Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, November 28, 2011

A Hard Question That Occupiers Will Have to Answer in Olympia Today

Posted by on Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:00 AM

But first this photo again, because it's worth setting today's Occupation in some historical context. We are now in the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression, and in Washington State, back during the ol' Great Depression, people marched on the state Capitol Building—just like they will today—to demand more help for the working class. Back then they called it a Hunger March, staged on behalf of the Unemployed Citizens League and other organizations. Today it's called Occupy the Capitol, staged on behalf of the 99 percent. But the basic demand is the same: a state that does more to help its citizens get through very hard times.

On January 16, 1933, people converged on Olympia for a Hunger March to demand food, shelter, relief and programs to create jobs for the unemployed throughout the state.
  • Vibert Jeffers, Susan Parish Photograph Collection, Washington State Archives, used with permission.
  • "On January 16, 1933, people converged on Olympia for a 'Hunger March' to demand food, shelter, relief and programs to create jobs for the unemployed throughout the state."

Now, here's the hard question that today's Occupiers will have to answer:

If Governor Chris Gregoire's proposed $2 billion in cuts to basic state services—coming on top of $10.5 billion in cuts already made to basic state services over the last three years—represents what Occupy Seattle has called "one of the greatest assaults in our state’s history against the interests of workers, students, and the poor," then...

Should the Occupy protesters support Gov. Gregoire's proposal to "buy back" about $500 million in cuts to education, prisoner supervision, and care for the developmentally disabled by temporarily raising the (regressive) state sales tax by half a penny?

So far, this half-cent sales tax increase is the only major revenue-raising idea formally on the table in Olympia. It has the benefit of getting needed revenue into the state treasury immediately to save important programs. (Unlike other taxes that are collected once a year, sales taxes are collected constantly.) But it has the problem of forcing the working poor to pay more, as a percentage of their income, to save programs meant to help the working poor. While Occupiers from all over head toward Olympia this morning, how about a poll on what they should say when they get there:

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Stock up on ramen and Campbell's when on sale. Ignore the advertisers. Stay out of clubs and restaurants. Stop spending.
Posted by You know it ain't going to get better. on November 28, 2011 at 6:19 AM
2
Whether they support it or not, they should also insist on other new sources of revenue going on the table. It's not enough just to make smaller cuts... the last round already hurt services. Even small ones will have disastrous consequences to the state's future economic viability, not to mention social fabric.
Posted by YoungBS on November 28, 2011 at 6:20 AM
3
The Governor's only idea is for the poor and middle class to pay higher taxes so the poor and middle class won't get more cuts. Gregoire is pathetic.
Posted by EFB on November 28, 2011 at 6:35 AM
4
At this point OWS/Seattle's strength is in the message against inequality and how it is destroying our communities.

Our presence alone is what is needed. Right now politicians are trying to continue to make deals with the 1% while Rome continues to burn. Policy-Shmalicy. It don't matter at this point. The solutions will start to come as we approach critical mass.

Amass Now! We'll figure it out once we have our quorum. They want us to talk about taxes when we want to talk about taking care of one another. You know they may pass a Tax referendum but that won't keep them from cutting basic services which will cost so much more in the long run fiscally.
Posted by findwhatscommon on November 28, 2011 at 6:44 AM
5 Comment Pulled (Trolling) Comment Policy
trstr 6
Not a hard question in the slightest. Should we make the poor pay more taxes? No.
Posted by trstr on November 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM
gloomy gus 7
You expect Occupy to address the issue with something like this level of subtlety?
Posted by gloomy gus on November 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM
8
It is essential to support and pass this tax.

No, it is not the best type of tax. But it is better than nothing, which is what social services will get if it doesn't pass. And rich people do pay sales tax, even if not as much as they should.

Even more importantly, we need to pass this tax so we can move on to the next one. We all know much more revenue is needed. But if this one fails at the ballot box, Democratic legislators (who are the legislators who decide these things) will be convinced that no tax measure of any kind will ever pass.

This will be true even if a significant portion of the NO votes are from voters who support higher taxes but think the sales tax is not good enough.

For an example of this, look at the polls showing that a majority of people oppose health care reform, but that a significant chunk of that opposition comes from people who think it didn't go far enough.

Democratic legislators can't handle that kind of nuance. You have to beat them over the head.
Posted by Moag on November 28, 2011 at 8:41 AM
9
1. i voted yes
2. i am originally from taxachusetts
3. poor people already pay too many taxes in this state and federally 15% on income and 11% on other goods

but i think the real question is:

Why can't the social concious and protests of the Great Depression? or of the Industrial Revolution?

because Americans have gone soft
Posted by grace on November 28, 2011 at 8:42 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 10
Many of the hundreds of cuts Gregoire and other Democrats have tallied are simply automatic spending increases that didn't end up happening. For example, because the state twice suspended automatic cost-of-living adjustments for education employees, budgeters counted it as a "cut" of $682 million. Another "cut" of $344 million is counted because it stopped regular cost-of-living increases for some pensioners.

The $10.5 billion number also includes more than $1 billion dollars that were cut from higher education, but much of that money is still coming in a different way because lawmakers hiked tuition rates to offset the reductions.



http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/FA…

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on November 28, 2011 at 9:23 AM
11
No way. They should shame the governor and DINO legislators into getting 1098 or something like it back on the table.
Posted by capicola on November 28, 2011 at 10:27 AM
Cascadian 12
The answer is clearly no. You don't address the inequalities that bedevil our society by imposing another tax on the 99%.

A progressive income tax, particularly one targeted on high earners? Yes. Higher property taxes? Higher estate taxes? Yes.

Or a higher base sales tax with a universal rebate to make it more progressive? Yeah, that would work too.
Posted by Cascadian on November 28, 2011 at 1:17 PM
13
Think, people think. 1/2 cent increase won't hurt poor people because they mainly buy food, which isn't taxed anyway. People who can afford to buy stuff aren't going to be deterred by 1/2 cent.

Cascadian, how long have you lived here, or are you just clueless? Because a high-earner income tax was voted down last November.
Posted by sarah70 on November 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy