Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, February 24, 2012

If Progressive Kajillionaire Nick Hanauer Really Wants to Make a Difference...

Posted by on Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:20 PM

I like local progressive rich guy Nick Hanauer when he's writing editorials demanding higher taxes on himself and his fellow rich guys. But when he's stupidly accusing teachers of "literally strangling our public schools to death," not so much.

I mean, put your money behind Republican Rob McKenna if you want, Nick, though you'd only end up (figuratively) strangling public schools yourself by electing a governor who would oppose any tax hike intended to fund them. Meanwhile, charter schools, for which you seem so eager to throw your fellow Democrats under the bus, there isn't a single comprehensive study to show that they outperform their traditional public school counterparts.

Whatever. I'm not here to argue charter schools. Been there, done that. Instead, because I'm in a giving mood today, and because Hanauer is a man of means who obviously cares deeply about public policy (even when he's occasionally wrong), I'd like to offer him a bit of free advice: If you really want to make a difference, Nick—if you really want to help move Washington state forward toward a fairer, more progressive, more prosperous future—gather up a few hundred million dollars and buy the fucking Seattle Times!

Really.

See, one of the biggest problems in Washington state politics, Nick, is the crushing asymmetry of our professional opinion industry, which starts and ends on the pro-business/anti-tax op-ed pages of the Seattle Times. As painful as it is to admit it, the Seattle Times is our state's paper of record, and as such leads the way for the rest of Washington's pro-business/anti-tax editorial boards.

Yes, most normal people don't read these editorials, let alone heed them, but politicians do, and so part of the reason why we are absolutely incapable of debating both sides of the budget ledger is because our editorial boards refuse to allow this debate to occur. As you know, Nick, without tax restructuring—without substantially raising taxes on rich people like you—state and local governments will inexorably shrink, gradually giving us the Republican agenda by default.

Quietly, off-the-record, most Democrats will admit that taxes are too low to sustain the government services and investments necessary for our state's economy to thrive, but they fear taking a stand on this issue, knowing that they'll only be pilloried by their local editorial boards. Hell, even many Democrats, having heard the mantra over and over again, are reluctant to challenge the corporatist dogma that low taxes and smaller government automatically create more and better jobs.

But imagine how different the conversation might be if the Seattle Times were in the hands of a publisher whose values more closely reflect that of the majority of Seattleites, rather than just those who chat over pomegranate lacquered diver sea scallops at the Rainier Club? And that publisher, Nick, could be you.

Seriously. You've got the bucks. Make them an offer they can't refuse. One which the extended Blethen family will pressure Frank to take, rather than watching the rest of their inheritance continue to wither away in the post-print era. And a man of your business acumen, Nick, you might even manage to turn that stodgy old fish wrapper around. Try some of that "innovation" stuff you're so keen on, maybe even put a few entertaining writers on the editorial board, scribes more skilled at making arguments than excuses. (You know how to reach me.)

Hell, with the op-ed pages of the state's largest daily newspaper at your disposal, you could even feed your charter schools jones (though I warn you, Republicans don't see charter schools as a means toward greater innovation, but rather as an excuse to crush teachers unions, steal their pensions, lower their wages, hike their health care premiums, and spend even less on K-12 education).

The point is Nick, the reason the right has been so successful at getting their message out through the news media is because they own it: Every single daily newspaper in the state, and most of the broadcast outlets as well. But you've got the wealth to rebalance the local media landscape in one fell swoop.

Talk is cheap, Nick. If you really want to make a difference, it's time to pony up some big bucks.

 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Quietly, off-the-record, most Democrats will admit that taxes are too low to sustain the government services and investments necessary for our state's economy to thrive, but they fear taking a stand on this issue, knowing that they'll only be pilloried by their local editorial boards. Hell, even many Democrats, having heard the mantra over and over again, are reluctant to challenge the corporatist dogma that low taxes and smaller government automatically create more and better jobs.

I think you mean Republicans
Posted by mattw on February 24, 2012 at 4:44 PM
2
"I mean, put your money behind Republican Rob McKenna if you want, Nick, though you'd only end up (figuratively) strangling public schools yourself by electing a governor who would oppose any tax hike intended to fund them."

And this is different from the Democrats how, exactly?
Posted by Reader01 on February 24, 2012 at 4:49 PM
3
What a petulant child you are Goldy. The only way he can satisfy you is to buy out your opposition?

And as for his view on the WEA, point out anything the WEA is in favor of that would improve teacher quality and student performance, other than class size. That's all they have is class size, which can only be improved with more revenue with the current system, and that is not likely to happen anytime soon. We need to do more with what we have, and increasingly less. The hard truth for these boomer teachers is that things like tenure and seniority are diametrically opposed to their supposed goals of improving education, quality and performance.

I'm no fan of charter schools either, but there is a middle ground that the WEA is unwilling to concede, at their own peril. Given the status quo, and especially if Hanauer decides to back McKenna, they can kiss their ass goodbye since the state will keep going red for the foreseeable future as long as the limp-wristed democrats in our state fail to act in a way that actually stands a chance at improving things. The voters have already started turning on them, and things like marriage equality may not be enough to keep moderate voters on their side if schools continue to flounder.
Posted by pragmatic on February 24, 2012 at 5:19 PM
4
I Should also mention that your issue is with the messenger when you should be more worried that the message resonates. Dems need to take the wind out of their sails, and until they do the republican hot air machine will continue to sail their ship fast and annoyingly furious.
Posted by pragmatic on February 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM
5
Wow, what a post, Goldy. Best blog writer in the West.
Posted by sarah70 on February 24, 2012 at 5:54 PM
BombasticMO 6
I'd host a goodbye Seattle Times party.
Posted by BombasticMO http://www.BombasticMo.com on February 24, 2012 at 7:46 PM
7
Amen. We need a way to the table with compromise and consensus. I sense that Hanauer might be that person but he is starting to sound tone-deaf. (And threatening to support a Rep. on one issue? Please. If that were the case, many of us would turn our backs on Obama and education because of his basketball buddy, Duncan.

On the other hand, Hanauer is just another in a long line of wealthy white guys who think they know it all (including education even though virtually none of them send their own kids to public schools).
Posted by westello on February 24, 2012 at 8:12 PM
Catherwood 8
@3, you talk about a "middle ground" - and where is that? Is it the teacher evaluation process that's in place in, for instance, the Seattle Public Schools, a process the SPS teacher union supported?

Or is it linking teacher pay to student test scores? Or merit pay? Both of which have been tried, in states with strong unions, weak unions, and no unions, and neither of which work worth a damn (unless you regard massive test-cheating scandals as "working well").

It seems, then, that the fault, dear pragmatic, lies not with the teachers, but with the administrators, that they are doofuses. But where's the legislative push to roll back bloated, controlling central administrations? Charter schools merely add another bureaucracy and siphon public funds off to private charter operators (who do on average no better or worse than non-charters). I see no useful proposals in this batch of legislative sausage. Better luck next session.
Posted by Catherwood on February 24, 2012 at 9:19 PM
DOUG. 9
Frank Blethen shot my fish.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on February 25, 2012 at 12:09 AM
Rotten666 10
@5 Really? Goldy? Really?
Posted by Rotten666 on February 25, 2012 at 7:36 AM
11
This is an EXCELLENT idea, and not just about public education. The media is largely in corporate hands and serves their corporate interests.

There can be no disputing the fact that the wealthiest members of our society have used their wealth to exercise disproportionate influence over our political system and have used that influence to further their own narrow self-interest. They have even more effectively used their wealth to purchase media outlets and have used those media outlets to further their own narrow self-interests as well. The wealthy, in this case the Blethen family, control the Seattle Times and use its voice - the loudest voice in five states - to serve the interests of the 1%.

There is a new media, a more democratic media, growing online, but it is really, really hard to gather an audience with a blog and the established media (and their institutions) continually work to dismiss and discredit that work.

It would be a lot quicker and easier to follow the path taken by the right-wing: buy whatever you want.

So we need wealthy progressives to write the check to buy media outlets and make them loud voices for the left. Mr. Hanauer has already shown his willingness to buy politicians, his money would be better spent buying the Seattle Times.
Posted by Charlie Mas on February 25, 2012 at 9:22 AM
Teslick 12
Geez, Goldy. NOBODY READS THE TIMES EDITORIALS BESIDES YOU. I don't understand this continuing obsession over something 99.8% of people don't care about.
Posted by Teslick on February 25, 2012 at 11:31 AM
KittenKoder 13
We spend the most on education in the world, yet our youth are not learning any more than they were 50 years ago (comparatively) in spite of huge hikes in how much we spend. So ... yeah.
Posted by KittenKoder http://digitalnoisegraffiti.com/ on February 25, 2012 at 12:03 PM
14
Clearly there is a problem with our education system when someone uses the phrase "literally strangling our public schools to death" without irony.
Posted by madcap on February 25, 2012 at 5:24 PM
15
@13 Whose youth? I bet there are a lot of youth today of particular complexions who learn more than their counterparts did 50 years ago.
Posted by madcap on February 25, 2012 at 5:27 PM
undead ayn rand 16
@13: Why do all your posts come off like a demented senior citizen? Oh yeah, bullshit statements like "our youth are not learning any more than they were 50 years ago".

Stop pulling stuff out of your ass and people will stop laughing at your posts.
Posted by undead ayn rand on February 29, 2012 at 9:53 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy