Only eight months for raping a teenage girl?

They should cut his balls off.

Eight fucking months! Please tell me that was a typo and you meant decades.

Ian-

I came here to say the same thing.

It goes hand in hand with drug use:

http://www.thenewstribune.com/updates/st…

"A guard at the Green Hill School, a state prison for juveniles in Chehalis, has been arrested in a drug raid.

Centralia police said Roy D. Clark, 26, was caught in a Thursday night raid with three others at his home as they were weighing and repackaging marijuana. "

"The teenage girl—who, the suit says, now suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression"

This girl had a lot of these problems long before she got there, that's for sure. I taught summer school there a few years ago. I wouldn't go back for a million fucking dollars.

I think they probably only convicted him for statutory rape. That's what first degree custodial sexual misconduct sounds like. I'm not 100% sure, but I believe First Degree Forcible Rape is five years to life.

Am I right lawyers or have I got it wrong?

How terrible.

@6 - which, of course, if true, does not mean that this was any less traumatizing for her than it would be for a girl who didn't previously suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, or depression.

This seems like the kind of crime where forehead branding is an appropriate punishment.

If he raped her, why wasn't he convicted of rape?? Not enough evidence? Or is someone lying??

I've been following this case and this person has a history back in the judicial system since 2002. If in fact she has something wrong with her (Mental Issues) it goes back to her pre teens, long before Mr. Fox came into the picture. Her history indicates, "robbery, forgery, theft and lying to law enforcement" She was 19 when the alleged indecent happened in 2008. This news item makes it sound like she is some 13 year old kid. Just want to put out there how old she really is. When did this issue turn to rape? I agree with the person who wrote comment # 6. Now as far as the grooming statement, who was grooming who? This little slut needs some help. Working in the Mental Health field, sounds to me like she might have had personal history with her own FATHER. (read between the lines).

it seems as though the information needed to make a jugment of fox isn't in yet. i know two employees from the glen, and there is definetly a problem with the facility; YES, why was a 19 yr. 7 mo. old young woman allowed to be in a children's facility? WHY, after being incarcerated previously there, and obviously without success, why was she returned to the glen? the alledged victim, has a history dating back to 2002 and as recent at dec. 2008, four mos. after being released from the glen. in 2008, she commited 8 counts or burglary, theft, robbery, possession and consumption of substance and falsifing info to a public servant. well, she established herself, that she lies, she must have a fixation for money, since some of previous crimes included forgery. i believe the possibility of her finally finding a sucker to hang is very probable, since she had only been at the glen, that time, since the end of feb. 2008, and fox started working as a temp the first of mar. 2008. it certainly didn't take her very long to find someone with compasion for her situation, to, appear as though, to plot her course. when fox did his night checks, the alledged victim stated she had a bad headache and wanted her light off, which was not according to regulation, and was told no. after fox did rounds, bed checks, he checked on the young woman. she asked if she could have the can he was drinking and without thinking, he handed her the can. the only dna evidence was the saliva on the can, stupid as that was. so, in my opionion, as others have had, he should have ignored he headache, told her to suck it up , go to sleep, deal with it in the morning. it cetainly doesn't seem to have been worth the involvment. she just found a sucker for a law suit, god help her soul, and as far as fox, he will be marked for the rest of his life. in conclusion; the echo glen needs to be closed down; the counseling staff needs to be investigated; the young woman needs to get some serious help and stop being coddled; she also needs to appologize for falsifing info about fox.

I was working at Echo Glenn at the time of this incident. Two prior incidents occured involving Heath
Fox. His Supervisor Brad Beach was told by two female co-workers that Heath Fox had made unwanted advances towards them. Brad Beach met with Heath Fox and asked him to stop but again didnt do anything about it (no investigation was conducted) and two weeks later there is a rape involving Heath Fox. It is common practice at Echo Glenn to sweep things under the rug by the administrators. All the administrators at Echo Glen should be held responsible for this incident from Superintendent Don Mead to Assoc. Superintendent Brad Beach. As the law suits go the one suit seattled questionable the female worker was as much to blame and was the male employee. As for the other suit that was filed as a piggyback in hopes of getting money. The second suit filed for sexual harrassent never occured towards Brad Beach's ex-wife Vickie Beach. I do find it strange that when the Heath Fox incident was reported his supervisor Brad Beach, Mr. Beach let him finish his eight hour shift before reporting it to any law enforcement aggency or releasing him from employment. SHAME ON YOU!!!!!

What! Did someone refer to this kid as a "little slut"? Fucking idiot. And who groomed who? How fucking stupid. Let's see - He a prison guard. She's a fucked up kid who can't legally leave. Let's go back to him once more...he's a prison guard with full rights to move about freely and not stick his dick in a prisoner. She's a prisoner with no right to leave. Let me simplify this for you morons - HE'S A FUCKING RAPIST! Now get over your issues you dumbshits.

Oh - number 15 if your still checking this post - I realize she's not a good victim because she's a dirty prisoner and all, but really, use some sense.

I agree with #14, why was a 19 yr. old with that much baggage in her past, still at a childrens facility?? Sounds like she did indeed find herself a scapegoat. This young lady (not child) with all of the shit in her past sounds like a very manipulative coniving person. I think she is much smarter that you all think she is. I don't believe a word of this as being RAPE!

i was at echo glen. and i heard about that. its fuckin disgusting

let me tell all of you something her criminal history is due to the system failing her from the start. As for that little slut your referring to is someones daughter and that would be my daughter! The way I see it your on the same level as Mr. Fox. For your information she didn't file this suit it was I her mother who pushed the suit. So maybe all of you should get your facts straight before you start making angry, hurtful, and damaging false statement about someone! Its obvious you should be putting your own lifes in check!

that is terrible that a place that is suppost to be so good for your child is so dangerous. their away from their home, placed in this facility were they should be safe and their violated....its a outrage this would happen. how do they know shes the only one its happened to thank u concerned parent

Omg if that happens to my daughter I'll kill who ever touches her I prey for my baby she's there now so help me god I hope they no what is good for them they better give my daughter nothing but respect or I'll be in their ass fosho.. I'm watching my baby mommy has ur back I love u<3<3<3