
In this week's paper, I write about Seattle's Chaco Canyon Cafe, the 90% organic/100% vegetarian utopia, the aims of which are laid out plainly on the menu:
"We respect our planet, our community, our people and ourselves. We create simple, beautiful, and excellent quality food from fresh, organic local and seasonal ingredients in a warm and welcoming environment. We positively encourage our community by setting an environmentally sound example in every aspect of our café."
And then there's the Chaco Canyon Cafe's name, the irony of which was brought to my attention by Stranger commenters:
It cracks me up—Chaco Canyon, Kokopelli imagery, etc with all the veggie types. Although it's a bit controversial, there is some evidence of cannibalism down there in the ol' ancient southwest. I doubt if we'll see that on the menu at the Chaco Canyon Cafe. Don't co-opt without doing your homework!
Posted by Gusto F
Actually, cannibalism is my first association with "Chaco Canyon" too. But it occurs to me that if you're eating "long pig" you're not eating what most people (or at least veggies?) consider "animals," so maybe it can still qualify as vegan fare? It's not going to be organic, but arguably you are at least helping the planet. Next up: the Soylent Green Bistro. With weekend Donner Parties. (All you can eat!)
Posted by Wandergeist
Here's what turns up with a Google search for "Chaco Canyon cannibalism." Maybe the Chaco Canyon Cafe folks chose the name as a cautionary reference?
1
6
7
10
12
14
16
Comments (18) RSS