If the November election were held today using the current ballot language for all proposed statewide initiatives and referendums—and that's definitely an if, because signatures to get these things on the ballot still have to be turned in and courts still have to consider some questionable proposed language—but if the election were held today, here are the TWO gay marriage votes you'd have to take.

Note that if you're pro-gay-marriage you'll have to vote "yes" on one and "no" on the other (and likewise, in the opposite direction, if you're anti-).

Who would want such a confusing situation? Gay marriage opponents who know that when voters are confused, they tend to just vote "no" on everything...

Initiative 1192

Initiative Measure No. 1192 concerns marriage for same-sex couples.

This measure would define marriage as a civil contract between one man and one woman and would prohibit marriage for same-sex couples.

Should this measure be enacted into law? Yes [ ] No [ ]

Referendum 74

The legislature passed Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6239 concerning marriage [and voters have filed a sufficient referendum petition on this bill.]

This bill would redefine marriage to allow same-sex couples to marry, modify existing domestic-partnership laws, allow clergy to refuse to solemnize or recognize marriages and religious organizations to refuse to accommodate marriage celebrations.

Should this bill be

___ Approved

___ Rejected