Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, October 4, 2012

A Word About Brooms

Posted by on Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:30 AM

Madeleine McKenna didn't write this.

Hi, my name is Madeleine, I'm a proud Democrat and also the proud daughter of my dad, Rob McKenna. I'm also working on his campaign as his Coalitions Coordinator.

And I wanted to say a word about brooms. Some of you "people" in the comments are trying to call my dad out as sexist for saying that he wants to "be the Governor who hands you the broom to break through that glass ceiling." I want to address those comments because my dad's too busy hosting a breakfast for assault victims at the moment with my mom.

First off, I helped him write that blog post. So are you trying to tell me, a woman, that I'm sexist? Because,hello, how is that even possible?

Second, it was supposed to be a joke. I thought Stranger readers were supposed to have a sense of humor but instead you've twisted this into Chicks for Rob all over again. Obviously women don't use brooms at work, unless they're janitors or something. Still, there are *real* sexist people out there who associate brooms with women because they don't know any better. But I thought that you guys were supposed to know better. I thought you were supposed to be "progressive." Well, Republicans can have senses of humor, too. We—they—can get jokes. And they can even make them!

Third: So my dad used the word "broom" which I guess is a four-letter word around here. So what? Feminists are supposed to be strong enough to reclaim the tools that once oppressed them. That's why in the 60's we had women throwing down their brooms and burning all their bras. But, NEWSFLASH: Fifty years later, women still use brooms and they still wear bras. They're just feminist about it.

In conclusion, if my dad ever offers you a broom, ladies, you should feel flattered. Not offended.

 

Comments (53) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Your dad's a DOUCHEBAG!
Posted by drwas on October 4, 2012 at 10:33 AM
2
Giving up the joke already? Sad.
Posted by Hanoumatoi on October 4, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Zebes 3
.... ohhhh, I get what's going on now.
Posted by Zebes http://www.badrap.org/rescue/index.html on October 4, 2012 at 10:35 AM
4
You guys got the PI going for it: http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitic…
Posted by David from Chicago on October 4, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Volo 5
Hehe, great parody
Posted by Volo on October 4, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Big Matt G 6
Okay, Slog, how long is it going to take to get this out of your systems?
Posted by Big Matt G on October 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM
Pol Pot 7
Is this supposed to be an ironic riff on Anne Romney style, out-of-touch, country club elitism?
Posted by Pol Pot http://bottlefuelrag.blogspot.com on October 4, 2012 at 10:39 AM
8
Honey, haven't you learned, NEVER apologize for a "joke" if it falls flat. It just makes you look even more whiny and pathetic.
Posted by Tom on October 4, 2012 at 10:39 AM
9
So true - a woman being sexist is like a black person being racist! Impossible!
Posted by Al Franken on October 4, 2012 at 10:40 AM
bgk 10
I roll a will save to disbelieve.
Posted by bgk on October 4, 2012 at 10:40 AM
11
Now I see the stranger editors' strategy behind this stunt - gamble that McKenna and his people aren't skilled enough to spend a day on Slog without being baited by commenters into saying something stupid and then continuing to shoot themselves in the foot by trying explain themselves.
Posted by goreedgo on October 4, 2012 at 10:42 AM
Helenka (also a Canuck) 12
Okay, please ... ENOUGH ALREADY.

Stop, just stop.
Posted by Helenka (also a Canuck) on October 4, 2012 at 10:42 AM
matt 13
zzzzzzzzzz

http://gawker.com/
Posted by matt on October 4, 2012 at 10:43 AM
Original Andrew 14
My partner and I want to get married.

Could you please ask your dad to stop dehumanizing and demonizing me and my family?

RepubliKKKans' lies and bigotry against gay people are truly vile, loathsome, and despicable.
Posted by Original Andrew on October 4, 2012 at 10:45 AM
15
Does this all mean that we're going to have Rob answering a SL letter of the day?
Posted by freshnycman on October 4, 2012 at 10:46 AM
16
HAHAHA the idea that a woman couldn't be sexist is hilarious! HA! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Ahem, sorry. I'm usually not like this.
Posted by zee on October 4, 2012 at 10:46 AM
17
Madeleine doesn't talk like that. You are better on your Rob parody. Which isn't that good either. Move on.
Posted by gator bait on October 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM
Theodore Gorath 18
You may want to consider the journalistic ethics of this. A lot of people just pop into blogs and read a few things throughout the day, and may not get the joke, or be around to read when you reveal it to be a joke. They could honestly think that McKenna is approving of these words, and you are not doing much to explicitly make clear it is parody.

Really not becoming of a newspaper, even if it is just the blog of the newspaper. It is pretty funny though.

Posted by Theodore Gorath on October 4, 2012 at 10:48 AM
Theodore Gorath 19
@10:

DC: 12
Posted by Theodore Gorath on October 4, 2012 at 10:49 AM
20
Broom is a five-letter word. Just sayin.
Posted by I can count letters. on October 4, 2012 at 10:51 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 21
Ethics? From The Stranger? Oh, that's rich.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on October 4, 2012 at 10:51 AM
OuterCow 22
The bra burning stuff never really happened, fyi:

http://www.snopes.com/history/american/b…
Posted by OuterCow on October 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM
23
@ 4 Looks to me like the PI get that it's a joke, but the reader comments aren't so bright.
Posted by originalcinner on October 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM
24
Am I supposed to be taking this seriously? On the off chance that this woman was serious, let me answer her question: YES, it is possible for a woman to be sexist. In order for the system to work, women have to internalize some of their oppression. That internalized oppression settles into our identities and then manifests itself in sexist attitudes and behavior. This internalized oppression can also lead to low self-esteem, which in turn results in higher levels of depression, cutting, and eating disorders among women. Having a vaj-jay-jay doesn't protect you from promoting sexism against other women or against yourself.
Posted by tinkerbell on October 4, 2012 at 10:53 AM
25
Hi Madeleine,
Politics is generally not pretty. Many Sloggers are having problems believing that Republicans have "invaded" what is usually a pretty safely Democratic space.

That having been said, I put my comments over on your dad's original post. I really want those questions answered. Forget the broom analogy. I have serious questions about his willingness to stand up for individual civil rights. He seems to be allowing his religious views to get in the way of secular civil rights. This is a serious problem for me. He also seems to be willing to follow the Republican Platform rather than the will of the people of Washington State. I am very concerned that if we vote him into office, no matter what he says, he will soon be trying to put that platform into place here. I have yet to vote for any Republican without regretting it.

I voted for him as Attorney General, and he went and sued to get rid of Obamacare. Serves me right. That really pissed me off. I just can't see myself trusting him again.
Posted by SeattleKim on October 4, 2012 at 10:53 AM
Pope Peabrain 26
Oh, I get it. Everyone wanted a beautiful day off. Smart.
Posted by Pope Peabrain on October 4, 2012 at 10:56 AM
icouldliveinhope 27
Hi Madeleine,

A lot of these comments are certainly not fair to you, and whether a woman can be sexist or not is definitely an age-old, complicated question. It's important for women to respect other women, but giving all women a free pass on attitudes that encourage sexist/heteronormative/damaging behavior is dangerous.

I probably won't feel flattered if your dad hands me a broom, but I also understand being a daughter, and being a daughter in the political landscape. Your dad certainly isn't as bad as a lot of his fellow partymembers (party people? heyooo).

But I have felt discouraged with your dad's policies toward women in the past, particularly in regard to my healthcare, and in regard to other issues regarding gender like gay marriage, which, in my feminisms, I consider to be a big, fat, feminist issue.

I do very much respect your dad for saying that he'll take the voters' votes for it if R-74 is approved, and for helping, in his own, politico, luncheony way, survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

But what would encourage me to know your dad cared a little bit more about women would be a little more humility: examining how some latent sexism (which we all harbor! All of us!) may have led to him telling that woman to get a job. Listening to prominent members of the feminist community -- not just the luncheon community -- when they give criticism, and taking that into account, publicly. And recognizing media outside the mainstream as still important media, as this, in this age of media, is such an important ways for underprivileged voices to be heard.

Yours in ladyhood,
Sarah Lloyd
Daughter, Feminist
Posted by icouldliveinhope on October 4, 2012 at 10:57 AM
sperifera 28
@18 - Seriously? If parody and/or satire is lost on a reader, then that is because they are too fucking stoopiddd. Ethics, schmethics. Long live parody.
Posted by sperifera on October 4, 2012 at 10:58 AM
29
In future, if Mr. McKenna wants to hand people something to use to break a glass ceiling, a hammer would probably be a better choice than a broom. It's the right tool for the job.

That said, how about we don't de-value the things that have traditionally been done by women? How about we don't buy into the idea that because sweeping is done by women it is therefore deserving of low status and held to be of low value? How about we don't get insulted when someone hands us a broom - regardless of our gender identity?
Posted by Charlie Mas on October 4, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Dexter 30
I love the argument that women can't possibly be sexist. It's like saying a gay politician can't possibly be a self-hating homophobe.
Posted by Dexter on October 4, 2012 at 10:59 AM
icouldliveinhope 31
Ughhhh I was hoping this was real because this seemed like there was a real teaching moment here. Whatever. INSLEE 2012 EVERYONE.
Posted by icouldliveinhope on October 4, 2012 at 11:03 AM
schmacky 32
@26: beautiful day off, and also means the Sloggers don't have to post about last night's disastrous debate.
Posted by schmacky on October 4, 2012 at 11:05 AM
seandr 33
Stranger say Rob McKenna will post, and me believe you! But silly Stranger only making joke! Ha ha!

Maybe next we play peek-a-boo! That really make me laugh.
Posted by seandr on October 4, 2012 at 11:06 AM
34
OK this is no way real- right? Please put me/us out of our misery. I really want to have more faith in modern young women than this. Today is a day I could really have used my Slog lolly.
Posted by good vagina on October 4, 2012 at 11:13 AM
Rowlf 35
Oh, honey. Baby girl.

The joke. Did not. LAND.
Posted by Rowlf on October 4, 2012 at 11:14 AM
Will in Seattle 36
Where is Big Bird?

Did they outsource him to China already?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 4, 2012 at 11:38 AM
37
"people"?
Posted by K X One on October 4, 2012 at 11:40 AM
38
@23: I just looked again and they totally changed the blog posting. When I saw it at 10:37 am, it was clear that the PI blogger was fooled. The question mark was not in the headline, and the five boldfaced sentences at the top have been added.
Posted by David from Chicago on October 4, 2012 at 11:53 AM
Theodore Gorath 39
@28: I am not saying that parody is necessarily unethical, or that it is not the responsibility of the reader to note it.

However, the rules are a bit different when it involves a newspaper or other forms of journalism. This is why newspapers have a section that is clearly marked "Editorial" or "Opinion," and those sections do not mingle with the rest of the news.

It is really quite the same thing here, that's all.
Posted by Theodore Gorath on October 4, 2012 at 11:57 AM
40
"First off, I helped him write that blog post. So are you trying to tell me, a woman, that I'm sexist? Because,hello, how is that even possible?"

If this is a joke, it's a really bad one. I'll wait for tomorrow to have the veil thrown off of this things, but there are two possibilities.

This is either a post written by Rob McKenna's daughter--and his having raised such a dimwit should keep him out of office. Or this post was written by Goldy. In which case, it's still a pretty stupid joke--because it doesn't hold a candle to Megan McCain's racist luggage.

But one thing that's true in either case. Madeleine? Really Rob, you named your daughter Madeleine? You don't even have to Google this poor girl to know EXACTLY how old she is. You are just the WORST kind of person.

And sweetie, get a really short hair cut and start calling yourself Madie, STAT! You and you're younger sister, Bella (I'm just making the obvious assumption) have been treated very poorly.
Posted by LukeJoe on October 4, 2012 at 11:59 AM
Womyn2me 41
OOOOOh. so this is a joke posting day on SLOG... and it's not even April Fools.
Posted by Womyn2me http://http:\\www.shelleyandlaura.com on October 4, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Keister Button 42
1/04/2012 - April Fool's Day in European and Canadian date format.

10/4/2012 - Fool's Day for Yankland's The Stranger.

One slash of difference. I don't see a problem with this parody. Lynne Varner comes up with ridiculous shit in the Seattle Times editorial pages much more frequently and nobody has sued her yet.
Posted by Keister Button on October 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM
zivilisierter Wurm 43
Pretty cheap to involve McKenna's daughter in on your parody/trollfest. Especially since it really misses the mark - I knew Madeline in college and she was smart and passionate about a number of social justice issues. While her father is a public figure, and to that extent I suppose he makes himself a legitimate target, this just feels malicious.
Posted by zivilisierter Wurm http://peregrinari.tumblr.com/ on October 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM
44
@ 43 McKenna's wife and daughters agreed to be in his lousy TV ads, as if having the support of three women makes him pro-women in general. By not saying, "Leave me out of this, Dad", they agreed to be part of it and are therefore fair game.
Posted by originalcinner on October 4, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Sean Kinney 45
@43. Exactly. Ms. McKenna probably would have taken The Stranger up on a guest post.

@44. That's her dad. Don't be an asshole.
Posted by Sean Kinney http:// on October 4, 2012 at 12:54 PM
ScienceNerd 46
@4 awesome! Thanks for the link.

I happen to be enjoying the posts. And if it confuses people, well they deserve to be confused.
Posted by ScienceNerd on October 4, 2012 at 1:03 PM
femwanderluster 47
"People?"

"First off, I helped him write that blog post. So are you trying to tell me, a woman, that I'm sexist? Because,hello, how is that even possible?"

WHAT?! Of course, it's possible. Just because you have ladyparts doesn't make you a feminist. Sorry to burst that bubble for you, but, hello? What?

Fuckin' hell, this can't be real. Thanks for the joke, Stranger!

The best thing would be if we all think this is a joke and turns out it's real. It's SO HARD to tell this parody from the actual stances these people take.

It's been fun. Wink-wank, Stranger, wink-wank.
Posted by femwanderluster on October 4, 2012 at 1:04 PM
Will in Seattle 48
Pretty sure all the chicks will be marching with Big Bird on the picket line ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 4, 2012 at 1:38 PM
49
ugh.. drop this joke. it was barely funny to begin with.
Posted by zippywilkinscoffee on October 4, 2012 at 2:28 PM
50
friend of a friend worked with the supposed McKenna daughter- apparently she actually is that stupid.
Posted by stilettov on October 4, 2012 at 3:42 PM
51
I know the real Madeleine McKenna. They had a lot more to work with
Posted by PurpleDawg on October 5, 2012 at 7:28 AM
Occupy Seattle 52
Sweetie dear,
Run along and ask your daddy what his position is on voter suppression going on in Washington state by his friend REPUBLICAN Secretary of State Sam Reed. Is he for or against? Or do we have to wait until after the elections to find out the details of where he stands? I am just SO THRILLED that these new and improved Republicans in our state, who are nothing at all like the Republicans in other states, somehow still managed to figure out how to suppress minority, youth, poor, and elderly voters all on their own. That's just smart thinking on the part of your dad, if you ask me.
Posted by Occupy Seattle on October 7, 2012 at 12:04 AM
53
Nobody burned their bras in the 60s or the 70s. Go fuck yourself and your stupid broom too.
Posted by suddenlyorcas on October 7, 2012 at 9:35 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy