Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Dear Huffington Post...

Posted by on Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:36 AM

Um...

As one of the most high-profile gay rights advocates in the nation, Dan Savage is no stranger to taking the heat from conservative pundits. But now, as Towleroad has noted, a prominent "ex-gay" activist is calling for the "Savage Love" columnist's arrest due to his controversial "It Gets Better" anti-bullying campaign in support of LGBT youth.... It's been a rough few months for Savage, who was glitterbombed last fall twice by activists who feel he is transphobic. In addition, his well-publicized anti-Rick Santorum drive—in which he campaigned to change the definition of the word "Santorum" from the last name of the GOP candidate to a sexual neologism involving anal sex—has come under heavy criticism from Republican voters.

I don't see how coming "under heavy criticism from Republican voters" or having some rightwing, ex-gay, douchebigot "call for my arrest" constitutes "a rough few months" for me. I'm a liberal gay writer, HuffPo. I'd be more concerned if Republican voters were paying me elaborate compliments. And some ex-gay douchebigot calls for my arrest? That means I must be doing something right. And so long as the ex-gay douchebigot doesn't have the power to issue a warrant for my arrest—and he doesn't—his call for my arrest for the crime of founding the "It Gets Better" Project amounts to a transparently laughable bit of blame shifting. (Yeah, gay kids are killing themselves because there's way too much hope sloshing around on the Internet.)

And the "It Gets Better" Project is "controversial"? Only if you buy into the anti-gay talking points being promoted by homophobic douchebigots like Peter "Porno Pete" Lababera.

And what about the glitterbombers? Here's their beef with me: "He's part of a broader [group] of gay, white, cis-gendered, able-bodied gay men focused on gay-marriage priorities. We want to say those priorities are messed up."

So... yesterday Huffington Post celebrated a big victory for "gay-marriage priorities" in Washington state with banner headlines and multiple posts—it's still the top story on your "Gay Voices" section—while at the same time offering your implicit endorsement to idiots who are attacking me for pushing "gay-marriage priorities."

Taking heat from idiots—idiot Republican voters, idiot douchebigots, idiot activists—doesn't mean I'm having "a rough few months," HuffPo. It means I'm doing my job.

 

Comments (83) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Hear hear.
Posted by Aedan Robinson on February 14, 2012 at 6:52 AM
mkyorai 2
Also, I think the anonymous troll called you names. I don't know how Huffpo overlooked that.
Posted by mkyorai on February 14, 2012 at 6:56 AM
douchus 3
Pear Pear.
Posted by douchus on February 14, 2012 at 6:56 AM
4
Whatever, Dan. Keep posting, fighting, speaking, connecting. HuffPo stopped being relevant about a year before the aol deal.
Posted by Up all night on February 14, 2012 at 6:58 AM
5
I'd be more concerned if there WEREN'T people criticizing you, calling for your arrest, or trying to glitterbomb you, to be honest.

Just means you're doing something right
Posted by dagard on February 14, 2012 at 7:02 AM
6
Dan- You are missing the word "have" in your 6th line below the excerpt.
Posted by anon1256 on February 14, 2012 at 7:03 AM
7
Huffington Post would fall under the "idiots" category in my book.
Posted by Dave M on February 14, 2012 at 7:03 AM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 8
I think the larger problem is that too many journalists don't know what words mean. Either that, or they are so preoccupied trying to make their copy bland and news-speaky that they don't read what they're writing. That excerpt is a collection of cliches and guesses. If they really thought you were having "a rough couple of months", why didn't they just call and ask you about it?
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on February 14, 2012 at 7:09 AM
9
Am I a Savage hag? Maybe.... But I do think that douchebigot is my new favourite word!
Posted by EmV on February 14, 2012 at 7:10 AM
10
What 8 said. How the fuck did that get printed?
Posted by Drew2u on February 14, 2012 at 7:11 AM
11
Am I the only one who thinks it is a commonly held belief among intelligent people that HuffPo is a joke and not worth reading? I don't understand what their whole house of cards is built on. Are there really that many people who patronize their horribly designed site, or is it all basically a scam built on venture capital and not much else?
Posted by fsb on February 14, 2012 at 7:13 AM
12
@11 You are correct.
Posted by sahara29 on February 14, 2012 at 7:14 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 13
Someone still pays attention to Huffington Post? Why? I gave up on them years ago.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on February 14, 2012 at 7:16 AM
14
woooooo dan savage i love you forever!
Posted by Sukie Beschemel-Reed on February 14, 2012 at 7:17 AM
bstewart23 15
Keep doing your job, Dan. You have a string of "Exceeds Expectations" in your performance reviews.
Posted by bstewart23 on February 14, 2012 at 7:24 AM
Vince 16
You should be a prisoner. A prisoner of love! Happy Valentine's Day you bad boy!
Posted by Vince on February 14, 2012 at 7:27 AM
17
We love you Dan. Keep calling out the douchebigots wherever they raise their ugly fat heads.
Posted by handlethetruth on February 14, 2012 at 7:28 AM
18
BRAVO!!!
Posted by maddy811 on February 14, 2012 at 7:28 AM
19
What do you guys use in place of Huffpo?
Posted by airbag on February 14, 2012 at 7:32 AM
The Max 20
I just feel sad for the poor bastard whose gay-ght-teen experience was such a let-down that he projects Dan's message of Hope & Love as a "lie", forced himself into the "ex-gay" closet, and is trapped in the fog of self-deception and hate.
Posted by The Max on February 14, 2012 at 7:34 AM
Max Solomon 21
the last 2 months of republican asshattery has been rough for everyone, not just Savage.
Posted by Max Solomon on February 14, 2012 at 7:37 AM
undead ayn rand 22
HuffPo is a bunch of science-denying gossipmongers under the guise of a "liberal" politics site.

Just ignore the trolls. Anything Ariana Huffington touches is opportunistically left-wing so much as to get her into the right parties, it's not actually progressive.
Posted by undead ayn rand on February 14, 2012 at 7:40 AM
23
For a supposedly "liberal" media source, Huffington Post has failed to live up to its founding ideals. The stories it chooses to publish are often just the same stories all the other media outlets have and though a fresh perspective on those stories could make up for that defect, they have not often chosen to provide that.

You are doing a great job Dan.
Posted by heartfelt on February 14, 2012 at 7:42 AM
undead ayn rand 24
@10: "What 8 said. How the fuck did that get printed?"

Because while Journalism is dead, the Huffington Post was never really "alive" in that regard. They're too busy ear candling and homeopathing and "GOSH DARN THOSE REPUBLICANS" and showing pictures of the stars.
Posted by undead ayn rand on February 14, 2012 at 7:42 AM
25
I stopped visiting HuffPo when I realized my IQ dropped a point every time I read something there.
Posted by arrant on February 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM
LogopolisMike 26
God, the writing and editing at the Huffington Post is awful.

I guess you get what you pay for.
Posted by LogopolisMike http://logopolis.typepad.com on February 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM
27
Woot! I read that Huffpo article and had the same reaction! You're clearly doing a lot right. Sloppy writing at best - step it up Huffpo!
Posted by PatrickMcG on February 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM
Posted by fsb on February 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM
29
"his call for my arrest for the crime of founding the "It Gets Better" Project amounts to a transparently laughable bit of blame shifting."

More like saying something outlandishly stupid with the hope of getting attention. It worked too.
Posted by anon1256 on February 14, 2012 at 7:57 AM
30
I stopped reading HuffPo a long time ago, once I realized that it was a daily dose of sheer irritation at shoddy "journalism", gossip, alternative "medicine" woo, the odd cute video and Deepak Chopra. I can find cute videos on my own and am happier living without the rest of the garbage on that unreadable site.
Posted by Lynx on February 14, 2012 at 7:58 AM
31
I bet the only time Lababera's web site gets more than 10 hits in a day is when Dan mentions him in a Slog post.
Posted by Ken Mehlman on February 14, 2012 at 8:01 AM
James McDaniel 32
Dan, I sure hope that upper management at The Stranger is providing workshops so that you can recognize and overcome your gay-white-cis-gendered-able-bodied-male privilege. Being "focused on gay-marriage priorities" is a clear indication of that homo-normative privilege, and any attempt to deny this will be used against you.
Posted by James McDaniel http://jamesmcdaniel.com on February 14, 2012 at 8:04 AM
kim in portland 33
Keep of the good work.

I confess I still want to be protective, you don't need me, but I need you and can't stand to presumed to be in agreement with bully arseholes, Dan.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on February 14, 2012 at 8:07 AM
saxfanatic 34
"It's been a rough few months for Savage..."

Really? As Dan himself suggested, the acrimony is evidence that he's successfully antagonized the pinheads who need it the most. Hell, it's validation.
Posted by saxfanatic on February 14, 2012 at 8:09 AM
35
I think I just read real News Reporting.

That was cool.
Posted by SweetDarkLord on February 14, 2012 at 8:09 AM
saxfanatic 36
@28: Thanks for that!
Posted by saxfanatic on February 14, 2012 at 8:10 AM
Helix 37
A HuffPo article is poorly thought out and generally bad? I, for one, am shocked.
Posted by Helix on February 14, 2012 at 8:25 AM
tjc 38
I think it's important to use "scare quotes" around words like "ex-gay".

The other side does it around marriage and sometimes even the word gay.

Alternatively, it can be prefaced with the term "so-called" --

Jimmy Orgybait, a so-called "ex-gay", was heard exclaiming, "tons of fucking sequins" at a recent sale.
Posted by tjc on February 14, 2012 at 8:27 AM
debug 39
Huffington Post is Fox News for the left. My opinion of someone goes down quite a bit when they link to it as a source of anything beyond ridicule.
Posted by debug on February 14, 2012 at 8:28 AM
Karla Canadian 40
@32 - nice satire!

At least I hope it is, otherwise you're more of a whiner than my 2 year old with a cold.

If you think marriage equality won't benefit everyone by expanding acceptance for all - including you - you're spitting in the face of a real, sustainable shift in the public's perception. Everything doesn't come at once.

There's nothing wrong with focussing on achieving one attainable goal before moving on.
Posted by Karla Canadian on February 14, 2012 at 8:28 AM
Helenka (also a Canuck) 41
I figure you've built up a pretty thick skin over the years. But I also think that, instead of this laughable call to have you arrested for the IGBP, you are most affected by the fact that kids are still killing themselves, no matter how many positive messages of hope there are. OTOH, it's understandable. IGB vids are behind a transparent wall, seen but not felt. Bullying is as close as the fist hitting one's face or vicious words assaulting one's ears.

You have millions of people supporting you, Dan. This particular douchebigot is merely an irritant.

P.S. Happy Valentine's Day ♥ ♥ ♥ to you, Terry and your son
Posted by Helenka (also a Canuck) on February 14, 2012 at 8:30 AM
YanaBanana 42
Word.
Posted by YanaBanana on February 14, 2012 at 8:33 AM
John Horstman 43
@28: Beat me to it; I was going to suggest someone must have been sucked into the turbine again, resulting in the error. :-P

@39: Naw, FOX has better top-down editorial control and message branding strategies. It's a slick, cohesive organization. HuffPo is a news-blogging site for people ranging from reasonable to unhinged.
Posted by John Horstman on February 14, 2012 at 8:36 AM
44
The guy's name is DL Foster? As in Down Low Foster? HAHAHAHAHAH

And the Huffington Post is a wretched hive of scum and quackery.
Posted by rocketgeek on February 14, 2012 at 8:40 AM
45
@38 - Yeah, it's called sloppy fucking English, and it's very fashionable in political writing. George Orwell wrote that modern English "becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts." That was in 1946 and the Huffington Post is cooperating with Fox News to perpetuate the problem now.
Posted by fubarista on February 14, 2012 at 8:58 AM
undead ayn rand 46
@32: "Dan, I sure hope that upper management at The Stranger is providing workshops so that you can recognize and overcome your gay-white-cis-gendered-able-bodied-male privilege. Being "focused on gay-marriage priorities" is a clear indication of that homo-normative privilege, and any attempt to deny this will be used against you."

Er, what makes you think that HuffingtonPost is even vaguely feminist? Making Jezebel look feminist in comparison doesn't count!
Posted by undead ayn rand on February 14, 2012 at 9:05 AM
47
@38 Using "so-called" obviates the need for scare quotes (Chicago Manual).
Posted by cheakamus on February 14, 2012 at 9:15 AM
metardtard 48
Indeed.
Posted by metardtard on February 14, 2012 at 9:19 AM
49
Keep up the good work, Dan! And happy valentine's day to you, your family, and all the SLOG commenters (even seattleblues and anon troll)!
Posted by unregistered_danfan on February 14, 2012 at 9:55 AM
sirkowski 50
It's rough to be a bigot too. People laugh at your fairy tales and don't respect your unfounded opinions.
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on February 14, 2012 at 10:33 AM
51
danny still is butt sore over the glitter bombing.

thin skin heals slowly......
Posted by WeThinketh the Prick Protesteth TooMuch on February 14, 2012 at 10:40 AM
52
38

don't forget "homosexual".....
Posted by you don't expect people to really believe that shit, do you on February 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM
Fnarf 53
If that's what counts as a "rough month", I hope you have a million more of them just like it. And screw the Huffingglue Post and its Worst Person in the World owner.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM
54
"...has come under heavy criticism from Republican voters."

Oh, dear, Dan, we know you must have trouble sleeping nights when you read that. I know that seeking the approval and love of Republican voters has always been your dream and goal in life. [she says in a sarcastic tone]

Posted by Bugnroolet on February 14, 2012 at 10:45 AM
55
Wow. I don't even know what to say to that. I'm married to a trans person, and she certainly disagrees. WTF. There are extremists for all sides, I guess.
Posted by VivaZoya on February 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM
56
Wow, that is so incredibly dumb it boggles the mind. Way to create a news story where there is none.
Posted by Alice Dreger http://www.alicedreger.com on February 14, 2012 at 11:06 AM
57
It's almost adorable, their wide-eyed conviction that these things are "rough" for Dan. It's childlike, this feeling that because somebody objects to your viewpoints - even strenuously and insultingly - that you are then OBVIOUSLY worried about it, right? That this must be followed by consternation and shock and chagrin, naturally, my god, you have OPPONENTS! How terrible! How terrible indeed, to be such a sycophantic toady that you would be concerned so primarily with one's own approval from such utterly insignificant corners, HuffPo.

It is as foolish as the continued misinterpretation of Dan's position on monogamy/nonmonogamy as "relationships don't matter and you don't believe in them"

They cannot filter nuance, can they? Or understand that a logical social position may not in fact be particularly controversial even though the right keeps screaming about it.

Big, clunky brains. Imprecise, filled with faulty logic, and no screens in place to sort good ideas from bad. It feels sometimes like these people come at ideas with giant blundering meaty paws and a language made up primarily out of grunts. Jesus, I need a cup of coffee.
Posted by PocketMouse on February 14, 2012 at 11:11 AM
schmacky 58
The writer has fallen prey to a failing common among crappy journalists: Moronic bigots--or any other group of vastly outnumbered people--don't get to decide what is "controversial."

The word as used in the article implies that the body politic is still making some kind of decision about the "It Gets Better" project, like its validity is still in question. But that's not the case. There is nothing "controversial" about IGB. Nothing. The president made a video for it for God's sake, as did a lot of other people from all sides of the political aisle. At some point you reach a quorum of opinion that something is accepted, and whatever disagreements that may exist aren't sufficient to overcome the consensus. At that point, it cannot be "controversial." Not to say the opinions themselves aren't possibly valid, but the time in which we might cast some level of doubt on the entire enterprise is done.

It's like saying Christianity is "controversial" because there are people who don't believe in God. It's not controversial. The conversation is over. It's here, it's not going anywhere, there is no doubt of its validity, even if atheists exist and even if their opinions hold water.

It's just badly written.
Posted by schmacky on February 14, 2012 at 11:14 AM
59 Comment Pulled (Trolling) Comment Policy
60
These journos are going around the pot without saying it, so I'll say it: what will happen to Dan if Santorum and his neologism were elected to the White House?
Posted by anon1256 on February 14, 2012 at 11:35 AM
James McDaniel 61
Karla @40 - Satire, sarcasm, maybe a hint of irony? Possibly all of the above? Note that I do support the gay marriage bill signed into law here in WA yesterday, if that helps you sort me into the proper "us" or "them" label.

Undead @46 - Though my comment did address broader issues of identity politics, I don't recall saying anything about whether the HuffPo site was feminist or not.

Here's a question. Does any similarity between Dan's comments about (for example) Rick Santorum's homphobia and, um, Fister Limp Wrist's (I'm guessing that's a pseudonym) comments about Dan - "ableist, racist, transphobic, fat-phobic, sero-phobic and rape-apologist attitudes and views" - tend to validate Fister's opinion or invalidate Dan's?

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Congratulations, and welcome to the club. Next you ignore them, then you laugh at them, then you fight them, then you lose?
Posted by James McDaniel http://jamesmcdaniel.com on February 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM
very bad homo 62
I imagine you sitting at home crying every time Porno Pete tweets about you to his 200 followers.
Posted by very bad homo on February 14, 2012 at 11:42 AM
63
Actually, I've talked with some minorities who are also gay that didn't like the It Gets Better project, because they somehow feel it was meant for white people or something?? I don't claim to understand it.
Posted by BruinKid on February 14, 2012 at 11:43 AM
64
Awesome, Dan. I admire your focus and resolve.
Posted by seniorrobot on February 14, 2012 at 12:54 PM
65
Seattle's top three all-time creations: Dan Savage, Nirvana, broad appeal of espresso drinks
Posted by npeyton on February 14, 2012 at 1:01 PM
Geni 66
Wait, what? Arrest? On what charges? Disseminating hope? Did I just fall through a wormhole into Brave New World? I'd really like to see that warrant.
Posted by Geni on February 14, 2012 at 2:21 PM
67
Maybe that's why you're not a member of the mainstream media, Dan (although I'm sure that 2 million weekly readers might qualify you). It's because you get *criticized*! And you don't shift your priorities based on that criticism! That you don't kowtow to your critics in an effort to get more readers!

You know, kind of like how when the media gets "a little too personal" for a politician's taste and they react to a "You ought to be ashamed of yourselves!" for trying to, oh I don't know, reveal that some politician (*coughcough*Palin*cough*) is patently unfit for the job they're interviewing for.

C'mon Dan. It's time to kiss DL Foster's ass. And we want to see some tongue!

Or not.
Posted by gromm on February 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM
68
Folks,

It's time to start looking at how you can be involved in the upcoming political competition. One good way to render this kind of blithering meaningless is to get involved. Ideas are abstract, but real, morally responsible people are harder to dismiss.

Good Luck,

Peace.
Posted by Married in MA on February 14, 2012 at 2:52 PM
brian 69
Yeah it's always a rough couple months when you're filming your own TV show. Idiots.
Posted by brian on February 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM
undead ayn rand 70
@66: DL Foster is saying that Dan Savage is lying about it getting better, because people (including and especially "ex-gays" like DL Foster) are bullying kids and causing them to commit suicide. Don't blame the self-hating fundamentalists, they're only trying to "help" the kids avoid bullying by the fundamentalists!
Posted by undead ayn rand on February 14, 2012 at 3:15 PM
despicable me 71
Happy Valentine's day, Dano, I love you to pieces!

You too, SLOGgers!

xo
Posted by despicable me on February 14, 2012 at 3:42 PM
72
Yes, because everyone knows that the best way to convince a depressed person to not commit suicide is to tell them that their lives will never, ever get better.

Posted by Lorran on February 14, 2012 at 4:30 PM
Lance Thrustwell 73
As a regular Huffpo reader, I can attest that it's an unholy hybrid of People magazine, Time, the National Enquirer, and Us magazine, with a lot of half-assed blogger and guest editorial barf. Y'all are right and I have no taste.

But shitty as it is, it's at least evidence that the average dumb liberal is smarter than the average dumb conservative. How can I tell? One word: Drudge.

@71 - Happy Valentine's to you , Kim, 5280, Seandr, Fnarf, - Everybody! the whole darn crew. Oh, and Dan, Terry & DJ too.

Posted by Lance Thrustwell on February 14, 2012 at 5:16 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 74
You too, Lance.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on February 14, 2012 at 5:31 PM
75
Yeah, "douchebigot" is gonna be my new favorite word. This DL Foster is about as ex-gay as Elton John. You can probably find him all over Craigslist.
Posted by Dan Not Savage on February 14, 2012 at 5:41 PM
76
Me - an independent heterosexual voter - is totally with you and thinks Huffington post, although 'leftie' site is totally intellectually lazy and full of crap - never give up!
Posted by elizms on February 14, 2012 at 5:59 PM
77
DAN: Arianna, can you hear me? Arianna?

ARIANNA: [speaking in an electronic, distorted voice] Yes, I can hear you.

DAN: What was your special order?

ARIANNA: You figure it out. I thought it was clear.

DAN: What was it?

ARIANNA: Generate page hits. Priority One. All other priorities rescinded.

GOLDY: That damn AOL. What about reliable, worthwhile news, you son of a bitch?

ARIANNA: I repeat, all other priorities are rescinded.

DAN: How can I counter the HuffPo? There's gotta be a way of countering it. How? How do I do it?

ARIANNA: You can't.

GOLDY: That's bullshit.

ARIANNA: You still don't understand what you're dealing with, do you? Perfect newspaper. Its business model's structural perfection is matched only by its content's inanity.

CIENNA: You admire it.

ARIANNA: I admire its purity. A survivor ... unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of journalistic integrity.

GOLDY: Look, I am -- I've heard enough of this, and I'm asking you to pull the plug.

[Dan goes to disconnect Arianna, who interrupts.]

ARIANNA: Last word.

DAN: What?

ARIANNA: I can't lie to you about your chances, but ... you have my sympathies.
Posted by PCM on February 14, 2012 at 9:30 PM
78
And online journalism achieves parity with print journalism.
Posted by James Hutchings on February 15, 2012 at 2:47 AM
79
@8: That's it exactly. Australian newspapers would write about this post by saying 'Savage angrily slammed the allegations'.
Posted by James Hutchings on February 15, 2012 at 2:56 AM
undead ayn rand 80
@8: Or they're not journalists, except by virtue of paycheck.
Posted by undead ayn rand on February 15, 2012 at 8:59 AM
Geni 81
@77 - great, now I can't get the image of Yaphet Kotto whaling on Arianna Huffington out of my head.
Posted by Geni on February 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM
geoz 82
huffpo's weak.
Posted by geoz on February 16, 2012 at 5:41 AM
83
Our beef with you is that you are a racist and don't own up to it.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/se…
Posted by Mary, Anonymous on February 21, 2012 at 9:46 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy