Hands sweating....vertigo...holy crap he can see the curvature of the earth, that is not a fish-eye lens! 6:48, "this is the tricky part" THIS!! THIS!! The tricky part would have been getting me out of the elevator 300 feet ago!
Anthony,
Intriguing. Having recently climbed to the summit of Mt. St. Helens (8375'), I can appreciate the sense of height though not the precarious way to go to that height. You're up "there" all right. Still, I can't help but wonder about the safety precautions of these fellows. I reckon they are adreneline junkies. Sure, they're harnessed but they're not in a cage (they unclip frequently too). And, servicing at that height just seems weird and impractical. How high must these towers have to be built? What is the point of diminishing returns? Can't the top of the tower be serviced another way? Dunno. Just seems unnecessary. But a cool video.
I forced myself to watch, albeit with the sound off. I'm sure I must have taken at least a couple of breaths during that, but I literally had to inhale for about ten seconds when it was over.
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! You wouldn't get me more than 20 feet up that thing without having me go into some sort of vertigo-induced convulsions!
I admire people who can do this with apparently no discomfort whatsoever; they're welcome to it. And I get the point of hooking on with the giant clip to give him enough support to drag his tool bag up behind him, but seriously how easy would it be for that clip to just slide right off what looks like open-ended rebar and large bolts?
@9: When I watched the first minute or so of climbing, it was the camera movement for me too. I guess the distance is so abstracted; the green earth just looks like carpet to me. Eep.
Holy crap, that just gets scarier and scarier! "just another 60 feet to the top"! And was that thunder at one point? And to second @15, how safe is that "clipping in"? I'm so alarmed just knowing about this.
What is the point of the helmets? For the first twenty feet?
I had an uncle fell from an electrical tower and needless to say, died- due to a faulty harness. Oh, if only he hadn't been wearing that pesky harness.
KPFF here in Seattle has a tower division, though when i got out of school they weren't hiring. But as soon as they are hiring again i'm sending in my resume :D Though they do less maintenance on the antennae and electronics and more inspection of the structure which doesn't always require a climb to the absolute top.
@29 - I don't think "afraid of heights" is the thing here. I'm not afraid of regular heights. This isn't regular. Something is missing in the brains of people who aren't afraid of this, god bless 'em.
Andy, @30, I was also wondering about footwear and other functional attaire for this job.
I was also wondering about having "lighten my load". Wouldn't want to discover that my climbing partner or I had food poisoning up there!
It isn't the height. I'm fine with heights, so long as I feel safe.
The higher they climb, the smaller the hand/foot-holds. By the time they get to the top, the rungs aren't much thicker than a pencil.
Now consider this: metal corrodes. Those rungs may have been designed to hold your weight when originally constructed. But they corrode over time. I don't want to be standing on one at 1600 feet when it gives out.
The thing that bugged me the most about this video was that the narrator kept saying "heighth" when he meant "height." I guess I'm one of Anthony's "missing part of the brain" crowd.
I don't mind being high up as long as the ladder is stable (meaning perfectly still) and I don't have to do anything but climb. They key is to not look down. Then again, I've never climbed anything higher than a 30' ladder! Even then, hanging on with one hand while you futz around with the paint and brush requires a LOT of concentration.
The scariest part of this is clambering up and over those awkward parts, with the pull of that 30 lb bag swinging below you. If you panic, you're fucked! Those guys have some zen focus going on. Amazing.
@30, Yeah, they generally go for mountaineering boots that that are light but have absolutely stiff soles and ankle support and good protection for your toes.
@33, the only story i've heard about lightening the load is urinating at those heights, which involves letting your partner climb past you, and facing downwind. Apparently this happens all the time :D
The helmets are also obviously to help avoid bonking their heads, duhr. Can't believe anyone would ever question the need to wear a helmet when maneuvering around a bunch of exposed metal rods and stuff.
I can't believe we have people doing jobs like this. I hope they get paid well and get laid lots.
I don't know about you other Slog folks but if my boss told me I had to climb a 1768ft tower tomorrow, with no safety harness or anything like that, I'd tell them to go fuck themselves!!
@13, you say it's not a fish-eye lens, which is true. Everyone saying "fish-eye" means "extreme wide-angle" because a fish-eye lens shows horizon-to-horizon, all 180 degrees. That said, 13 is wrong because this IS an extreme wide-angle lens, which you can tell when straight lines become bent depending on the angle the climber looks at them.
On a totally different note, nice anti-crepuscular rays at 2:00.
I can't watch this at all, I can barely look at the picture. I am so afraid of heights that I often can't LOOK UP at anything really tall without falling down. When I go to the mall and they have those 2 and 3 story sky ramps from one side to the other, I have to walk all the way around right in front of the store windows to get to where I am going. I often just leave without getting what I went there for in the first place. I can't walk or stand at or near railings, take escalators that are open on either side, go out on terraces or sit in balcony seats.
Okay, gotta go. The hair is starting to stand up on my neck and arms just talking about and reading this.
To provide an alternate voice to the chorus: I'd totally do that job. Being up that high would feel peaceful to me! I love heights - I recently rappelled from the top of the Rainier Tower, which is 514 feet, without feeling afraid. (It was a charity event, not a solo maverick thing.)
I do wonder about wind, though, and what their weather standards are (such as not climbing if the wind is X MPH or more).
we can build something like that as well as climb something like that. crayzee!!
(No, I'm not stupid enough to free-climb it. But if they were patient enough to let me keep the safety line hooked in, I'd love to try it.)
wait, WHAT?! Fuck this job!!
Intriguing. Having recently climbed to the summit of Mt. St. Helens (8375'), I can appreciate the sense of height though not the precarious way to go to that height. You're up "there" all right. Still, I can't help but wonder about the safety precautions of these fellows. I reckon they are adreneline junkies. Sure, they're harnessed but they're not in a cage (they unclip frequently too). And, servicing at that height just seems weird and impractical. How high must these towers have to be built? What is the point of diminishing returns? Can't the top of the tower be serviced another way? Dunno. Just seems unnecessary. But a cool video.
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! You wouldn't get me more than 20 feet up that thing without having me go into some sort of vertigo-induced convulsions!
I admire people who can do this with apparently no discomfort whatsoever; they're welcome to it. And I get the point of hooking on with the giant clip to give him enough support to drag his tool bag up behind him, but seriously how easy would it be for that clip to just slide right off what looks like open-ended rebar and large bolts?
Transmission tower climbers are Bad Ass.
*shudder*
I think I'd rather have a crap minimum-wage job at Walmart than climb that thing.
and what about that thing that appears to be a giant funnel cloud in the background after 2:00 mark?
I had an uncle fell from an electrical tower and needless to say, died- due to a faulty harness. Oh, if only he hadn't been wearing that pesky harness.
This looks fun!
I was also wondering about having "lighten my load". Wouldn't want to discover that my climbing partner or I had food poisoning up there!
The higher they climb, the smaller the hand/foot-holds. By the time they get to the top, the rungs aren't much thicker than a pencil.
Now consider this: metal corrodes. Those rungs may have been designed to hold your weight when originally constructed. But they corrode over time. I don't want to be standing on one at 1600 feet when it gives out.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVLY/KTHI-T…
The scariest part of this is clambering up and over those awkward parts, with the pull of that 30 lb bag swinging below you. If you panic, you're fucked! Those guys have some zen focus going on. Amazing.
@33, the only story i've heard about lightening the load is urinating at those heights, which involves letting your partner climb past you, and facing downwind. Apparently this happens all the time :D
But this guy was looking down constantly!
@25:
I assumed the helmets were to provide protection in case the guy up-ladder drops a tool or something.
I don't know about you other Slog folks but if my boss told me I had to climb a 1768ft tower tomorrow, with no safety harness or anything like that, I'd tell them to go fuck themselves!!
On a totally different note, nice anti-crepuscular rays at 2:00.
Oh but I beg to differ!
Okay, gotta go. The hair is starting to stand up on my neck and arms just talking about and reading this.
I do wonder about wind, though, and what their weather standards are (such as not climbing if the wind is X MPH or more).
The video can still be seen here: http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/8…
Do you think they could get the guy from Dirty Jobs up there?
Hey, did anyone else notice that Dan has all the top ten SLOG posts again?