Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, August 2, 2012

This Word Must Die

Posted by on Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:47 PM

The Awl has a very nice post about why the word "literally" is so overused right now. I'm not throwing stones, here—I have a serious "actually" problem, as Bethany Jean Clement likes to point out—but we do need to put the word "literally" down for a while. Even jokes about the word "literally" have to stop. Let's all agree to work together to make this change. We can do this!

 

Comments (51) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Jason Josephes 1
Then what will Chris Traeger say?
Posted by Jason Josephes http://www.myspace.com/bluemoonseattle on August 2, 2012 at 4:52 PM
2
I am literally confused to death by this.
Posted by Daily in LA on August 2, 2012 at 4:53 PM
Soupytwist 3
I am figuratively over the moon with this post!
Posted by Soupytwist http://twitter.com/katherinesmith on August 2, 2012 at 4:53 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 4

Rilly !

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on August 2, 2012 at 4:54 PM
Dr_Awesome 5
Please also add 'basically' to the list.
Posted by Dr_Awesome on August 2, 2012 at 4:59 PM
6
I *really* agree. Adjectives are very easily overused. Usually, the -ly words basically clutter up the writing.
Posted by strunkite on August 2, 2012 at 5:10 PM
lizlemon 7
@1 beat me to it. I love the way Chris Traeger says it: "Litch-ra-lly"
Posted by lizlemon on August 2, 2012 at 5:11 PM
rootwinterguard 8
So, you put your foot down on using the word 'literally,' but you'll still post every gossipy, inane flotsam uttered about Sarah Palin?
Posted by rootwinterguard http://www.askanatheist.tv on August 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM
9
Basically, I'm actually literally loverly with adverbs.
Posted by I have always been... east coaster on August 2, 2012 at 5:23 PM
tainte 10
awesome
Posted by tainte on August 2, 2012 at 5:28 PM
Will in Seattle 11
I am literally enthralled by the Blue Angles.

Oh, and those jet guys too.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 2, 2012 at 5:36 PM
gloomy gus 12
You also use "disingenuous" and "hopefully" as flabby placeholders way more than you used to. Some commenter gave me shit for pointing and laughing at it the other day, which pleased me.
Posted by gloomy gus on August 2, 2012 at 5:51 PM
Hover Dog 13
This post is literally Hitler.

And no, I won't stop making 'literally' jokes. I prefer the humor to actual progress.
Posted by Hover Dog on August 2, 2012 at 6:11 PM
14
@8, it's flotsam and jetsam. Flotsam used alone is actually wrong.
Posted by sarah70 on August 2, 2012 at 6:12 PM
Cato the Younger Younger 15
This literally made me want to jump the shark.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on August 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM
rootwinterguard 16
@14: I heard 'flotsam' used by itself on Star Trek: The Next Generation. Given that, it must be a perfectly cromulent word.
Posted by rootwinterguard http://www.askanatheist.tv on August 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM
Karlheinz Arschbomber 17
No comment until Brian Boitano makes his opinion known.
Posted by Karlheinz Arschbomber http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arschbombe on August 2, 2012 at 6:19 PM
rootwinterguard 18
@14 Also: my 1944 Websters New Int'l Dictionary says you're wrong.
Posted by rootwinterguard http://www.askanatheist.tv on August 2, 2012 at 6:21 PM
Urgutha Forka 19
The comments on this post were literally predictable
Posted by Urgutha Forka on August 2, 2012 at 6:34 PM
20
This is literally the dumbest Slog post all week.
Posted by suddenlyorcas on August 2, 2012 at 6:52 PM
21
18: I think you need to stay away from the thesaurus. You sound like one of those Glen Beck fans who bust out the dictionary anytime they need an archaic or rarely used word to underline their purported intelligence.
Posted by Jizzlobber on August 2, 2012 at 7:19 PM
22
Disagree. "Literally" can be hilarious when used correctly. Misuse should be punishable by stockade.
Posted by Patrick McGrath on August 2, 2012 at 7:20 PM
Xenos 23
@2, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18, 19, & 20 Up against the wall, all of you!
Posted by Xenos on August 2, 2012 at 7:23 PM
gloomy gus 24
rootwinterguard, way to stand up for those fantastic words. Bravo.
Posted by gloomy gus on August 2, 2012 at 7:26 PM
25
But I miss "literally" already! Could I use litter-ily? As in: I litter-ily threw my phone out the car window after reading the post? Or maybe: The driver behind me had to be litter-ily carried away on a stretcher? How about liter-ily: The paramedics liter-ily saved the driver using blood transfusion? Or: The tallest paramedic was leader-ily a foot taller than the rest of us and liter-airily exhaled orders as the victim rolled latterally into the maw of a medical system that would looter-ily and littler-ily resize his bank accounts? I picture you with flames shooting from your ears, lit-ear-ily and lit-eerily longing leeringly that "literally" has been laid direly in its literary grave. But it's, you know, a little early.
Posted by rubus on August 2, 2012 at 7:56 PM
Zebes 26
I'm going to start saying "laterally" instead.
Posted by Zebes http://www.badrap.org/rescue/index.html on August 2, 2012 at 7:58 PM
27
@16, OMG like I read your comment and I'm seriously sorry about my claim.
Posted by sarah70 on August 2, 2012 at 8:22 PM
TreGibbs 28
I have no problem with the use of the word "literally" as long as it's literally used correctly...
Posted by TreGibbs on August 2, 2012 at 9:18 PM
Puty 29
I'm with you, Paul.
Posted by Puty on August 2, 2012 at 9:28 PM
30
Once I wrote a column (back when I wrote a column) with "literally" in every sentence. Literally!

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/night…

Posted by Christopher Frizzelle on August 2, 2012 at 10:02 PM
31
Language peeving is literally the least attractive trait that educated people can have.
Posted by kpt on August 2, 2012 at 11:14 PM
seandr 32
@30: Thank you for making it evident in the first two sentences that reading any further would be a complete waste of time.

@31: Yes! Thank you!

Posted by seandr on August 2, 2012 at 11:26 PM
33
@26 I just laterally shat myself laughing.
Posted by katallred on August 2, 2012 at 11:49 PM
34
Can we also get rid of the language hic "like.."
[Like] Seriously, we need to make that go away.
Posted by fotoeve on August 3, 2012 at 12:48 AM
Laurence Ballard 35
Mr. Constant, why stop there? Let's struggle to walk with care around adverbs in general...
Posted by Laurence Ballard http://laurenceballard.com on August 3, 2012 at 4:36 AM
36
"Literally" is the new "totally."
Posted by Totally Awesome, Dude! on August 3, 2012 at 5:06 AM
37
Eh...it's six in one.
It is what it is.
Posted by tacomagirl on August 3, 2012 at 6:26 AM
38
Sarah70 @ 14 Flotsam is the wreckage of a ship, Jetsam is stuff purposefully thrown overboard. The words may be used together most of the time but that doesn't mean they don't exist as separate useable words. You're wrong. What intrigues me is how you thought you could be so correct.

While we're on the topic of certainty and banishment, I submit for your consideration the phrase "I know! Right?" This appears to mean "I corroborate your assertion with certainty, but I just want to confirm your approval because my certainty is contingent upon you liking me."

weak-dick bullshit.
Posted by JAT on August 3, 2012 at 7:16 AM
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn 39
Boring topic.
Posted by Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn http://youtu.be/zu-akdyxpUc on August 3, 2012 at 7:22 AM
Allyn 40
@38 lighten up. She was corrected and she responded gracefully. You, however, come across as a jerk.

Your post was literally informative up until the third sentence. Then, instead of leaving readers thinking, ‘huh, now I know something I didn't before,’ readers are left thinking, ‘huh, he's such a jackass.’

Lighten up and quit being so aggressive. This is SLOG for [god's] sake, not redit.
Posted by Allyn on August 3, 2012 at 7:45 AM
41
@40 Sorry everyone. I missed the graceful response and my jackass just overflowed.

I'll crawl back into my lair of bitterness now.
Posted by JAT on August 3, 2012 at 7:49 AM
Allyn 42
@41 all's well. Keep us informed, we like to learn new things.
Posted by Allyn on August 3, 2012 at 7:52 AM
rootwinterguard 43
@41: I too have the problem with Jackass-overflow. Some day, someone will make a support group for people like us.
Posted by rootwinterguard http://www.askanatheist.tv on August 3, 2012 at 8:41 AM
44
Hi, my name is clashfan and I'm a jackass. I've been jackassery-free for three days now.
Posted by clashfan on August 3, 2012 at 9:45 AM
Asparagus! 45
Who the fuck cares about this? It's an invented outrage that serves to differentiate the elite from the not elite on linguistic terms.
Posted by Asparagus! on August 3, 2012 at 9:48 AM
More, I Say! 46
@12 I was literally only giving you friendly shit about it - a tease, if you will. (I am totally not being disingenuous when I say that, either.) Hopefully you'll pick up on that next time.
Posted by More, I Say! on August 3, 2012 at 9:49 AM
More, I Say! 47
@38, I once met a girl who claimed to have coined the term 'I know, right?"

...

...I know, right?
Posted by More, I Say! on August 3, 2012 at 9:53 AM
48
@45, I distinguish people who at least attempt to use proper grammar (spelling, punctuation, etc.) from those who do not. I do make judgments about their education level, and sometimes their intelligence, from these markers. I'm not going to apologize for that.
Posted by clashfan on August 3, 2012 at 10:01 AM
Asparagus! 49
@48

Overused words, who's colloquial meaning is somewhat different than their dictionary meaning, aren't grammar, and aren't spelling. Most of these words are completely benign, and using "literally" in casual speech doesn't say anything about educational level or intelligence. It's a ham handed and completely invent shibboleth wielded by people who need to feel some artificial sense of linguistic superiority.

If we're strictly speaking about widespread grammatical errors, then I agree, something needs to be done, but I don't think a war on malaprop and colloquialism is the best use of time in that regard.
Posted by Asparagus! on August 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM
50
I'm Back!
@45,48 apparently the Books editor of the Stranger disagrees to some extent. Shibboleth - fantastic word, but (in the modern sense at least) the same could be said of your "elite"-dropping.

Either language has meaning (and we're judged by it) or it is just space-consuming self-important spew without meaning. I've been judged to be a jack ass; I'll cop to that. But if anyone thought I was literally a jack ass then they were actually doofuses.
Posted by JAT on August 3, 2012 at 10:57 AM
51
oops - 45 & 49, that is.
Posted by JAT on August 3, 2012 at 10:58 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy