Slog

Slog Music

Music, Nightlife,
and Drunks

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Council Will Vote on Yesler Terrace Package on September 4

Posted by on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM

“I would strongly urge you to support all Nick Licata amendments, Cabdi testified today. Council members obliged.
  • Me
  • "I would strongly urge you to support all Nick Licata amendments," Cabdi testified today. Council members obliged.
This morning, a special committee of Seattle City Council members gunned through another slew of amendments to the Yesler Terrace legislation before ultimately passing the package, setting the measure up for its all-but-inevitable passage by the full council on September 4.

A few of the amendments were technical clarifications necessary to ensure this $290 million, 5,000-unit redevelopment project overlooking downtown Seattle moves forward smoothly, but the majority addressed the most incendiary community concerns with the megalithic project—everything from the nebulous number of low-income units to whether the public land could be leased instead of sold—and helped clarify the accountability measures that will define the 20-year relationship between the city and Seattle Housing Authority (SHA), the public housing group responsible for the rebuild.

For instance:

· An amendment proposed by Nick Licata would satisfy low-income housing advocates by requiring the SHA to build an additional 100 units of extremely low-income housing in Yesler Terrace (bringing the total number up to 661), provided that the group has already built a required number of other low-income and workforce units. As Licata explains, 661 extremely low-income units has always been the goal of SHA, but this new amendment makes that goal enforceable, "not just aspirational," he explains. "It’s a requirement, given that certain conditions are met."

· Another amendment directs SHA to explore the feasibility of leasing the highly valuable public land in lieu of selling it, and reporting its findings back to the council by September 2013.

· The council also directs the city to explore the feasibility of building a mixed-use building in Little Saigon that includes more low-income housing and a Vietnamese Cultural Center, as hundreds of residents in the area have petitioned.

· Council member Bruce Harrell introduced language that would make SHA more accountable to its low-income residents during the long-term relocation process—which addresses one of the concerns that caused Yesler Terrace commissioner Yusuf Cabdi to resign in protest last week.

"We need an appeal process to the housing committee to make sure this process goes smoothly," Harrell said, echoing Cabdi's concerns. "If it goes sideways, we need a structure in place, an advocacy process [for residents] so that an appeal could be heard."

All of these measures passed unanimously, as did amendments mandating that SHA reinvests all the proceeds from selling up to 42 percent of Yesler Terrace land back into Yesler Terrace, that SHA provide the city with a detailed, annual report on the sales, and that if SHA approaches the city for future housing levy dollars (they've already secured some in the agreement), they'll have to apply and compete for those funds like everyone else.

"It’s a no-cut-in-line amendment,” explains Licata.

Council President Sally Clark explained that the package showed "the greatest respect for residents and greatest look towards the future… [it acknowledges that] these resources are scarce, they’re precious, and there’s a long waiting list for people who need that support.”

And after sitting through a festering bedsores' worth of meetings on the matter, I tend to agree.

 

Comments (7) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Reporting like this is what makes the Stranger so invaluable. Unfortunately it also reinforces the fact that Seattle does not have a decent daily paper (aside from Slog).
Posted by abject funk on August 16, 2012 at 12:36 PM · Report this
2
What happened with the amendment that called for allowing only 20 (or was it 20%) of the low income housing units to be built on the East side of Boren? Did it pass?
Posted by dct on August 16, 2012 at 12:40 PM · Report this
icouldliveinhope 3
@2: Yeah! Did anything happen with that?

But thanks, Cienna! This is so, so valuable. Posted a summary/link on FirstHillSeattle.com, which I'm attempting to revitalize.
Posted by icouldliveinhope on August 16, 2012 at 12:48 PM · Report this
4
From the Land Use Code amendment and rezone ordinance document on the City's website:
http://www.seattle.gov/council/attachmen…

"d. Location. Affordable housing must be located within the Yesler Terrace redevelopment area. No more than 140 of the replacement units shall be located east of Boren Avenue. A minimum of 50 replacement units shall be located in at least five of the eight blocks west of Boren Avenue. When provided within a development permitted under a single master use permit that includes dwelling units other than affordable housing, the affordable housing shall generally be distributed throughout the development."
Posted by dct on August 16, 2012 at 1:47 PM · Report this
Max Solomon 5
"Megalithic Project"?

please.
Posted by Max Solomon on August 16, 2012 at 1:56 PM · Report this
6
@1, always look on the bright side of life.
Posted by gloomy gus on August 16, 2012 at 2:39 PM · Report this
7
@gloomy. That is right only if you have never seen the gloomy side of life. I appretiated the city countil effort, but i am dissappointed with this passage that did not address the economic impact of this project on tanents, and the failure to bring a third party to oversee the tenant relocation process. As expected SHA got what they wanted. Sad day indeed!
Posted by Yusuf Cabdi on August 16, 2012 at 8:11 PM · Report this

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy