Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

My Jihad Against Monogamy Has Failed

Posted by on Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:27 PM

Should I give up?

Monogamy is on the rise, according to a new study that finds that couples these days generally are more monogamous than they used to be.... The study of 6,864 men and women—responses were collected from 6,082 individuals in 1975 and from 782 in 2000—examines differences on a variety of issues, including monogamy. The percentages of heterosexual men who reported having sex with someone other than their wife dropped to 10 percent in 2000 from 28 percent in 1975; among married women, it declined to 14 percent from 23 percent. Among gay men, the percentage who cheated on a partner they lived with dropped to 59 percent from 83 percent; for lesbians it declined to 8 percent from 28 percent.

Give up? Or point out that people in 1975 often stayed in marriages that didn't satisfy them—sexually, emotionally, whateverally—and opted to cheat on their spouses because cheating was less stigmatized in 1975 than divorce? These days, of course, cheating carries a larger social stigma than divorce. (I blame Ronald Reagan.) Consequently people in sexually/emotionally/whateverally unsatisfying marriages today are much liklier to divorce and remarry than people in sexually/emotionally/whateverally unsatisfying marriages in 1975. I hate to burst Ross Douthat's bubble here, but... serial monogamy is not quite the same thing as married-and-sexually-exclusive-for-life monogamy.

I mean, let's say someone who took part in the 1975 study had been married to one person for 40 years and cheated on his one-and-only spouse one time. He would've been counted among the terrible, no-good, really bad non-monogamists. (Assuming, of course, that he answered the question truthfully.) But a guy who took part in the current study who had married and divorced four women and is currently on his fifth wife but who had refrained from sticking his dick in women to whom he wasn't currently married would be counted among the sainted monogamists because he hadn't technically cheated on any of his five wives.

Who, I ask you, was better at monogamy? The guy in 1975 who was married to one woman for forty years and cheated on her once? Or a guy who marries and divorces four women and—odds being what they are—is likely to divorce his fifth wife and move on to a sixth?

The fine print: I'm not actually waging jihad against monogamy! If people in monogamous relationships are content, I'm content! But monogamy isn't for everybody.

 

Comments (23) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 1
Has more do to with the Birth Dearth than anything.

Look around...how many "Swingin' Single" women are there who you would actually want to (well, not YOU, but...)

Answer: None.

Test Case: Notice an attractive woman in her mid-Thirties at a restaurant picking up take out. Odds are, waiting outside is an oversize SUV bought by her husband, with two car seats in the back.

Guys know they have to lock that stuff in cause there's more demand than supply.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on September 7, 2011 at 1:31 PM
Posted by venomlash on September 7, 2011 at 1:40 PM
3
@1 Sounds like the Supreme Ruler of the Universe isn't getting any.
Posted by Ken Mehlman on September 7, 2011 at 2:00 PM
4
No, don't give up, Dan! I'm a serial monogamist, but poly-amorous peoples need an advocate! That advocate is you, Sir.
Posted by scratchmaster joe on September 7, 2011 at 2:01 PM
5
So it's "having sex with someone other than [a spouse]" for straight folks but "cheating" for gays? I bet more of the straight folks are cheating despite the quoted figures for us homos being way higher.
Posted by decidedlyodd on September 7, 2011 at 2:02 PM
BEG 6
Another big diff from 1975 would be lethal STDs.

Anyway these things tend to go back and fourth historically speaking. Be interesting to see the stats in another 20, assuming marriage itself lasts that long.
Posted by BEG http://twitter.com/#!/browneyedgirl65 on September 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM
7
Isn't it kind of weird that they surveyed about 5000 fewer people in 2000?
Posted by strawberrymilk on September 7, 2011 at 2:10 PM
8
I am, luckily, partnered with someone smart, sexy, and interesting. I am not looking around. Now if I was saddled wth an aging pretty boy who's dumb as a post, I'd definitely be anti-monogamy.
Posted by mongoose on September 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM
9
I have a social science background and even after trying to find this article online (not linked from the Family Institute, and not online through UW Libraries) I have no idea what this method means. Did they start with 6,000 individuals in 1975 and have an 89% attrition rate over 25 years? Are they saying couples had more extramarital sex when they were 25 years younger? Duh?

I'm confused.
Posted by InfinitePest on September 7, 2011 at 2:21 PM
10
Why am I having a hard time believing that straight married women cheat more than straight married men? And why am I having a hard time believing that only 10% of married men are straying?
Posted by SeattleKim on September 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM
11
I'm for options. I'd no sooner expect everyone to adopt my open relationship model than I'd want people trying to shove me into monogamy.

Same thing for same-sex marriage. If you want to pattern your relationship on the typical heterosexual couple, then great! I'm all for it. Just let me have the option of creating some kind of alternative.
Posted by Corydon on September 7, 2011 at 2:56 PM
12
is there anything more tedious than Danny shilling for cheating?
Posted by no. there is not. on September 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM
13
The study used numbers from 2000 that interviewed only 79 married heterosexual men, of whom 8 reported that they had had sex outside the marriage. So basically, the result is not particularly useful.
Related to this, they also report that the number of hetero men who had a "meaningful love affair with someone else" outside the marriage dropped from 30% in 1975 to 1% in 2000. Wow! Must be nobody having an affair by now, at that rate!
The numbers in 2000 are a little better for the other groups:
192 gay men
375 lesbians
127 heterosexual females
So perhaps the claimed statistics for incidence of sex outside the relationship for gay men (down from 83% to 59%) and for lesbians (28% down to 8%) have more basis. Maybe.
Posted by Biologist in the stix on September 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM
milemarker 14
Which monogamy - emotional or sexual?
Posted by milemarker on September 7, 2011 at 3:27 PM
15
I would hazard that this indicates more men and women are lying, one way or the other. Either more were lying about cheating in '75 or more were lying about not cheating in 2000.

Or, it could be that this is a garbage study that's getting publicity because people want to believe what it says.
Posted by Hal_10000 on September 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM
16
Never, ever, EVER rely soley on data generated by people reporting their own behaviour. Not only do people lie, omit, and make shit up, but even when it comes to perfectly innocuous stuff like how often they floss, people are wildly inaccurate with their self-reporting.
Posted by ignatz ratzkywatzky on September 7, 2011 at 5:46 PM
Roma 17
Among gay men, the percentage who cheated on a partner they lived with dropped to 59 percent from 83 percent; for lesbians it declined to 8 percent from 28 percent.

Quite a difference. I wonder what accounts for it? Are lesbians just as interested as gay men are in fucking someone other than their partner but they are more likely to stick with the commitment they made to be faithful? Or are gay men more inclined to want to fuck someone other than their partner? Or both?
Posted by Roma on September 7, 2011 at 7:33 PM
18
And perhaps the phrase "it was the seventies" should come into play. Post-sexual revolution, pre-AIDS.
Posted by DRF on September 7, 2011 at 8:01 PM
scary tyler moore 19
@3, if you saw what he looks like (and i have) you'd know why he isn't getting any. that combined with his repulsive appearance.
Posted by scary tyler moore http://pushymcshove.blogspot.com/ on September 7, 2011 at 8:21 PM
20
Yup, #18: Been there, done that.
Posted by judybrowni on September 7, 2011 at 11:22 PM
21
Dear Dan:

Ross Douthat is a tar baby.

Also, with regard to gay monogamy, can you think of anything that might have happened to change gay persons' coupling patterns between 1975 and 2000?

Gosh, I sure can't. Clearly, it must simply be a natural biological normal human rational virtuous preference for monogamy, asserting itself after some sort of aberration.
Posted by robotslave on September 8, 2011 at 1:57 AM
22
The "new" study is still 11 years old. That's hardly current social trends, and it was before Dan rose to anywhere near his current level of prominence. We need some newer data.

That said, Dan's explanation does have a hole in it. Divorce has not actually increases between the 70s and now. It has leveled off or declined slightly. Since the 60s, yes, but not since the 70s.
Posted by John xt2 on September 8, 2011 at 5:52 AM
davidLBC 23
Plus Dan smote all of the bisexuals so we don't have to deal with their shenanigans messing up our statistics.
Posted by davidLBC on September 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy