Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

America's Favorite Plays, with Statistics

Posted by on Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:03 AM

I missed this back in December—Hugh Grant declaring theater a waste of time:

"I personally find going to the theatre is enjoyable about one time in 20", he told World Entertainment News Network (WENN) last week. "The other 19 you're just going, 'Oh, come on. Let's get to the end of it and have a drink'".

... one of the reasons he says he declines to tread the boards? He "can't quite justify it ... because I know what misery it is for the audience". Recognising the limits of one's own talents is rare in moviemaking; for that alone we should forgive Grant everything he made in 1995.

Just because the stone-thrower lives in a glass house doesn't mean his rock can't fly out and hit its target... or something.

Meanwhile, over at the Wall Street Journal, Terry Teachout digests some data from Theater Communications Group about the most-produced plays of the decade (not counting Shakespeare or seasonal plays):

1. "Proof," by David Auburn (54 productions).

2. "Doubt," by John Patrick Shanley (48 productions).

3. "Art," by Yasmina Reza (45 productions).

4. "The Drawer Boy," by Michael Healey (36 productions).

5. "Rabbit Hole," by David Lindsay-Abaire (33 productions).

6. "Wit," by Margaret Edson (29 productions).

7. "I Am My Own Wife," by Doug Wright (26 productions).

8. "Crowns," by Regina Taylor (26 productions).

9. "Intimate Apparel," by Lynn Nottage (25 productions).

10. (tie). "The Glass Menagerie," by Tennessee Williams, and "The Laramie Project," by Moisés Kaufman and the Tectonic Theater Project (23 productions each).

It's a surprising list. Most of the plays are serious and philosophical, none of them is a musical—and, barring the Williams, most of them are contemporary. No Brecht, no Miller, no Shaw, no Wilde... American theaters and audiences, according to the numbers, prefer new and newish plays to the classics.

But you wouldn't know that from the bitching of most contemporary playwrights—or, um, me.

(Another way somebody—Hugh Grant maybe—is sure to read the data: Audiences don't like new plays and theaters wouldn't be in such trouble if they produced more museum pieces. But that reading doesn't work. Financially broken theaters have their bureaucracies and institutions, not their art, to blame. And it neglects the success of relentlessly contemporary theaters and companies like Steppenwolf, On the Boards, the Public, the Wooster Group, etc., etc.)

The TCG lists, broken down by season, also tell us that Seattle is seeing pretty much what the rest of the country is seeing. Between ACT, Intiman, and the Rep, we've gotten all the Nottage and Ruhl and Martin McDonagh that everyone else gets. It's almost like they're colluding...

Which tells us that our theater culture might be more nationally homogeneous than we thought. Over on his blog, local playwright (and Stranger Genius Award-winner) Paul Mullin has been banging a gong for cultivating more locally produced plays. His essay "Theatre Takes Place: Why Locally Grown Plays Matter" is long, passionate, and gutsy. A taste:

Over the last fifty years, the model of the auteur director serving as the alpha and omega of dramatic endeavor, imposing his or her “concept” on new play and classic alike— a model borrowed from and encouraged by the film industry— has grown increasingly infectious in American theatre. You need not look beyond Seattle with Dan Sullivan and Bartlett Sher essentially running their respective shops like Triple A feeder teams for the Broadway big leagues. (We can expect more of the same from the Intiman’s newly appointed Artistic Director, Kate Whoriskey. Hand-picked by the beatified Sher, she is sure to serve mostly as his marker absently placed in a book he may or may not return to some day.) [Ouch.] Hell, the fact that the recently introduced TPS Gregory Awards has a category for Outstanding Director but none for playwright is a crystalline example of how far this trend has gotten out of hand.

The new TCG data bears Mullin's discontent.

"Theater Takes Place" is the first of a 13-essay cycle called "Towards a World-Class Theater" that Mullin is threatening to complete. (It's part of a larger threat he first made publicly from the stage at the Genius Awards, challenging everyone in the room to make Seattle a "world-class theater town" within ten years.)

Say what you will about Mullin's arguments, the man's got some fire in his guts.

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Hugh Grant made "Love, Actually." So he should know all about torturing audiences.
Posted by Hugh Jasshole on January 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM
Mullin 2
Brendan, it's important to note that that data is from TCG member groups only, and not an accurate sample of the plays being produced around the country at all the various theaters.

How many of the houses in Seattle are TCG members? Only a few I'd wager. I'm pretty sure Annex, WET and Balagan aren't. Same sort of skewing would be true in theatre cities across the country.
Posted by Mullin http://www.paulmullin.org on January 12, 2010 at 11:26 AM
3
Paul, while you are correct that none of those theaters are TCG members, there are more than a few Washington companies represented through TCG: Harlequin, SCT, Book-It, Wing-It, Seattle Rep, Freehold, Intiman, Seattle Public, ACT and Taproot. That's still only what, 15% of theater produced in Seattle? So I would agree that the results should not be used for anything but entertainment value.
Posted by shanes on January 12, 2010 at 12:13 PM
4
I love Paul Mullin's work, but it seems to me he should do a little bit more research before suggesting that Kate Whoriskey would bring "more of the same" kind of theatre Bart has been creating in this city. Both are great directors, but Kate Whoriskey and Bart Sher are very different in their experience, philosophy, and style. Look at their resumes: Bart is a classics director - Shakespeare and musicals. Kate is largely known for her contemporary work - Cho and Nottage. Beyond that, Kate's public mission of diversification in the theatre community - on and off stage - coupled with her passion for issue and awareness-raising plays will be a fresh and stark change for most audience members, and an overdue change in this city.
Posted by reconsider on January 12, 2010 at 12:27 PM
5
of course...out of those top 10 plays, how many could be considered a "successful" run (just because they were the most produced doesn't mean they made cash).
Posted by I'm OK, You're OK on January 12, 2010 at 12:37 PM
josh 6
Though I have no evidence or enough background to even begin to research it, I wonder if there's something else driving those numbers like distribution channels or production costs that might explain how newish, single-word titled plays make it through the TCG.
Posted by josh http://www.sciencevsromance.net on January 12, 2010 at 12:50 PM
7
@ 3. Maybe 15% of the total theaters, but what percentage of the audience?

I wish I knew the exact number, but I'm guessing it's a hell of a lot more than 15%. Intiman and the Odd Duck do not weigh the same.
Posted by Brendan Kiley on January 12, 2010 at 1:12 PM
COMTE 8
Paul is correct in that TPS' first annual awards (not including the Greg Falls Award which has been presented for the past dozen years or so) didn't include a category for playwrights. However, it should be noted this first go-round was intentionally kept limited in scope, primarily as a means of "testing the concept". Now that TPS has some reasonable assurance the theatre community will support such an annual event, it's my understanding that the number of categories will be expanded accordingly. And one would certainly expect playwrights to be included in that larger recognition.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on January 12, 2010 at 2:05 PM
Mullin 9
Chris, as our old friend Bill Salyers likes to say: "From your mouth to God's ears." And I as like to say, "We'll be watching."

Josh, one huge factor to consider is that most of those plays have very small cast sizes.
Posted by Mullin http://www.paulmullin.org on January 12, 2010 at 2:26 PM
Cracker Jack 10
I would just like to take this moment to say that I would pay money to see a production in which Hugh Grant dies in a fire.

He could do Pippin and this time take the Player's advice.
Posted by Cracker Jack on January 12, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy