Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Is the University of Washington Catering to Nonresidents?

Posted by on Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:53 AM

tuition.jpg
  • Source: University of Washington

Prospective students and their parents were understandably outraged when the University of Washington recently announced that it was cutting the available slots for in-state freshmen by three percent at the Seattle campus, in order to make room for more lucrative nonresidents. And I'm sure the news that even the Tacoma and Bothell campuses are now heavily recruiting in California and elsewhere didn't calm any nerves. But I'm guessing folks might be a little surprised to learn how much the UW has been forced to cater to out-of-staters in order to compete for their tuition dollars.

According to the UW's own statistics, between 2000-2001 and 2006-2007, undergraduate nonresident tuition grew at a slightly higher pace than resident tuition, 71 percent compared to 59 percent. But over the past four years that trend has dramatically reversed, with resident tuition rising another 45 percent since 2006-2007, compared to a 19 percent combined hike for nonresidents.

For example last year, resident tuition jumped by 13.1 percent, while nonresident tuition only rose by 3.9 percent, well less than than annual 5.6 percent public four-year tuition inflation reported by the College Board.

Such a deal.

Of course, UW administrators really aren't to blame. Legislators have slashed support for higher education by more than 50 percent over the past two budgets, demanding that our universities cut costs and operate more like a business. So the UW has chosen the rational path of seeking to maximize revenues by attracting higher paying customers. That's what businesses do, right?

I guess. But I just don't see how this policy serves the interests of Washington's youth or its economy.

 

Comments (21) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gefion 21
"See, but that isn't how it works. Tuition for every student is $25,329/year. The state subsidizes $16.5k of that for its residents."

Actually, I think that the average cost of educating one undergraduate per year is less than $25K. The state general fund subsidizes about 45% of the cost for residents and students and their families are left with the balance of about $9K, meaning the total cost of the education is around $16K. I don't have a document to pull this percentage from, but it's what is cited in all the doom and gloom emails I continually receive from the UW Pres. and Provost as a staff member.

Non-resident students either "cost" more or very literally do subsidize the operations of the UW, including the educations of residents.
Posted by gefion on April 21, 2011 at 6:04 PM
Confluence 20
@14

Wow, a sociopath. Your parents must be so proud. It's soulless pieces of shit like you that ruin society for the rest of us. Lemme guess, going into business? Best of luck, ya pointless shitstain! Here's to hoping you end up like the Enron guys one day!
Posted by Confluence on April 20, 2011 at 9:31 PM
19
"Why can't UW forego that damn stadium and help out its own state's kids?"

That stadium is a revenue-generating asset and will be paying for itself
Posted by Reader1 on April 20, 2011 at 6:12 PM
18
See, but that isn't how it works. Tuition for every student is $25,329/year. The state subsidizes $16.5k of that for its residents.

So what you're seeing is, tuition is going up 4-5%/year. It's just that the state is simultaneously, constantly making HUGE cutbacks in the amount of subsidy it provides.
Posted by Cow on April 20, 2011 at 6:10 PM
17
Out-of-state students aren't just cheaper. With higher entrance requirements, they're also better. If a large portion of them end up staying in the area, maybe they end up bringing more future value to the state economy. I was an out-of-state student who stayed, and most of my OOS friends stayed too.
Posted by Oregon dawg on April 20, 2011 at 5:37 PM
16
Why can't UW forego that damn stadium and help out its own state's kids?
Posted by coda on April 20, 2011 at 5:32 PM
Will in Seattle 15
plus if they come in with straight A's now, and some IB and AP credit, they'll be forced to declare a major after their first semester and have their tuition jacked up by the time they're a Junior (since they'll have 4 years of credits, most of which won't apply to their major).

Sucks to be kids now. The old white fogies in Eastern Wash keep ripping them off to live off their socialized programs.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 20, 2011 at 5:21 PM
14
UW accepted me as out-of-state with zero high school diploma or GED. Just one sweet talked personal essay and some face time with the advisors of the specific school I was applying to.

Laughing at some little overachiever 18 year old who got straight As right now.
Posted by Swearengen on April 20, 2011 at 5:08 PM
Mittens Schrodinger 13
@BigSid--sorry. Instead of "cheap" how about "relatively cheap" since that is what I meant...obviously tuition isn't cheap! In-state or out. I agree with your points...so what's the solution? Tax? Oh yeah, the politicians we elect won't do that, so prices gotta go up. You want the cost of getting an education to remain at the same rate as the "back in my professor's day" rates of 30 years ago? Drop the cost of providing said education back to what it was 30 years ago. Simple.
Posted by Mittens Schrodinger on April 20, 2011 at 2:32 PM
Will in Seattle 12
@11 for the win.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM
11

Remember when teachers, poor people, the disabled, the elderly, firefighters, police officers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR, and PBS crashed the stock market, ruined the real estate market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes?

Yeah, me neither.

(I wish I had written that)
Posted by Mitch on April 20, 2011 at 1:52 PM
rob! 10
You have such a way of cutting to the essence, @9. Well done. This would also COMPLETELY eliminate provincialism, so two birds for that jagged stone.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on April 20, 2011 at 1:38 PM
OuterCow 9
Hey, every public college should just take only out of state students! *Poof!* Higher education budget crisis gone!
Posted by OuterCow on April 20, 2011 at 12:59 PM
8
this is basic infrastructure. and as a society, we no longer understand the value of it. this is just who we are as a people. it's a sad picture.
Posted by philosophy school dropout on April 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM
7
Someone said it better than me, but when you monetize education, same as health care and debt, this is what happens. Obviously out-of-state students pay more; we all pay taxes (I know, NOT an income tax) that go toward supporting the UW system so if someone wants to attend from out of state they SHOULD pay a significant mark-up. Calling in-state tuition "cheap" is a total non-starter, I had professors in college who paid THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER QUARTER to attend UC schools, where they USED to guarantee placement to any student graduating in the top 10% of their high school class. Now that's gone. $8 per credit community colleges? Also gone. If you haven't been paying attention, a bachelors degree is the new HS diploma: it's fucking toilet paper. You're guaranteed exactly JACK AND SHIT for earning a bachelors now, but let's make it even harder to get even THAT far for in-state students who want to attend the school paid for by their parents and themselves..
Posted by BigSid on April 20, 2011 at 12:18 PM
6
Since it's all about the money, and not about the futures of our own young people, why not just auction off the available slots to the highest bidders?. We must ensure the education of our global plutocracy.
Posted by pirate68 on April 20, 2011 at 12:15 PM
5
Here's a good commentary on the situation:

http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2011/04/uw…
Posted by ScruffyBallardMan on April 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM
4
And that is why my son is going out of state for College next year.
Posted by garumph on April 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM
Mittens Schrodinger 3
Doesn't it serve Washington's youth and economy by not just hiking tuition across the board? Wouldn't resident tuitions have had to go much higher if there wasn't an increase in non-resident enrollment to go along with it? Resident tuition was ridiculously cheap...the increases bring it more in-line with other states' resident tuitions. Non-resident tuitions were already pretty high, relative to other states, hence a much higher hike for residents than non-residents.
Posted by Mittens Schrodinger on April 20, 2011 at 12:04 PM
Aurophobia 2
Think of it as out-of-state students subsidizing the education of Washington students.
Posted by Aurophobia on April 20, 2011 at 12:00 PM
Will in Seattle 1
Every out of state postgrad is someone that the state isn't underfunding, so I can see why.

It's not like the state Constitution requires us to treat Education as the Primary Duty of the state, way behind funding roadways for eastern washington or insane tunnels we can't afford that double pollution and global warming impacts for Billionaires ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 20, 2011 at 11:58 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy