you can possibly fit into the day. On time.

And shave.
Posted by seandr on September 15, 2009 at 8:54 PM
Gomez 15
To be fair, I'm obviously not a McGinn fan but I like his idea to slash the strategic staffers. Does he really need to pay a bunch of people to tell him how to handle matters when he's already got a battle plan? Clearly not.

Seattle does seem like a place where there's a lot of well-paid chiefs and not enough indians, and the City's no exception.
Posted by Gomez http://gomezticator.livejournal.com on September 15, 2009 at 11:52 PM
16
That idea of slashing strategic staffers comes right from Mallahan. During their Q&A/Debate, McGinn even sort of laughed off the suggestions when Mallahan raised it.
Posted by gogogogo on September 16, 2009 at 12:22 AM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 17
The Strategic Advisor positions are a way to runaround the unions. Hence, they won't be going anywhere.

The only place where it makes even remote sense to combine SPU and SCL has already been done: The billing system and the combined call center. Both of these have been detrimental to both City Light and the ratepayers.

Here's a better idea: Take authority over the utilities away from the council and mayor's office, and put it in the hands of an independent utility commission. This commission will oversee the budgets and the rates processes of the respective organizations, and advise of policy matters and infrastructure investments.

Right now, they are run as cash cows for the city, which means that even routine maintenance (streetlights. poles, mains, etc) get neglected in favor of political pet projects.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on September 16, 2009 at 6:49 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy