Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, December 16, 2011

Seattle Police Chief John Diaz Wants to "See Numbers" Behind DOJ Report Before Committing to Dept. Changes

Posted by on Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:37 PM

TGIF, amirite?
  • TGIF, amirite?
Seattle Police Chief John Diaz and several members of his command staff were gracious enough to give a revolving door of reporters a few minutes to hammer them with questions about the big news of the day: That Seattle Police officers routinely excessive force (especially batons) on suspects (especially minority suspects) instead of employing de-escelation tactics. Here's what I took away from my 15 minutes (in heaven!) with Diaz:


Do you believe the DOJ's findings that 20 percent—one in five—of use of force incidents are excessive?

Asst. Chief Clark Kimerer: We’ve been looking at this data for years and years and they didn’t come to the conclusions that we have. Some of their conclusions are based on the opinions of their consultants. That’s quite different from number crunching.

Diaz: I cannot say right now. I’ve asked the DOJ, let us see the numbers. I can say we use less force than most, if not all, major cities in the US.

We’ve done an exhaustive review of every single one of our use-of-force cases. We gave over 200,000 docs to the DOJ in the spirit of collaboration. We said we weren’t going to wait to the end of their investigation, we were going to implement as we went along and we've done so. Their suggestion for a Use of Force panel was a great one. We implemented it.

Let me make this clear: The department is not broken. [Our officers are] out there making this community safe. It’s one of the safest communities in the country. But are there things to improve? Absolutely.

Do you agree with the DOJ recommendation that the Office of Professional Accountability investigate all use-of-force complaints independently, instead of referring two-thirds of them to precinct supervisors?

Kimerer: This does not add up to our own experience and policies. They already investigate every use-of-force complaint.

Kathryn Olson, director of the OPA: I didn’t understand their concern that use of force cases were routinely being sent back to the precinct. Out of 160 cases in 2009 and 2010, only one case was referred to the precinct.

Diaz: We’ll be reviewing [the recommendation], along with all their other recommendations. But first, I'd like to see the data [that supports their conclusions]. If the data’s there, it’s there. At this point we're saying, let’s see the data, sit down, and talk about it.

Do you agree that SPD "does not collect adequate data to self-assess whether biased policing is occurring"? If so, what are you willing to do to address this problem, and what's you're message to the minority community in light of the DOJ finding that 50 percent of excessive force involved persons of color?

Diaz: I know you get sick of hearing this but we have to work on my three tenants—fighting crime, reducing the fear of crime, and building community. We have an outside entity that continues to survey the community every three months. [Our officers] have the highest ratings they’ve ever had.

But the DOJ's report suggests what you're currently doing isn't good enough. You've been Chief for 18 months and nothing's changed. So what are you willing to do differently?

Diaz: We’ve been working for 10 or 12 years on this issue. I want to sit down with Jack McDevitt [who worked with the DOJ on these findings] to find out how he found these conclusions and work on fixing the problem. But we do collect data now.

Much of the DOJ data—the idea that 44 officers generate 30 percent of the department's use-of-force reports—seems to suggest there are a few contemptive cops out there giving the whole department a bad rap. How do you plan to remedy this?

Deputy Chief Nick Metz: To say those officers are a few bad apples isn’t necessarily correct—

Diaz: Training, coaching, and discipline. You have to remember, we have hundreds of thousands of stops every year. We don’t use force in the overwhelming majority—it's used less than one percent of the time. But we need ongoing training, ongoing mentoring.

It seems that right now, there's not a lot you're willing to concede in this report. If the DOJ provides its data and you then disagree with their findings, what's the next step? Litigation?

Kimerer: Threats of litigation in a place like ours that’s been so cooperative and accountable, that’s not the way to get to the results we want to see made. If we agree with what they’re finding, we’re going to change.

Diaz: We’re a long way from litigation. We’ve agreed to collaboration. The report, as scathing as it was, was clear about how involved and committed in this process that we are.

The report notes that officers don't know how to differentiate a Terry stop from a casual civilian encounter. This is a fundamental and very basic aspect of policing. So, WTF?

Diaz: We need to push ongoing training. Our department is only getting younger. That’s why things like LEED are going to be so important. The moment they enter that academy, we’ve got to start with that communication standard.

 

Comments (23) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
Like I said, they think you're Serfs, not Citizens.

And they don't think you have Rights, only those boons granted by Corporations and the Rich unto their lowly peons.

Just stick a Sherrif of Rottingham outfit on Diaz.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 16, 2011 at 4:43 PM
Fnarf 2
This is a terrible, terrible response. You officially get an 'F', Chief Diaz. You are a buffoon, a flunky, a craven coward, and a fool.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on December 16, 2011 at 4:43 PM
Fnarf 3
Oh, and PS -- this greatly increases the odds that there's going to be all-out war between the city and the DOJ on one side and the cops on the other.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on December 16, 2011 at 4:44 PM
Joe Szilagyi 4
Fire Diaz, replace with a new chief, make chief second in command, have a civilian commissioner that is the true boss and command authority in all police matters. The civilian leader (and OPA) should answer ONLY to the City Council.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://twitter.com/joeszi on December 16, 2011 at 4:49 PM
Westlake, son! 5
How about, "SPD has made some mistakes in the past, and we'll be working closely with the DOJ and the citizens of Seattle to ensure these mistakes won't continue going forward."

That would be a good response instead of, "Let me make this clear: The department is not broken," because that's actually precisely what the DOJ said.
Posted by Westlake, son! on December 16, 2011 at 4:57 PM
Will in Seattle 6
@4 for bare minimum response by Mayor and Council.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 16, 2011 at 5:08 PM
7
"We’ve been working for 10 or 12 years on this issue" - Wow. That was an insanely stupid thing to say.
Posted by sisyphusgal on December 16, 2011 at 5:09 PM
Hawke 8
So if Diaz DOESN'T agree with the data used, he won't make any changes?
Posted by Hawke http://facebook.com/thehawke on December 16, 2011 at 5:12 PM
NaFun 9
DENY DENY DENY DENY
Posted by NaFun http://www.dancesafe.org on December 16, 2011 at 5:53 PM
10 Comment Pulled (No) Comment Policy
11
He let you in his office after that fiasco of a "public forum" you hosted and he attended downtown when Ian Birk was being slapped on the wrist?

That's probably the most impressive thing he has done as Chief so far.
Posted by Swearengen on December 16, 2011 at 5:58 PM
balderdash 12
Why do I feel like Diaz would be pepper-spraying the DoJ right now if he could? Maybe breaking out their taillights?
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on December 16, 2011 at 6:30 PM
13
fnarf@3, I'm not all that sure that the city is going to side with the DOJ on this. The mayor has been rather obsequious to the chief and a total believer in the ability of the cops to reform themselves. Plus the city council, including the so-called social justice spokesmen, have been rather mute throughout the accountability process. As a matter of fact, I think the city will side with the cops in the hope making a contract with the union easier to come by and to prevent punitive financial damages.
Posted by neo-realist on December 16, 2011 at 7:11 PM
Fnarf 14
@13, the financial damages of ignoring the DOJ report are going to be mindboggling. The next brutality case that comes up? The lawyer's going to say "they knew they had a problem, they ignored it, they decided to pretend it didn't exist, and here we are" and some schmuck is going to OWN the City of Seattle.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on December 16, 2011 at 7:21 PM
pissy mcslogbot 15
interesting that one of the DOJs main points and concerns is that there is insufficient, as in far too little, data from the police run office of accountability;

because, you know, collecting and keeping data is kinda a vital and important component of "accountability", right?
Posted by pissy mcslogbot on December 16, 2011 at 7:37 PM
16
@14, I hope you're right:)
Posted by neo-realist on December 16, 2011 at 7:42 PM
Joe Szilagyi 17
@16 most of us that pay property tax in the city sure as shit hope Fnarf's prediction, while right, doesn't come to pass. These cops like Diaz and O'neill that live outside the city have no chips in the game and little to lose. We're the ones left holding their shit filled drawers.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://twitter.com/joeszi on December 16, 2011 at 8:13 PM
18
@17, then the Mayor and the City Council better grow a pair and make the SPD play ball with the DOJ
Posted by neo-realist on December 16, 2011 at 8:41 PM
19
That's not what "tenants" means.
Posted by yuiop on December 17, 2011 at 12:44 AM
20
CHINGA TU MADRE JUANITO!
Posted by masgroovy on December 17, 2011 at 2:50 PM
21 Comment Pulled (No) Comment Policy
22
On the bright side, anyone else noticed how much better behaved the drunk Indians are downtown?
Posted by John Trouble Smith on December 17, 2011 at 5:50 PM
lauramae 23
Every time I see that video of Ian Birk swaggering, with his fucking hips jutting out, hand on his belt right before he murdered a guy, it is very clear to me that the Seattle Police not only tolerate an atmosphere where cops escalate situations, but also they encourage it.

Some people join the military because they hope they get to kill people. Some of those come back and become cops.
Posted by lauramae on December 17, 2011 at 7:15 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy