Slog

Slog Music

Music, Nightlife,
and Drinks

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

SL Letters of the Day: TOP Has Other Options

Posted by on Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:20 PM

I was surprised that you didn't mention the most obvious answer to "Tired Of Pills," the a woman in this week's column who can't stand the pill who's married to a man who can't stand condoms. The copper IUD (Paragard) is hormone-free, extremely effective, much safer than the Pill, and can't be felt during sex. In America the IUD still has a bad reputation, but this is based on some very old and, frankly, unscientific evidence that has been amply disproved and should be relegated to the status of an old wives' tale.

I am in exactly her situation: married, hate pills, hate condoms, don't want to get pregnant. I haven't had any babies, which some doctors insist means you can't get an IUD, but that isn't true. It just means you need to go to a proper gynecologist who knows what she's doing, since it's a little more difficult to get it fitted. It took me two visits, once to get fitted, and again to have it inserted. It felt like really bad cramps but was totally bearable. In exchange for that mild discomfort, I have had flawless and effortless birth control for the past 5 years and won't have to even think about it for at least 3 more.

Considering how many women have trouble with the hormones, and how many horrible, disastrous side effects they can have (Yasmin class action, anyone?), I would love it if practical and intelligent authorities would broach the topic of IUDs more often. Most of the women I know have never even considered it.

We Have Options

Thanks for taking the time to write, WHO. Lots more suggestions for TOP from highly-fertile-but-successfully-childless "Savage Love" readers after the jump...

··························

I think that you overlooked an excellent option in your reply to Tired of Pills: a diaphragm. They're just as effective as other barrier methods when used properly and consistantly, without any of the side effects of hormone based birth control. My wife and I used one for decades before I had my vasectomy, and once it was in I couldn't tell that it was there. It became just a part of our foreplay where I would sensually load it up on the inserter with the spermicidal jelly and she would coyly play with herself inserting it. Effective, safe and fun.—Snipped Now

··························

Tired of Pills should get an intra-uterine contraceptive. I've had mine for five years and I love it. After trying every friggin pill and shot on the market, and even the nuvaring, I was still having depression, low sex-drive, and weight gain and loss, from the hormones. It's a tiny piece of plastic and copper that fits in your uterus and prevents pregnancy with something like 99.9% effectiveness. You should tell her to read about all the positives and negatives on Planned Parenthood's website. It has not messed with my hormones at all, I still ovulate — which means I still get horny. Saved my penis-in-vagina sex life.—Good Sex Awaits

··························

The letter from Tired of Pills mentioned that her doctor doesn't think non-pill options would be a good fit for her, but I'd encourage her to get a second opinion on that. Lots of doctors, especially those who went to med school a few decades ago, are reluctant to prescribe IUDs, especially for women who've never given birth. They tend to believe IUDs will cause infection and/or fall out without being noticed. This may have been true in the past, but in fact the current generation of IUDs is extremely safe, reliable, and effective. I also can't take hormonal birth control (gives me jaundice), and I've had, and loved, my IUD for about 18 months. If she gets a copper IUD, TOP can expect to have longer, heavier, and more painful periods for the first six months or so, but after that, they're likely to go back to whatever they'd be without the influence of hormones.—I Use Device

··························

I just wanted to add my two cents about the lady who isn't able to take the pill without adverse side effects, yet her husband flatly refuses to wear a condom. There are a couple of other barrier options that aren't IUDs, specifically diaphrams, the sponge, and female condoms. (If TOP can't tolerate the pill then she shouldn't go anywhere near injectables such as Depo Provera.) If they decide that they don't want to have children, her condom-phobic husband can get a vasectomy. Sterilizing women (tubal ligation) is full-on surgery and will require a hospital stay. A vasectomy is a day procedure and will require a cold pack and gentle treatment for a few days. I think, also, that this situation is an interesting result of the complete lack of effective contraceptive options for men. Men have condoms or sterilization. Why aren't men asking for more?—AMN

··························

Just a note to "Tired of Pills" who wrote in to say hormonal birth control pills weren't working for her, but her husband didn't want to wear a condom. There's another option all women should be aware of: biology. Your body will tell you when it's fertile if you pay attention to your cervical fluid and waking temperature. If you 1) track these on a calendar chart and 2) follow the Fucking Rules (based on how long YOUR fertile period is + how long sperm can survive in a woman's body), your husband only needs to wear a condom (or explore creative non-vaginal-intercourse options) between 7-10 days out of a typical thirty-day menstrual cycle. The rest of the time, have all the vaginal sex you want. This is called Fertility Awareness Method. FAM is NOT the same thing as the old calendar/counting method, which doesn't take into account the differences in each woman's cycle. Once you get the hang of charting your cycle for a few months it's really minimal work. There's more info on FAM at www.tcoyf.com, but IMHO, every woman should have a copy of "Taking Charge of Your Fertility" by Toni Weschler, MPH, on her shelf. Well worth the $15 at Amazon to know and understand what your body is telling you already.—Six Fucking Years and No Baby Yet

··························

I love your column and I agree with your response to Tired of Pills who wants her husband to wear a condom so she can go off the pill. However, please post a follow-up that TOP must do some research (because she is the best expert on her body) and visit another doctor who will work with her on this issue! As a women's health advocate I have encountered doctors, even gynecologists, who have set opinions and aren't willing to work with women on the huge array of contraceptive options available. Planned Parenthood has great info about contraceptive options here. My immediate thought was that TOP should try hormone-free barrier devices like a diaphragm or the sponge. If she wants to increase the contraceptive effectiveness her husband can pull out before ejaculation. A good doctor will help her find a birth control method that really works for her and her husband, not just keep cycling her through variations of the pill. Thank you for all your sex positive work.—Women's Health Advocate

··························

I know exactly how TOP feels. I've been with guys who can't stand condoms. They've either whined like little boys, or acknowledged it like gentlemen. But all of them preferred I be on the pill. I feel their pain, I really do. Condoms don't exactly feel amazing for me, either, especially after marathon sessions. But too bad, for both of us. I can't stand the way I feel when I'm on the pill. The weight gain, skin issues, extreme mood swings including depression, change in arousal (or complete lack thereof) make me crazy. It nearly ended one of the best relationships I have ever been in. (If I could have dumped myself, I would have.) My boyfriend was extremely understanding and patient partly because he's awesome, and partly because he recognized it was his idea to begin with. We were both shocked to realize how much of an effect hormones had on my personality, and agreed that I needed to get off the pill if we were going to stay together. Could I have tried more than the two different brands? Sure, but it could have taken months if not years to find the right one, if at all. I wasn't willing to put myself through that, let alone my boyfriend.

After the pill disaster, we now use a variety of methods, all nonhormonal. Sometimes I use a diaphragm and spermicide, so my boyfriend can go without a condom. Sometimes he uses a condom, so I can go without a diaphragm (not many options for spermicide, and they can fuck up your system too). I'm charting my cycle, so we can up the protection during my fertile days, or get creative otherwise. Sometime we take a risk, and just go for it. We always pull out. We've tried dozens of different types of condoms to find the best fit. We've talked about what would happen if I got pregnant, and have Plan B, and C and D and E in place. Is it fool proof? No, but what is, really? The point is he was more than willing to work something out, because he loves me more than he loves not using condoms. And I know how much condoms suck for him, so I'm willing to do the same. Compromise and creativity on both sides.

Anywho, that's it. Love your advice, and wanted to add to it.—Pills Aren't My Thing Either

P.S. I can't wait for the male pill to come out. Then guys might actually experience some of what we go through and shut the hell up.

··························

You should tell the lady whose husband hates condoms about this.—Birth Control For Men

 

Comments (43) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Why not just have your old man get the snip snip?
Posted by Bloated Jesus is Bloated on July 25, 2012 at 2:25 PM · Report this
2
Try the pullout method!
Posted by sall on July 25, 2012 at 2:28 PM · Report this
icouldliveinhope 3
Another vote for the IUD! I have never had babies, but after insisting to the lady at Planned Parenthood that I have exhausted my hormonal options, she went ahead and gave me one. I was 21 then, and am 25 now, and it has worked great.

Not the diaphragm, though, unless yr partner LOVES the taste of spermicide.
Posted by icouldliveinhope on July 25, 2012 at 2:36 PM · Report this
4
Another vote for the snip, here. It was the most amazing gift my partner ever gave me (and himself, since I'm pretty much a delicately wombed lady, so no IUD, and have some pretty severe emotional issues on hormones of any kind). Vasectomies are AWESOME!
Posted by zobot http://wsu.academia.edu/zoealeshire on July 25, 2012 at 2:41 PM · Report this
6
Why are so many people recommending and IUD when the woman stated in her letter that her doctor doesn't think it would be a good fit for her? Some women become susceptible to toxic shock if they have an IUD. IUD's are good but, like every other form of birth control, are not for everyone.
Posted by Imthemoon on July 25, 2012 at 2:44 PM · Report this
7
I had an IUD for eight months, and it was agony. I would have spontaneous cramps that were so bad I would nearly black out. When this started happening while I was driving, I had it removed. The IUD can be great for many women, but from what I've experienced and what I've heard from friends, it is NOT APPROPRIATE for women who haven't had children.

Because the cervix has never been dilated in women who haven't had children, the cervix can be much more cranky, resulting in the symptoms I had. Your mileage may vary, but it was definitely NOT a pain-free straightforward solution for me.
Posted by arts&letters on July 25, 2012 at 2:51 PM · Report this
8
I used the IUD before I had kids and it worked great. My daughter now has one and she is very happy with hers. The diaphram works well, except for the taste. Don't expect to get oral if you are using spermacide. The female condom is a no-brainer if he won't use a condom. But really, if he has his head so far up his own ass that he thinks condom-free sex is more important than his partner's well being? DTMFA.
Posted by SeattleKim on July 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM · Report this
UK_Nurse 10
I found reading the comments following this week's column really interesting as I work as a Sexual and Reproductive Health nurse in the UK - access to free contraception means we are essentially able to offer whatever we want to our patients, provided they have no medical problems or personal objections.

The LW's husband being a dick aside (I agree that seemed to be the central issue, rather than her inability to find a contraceptive method that worked), she should definitely approach another healthcare professional for their opinion as I find it odd that her doctor has changed her brand of pill so frequently, rather than changing to another method entirely.

The copper IUD is certainly the most effective non-hormonal method and the main contraindications are previous pelvic infections and abnormalities to the uterus, as well as heavy, painful periods (in which case an IUS or Mirena coil would be the better option as it reduces bleeding by up to 90%).

Fertility Awareness Methods require a lot of teaching and is not really a method I would recommend to anyone under the age of 35, as being slightly older offers better results due to natural loss of fertility experienced by older women. It is recommended to use two methods of FAM - basal temperature and cervical mucus are the most frequently taught - and does need to be monitored for at least three cycles before being relied upon as a contraceptive method. Fertility beads are crap unless the woman has a perfect textbook 28 day cycle all the time and even then, it only works if she ovulates on day 14 - which not all women will.

While sterilisation has been mentioned quite a few times, you may be surprised to know that the IUD/IUS and subdermal implant are both more reliable than sterilisation (both vascetomy and tubal ligation) as well as being safer in terms of side effects and risks of surgery. The subdermal implant is a great progestogen-only method that lasts up to 3 years, although unacceptable changes to bleeding patterns is a side effect that results in most women having it removed - 70% of women can expect to be amenorrhoeic by the first year.

The other point to make is that a hormonal method that does not agree with a woman at one stage in their life, might be perfect for her at another - so don't rule out a method completely if your circumstances change. Also, any method of hormonal contraception is associated with side effects in the first 3-6 months as the body adjusts to a change in hormonal levels - grinning and bearing the short-term side effects for a longer term benefit of contraception is the price of admittance.
More...
Posted by UK_Nurse on July 25, 2012 at 3:25 PM · Report this
11
When I got my tubes tied it was a day procedure. Still a bigger deal than a vasectomy, yes, but as surgery goes, not major.
Posted by agony on July 25, 2012 at 3:31 PM · Report this
12
@10 Great post. Nice to compare and contrast different approaches, and sharing your info.

Dan, any chance of throwing some love in the direction of some Eagle Scouts that are returning their medal's back to the Boy Scouts in protest the BSA's Anti-Gay stance? What better way for them to honor their pledge to the commitment of others and caring for the community than by returning them.
http://boingboing.net/2012/07/23/eagle-s…
Posted by Large Hardon Colluder on July 25, 2012 at 3:43 PM · Report this
debug 14
We planned my vasectomy after our second child.

Wasn't that big a deal and saved me from "are you sure you don't want to have another" conversations that would otherwise come up when she held someone else's baby (body clocks are powerful things). Anyway, getting snipped is the way to go if you know you're done breeding.
Posted by debug on July 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM · Report this
15
I'm training as a family doctor, and I've encountered a lot of doctors who dismiss the IUD for nulliparous women on pretty flimsy grounds. It's certainly easier to pass an IUD through a cervix that a baby has already passed through, and older women in long-term relationships are certainly less likely to have an STI that could become a PID thanks to the IUD insertion... but somehow a lot of docs go from "married women with babies are ideal candidates for IUDs" to "married women with babies are the ONLY candidates for IUDs". I don't get it, but that's the most common reason I've seen doctors give for why an IUD might be "not a good fit". If that's the case, I'd add my voice to the chorus suggesting that TOP help her doctor reconsider this view, if present. (Of course, TOP hasn't told us why her doctor reached this conclusion, and there are legitimate contraindications to IUDs, so her doctor might be right. Maybe she has Wilson's disease, who knows.)
Posted by zender on July 25, 2012 at 4:01 PM · Report this
16
I have had major issues with hormonal birth control, but have been able to use a Mirena hormonal IUD with no issues at all! In fact, quite the opposite: I have had exactly two periods in the past 15 months, each lasting for a day. Because the hormone levels are so low, I get none of the side effects. I know it's not for everyone, but if a Paraguard isn't an option based on longer periods, even women who may have had to avoid hormones in the past might be able to use the Paraguard.
Posted by Marone on July 25, 2012 at 4:11 PM · Report this
17
Eh. I got my Mirena at 20 when I hadn't so much as had a pap smear, let alone a baby. It hurt for, oh, two hours? I've been a happy, period-less camper since.

It doesn't prove anything about IUDs, obviously, but since people are dealing in anecdotes, I thought I'd throw one in with a happy ending.
Posted by aka90 on July 25, 2012 at 4:18 PM · Report this
19
Don't get me wrong, I love my 15-month-old daughter and wouldn't trade her for the moon. BUT... she was born 7 years into my wife's 10-year-rated Paragard IUD.

I'll never forget what the Dr told us upon confirming that my wife was, indeed, pregnant: "Well, 7 years is pretty good, right?"

We weren't planning on having kids.
Posted by Daily in LA on July 25, 2012 at 4:40 PM · Report this
20
I just wanted to provide a bit of a counterpoint to the "IUDs are magical and everyone can have one" folks - because while I think they are an underused and under-promoted option, they aren't perfect for everyone and I'm a bit sorry I listened to them.

I was a nullips two years ago when I went to get an IUD placed at a well-travelled planned parenthood clinic associated with a teaching hospital in a major city. I spent 45 minutes with my legs in stirrups as first a med student, then an attending, then the staff doctor tried to jam the thing through my cervix. I was in so much pain that my legs were shaking involuntarily. They were very kind and they eventually placed it, but they told me not to have unprotected sex for 6 weeks until the follow-up appointment. At that appointment, a transvaginal ultrasound revealed that the IUD had not migrated into the correct position, and was in fact stuck in my cervix. I had to have it removed.

I now regret that little adventure in gynaecology. I'm due to have my first child at the end of the summer, and I've read that cervical scarring can impede proper dilation of the cervix during childbirth. I can't imagine that my cervix didn't get a bit scarred.

Further, IUDs leave you vulnerable to PID and infertility if a dishonest and selfish partner gives you one of a couple common STIs. I wouldn't trust the man described in the letter to do that - and not because he doesn't like condoms, but because he rates his pleasure as more important than the health of his partner. I would compare him to my husband who also hates condoms - to the point that we abstained from PIV sex after I had to go off the hormonal bc pill (migraines with aura could produce strokes), and during the whole IUD fiasco until I got on the mini pill. Not one complaint did I hear. Never once did he attempt to guilt me into putting my health at risk. I love that man.
More...
Posted by historygirl on July 25, 2012 at 4:55 PM · Report this
22
I agree with those who observed that the problem is not birth control, but the husband's inability to make ANY kind of sacrifice or even, it seemed, to acknowledge the sacrifices she's already made.

That said, tubal IMPLANTS (Essure) are not a full-on surgical procedure for female sterilization. Yes, they take several months to work and require some follow-up visits, but there is a permanent option for women that does not require surgery.
Posted by Ms. D on July 25, 2012 at 5:33 PM · Report this
sirkowski 24
Falcon Punch.
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on July 25, 2012 at 6:44 PM · Report this
25
you could put it in her butt
Posted by high and bi on July 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM · Report this
27
Here in Alberta they have free clinics and are giving all of the active teens IUDs because condoms aren't all that great at stopping pregnancy in the end (at least the stats are unacceptable for teens). IUD is considered very safe and obviously this kids don't have previous pregnancies. I got mine at the same clinic although I am older. It is pretty good but my periods are heavy.
Posted by Lady of Eagle Lake on July 25, 2012 at 10:12 PM · Report this
28
For the record, my husband claimed he could feel the IUD, and he didn't like it. Just sayin.' Otherwise the best birth control ever... except for the vasectomy, which tops them all! And if you live in Washington state and you feel you can't afford it we have this great state program called Take Charge, and you can probably get it inserted for free at Planned Parenthood.
Posted by bodhirungus on July 25, 2012 at 10:39 PM · Report this
29
I got Essure. It's permanent and there's no hospital stay. Granted it's about as serious as you'd want an outpatient procedure to be, but I still went home the same day with no side effects worse than a period. Took a few days off working out just to be safe.

The worst part was the test to make sure it worked: they pressurize your uterus and it hurts like a bastard. They didn't warn me so I'm warning you -- had I known I'd have asked for drugs for that.

Although it is a patented procedure, my middle-of-the-road medical insurance paid for it. I'm not particularly selling it, but if we're throwing out alternatives it should be on the list.
Posted by Moggadeet on July 25, 2012 at 11:13 PM · Report this
spaceapple 30
So is male tantra just a myth? It seems that would be the ideal- to learn how to orgasm and not ejaculate, or else have some non-blue-balls control over it.
Posted by spaceapple on July 25, 2012 at 11:41 PM · Report this
31
My tubal ligation didn't require any hospital stay. It was outpatient surgery--I was home and recuperating the same day. It is an excellent option for anyone who is not considering children, who doesn't want to have a foreign device implanted in their body, and does not want to gamble with the hormonal effects of oral contraceptives.
Posted by nifty on July 25, 2012 at 11:58 PM · Report this
32
Something I haven't seen mentioned yet is that when women take hormonal birth control pills, those hormones are passed through her urine. Hormones in water where critters live is a bad thing, and scientists are seeing the results in deformities in amphibians caused by such hormones.

There are good alternatives, as everyone has mentioned. I got a tubal ligation after my daughter was born (part of the 1% IUD failure rate). My eldest was the result of inconsistent use of a diaphragm (I was 19 at the time). My current husband has had a vasectomy, too. Nothing like combining two highly effective methods of BC.
Posted by Barbara on July 26, 2012 at 5:38 AM · Report this
33
i'm so surprised to see that nobody has mentioned the option of the NuvaRing. i have been using this for five years with no problems -- it's a low dose of hormones, so there's really no weight gain, no raging hormones to speak of, just effective protection that regulates your period like a boss. you insert it and it's in there for three weeks, then you're off a week -- same schedule as the pill. my husband has never complained about being able to feel it during sex, and if your partner does, it can be removed for up to 3 hours at a time anyway. i have found it to be the best method i've ever used.

it's usually classified as a second-tier prescription on most insurance plans -- so it won't be as cheap as being on the pill -- but for the ease, convenience, and effectiveness, it's really worth the extra few bucks.
Posted by k666 on July 26, 2012 at 6:47 AM · Report this
34
I'm also a huge fan of my nuvaring. I've been on it for 3 or 4 years now and it has made my periods very light and regular as clockwork. It's even made me less moody! My tits still swell up like blimps, but that's pretty normal, right? I gained a little bit of weight, but nothing horrible. Maybe 10 pounds, but mostly in the right places. I had semi-irregular periods for a short amount of time, but I'm pretty sure that was just due to excessive stress in my life. It's the only method of birth control I've ever used, but I've been really happy with it. I've even used it continuously (pretty much only when i've been too broke to buy tampons) and it's effective that way too.

I guess I feel kinda like a freak because hormonal birth control makes me less cranky and I actually like having my period. I don't exactly look forward to it, but I just don't feel right if I skip a month or two of menstruation.
Posted by carrot on July 26, 2012 at 7:04 AM · Report this
36
My wife's got the IUD and a number of my friends wives and girlfriends have it. It's been a huge success for the most part, though my wife has had some complications including spotting and pain sometimes even not near her period. The plan is to remove it when we're ready to have kids and when we're done with that I get snipped.

I really wish there were better options for male birth control. Get on it science!
Posted by Root on July 26, 2012 at 8:42 AM · Report this
37
I tried the Pill (interfered with another medication I need to take), the NuvaRing (kept falling out), and the Mirena (gave me a non-STD infection). After that, my husband said I'd been through enough, and got a vasectomy. I'm very grateful.

From what I've read, Planned Parenthood is more open-minded about giving a woman who's never been pregnant an IUD.

I liked how you listed a variety of options for your original advice-seeker here, Dan.
Posted by My Name Here on July 26, 2012 at 3:10 PM · Report this
persimmon 38
Yes, go to Planned Parenthood to get an IUD. I had mine put in there after my long-time gynecologist refused on the grounds of "protecting my fertility." PP is very passionate about the effectiveness (both financially and results-wise) of IUDs, and, as a result, have a lot of practice putting them in. This prevents a majority of the potential problems of having an IUD installed. Not everyone's body is made for them, obviously (I have a friend whose cervix is too small), and they fucking hurt for a few days, but totally worth the years of worry-free contraception. I've had mine (Paragard) for 6 years now, and another friend of mine has had one for five.
Posted by persimmon on July 26, 2012 at 6:45 PM · Report this
39
After being on an estrogen-based pill for slightly under two years, I got a massive, 14-day-long migraine. My doctor took me off the pill immediately. Because of that migraine, estrogen-based pills are no longer an option for me. In fact, no doctor who sees "migraine with aura" on a woman's medical history will prescribe estrogen pills. It's really a bummer, because I liked being on estrogen-based pills--they made my periods a breeze, and there weren't any side effects until the migraine showed up. I went on Progestin-only pills (POPs) for a while, but they were horrible! Weight gain; long, unpredictable periods; weird hair growth; moodiness. Not fun. Plus, my doctor told me that going on POPs long-term is really bad for you. So, my only option is something non-hormonal like a diaphragm or a copper IUD. I haven't gone this route yet, but the IUD makes me really uncomfortable for most of the reasons listed above. Birth control is so important, but it is hell. I think it's really important for guys to know that birth control isn't as simple as taking a pill everyday.
Posted by EEB on July 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM · Report this
40
A note to AMN--I had a tubal ligation last December, and it was a completely out patient procedure. I went in to a surgery center (not a hospital), got in my gown, did a few pre op things, got the anesthesia, woke up an hour later to juice and a cookie, went home, took a quick nap, and woke up hungry, alert, and not in any pain. I didn't even take my pain meds. The worst part was that I couldn't put anything inside for 4 weeks, so I had to use pads instead of tampons for my period. I have two nearly invisible scars, each about 3 mm long. It's permanent, which isn't for everyone, but it's not the same procedure as it used to be. Check it out.
Posted by SexyAgnostic on July 27, 2012 at 9:46 AM · Report this
pastaefagoli 41
NuvaRing is exactly the same as the pill, with a different method of administration.

I'd just like to point out, that there are in the range of 50 different FDA-approved formulations of 'the pill.' There are 8 different classes of progestin which all have differing degrees of androgenic, esterogenic and progesterogenic effects. Depending on your unwanted side effects, you can choose the correct progestin for your body's needs.

This takes some research, and don't even bother reading "reviews" on the Internet, because they are wholly useless, but there very well may be a pill out there for the people who think they just can't handle the pill.
Posted by pastaefagoli on July 27, 2012 at 11:33 AM · Report this
pastaefagoli 42
I guess my suggestion kind of rests on the assumption that people are knowledgeable about their own biology, which I know is not true, but still.

I wish people had a clue.
Posted by pastaefagoli on July 27, 2012 at 11:34 AM · Report this
43
@39 I'm not sure which of the reasons listed about the IUD concern you, but I wanted to let you know that just because you cannot take hormonal pills does not necessarily mean you cannot use a hormonal IUD. I have migraines, can't take hormonal pills, and have a MIrena IUD because the copper one would exacerbate the heavy bleeding and cramping I get from PCOS. The hormones in the IUD are a very low dose and they only act locally. I agree that birth control is hell. I would go get a tubal, but then I would get a period, and I love NOT having debilitating cramps that land me in the ER!
Posted by tachycardia on July 28, 2012 at 7:38 AM · Report this
44
TOP and Dan saw the birth control choices for PIV sex as either hormonal birth control or condoms, her responsibility or his. Readers have pointed out the full range of his OR her options: vasectomy, diaphragm, etc. TOP brought up SHARING responsibility for preventing pregnancy, and, to share, communication IS key.
Fertility awareness methods involve shared responsibility and intimate conversations -- a his AND hers option. Very sexy. As an alternative sex advice columnist, Dan, you can help widen people's contraceptive horizons beyond the pill or condom dichotomy, and I encourage you to educate people particularly about lower tech, sustainable options.
Natural methods allow us to do this really intimate act while acknowledging what it was designed to do. Natural methods are not saying sex is ONLY for procreation, but they are saying that sex is ABOUT procreation as well as the many other things you address in your column. Acknowledging the procreative function of intercourse is actually VERY sexy. And, for women, knowing when we're fertile is empowering. Checking my temperature and vaginal mucus, being in touch with the cycles of my body, acknowledging my animal nature is a turn on. O.K. Dan, it's not for everyone, call it a kink, if you want, but please put it out there as an option.
When we talk about women having a right to birth control, we are usually referring to a right to pay big pharma for artificial hormonal birth control. Women also have a right to natural birth control, but unless you and other people in influential places start putting it out there as an option, it's gonna stay submerged in our collective unconscious like it was in mine.
Posted by MicheleB on July 30, 2012 at 7:47 AM · Report this
45
@7, "what I've heard from friends, it is NOT APPROPRIATE for women who haven't had children."

See, this is the problem. People form opinions (and spread those opinions as if they are fact) based on what their friends say, rather than what doctors and scientific studies say. IUDs ARE appropriate for women who haven't had children, whether they want to have kids in the future or not. Mine went in fine (no kids), not particularly painful or difficult insertion.
Posted by justsomeone on July 30, 2012 at 9:03 AM · Report this
46
Do you know what they call people who use the pull-out method?

Parents.
Posted by pjc on July 30, 2012 at 1:21 PM · Report this
John Horstman 47
@44: People may not mention "natural birth control" or, as I prefer to call it given the fact that "natural" is an ideogram with no concrete definition, "not engaging in activities likely to result in pregnancy" is that not engaging in activities likely to result in pregnancy is a completely obvious way to avoid pregnancy. Given that the letter writer was specifically asking for advice on how to engage in activities likely to result in pregnancy (PIV intercourse whenever) without becoming pregnant and also without using condoms or hormonal birth control, suggesting that the couple not engage in activities that are likely to result in pregnancy isn't really addressing the question.
Posted by John Horstman on July 31, 2012 at 10:50 AM · Report this
48
@6:

If the doctor thought the Pill was a "better fit" for her than other birth control options, and each formulation of the Pill was causing her horrible problems (hard to think of a "worse fit" than that), a second opinion (taking into account the LW's entire medical history) might not be a god idea. Some doctors aren't fully aware of the range of options, or that nulliparous women can be candidates for IUDs, for example.

I had similar problems after the birth of our first child--the pill had side effects I didn't want, and my husband had issues with condoms. He pulled out. We used the sponge. We tried the rhythm method. Then we had a baby. I tried the diaphragm (loved it, actually) but discovered I have a sensitivity to spermicide. Now I have a Mirena IUD and I love it--I don't get the side effects I got with the Pill, but reactions to various kinds of birth are very individual. I also don't mind being the one responsible for birth control, I find it empowering.

Posted by GrammarQueen on July 31, 2012 at 12:03 PM · Report this
49
by "might not be a god idea" I mean "might be a good idea." Forgive my typos.
Posted by GrammarQueen on July 31, 2012 at 12:04 PM · Report this
50
I am fond of "fertility awareness" birth control only because I got my lovely daughter when I was supposedly using that. I still think it probably works great, but doing it correctly is *really difficult*, and we were highly motivated--all it takes is a weak moment...which is why I don't recommend it to people.
Posted by GrammarQueen on July 31, 2012 at 12:07 PM · Report this
51
@John Horstman #47
Using Fertility Awareness Methods, TOP and her husband can have unprotected condom-free sex the majority of the month. Then, they can choose to use condoms or do other sexual variations the minority of the month. In TOP's situation, that strikes me as a better solution than using condoms all the time, which is basically where Dan had left her.
Posted by MicheleB on August 3, 2012 at 9:12 AM · Report this

Add a comment

Commenting on this item is available only to registered commenters.
Advertisement

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy