Comments

1
In almost every poll you will see some trending in all directions.

As for what is going through their mind? They probably are buying into the idea that the sabotage of the oil platform was perpetrated by environmentalists out to stop drilling. They are appropriately reacting to this terrorism by not giving up on the American way of life as they see it. (drill baby drill)
2
Anyone care to speculate what's going on in those folks' heads—did they never think about offshore drilling before but now it seems exciting, are they just lying to pollsters for kicks, do they loathe seals?

My observation, having had a chance to watch people take multiple choice questions where they've just been given the answer, is that 2% is about the margin of "checked the wrong box without really reading the question very carefully." Seriously. I've seen this with sample sizes of about 60 people, and it's shockingly hard to get them to all give the right answer on cue. There's always at least one person in the room who zoned out at exactly the wrong moment.
3
They're fucking with pollsters. I do it all the time.
4
There's an error margin in all polls, due to poor questioning technique, mumbling, misunderstanding, response error, and pollster recording errors. Chances are, there are errors in all the response choices, just this one stands out because it makes less sense.
5
Moral of the story: conservatism is 2/3 stuborness and 1/3 ignorance.
6

Seattle will miss out on getting nutrient rich oil for its seafloor.

Oil helps regrow salmon and mollusks.

7
If the question was asked as shown, with Virginia rather than Washington, maybe that 2% has heard about the whackadoodle government in VA and thought fuck em.
8
Every day, in every way, the USA gets further and further behind while the rest of the world moves away from Oil.
9
Please ask those that ran the poll *how* did they "pose this question to 500 people in the Seattle area"? that is, did they phone them? did they stop them as they left mariners stadium? how did they assure that this sample was a representative/randomly selected sample?

folks that pick up land-lines (which is all they can use when they phone) without regard to the incoming caller-ID are *not* going to be a random sample of the population at large.
10
I was forced to listen to freaking Limbaugh as I worked in my dad's garage today. I'll bet he's got a lot to do with those 10 people who now support it (Limbaugh, not my dad).
11
Fuck polls. The question isn't, "do you believe we should be drilling for oil irresponsibly?" it's "why the fuck aren't we off fossil fuels as countless politicians have promised. Some people see it as a, anything to bring down the cost of a barrel of oil, then justify it with god and call it a year.
12
where is the "i support a competent entity rehauling the regulations and practices for offshore drilling before raping the earth dry" option that you stupid, polarizing, reactionary fucks like dominic always seem to forget exist in your petty black and white fantasy worlds.
13
I implicitly and unquestioningly trust a poll whose corporate logo looks like a Route 66 burger-'n'-shake shack's, and who can't be bothered to change all the worms from the last pond they dropped their lines into.
14
Both "now support" and "now oppose" fractions are exaggerated.

Not only do poll respondents fuck with pollsters, but respondents who strongly (and unequivocally) support X will routinely assert "Y (no matter what Y is) makes me more likely to support X".
15
There's actually a few people - even in Seattle - that just straight hate the environment, and will do anything to piss off environmentalists.

Unfortunately for them, they're part of the environment, so they're only really hurting themselves. I'm not sure they've really thought that through, though. It's more of the vindictiveness.
16
Maybe people figure that after this spill we wont be in uncharted waters anymore(pardon the pun), and will know how to deal with a spill of this sort. In effect...the spill made the oil drilling industry safer.

17
Please, 5 yrs from now, gas hits $4/gallon again, drilling will be back. Your wet dreams of a bike riding utopia are just that.
18
"why the fuck aren't we off fossil fuels as countless politicians have promised."

Maybe because that's impossible.
19
we're not off fossil fuels because of money and science. we won't get off fossil fuels until they're unaffordable or gone (and petroleum will be gone soon - why do you think they're drilling 4 miles below sea level?). we'll just keep coming up with new rationalizations and mitigating techniques to convince ourselves the machine we've built can keep lurching forward. if it doesn't collapse it must still be 'progress'.
20
mrbombit @16: In effect...the spill made the oil drilling industry safer.

By that logic, we should thank the meatpackers that Upton Sinclair exposed in The Jungle for making the meatpacking industry safer, and Bernie Madoff for re-establishing trust in investment managers.

Unfortunately for our friend mrbombit, the only way this disaster is going to make deep-sea drilling safer is by forcing the very changes that mrbombit will welcome about as much as a root canal.
22
As long as Americans can keep driving no matter what! And that's just the way Jesus wants it to be! SHOUT GLORY!!
23
fivethirtyeight.com looked at this exact issue a couple days ago and it's worth a read. In the column, ("Don't Take Polling Literally, Part #39916") Sr. Silver addresses why 21% of people -- in a PPP poll -- answered they were MORE LIKELY to support further drilling because of the spill in the gulf. Basically, he says pollsters shouldn't offer illogical responses, because sometimes people are going to pick them; perhaps people will assume the offered responses are logical because, well, the pollster offered them...and people will select those responses because they're trying to be consistent with earlier questions. Specifically, the pollster had just asked the responders "Do you support drilling", so when this illogical question/response was then offered, people didn't want to sound inconsistent. Silly pollsters. Silly responders. Silly results.
24
it drives me crazy that people are so opposed to drilling but won't get out of their cars. should we keep trying to take oil from other perhaps less-regulated countries instead? quit driving, people, if you really give a crap.
25
"So long as Americans do not reduce their consumption of oil, refusing to drill at home means importing more of the stuff, often from places with looser environmental standards. The net effect is likely to be more pollution, not less. Nigeria, for example, has had a major oil spill every year since 1969, observes Lisa Margonelli of the New America Foundation, a think-tank. Putting a price on carbon would eventually spur the development of cleaner fuels, and persuade Americans to switch to them."

http://www.economist.com/world/united-st…

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.