Comments

1
Yes. Thank you, Cienna.
2
This is one of my favorite elenchos quotes:
And if you are a woman who has a different opinion, where do you get off attacking and marginalizing other women this way? Why is only your point of view valid and not theirs?
3
TRUTH!
4
"Perhaps it's because I mostly wear sensible shoes and don't have a baby"

Well looking like a butch lesbian probably helps.
5
I caught part of the discussion this morning on NPR. Joni Balter made me cringe the whole time. All she did was run herself into the ground at the beginning of the piece. Her added stab at The Stranger was hilarious "they'll publish any little hiccup on the slog! harr harr harr"

I only caught the beginning of the piece, but props to whomever was there from The Stranger on speaking out against her ridiculous bullshit... and doing so in a much more well-spoken manner.
6
Brilliant.
7
I'm still... incoherently in awe.
8
"you have no data to back up this claim"

Cienna, this is not a democracy, it's a Burgessocracy. No one is allowed to say that legislation works better when it's based on cold empirical data that justifies the need for a law with evidence.
9
and there you have it kids: proof-by-blatant-assertion ...now on *both* sides of this lamentable emotionally charged issue.

some folks really are feel scared. and the fact that I never have been, and you never have - doesn't change that.

try to show a little empathy. yes yes... the fact that Burgess is on one side of this can make that a challenge. but i know you're up for it!

10
Balter needs sensible shoes and a fuck you attitude when on the street at night. Men get accosted too, so everyone needs basic self defense classes. But being asked for a hand out and shrieking away into the night, give me a break. And Balter needs to check out other cities at night. Most are WAY worse.
11
So you are saying you wear sensible shoes and it keeps away the aggressive contact. So are you saying that women wearing heels are bringing it on themselves? This is the same kind of crap that female apologists say for rape victims who say "well I have never been raped because I don't walk down the street in a slutty skirt."

Just because you don't feel the aggressive panhandling does not mean other women don't. Stop speaking everyone else please.
12
I want to elaborate that this bill is bullshit but there is no reason to marginalize the perspective of your opponent just because she wears heels. Nobody should put women in the city counsel just because they are more scared.

It is really easy for us that live inside the downtown area to explain how well we handle aggressive contact on the street but remember we want people to be attracted to downtown. We want them to come and walk around slowly, spend money, and attend shows and art galleries. If you want to zoom about your business in a shell of non-interaction buy a car and move to the suburbs.
13
@9 A lot of us have NEVER denied that some people are scared of downtown. A lot of people are scared of a lot of downtowns, whether they live in Seattle, SF, San Diego, NYC, Boston, or London. A lot of us would be showing a lot more empathy if Team Burgess hadn't tried to ram this down the city's throat without even pretending to wheel out anything but a handful of opinions to support them. No metrics on crimes. No data on the numbers of homeless downtown and in tourist areas. All we got was him and the DSA waving around vague letters they'd received, after it was revealed downtown businesses were actually CATALOGUING the homeless population in spreadsheets.

And through all this, still no word from Burgess that he would do anything to get more money for more cops. Which, if you point it out, apparently sends his supporters into a hot rage.
14
One of the articles you cite to debunk Joni's argument, written by Dominic, clearly states the following:

"Studies show that tourists, heterosexual couples on dates, and women are more likely to be panhandled."

I don't know why I bother writing a comment to point that out, though, because you obviously cannot read.
15
@14 Name one major city where those groups of people DON'T get panhandled more than anyone else.
16
Um, Dubai?
17
@15: Yes, agreed. And I also don't think the panhandling ordinance was designed to rectify any issue of on-street leerers and intimidators, so I'm not batting for Balter here. But if Cienna is going to troll for comments--and that's all this post is, rather than legitimate legislative discourse--she should at least get her shit straight.
18
Cienna, your post was awesome. And, btw, elenchos is an ass.
19
Thank you, Packeteer.

It's good to know that Ciena is young and strong and powerful enough to beat up any baddies who dare cross her path, with an awe-inspiring fuck-you attitude, as Vince puts it. After all, life is really just a question of who's the most punk rock. Who's the most DETROIT, man.

It's good to know that we all live in a world with no old people, no frail people, no vulnerable people.

Someone says "some people feel threatened", and you answer "well I ain't afraid!". That's not the point.

I've met Ciena. She's taller than I am, and she could easily take me in a fight.

One thing that a lot of you seem to be missing that the people on the other side of this dispute aren't talking about tough-as-balls young people, however lovely you are when you're working out your street-walking chops. But the little old ladies in Chinatown are citizens too.

Also: you know who the primary victims of aggressive street behavior are? THE HOMELESS. When I was homeless the very first thing that happened to me was I got robbed at knifepoint under the viaduct, relieving me of the only dollars I had.

Homeless people are far more likely to get harrassed, threatened, robbed, beaten, raped and killed on the street than other people. It happens all day long, every day. There's a lot more kinds of aggression out there than just the red herring "panhandling".
20
Joni Balter is an idiot, Elenchos is an ass, I don't like being agressively panhandled, sometimes I give money to homeless women, I'm small and female and ageing and sometimes don't feel safe on the streets even though I don't have babies or wear high heels, and I think this ordinance is ridiculous. (I am small, I contain multitudes)
21
Catfight.
22
@ Fnarf, don't lose sight of the point, which was, Joni Balter was playing the gender card.

Yes, Seattle has problems with homelessness and panhandling, like every other city in America. But Balter came in playing the gender card, and a lot of women are taking issue with that.
23
Damn straight, Cienna.
24
Playing the gender card doesn't mean that gender isn't *part* of a very complicated issue.
25
The closest I've come to being aggressively panhandled in Seattle (or anywhere) is being spat on by a homeless young woman when I didn't give her money. I think my height, attire and street demeanor or lack thereof were all irrelevant. It was quite obnoxious, though.
26
What @22 said! Isn't this whole post about how the bullshit about "in high heels and holding a baby" is a remarkably sexist and poorly formed argument? I don't know since when wearing high-heels and toting a nene made you more of a woman...
And yeah, I work downtown, walk to and from work from the hill, am a petite female, sometimes I do wear heeled shoes...
27
Fnarf @ 19 says:

"There's a lot more kinds of aggression out there than just the red herring "panhandling". "
--
And there are laws against that shit. Enforce those laws.
28
Why does size and gender suddenly make you immune from violence, anyway?
29
@28 Tall White Dudes are scary. Does that mean Ballard is where you're least likely to be aggressively panhandled?
30
@11 An attacker will size up his intended victim for vulnerabilities. Not being able to run is just such one. I would tell women not to wear expensive jewelry when out walking alone at night as well. You don't wear a wallet in your back pocket when on the street at night. Especially if you look like you've been drinking. Anyone who will attack (not panhandle) to rob or some such will not care about a law anyway.
31
See? This is exactly the point of leaving a smelly, red herring lying around. Suddenly we're all arguing a point that is completely tangential to the SPECIFIC LEGISLATION IN QUESTION.

That's the cynical ploy that Balter and her team are attempting to use here. She'd have you believe that this is all about making women safe, rather than the real target: defeating McGinn and empowering Burgess.

Bullshit. Stop the silly posturing. Burgess had his chance to declare a run for Mayor and chose not to. We have serious issues facing the city, and we need everyone to roll up their sleeves and get to work.
32
Timothy's right.

This thread is now about puppies.
33
sheesh slog, way to piss all over the Joni Take Back the Night in Prada shoes brought to you by Nordstrom and the Seattle DSA event...
34
31 wins the thread, and quite possibly all future aggressive solicitation bill threads.
35
What's with the sensible shoes stuff? Clearly all that's needed is a viral crush video showing 4" stiletto heels penetrating a panhandler's skull (which the bums can all see on their iPhones), and the "problem" will evaporate. I could be wrong (it happened once), but I believe the Supreme Court just gave their seal of approval (bark! bark!) to such videos.
36
Don't know where this baby-hating victim-blaming "she was wearing sexy shoes so clearly she was asking for it" bullshit is coming from, but it remains bullshit.
37
@34, are those buttocks in your new avatar?

"Butter my buns and call me a biscuit!"
38
For this question, the interesting data would be the cross-tabs on the contacts that the council recieved on this issue (or, even better, on a real poll, if anyone did one). Neither Joni nor Cienna present such data.
39
Oh, now Cienna is offended! Eli and Dominic were right to dismiss everybody's complaints about safety and Joni Balter is offensive for calling them out.

Cienna, you're just trying to fit in with the macho boys club where you work. Yes, a lot of them are gay with a little lisp, but they sit around all day acting like frat boys, picking on easy targets they can to give themselves a cheap laugh. The Stranger's brand of comedy is to mock and humiliate the weak, as long as you can figure out a way to frame it in a way that passes for politically correct. And you're part of that club.

I really want to hear what Dan Savage thinks about this. You kids doing an terrible job.
40
I love that elenchos called The Stranger staff a bunch of fags.
41
@39 this
42
Exce-fuckin-llent post, Cienna!!

Your last three lines should be engraved on a heavy rock and thrown through Ms Balter's Seward Park window. Her "argument" is straight outta the 50's when women were still thought of as the weaker sex. Fuck that shit. Feminism - real, TRUE Feminism - sez FUCK that shit.

(Why is elenchos being such an ass?)
43
And thank you, Elenchos, so much for proving my statement here that you simply change the arguments to suit your agenda in a written version of Calvinball whenever things go the other way.
44
Both the Stranger AND Joni are missing the point.

Joni is partly right. A lot of women do feel more vulnerable downtown at night. It may or may not be justified, but they feel vulnerable nevertheless.

But where she goes completely off the rails is the false assumption that this new aggressive panhandling law would have done anything to actually make women safer.

Attacking Joni for feeling vulnerable is useless. That isn't the point. Attack the misguided law (which Dom has been doing quite well).

Joni (and doubtlessly many other women) feel vulnerable downtown at night. Fine. I sympathize. But don't use your fear as justification to create bad law.
45
I hope Eli gets his lawyer to slap Cienna with a lawsuit for creating a hostile work environment. Saying he's got great legs is totally sexual harassment. Even if he does.
46
Cienna, did you actually read any reports or check any "facts" outside of the 4 circular hyperlinks you provided (all of them link to your own newspaper!) re your assertion that women aren't aggressively panhandled more than men? It takes all of a few seconds to Google books and articles that reveal studies which have found women to be more likely to donate to panhandlers, more likely to be approached, and more likely to be aggressively solicited. Of course, this would require reading sources outside of your own fricking newspaper.
47
@ 46, it's up to Joni to prove her case first, since she brought it up. Or you, if you have links to any of these "books and articles that reveal studies" that you mentioned.
48
@47, really, you're that helpless? Well okay.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=women+more+likely+t…
49
@46:

6. Which segments of the public are most likely to be panhandled? Field
observations and survey data indicate a preference among panhandlers for
soliciting male passersby
(Gilmore 1940; Stark 1992; Weiner and Weaver
1974; for an exception, seeWilson 1991). The reasons for this are unclear, although
men may be more likely than women to have change in their pockets
and less likely to react negatively to face-to-face contacts with homeless people
(or to avoid such contacts entirely).3 Panhandlers may also learn through
experience that approaching men creates fewer hassles with the police. Perhaps
the most promising situation is when awoman accompanies a man. One
panhandler quoted by Stark (1992) states that
couples are almost always sure marks, especially if it looks like they’re out for a
big night. The guy, who’s going to spend a lot of money to impress his girl,
doesn’t want to take any chances that she might be put off if he doesn’t help a
poor guy like me. (P. 345)


via http://www.pineforge.com/isw6/articles/c…

The article goes on to show via research that men are quite a bit more likely to be panhandled, but women are far more likely to change their shopping habits, even though they are less likely to be panhandled.
50
P.S. To Cienna, when you write, "You are ignoring the facts.... in favor of intimating that women are aggressively solicited more than men," you then provide 4 links, the second of which is a story at your own newspaper, in which Dominic Holden wrote, "Studies show that tourists, heterosexual couples on dates, and women are more likely to be panhandled." WTF? Did you even read your own paper's articles?
51
No Baconcat, more precisely it says "that women often steer clear of particular locations, alter their schedules, modify their physical appearance, minimize sociability, and use companions to cope with public harassment by men in general. The same strategies should also make them less
accessible to homeless panhandlers." So yeah, women who don't feel safe in area and avoid that area, are therefore not going to be panhandled there. Uh, doh.
52
@29, actually, these days you're more likely to be aggressively panhandled in Ballard than anywhere else in the city. Certainly more than most parts of downtown. Ballard is teeming with street drunks nowadays. Most of them are harmless but there are quite a few rough ones. This is definitely a change from, say, ten years ago.

I would nominate 5th between Main south to Uwajimaya, centering maybe on Union Market on Jackson, as the current scuzziest blocks downtown. I think Ballard by the library, or maybe 36th just before it turns into Leary in Fremont as the worst overall. On those blocks right around the George and Dragon there's been a couple of guys who reek of booze and piss and shout, lunge, and kick out at passersby the last few times I've been by there.

Of course, if I lived in Fremont and had to bear with the insufferable nightclubbers, I might do a little kicking out as well.
53
@51: They prefer men because there are more of them there? That's not the definition of preference, that's prevalence.
54
@52 - not unless you wanted to get arrested.
55
@54: omg, funny and trenchant stuff that.
56
@ 47, it's not my fault you don't know the rules. Let me spell it out for you.

It is NEVER incumbent on anyone to go out verifying your claims. It is ALWAYS incumbent on you to do that.

It's not that I'm helpless; it's that I'm not interested in doing your work for you.

Now, please go through your google search, read some of those links, and post the ones that support your assertion. I'm not doing that for you.
57
I think the bottom line we all seem to agree upon:

The city needs to hire more cops. The city said it was planning on hiring more cops (21 new uniformed officers a year). The city isn't hiring more cops.

Why isn't the city hiring more cops like it said it would? Is it up to the city council to hire more cops or is it up to the mayor to hire more cops?

Cops, cops, cops, cops, cops!
58
Here are some hard facts that nobody can dispute:

At least half the murders in Seattle are committed by blacks, a group that makes up only 8% of Seattle. In 2008, blacks committed at least 14 of the 28 murders here. In 2009, blacks committed at least 12 of the 21 murders here. Black thug violence is a far more dangerous and serious problem in Seattle than the panhandling bum problem, which is also a big drag.
59
I think the last paragraph in her post says it all about Cienna - everything she does is based on anecdotal evidence, no matter the topic.

Maybe you can try finding some facts every once in a while. Ah, but that would mean you might want to try and be objective.

The Stranger has turned into a crappy left wing Fox News. So sad, as you used to actually do reporting...
60
I love that there are two posts attacking Joni for turning this bill into a women's issue while Dan Savage managed to turn a gay bathhouse closing into an anti-gay issue despite the fact that there was no evidence to support that. Why aren't you bashing HIM as irrational and knee-jerk?
61
It's more dangerous for women to be married to men, or be dating men, or to have recently broken up with a man, than to walk around town at any hour. No, I don't have any data to support that but I know it, and its at least as plausible as what many of you say. It's definitely dangerous for women to walk around the UW campus day or night and there aren't many panhandlers on campus. It also seems to be dangerous for older women ("little old ladies", they're sometimes called) to be walking on the Trail and have bikers attempt to pass them without making themselves plain enough before they get to the older women. Then the women get killed. So maybe we should develop an ordinance protecting walkers against bikers who don't ring their bells or at least slow down. At least we KNOW that that's a problem.

I have a hard time believing Joni Balter's afraid of anything or anyone. More likely the other way around.

62
@theophrastus: Saying that people are scared strikes me as very similar to saying that people are offended. You can't quantify fear. Sometimes I wake up in the middle of the night convinced that someone is in my house and that I need to defend myself. Does that mean I have the right to target a certain group and pass an ordinance because I am overcome with fear? How many people that have been "aggressively" panhandled bothered to even try to figure out what the people they were talking to were saying before they scurried away? I once thought I was being pursued against me will by a homeless man. Then I found out he was offering people some perfectly good sub sandwiches that he had dumpstered from Quizno's.

@six shooter: From your handle, I think it's pretty obvious what your solution to the world's problems is: Kill 'em all. That must be why you want more cops; more violent thugs to bash some heads in this city. No thanks.

@58: What's your source? How are you defining "black"? Did you get the census records of the individuals involved? How many whites that killed other people were charged with simple manslaughter instead of murder? How many people did police kill in those years before they got away scot-free with no charges? And moreover, what have you done lately to address the problems of poverty and lack of self-worth or a positive self-image faced by inner city minority youth?

@Cienna Madrid: Nice post. We need less fear in the world.
63
The Stranger should just admit that they are paying writers for pageviews like Gawker does. It would explain why so many ridiculously shallow stories end up published in the paper and posted on the Slog.

This story was covered far more eloquently before Cienna's post. Cienna, you make me ashamed to be a woman because you can't find any more nuanced arguments against such Joni's obviously trolling comments. Your vagina does not make you entitled to speak for all women, sweetheart.

This is starting to look like the second coming of ECB.
64
Even at the times where I was "aggressively" panhandled, the new law would have done nothing to stop it. If anything it would have made it worse, cause the government would have to raise taxes on me, which is way worse than being uncomfortable when a crack head is scratching at himself and begging for change.
65
"@58: What's your source? How are you defining "black"? Did you get the census records of the individuals involved? How many whites that killed other people were charged with simple manslaughter instead of murder? How many people did police kill in those years before they got away scot-free with no charges? And moreover, what have you done lately to address the problems of poverty and lack of self-worth or a positive self-image faced by inner city minority youth?"

murder data = Seattle pi's year-end articles
population data = citydata dot com or any site that gives demographic info.

Black males already have too much self esteem! They don't need more! What they need is some humility! Also it is not my responsibility to raise some trashy crack mammy's ghetto spawn. That is the responsibility of the brood-sow and the buck babydaddy.
66
K3, the irony is that Erica C. Barnett's writing at PubliCola on aggressive panhandling and the mayor's fight with the city council has uncovered far more information and given readers a far more nuanced perspective. Without insulting anybody for their opinions.
67
I get it about the whole agressive panhandeling thing but, something just dosent feel right about charging agressive panhandlers a $50. fine! Joni Balter needs to take off her High Heels and put on some Flats so she can get connected to the real world.
68
@65, well, you've clearly shown what side of the racism fence you're on. I suppose you want us to go back to slavery, different drinking fountains, whites in the front of the bus, lynchings, and all that right? I get the idea. How the hell would you know what another person thinks or feels or how much humility they have? Have you ever been part of a black community? Gone to a black church? Helped the BSU prepare for Black History Month? Of course you haven't. It would be too much of an assault on your whiteness. You wouldn't be able to handle the awful things your own relatives did in the KKK and under Jim Crow and slavery. You wouldn't be able to look anyone in the eye because you refuse to see people of color as people. That way, you don't have to feel anything for them.

You are a disgrace to humanity.
69
I CANT BELIEVE THAT SOME HUMAN WOULD SAY SOMETHING LIKE AGGRESSIVE SOLICITATION ISN'T A WOMAN'S ISSUE, ARE WE SURE THIS THING WAS HUMAN.
70
Aggressive panhandling IS a woman's issue. It shouldn't be more of an issue for women than it is for men, but I do think that women, in general, have more reason to be concerned about being accosted on the street than men do.

It's wonderful if the writer has never experienced harassment on street. I'm from the east coast, lived here for almost 2 decades and consider myself somewhat of a tough cookie. Yet I have been verbally (and physically, unfortunately) accosted on the street multiple times since I was, like, 12. This doesn't make me a victim, and I'm not bawling every day over it, but I certainly don't begrudge women who want streets safer for other women. The writer should consider that her experience may not be reflective of her entire gender's.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.