Meighan Doherty, one of the organizers of the march and much-panned rally here in Seattle (NOT THE D.C. March, people), responds to complaints...
This was a learning experience for everyone involved, as are all large projects like this, and despite opposition, challenges and lots of daunting work, everyone pulled their weight and made a valid and necessary contribution. I have been working with at-risk LGBT youth since I was 16 years old and I have never seen a more mature, accountable and positive group of young people. If anyone has a big problem with it then I echo the comment above: either join in the fight or create your own groups but don't knock the work of these people if you have no idea what went into putting this weekend together. I am proud to have been a part of this and I hope regardless of your personal opinion we all remember that there is a lot at stage with Referendum 71 and we ALL need to get involved.
First, props to the folks who organized a weekend's worth of activities. I know what goes into organizing events like these, and what those meetings can be like, and it's a lot of hard work.
But you still gotta take your lumps, hard work or no hard work, mature and accountable or infantile and unaccountable. When you plan a political rally and march and ask people who aren't involved in the planning to attend—when the success of your march and rally hinges on the attendance of folks who weren't involved in its planning—you have to be ready to take responsibility for the way the event came off. Sorry, but you can't hide behind the hard work you did behind the scenes and demand immunity from criticism. That's not the way it works.
Yes, people should get involved. And people do. But for some people showing up at a demonstration is as involved as they're willing to get or able to get at this time in their lives. If you hold these people in contempt—if your rally demonstrates that you're contemptuous of their time and your reaction to their criticisms demonstrates that you hold their feedback in contempt—don't be surprised if they don't show up at your next march or rally or demonstration. And you need them to show up. You can't claim to be leading a movement if no one is following. It's not good enough to say, essentially, that you can't criticize if you don't get involved. You want them to get involved, you need them to get involved, you needed the people who showed up on Sunday to stay involved. So their criticisms matter. You should be anxious to hear them and take action on them.
Around 3 PM on Sunday I was walking down 15th—I couldn't make the rally because I was with child—and I noticed about a dozen people walking south on 15th away from Volunteer Park carrying R-71 signs. I thought that was odd. The rally couldn't be over already, could it? Now I know that those were people leaving early, people who had given up on the march because they had had it with the rally. Those people won't be back. Maybe you don't think you need them. But you do. And any movement that takes people who by their very presence at a rally demonstrate they're willing to become politically involved and drives them away in droves, well, that's not a recipe for success.
And, I'm sorry, but it sure doesn't sound like everyone involved "made a valid and necessary contribution." It sounds whoever was in charge of the rally, whoever picked the speakers and "entertainers," really blew the pooch. That's something to bear in mind as you move forward. At the very least whoever it was that put the rally together shouldn't be given that job again. That's accountability. And remember: it's activism, not the special olympics. Not everyone is entitled to a medal.
1
2
4
5
6
8
12
14
15
17
26
28
34
37
Comments (37) RSS